Precision of a new SS-OCT biometer to measure anterior segment parameters and agreement with 3 instruments with different measurement principles.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the repeatability of a new swept source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) based biometer to measure anterior segment parameters, and to assess the agreement with three other imaging devices based on different measurements principles. SETTING: Unit of Eye and Vision, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Sweden. DESIGN: Prospective, comparative case series. METHODS: 3 consecutive measuremetns were obtained in unoperated eyes with the Eyestar900 (SS-OCT), Lenstar 900, MS-39, and Sirius. The following anterior segment parameters were evaluated: central corneal thickness (CCT), corneal diameter (CD), aqueous depth (AQD), and corneal power metrics. The repeatability limit (Rlim), coefficient of variation (CoV), and a repeated measures Bland-Altman analysis were performed. RESULTS: 74 eyes of 74 participants were measured. The Rlims for CCT, CD, and AQD were lower than 10µm, 0.3mm, and 0.10mm for all devices, respectively. The corresponding CoVs for these parameters never exceeded 1.2%. The Rlim for the corneal power metrics never exceeded 0.60D for any of the instruments. Lenstar showed the best agreement with the MS-39 to measure CCT, CD, and AQD (limit of agreement interval, LoA: 15.54µm, 0.55mm, and 0.16mm, respectively). The mean difference for keratometry parameters was lower than 0.3D for all device comparisons, and the LoA interval ranged between 0.52D to 1.21D. CONCLUSIONS: The repeatability for measuring anterior segment parameters was good, and the agreement among all the instuments was good for CD and AQD measurements. However, for CCT and keratometer parameters, the instruments cannot be used interchangeably due to large LoA interval.

Axial length acquisition success rates and agreement of four optical biometers and one ultrasound biometer in eyes with dense cataracts.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the axial length acquisition success rates and agreement between various biometric parameters obtained with different biometers in dense cataracts. METHODS: Fifty-one eyes were measured using Anterion®, Argos® and IOLMaster® 700 swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) biometers, a Pentacam® AXL partial coherence interferometry (PCI) biometer, and an OcuScan® RxP ultrasound biometer. We measured keratometry (K1, flattest keratometry and K2, steepest keratometry), white-to-white (WTW), anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT) and axial length. Cataracts were classified according to the Lens Opacities Classification System III grading system, the dysfunctional lens index (DLI) and Pentacam® nucleus staging (PNS) metrics. Percentage of acquisition success rate and a Bland-Altman analysis for the agreement between biometers were calculated. RESULTS: The mean LOCS III score was 3.63 ± 0.92, the mean DLI was 2.95 ± 1.30 and the mean PNS was 2.36 ± 1.20. The acquisition success rates for the Anterion®, Argos®, IOLMaster® 700, Pentacam® AXL and OcuScan® RxP biometers were 94.12%, 100%, 98.04%, 60.78% and 100%, respectively. There were significant differences in the success rates between biometers (P = 0.014). There were statistically significant differences between biometers for all parameters evaluated (P < 0.05). The range of the limit of agreement (LoA) for all comparisons of K1 and K2 were > 1.00 D. The LoA for WTW ranged from 0.095 to 1.050 mm. The LoA for ACD and LT ranged from 0.307 to 0.114 mm and from 0.378 to 0.108 mm, respectively. The LoA for axial length ranged from 0.129 to 2.378 mm. CONCLUSIONS: Among optical biometers, those based on SS-OCT technology are more successful at measuring axial length in eyes with dense cataracts. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered with the National Institutes of Health (clinical trial identifier NCT05239715, http://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov ).

