Called to Lead: A Qualitative Examination of the Experiences and Contributions of Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetists During the COVID-19 Pandemic Response in the United States.

The COVID-19 pandemic strained healthcare providers, particularly certified registered nurse anesthetists (CRNAs). To date, little research has focused on the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on CRNAs, whose unique skillset conferred on them expanded roles and responsibilities, increasing their stress load. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to utilize qualitative descriptive methodology to examine the experiences of CRNAs during the COVID-19 pandemic. Twelve CRNAs providing patient care in the US during the COVID-19 pandemic completed the interview protocol. Five key themes were identified including 1) roles of CRNAs, 2) collaboration, 3) challenges, 4) mental health implications for CRNAs, and 5) pride in profession. This study's descriptions of CRNA experiences during this unprecedented time in contemporary history identifies critical areas for further investigation and provides insights into anesthetic, mental health, and policy priorities to better support CRNAs now and through future infectious disease outbreaks.

Occupational safety and health guidelines in relation to COVID-19 risk, death risk, and case-fatality proportion: An international, ecological study.

Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) began in 2019 with several unknown factors. The World Health Organization (WHO) subsequently developed COVID-19 occupational safety and health (OSH) guidelines to reduce occupational COVID-19 transmission. Many countries also developed their own COVID-19 OSH guidelines, but whether these guidelines included WHO's guidelines and whether including WHO's guidelines in countries' COVID-19 OSH guidelines reduced COVID-19 transmission is unknown. Objectives: The objectives of our study were to (1) compare the COVID-19 OSH guidelines of several countries to WHO's OSH guidelines, (2) estimate associations between characteristics of countries and their OSH guidelines and the number of WHO's OSH guidelines included in countries' OSH guidelines, and (3) estimate associations between WHO's OSH guidelines included in countries' OSH guidelines and COVID-19 risk, death risk, and case-fatality proportion. Methods: This study represents international, ecological research of 36 countries from all six world health regions. Countries' COVID-19 OSH guidelines were compared with WHO's OSH guidelines. Linear regression models adjusted for potential confounders were used to estimate associations of interest. Results: The median number of WHO's 15 COVID-19 OSH guidelines included in countries' COVID-19 OSH guidelines was eight. Countries' COVID-19 OSH guidelines focused on workers included significantly more of WHO's COVID-19 OSH guidelines than countries' COVID-19 OSH guidelines focused on general populations. Including "provide personal protective equipment for workers" and "create workplace policy for wearing personal protective equipment" in countries' COVID-19 OSH guidelines were significantly related to decreased COVID-19 risk, death risk, and/or case-fatality proportion. Conclusions: Countries' COVID-19 OSH guidelines should include WHO's guidelines, focus on workers, and include "provide personal protective equipment for workers" and "create workplace policy for wearing personal protective equipment."