Repeatability of a fully automated swept-source optical coherence tomography biometer and agreement with a low coherence reflectometry biometer.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the repeatability of a fully automated swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) and its agreement with an optical low coherence reflectometry (OLCR) for several biometric parameters. METHODS: In this study, 74 eyes of 74 patients were measured using the Eyestar 900 SS-OCT and Lenstar LS 900 OLCR. Flat keratometry (K1) and steep keratometry (K2), central corneal thickness (CCT), anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), and axial length (AL) were measured three times with each device. The repeatability was analyzed with the intrasubject standard deviation, coefficient of variability (CoV), and coefficient of repeatability (CoR) for each instrument. The agreement between the instruments was evaluated with Bland-Altman analysis. RESULTS: K1, K2 and CCT CoV values were < 0.2%, < 0.4% and < 0.55%, respectively. Higher CoV values were found for ACD and LT ranging from 0.56% to 1.74%. The lowest CoV values were found for the AL measurements (0.03% and 0.06% for the Eyestar 900 and the Lenstar LS 900, respectively). AL measurements provided the highest repeatability, measured with both CoV and CoR values, and the CCT was the parameter with the lowest repeatability. The CCT and LT measurements were statistically significant between the two biometers (P < 0.001). The interval of the limits of agreement was < 0.6 D for K1 and K2, 15.78 µm for CCT, 0.21 mm for ACD, 0.34 mm for LT, and 0.08 mm for AL. CONCLUSIONS: Both biometers provide repeatable measurements for the different parameters analyzed and can be used interchangeably.

Axial length measurement failure rates using optical biometry based on swept-source OCT in cataractous eyes.

INTRODUCTION: Ocular dimensions measurement is extremely important in cataract procedures and refractive surgery. The use of optical techniques for axial measurements has been developed in recent years. AREAS COVERED: The purpose was to summarize the outcomes reported when swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) optical biometry failed during axial length measurement. A peer-reviewed literature search was carried out to identify publications reporting clinical outcomes for cataractous eyes measured with SS-OCT optical biometers available on the market. A comprehensive analysis of the available data was performed, focusing on parameters such as the sample of eyes evaluated, failure rates, and specifically, the cataract type when the measurement was not possible. 27 studies were included in this review. In general, SS-OCT biometers lead to only small failure rates when measuring axial length (but in some cases up to 38.49%). In the few cases where the measurement was not possible, the cataract type of the eyes was mainly mature white or grade ≥ IV. SS-OCT optical biometers show good outcomes when measuring axial length in eyes with advanced cataracts. EXPERT OPINION: We believe that the use of SS-OCT technology may be considered the gold standard for measuring axial length in any type of cataract.

Lens-vault analysis and its correlation with other biometric parameters using swept-source OCT

Purpose: To measure lens vault (LV) and to assess its correlation with various ocular parameters in healthy eyes, using for all measurements the same high-resolution swept-source optical coherence tomographer (SS-OCT).Methods: We prospectively recruited 67 Caucasian healthy patients whose mean age was 41.9 ± 12.4 years; only their right eye was included in the study. Data were all recorded with the ANTERION SS-OCT and comprised, for each patient, 5 consecutive measurements of LV, anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), axial length (AL), white-to-white (WTW) distance, central corneal thickness (CCT), anterior chamber volume (ACV) and spur-to-spur (STS) distance.Results: Mean LV was 0.26 ± 0.23 mm (ranging from -0.24 to 0.78 mm). Data analysis revealed a statistically significant negative correlation between LV and ACD (R=-0.80, p < 0.001), AL (R = -0.36, p = 0.002), and ACV (R = -0.68, p < 0.001), and a positive correlation between LV and LT (R = 0.67, p < 0.001), and age (R = 0.53, p < 0.001). In contrast, no statistically significant correlation was found between LV and WTW (R=-0.17, p = 0.15), CCT (R = 0.11, p = 0.36) or STS (R=-0.10, p = 0.41).Conclusions: Taking into account our findings about intra-parameter correlation levels, we believe that LV should be measured and analyzed together with other ocular parameters in clinical routine practice both for diagnosis and for some refractive surgeries. (AU)

Lens-vault analysis and its correlation with other biometric parameters using swept-source OCT.

PURPOSE: To measure lens vault (LV) and to assess its correlation with various ocular parameters in healthy eyes, using for all measurements the same high-resolution swept-source optical coherence tomographer (SS-OCT). METHODS: We prospectively recruited 67 Caucasian healthy patients whose mean age was 41.9 ±â€¯12.4 years; only their right eye was included in the study. Data were all recorded with the ANTERION SS-OCT and comprised, for each patient, 5 consecutive measurements of LV, anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), axial length (AL), white-to-white (WTW) distance, central corneal thickness (CCT), anterior chamber volume (ACV) and spur-to-spur (STS) distance. RESULTS: Mean LV was 0.26 ± 0.23 mm (ranging from -0.24 to 0.78 mm). Data analysis revealed a statistically significant negative correlation between LV and ACD (R=-0.80, p < 0.001), AL (R = -0.36, p = 0.002), and ACV (R = -0.68, p < 0.001), and a positive correlation between LV and LT (R = 0.67, p < 0.001), and age (R = 0.53, p < 0.001). In contrast, no statistically significant correlation was found between LV and WTW (R=-0.17, p = 0.15), CCT (R = 0.11, p = 0.36) or STS (R=-0.10, p = 0.41). CONCLUSIONS: Taking into account our findings about intra-parameter correlation levels, we believe that LV should be measured and analyzed together with other ocular parameters in clinical routine practice both for diagnosis and for some refractive surgeries.

Transitional conic toric intraocular lens evaluation after femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery using intraoperative aberrometry.

PURPOSE: To assess refractive and visual outcomes following phacoemulsification with femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) using intraoperative aberrometry and implantation of a toric intraocular lens (IOL) in eyes with different degrees of astigmatism. METHODS: One hundred two eyes of 70 patients who underwent implantation of the transitional toric 565 Precizon IOL (Ophtec BV) were enrolled. FLACS, capsular tension ring insertion, and intraoperative aberrometry were performed. Main outcome measures were refractive error, uncorrected- and corrected distance snellen decimal visual acuity values (UDVA and CDVA, respectively), and IOL rotation. Specifically, a vector analysis was carried out with J0 and J45 evaluation. Eyes were evaluated 1-year after surgery. RESULTS: Overall, 94.12% (96 eyes) and 100% (102 eyes) of the eyes showed a spherical equivalent (SE) within ± 0.50D and ± 1.00D, respectively. The mean SE and refractive cylinder were - 0.06 ± 0.29D and - 0.23 ± 0.37D, respectively. Vector analysis revealed that 100% of the eyes were within ± 0.50D for the J0 and J45 cylindrical components. The mean toric axis rotation was 1.10 ± 1.71° (from 0° to 5°), 77% (79 eyes), and 100% (102 eyes) of the eyes showed UDVA and CDVA of 20/25, respectively. The postoperative mean values of monocular UDVA and CDVA were 0.88 ± 0.17 and 0.96 ± 0.07 (about 20/20), respectively. No patient required IOL realignment during the postoperative follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The present study suggests that the use of the Precizon IOL after FLACS, using intraoperative aberrometry in patients with different amounts of astigmatism, provides good visual acuity, accurate refractive outcomes, and excellent rotational stability.

Evaluation of 6 biometers based on different optical technologies.

PURPOSE: To evaluate repeatability and agreement between various biometric parameters using 6 biometers based on different optical technologies. SETTING: University of Valencia, Spain. DESIGN: Prospective, comparative case series. METHODS: 150 eyes were measured using the Aladdin, AL-Scan, Argos, IOLMaster700, Lenstar LS900, and OA-2000 biometers. Keratometry (K1 and K2), J0 and J45, central corneal thickness (CCT), anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), axial length (AL), white to white (WTW), and pupil size (PS) were measured 5 times with each device. Intrasubject SD, coefficient of variability (CoV), coefficient of repeatability, intraclass correlation coefficient, and Bland -Altman graphs were analyzed. RESULTS: CoV values were <0.30% for K1, K2, and AL and up to 1.61% for CCT, ACD, LT, and WTW. PS values were higher (from 4.2% to 7.68%). There was statistically significant differences between biometers for all parameters evaluated (P < .001), and these differences varied as a function of the parameter analyzed. The limit of agreement (LoA) width of some comparisons for K1 and the majority for K2 were >0.50 diopter. A similar pattern was found for J0/J45. For CCT, many comparisons showed LoA width values of >25 µm. The LoA width for ACD ranged from 0.366 mm to 0.175 mm and for LT was about 0.2 mm. AL showed a highest LoA width of 0.225 mm. The LoA width for WTW was, in most cases, about ≥0.50 mm. The LoA width for PS ranged from 1.578 mm to 3.541 mm. CONCLUSIONS: The 6 biometers provided repeatable measurements for the different parameters analyzed. The LoA obtained for each comparison should be analyzed carefully to consider the interchangeability of these devices.

Agreement of predicted intraocular lens power using swept-source optical coherence tomography and partial coherence interferometry.

PURPOSE: To analyze the agreement of the predicted intraocular lens (IOL) power obtained with ANTERION, IOLMaster 700 and Pentacam AXL biometers. METHODS: We calculated the monofocal and trifocal IOL power using the SRK/T, Haigis, Barrett Universal II and Hoffer Q formulas for 106 eyes. IOL power agreement between devices was evaluated using the Bland-Altman method. RESULTS: We found significant differences between biometers comparisons (p < 0.001). ANTERION and IOLMaster 700 did not produce significant IOL power differences (p > 0.05), with the same outcomes for medium- and long-eyes. No significant differences were found using the SRK/T, Haigis, or Hoffer Q formulas for short-eyes (p > 0.1). However, Barrett Universal II formula produced significant differences (p < 0.05) and these differences lay between the ANTERION and Pentacam AXL. ANTERION versus IOLMaster 700 comparison showed limits of agreement (LoA) varying from 1.1071D in SRK/T monofocal medium-eyes to 1.6828D in Hoffer Q trifocal all-eyes. The largest LoA (about 3.0D) was found for short-eyes when comparing the Pentacam AXL with the other two devices. CONCLUSIONS: These devices provided statistically significant but clinically insignificant mean differences in predicted IOL power. However, wide LoA values suggest that for specific eyes these outcomes could be clinically significant.

Enhanced Monofocal Extended Depth of Focus IOL With a Diffractive Surface Design.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the refractive and visual outcomes following cataract surgery and implantation of a new enhanced monofocal extended depth of focus (EDOF) intraocular lens (IOL). METHODS: Fifty eyes of 25 consecutive patients who underwent implantation of the xact Mono-EDoF IOL (Santen Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd) were enrolled in this study. Main outcome measures were refractive error and monocular corrected (CDVA) and uncorrected (UDVA) distance visual acuity values. Monocular visual acuity at different vergences (defocus curve) was obtained. Patients were evaluated at 12 months postoperatively. RESULTS: At 1 year of follow-up, all eyes showed a postoperative spherical equivalent within ±1.00 diopters (D) and 95% of eyes within ±0.50 D. The mean postoperative spherical equivalent was -0.15 ± 0.28 D. A total of 88% and 100% of eyes showed UDVA and CDVA of 20/25 or better, respectively. The mean values of UDVA and CDVA (Snellen decimal) were 0.94 ± 0.09 (range: 0.70 to 1.00) and 0.99 ± 0.03 (range: 0.79 to 1.00), respectively. Defocus curve showed good visual acuity at distance and intermediate distances with a depth of focus value of 1.25 D. No visual disturbances were reported in the whole sample during the entire follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The current study shows that this EDOF IOL provides good visual performance at far and intermediate distances. The lens may be considered for patients interested in reducing spectacle independence at intermediate distances. [J Refract Surg. 2021;37(9):595-600.].

In vivo optical quality of posterior-chamber phakic implantable collamer lenses with a central port.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this review is to summarize the optical quality results in patients following the implantation of the V4c implantable collamer lens with a central port (ICL, STAAR Surgical Inc.). MAIN TEXT: A literature search in several databases was carried out to identify those publications, both prospective, retrospective and/or comparative with other refractive surgery procedures, reporting optical outcomes of patients who were implanted with the V4c ICL model. A total of 17 clinical studies published between 2012 and 2021 were included in this review. A detailed analysis of the available data was performed including number of eyes, follow-up and preoperative spherical equivalent. Specifically, the review focused on several optical parameters including higher-order aberrations (HOAs), modulation transfer function (MTF) cut-off frequency and Strehl ratio. This review encompassed a total of 817 eyes measured using different optical devices based on Hartmann-Shack, retinal image quality measurement and ray-tracing technologies at different follow-ups. CONCLUSIONS: The outcomes found in this review lead us to conclude that the ICL V4c model provides good optical quality, by means of different metrics, when implanted.

Evaluation of Physiological Parameters on Discomfort Glare Thresholds Using LUMIZ 100 Tool.

Purpose: To assess the links between discomfort glare sensitivity and physiological factors such as eye biometry, refraction, skin phototype, age, and gender among a large sample of healthy human subjects. Methods: A total of 489 participants who were 20 to 70 years old (241 men, 248 women) underwent discomfort glare threshold measurements via the LUMIZ 100. Eye biometry and optical quality were measured using a Zeiss IOLMaster 700 biometer and i.Profiler aberrometer. Iris color, skin tone, age, gender, eyeglasses use, chronotype, fatigue level, self-evaluation of light sensitivity, and time spent outdoors were determined. Statistical analysis was carried out using nonparametric Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis tests for categorical data and correlation coefficients for numerical data. Results: The female subgroup had lower discomfort thresholds than the males (P < 0.001). There was no effect of age group, ametropia, eye biometry, iris color, skin tones, chronotype, or fatigue level on discomfort thresholds. Discomfort thresholds were related to self-assessment of light sensitivity, sunglasses ownership, and frequency of use (P < 0.001). Conclusions: Exploration of easily measurable physiological parameters and questionnaire failed to provide reliable indicators of individual light sensitivity to discomfort glare. Translational Relevance: Light sensitivity is highly subjective and variable across the population. Patients frequently complain about light bothering their daily lives. Accessible physiological factors and questionnaires are unable to predict discomfort levels due to glare. The LUMIZ 100 provides a reliable, rapid, and safe way to determine light discomfort thresholds in order to better manage light sensitivity in clinical care.

Agreement between intraoperative anterior segment spectral-domain OCT and 2 swept-source OCT biometers.

Purpose: To evaluate the agreement of different biometric parameters obtained using intraoperative spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and two swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) based biometers.Methods: 102 eyes were assessed using the intraoperative SD-OCT integrated into the Catalys femtosecond-laser, and the IOLMaster 700 and Anterion SS-OCT-based-biometers. Central corneal thickness (CCT), anterior chamber depth (ACD), white-to-white (WTW), and lens thickness (LT) were measured.Results: There were statistically significant differences for CCT, ACD, WTW and LT between devices (p < 0.001). The mean difference for ACD ranged from -0.067 to -0.250 mm, with the largest mean difference being between the IOLMaster 700 and Catalys. CCT mean differences ranged from 7 to 32 µm, with the largest mean difference being between the Anterion and Catalys. For WTW, the comparison between the IOLMaster 700 vs Catalys showed the largest mean difference (0.38 mm). However, the mean differences for LT from all three devices were quite similar, ranging from -0.02 to -0.08 mm.Conclusions: SS-OCT biometers showed good agreement for ACD, CCT, WTW and LT. The SD-OCT showed ACD, CCT and WTW values that do not seem to be interchangeable with the SS-OCT biometers; however, this device did show excellent agreement in the case of LT.

Agreement Between Angle-to-Angle Distance and Aqueous Depth Obtained With Two Different Optical Coherence Tomographers and a Scheimpflug Camera.

PURPOSE: To compare angle-to-angle (ATA) distance and aqueous depth (AQD) readings produced by two different optical coherence tomography (OCT) devices and a Scheimpflug camera. METHODS: ATA distance and AQD were measured in 60 eyes using the Visante time-domain OCT (TD-OCT) (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG), the Anterion swept-source OCT (SS-OCT) (Heidelberg Engineering GmbH), and the Pentacam HR Scheimpflug camera (Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH). Moreover, ATA distance was measured along the horizontal and vertical meridians. Bland-Altman analysis was used to assess the agreement between devices. RESULTS: All three devices did not yield similar horizontal ATA distance: 11.96 ± 0.47 mm (TD-OCT), 11.96 ± 0.42 mm (SS-OCT), and 11.05 ± 0.52 mm (Pentacam). More specifically, the Pentacam yielded significantly smaller values (approximately 0.9 mm, P < .001). Mean vertical ATA distance was 12.61 ± 0.65 and 12 ± 0.65 mm for the TD-OCT and SS-OCT, respectively (P = .983). Vertical ATA distance was significantly larger than horizontal ATA distance for both OCT devices (approximately 0.6 mm, P < .001). The lowest mean difference was found between both OCT devices (0.0068 and -0.0415 mm, for horizontal and vertical meridians, respectively) and the highest between the Pentacam and the two OCT devices (approximately 0.9 mm). As for AQD, inter-device mean values were also statistically significant: 2.89 ± 0.48, 2.82 ± 0.49, and 2.79 ± 0.50 mm, for the TD-OCT, SS-OCT, and Pentacam, respectively (P < .001). Mean differences were similar for the TD-OCT versus SS-OCT and SS-OCT versus Pentacam (approximately 0.02 mm), and larger between the TD-OCT and Pentacam (approximately 0.05 mm). CONCLUSIONS: The results show that the TD-OCT and SS-OCT are interchangeable instruments for ATA distance measurement but the Pentacam is not with either of the two OCT devices. A clinical criterion should assess whether these three devices could be used interchangeably for AQD measurement. [J Refract Surg. 2021;37(2):133-140.].

Optical and visual quality assessment of an extended depth-of-focus intraocular lens based on spherical aberration of different sign.

PURPOSE: To assess the optical quality and the visual performance of patients implanted with an extended depth-of-focus (EDOF) intraocular lens (IOL). METHODS: Thirty-eight eyes underwent implantation of the Mini WELL Ready EDOF IOL and were evaluated at 3-months postsurgery. Higher-order aberrations (HOAs) and modular transfer function (MTF) were measured at 3- and 5-mm pupils. Binocular uncorrected-distance visual acuity (UDVA) and corrected-distance visual acuity (CDVA), uncorrected-distance intermediate visual acuity (UIVA) and corrected-distance intermediate visual acuity (CDIVA) at 80 cm, and uncorrected-distance near visual acuity (UNVA) and corrected-distance near visual acuity (CDNVA) at 40 cm were obtained. Postoperative refraction, binocular defocus curve, halometry and subjective ad hoc patients' questionnaire were also evaluated. RESULTS: HOAs were 0.171 ± 0.046 µm and 0.406 ± 0.137 µm at 3 and 5 mm, respectively. MTFs decreased as the spatial frequency increased being comparable for both pupils. 92.10% of eyes were within ± 1.00D, and the mean postoperative spherical equivalent was - 0.25 ± 0.65D. Mean UDVA, UIVA and UNVA were 0.06 ± 0.12, 0.05 ± 0.10 and 0.26 ± 0.28 logMAR, respectively. Mean CDVA, CDIVA and CDNVA were - 0.01 ± 0.08, 0.06 ± 0.11 and 0.24 ± 0.12 logMAR, respectively. Defocus curve showed a continuous range of vision, especially at intermediate distances. Mean discrimination index was 0.79 ± 0.04. Questionnaire revealed that about 79% of patients reported a high or moderately high satisfaction with the procedure, and about 95% of patients would undergo the same procedure again. CONCLUSIONS: The Mini WELL Ready EDOF IOL provided good optical and visual quality with high level of patient satisfaction and seems to be a valuable option to provide unaided vision at different distances minimizing visual disturbances.

Posterior-chamber phakic implantable collamer lenses with a central port: a review.

We aimed to summarize the outcomes reported following the implantation of the V4c implantable collamer lens with a central port (ICL, STAAR Surgical Inc) for myopia correction. A literature search in PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus was carried out to identify publications reporting clinical outcomes of patients who were implanted with the V4c ICL model and had a follow-up period of at least 6 months. A total of 35 clinical studies published between 2012 and 2020 were included in the present review. A comprehensive analysis of the available data was performed, focusing on visual and refractive outcomes at different time-points post-surgery. In addition, adverse events and other parameters such as endothelial cell density, intraocular pressure and vault measurements-which were evaluated in some of the studies-were also compared. This review encompassed a total of 2904 eyes. The outcomes reported in this review lead us to conclude that ICL V4c implantation for myopia correction is a safe and efficient procedure, with stable visual and refractive outcomes and low adverse event rates. The patient's anterior segment should be thoroughly characterized, and the ICL parameters should be carefully selected so as to achieve good outcomes and avoid complications.

Repeatability of whole-cornea measurements using a new swept-source optical coherence tomographer.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the repeatability of several corneal parameters provided by a high-resolution swept-source optical coherence tomographer (SS-OCT). METHODS: One eye from each of 74 patients was measured five times consequently using the ANTERION SS-OCT. The following corneal parameters were analyzed: average, steep and flat keratometry (K), astigmatism for anterior, posterior and total at 3-mm, average K and astigmatism at 6-mm, anterior and posterior eccentricity, higher-order aberrations (HOA) and spherical aberration (Z40), and anterior and posterior best-fit sphere at 8-mm. The intrasubject standard deviation (Sw), coefficient of variation (CoV), coefficient of repeatability (CoR) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were calculated for each parameter to assess the repeatability. RESULTS: We have not found statistically significant differences between repeated measurements (p > 0.05). Repeatability was good considering the different metrics used. Sw values were <0.09, varying from 0.035 (posterior average K at 6-mm) to 0.0878 (anterior flat K at 3-mm). CoV values were also low and similar among the different parameters (from 0.08% to 0.21%), except for anterior, posterior and total astigmatism (from 2.25% to 8.46%). Both anterior and posterior eccentricity, and corneal aberrations (HOA and Z40) CoV values were also high. The CoR values were low for all parameters showing those related to the posterior cornea the lowest values (about 0.01). ICC values were >0.98. CONCLUSIONS: The ANTERION SS-OCT showed good repeatability when reconstructed different parameters for the whole cornea. This device produces measurements with high repeatability that could be useful for clinical research.

Agreement of white-to-white measurements with swept-source OCT, Scheimpflug and color LED devices.

PURPOSE: To assess the interchangeability of different devices for measuring white-to-white (WTW) distance. METHODS: WTW distance was measured in 53 eyes of 53 patients using Anterion swept-source optical coherence topographer (SS-OCT), IOLMaster 700 SS-OCT, Pentacam HR Scheimpflug and Cassini color LED. Statistical analysis was done by means of the Friedman test and the post hoc Tukey test. The Bland-Altman analysis was applied to carry out pairwise comparisons with the average difference, 95% confidence interval of the average difference and limits of agreement 95% (LoA). RESULTS: WTW values obtained by the Anterion, IOLMaster 700, Pentacam HR and Cassini were: 11.84 ± 0.41 mm, 11.96 ± 0.41 mm, 11.68 ± 0.38 mm and 12.65 ± 0.52 mm, respectively. Statistically significant differences were found in all pairwise comparison (p < 0.001). The lowest mean difference was found between the Anterion and IOLMaster 700 (- 0.11 mm) and the highest between the Pentacam HR and Cassini (- 0.96 mm). The widest LoA ranges were those that compared any device with the Cassini. LoA ranges when the other three devices were compared among them were similar: Anterion versus IOLMaster 700, Anterion versus Pentacam HR and IOLMaster versus Pentacam HR (about 0.2 mm). CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that there were statistically significant differences in WTW measurement among the four devices, but under a clinical point of view, we believe that Anterion and IOLMaster 700 may be considered interchangeable and so Anterion and Pentacam HR, however, IOLMaster 700 and Pentacam HR may not and neither is Cassini with any of the other three devices.

Agreement between 2 swept-source OCT biometers and a Scheimpflug partial coherence interferometer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the agreement between different parameters obtained with 2 swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT)-based biometers and 1 Scheimpflug camera with partial coherence interferometry (PCI). SETTING: Single center, Oftalvist, Alicante, Spain. DESIGN: Prospective case series. METHODS: Biometry was performed in 49 eyes using 3 optical biometers: ANTERION SS-OCT, IOLMaster 700 SS-OCT, and Pentacam AXL PCI. Keratometry (K), J0 and J45 vectors, anterior chamber depth (ACD), central corneal thickness (CCT), white-to-white (WTW), lens thickness (LT), and axial length (AL) were measured with each device. Bland-Altman analysis was applied. RESULTS: This study comprises 49 eyes of 49 patients. There were no statistically significant differences for K1, K2, J0 and J45 between the 3 devices (P > .9). In contrast, there was a statistically significant difference in the ACD, CCT, WTW, LT, and AL between the biometers (P < .001). Specifically, there was a statistically significant difference between ACD, CCT, and WTW values for all-pairwise comparisons. IOLMaster showed the shortest ACD value and ANTERION showed the largest ACD. IOLMaster showed the highest CCT and Pentacam showed the lowest CCT. IOLMaster showed the largest WTW and Pentacam showed the shortest WTW. The LT measured with IOLMaster was thicker than that measured with ANTERION. There was a statistically significant difference in the AL between IOLMaster and Pentacam, with a shorter AL measured with IOLMaster (P < .001), but no differences were found between ANTERION and IOLMaster (P = .599) and between ANTERION and Pentacam (P = .054). CONCLUSIONS: Mean differences and the limits of agreement obtained in all-pairwise comparisons of the different parameters should be judged clinically to consider the interchangeability of these devices.

Ocular biometry with swept-source optical coherence tomography.

This study aimed to summarize the outcomes reported when swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) is used for ocular biometry. A literature search was performed to identify publications reporting clinical outcomes of patients measured with commercial SS-OCT. Twenty-nine studies were included in this review. A comprehensive analysis of the available data was performed, focusing on parameters used for intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation in cataract surgery, including keratometry, central corneal thickness, white-to-white distance, anterior chamber depth, lens thickness, axial length, IOL power, and pupil diameter. Different metrics for repeatability, reproducibility, and agreement between devices were analyzed. In general, SS-OCT biometers provide excellent repeatability and reproducibility outcomes; however, the differences obtained for some parameters measured in agreement studies should be carefully analyzed to validate the interchangeability between devices. The good outcomes reported lead us to conclude that optical biometers based on SS-OCT technology are likely to become the gold standard for ocular biometry.