Diagnostic accuracy of prehospital lung ultrasound for acute decompensated heart failure: A systematic review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Lung ultrasound (LUS) reduces time to diagnosis and treatment of acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) in emergency department (ED) patients with undifferentiated dyspnea. We conducted a systematic review to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and clinical impact of LUS for ADHF in the prehospital setting. METHODS: We performed a keyword search of multiple databases from inception through June 1, 2023. Included studies were those enrolling prehospital patients with undifferentiated dyspnea or suspected ADHF, and specifically diagnostic studies comparing prehospital LUS to a gold standard and intervention studies with a non-US comparator group. Title and abstract screening, full text review, risk of bias (ROB) assessments, and data extraction were performed by multiple authors. and adjudicated. The primary outcome was pooled sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic likelihood ratios (LR) for prehospital LUS. A test-treatment threshold of 0.7 was applied based on prior ADHF literature in the ED. Intervention outcomes included mortality, mechanical ventilation, and time to HF specific treatment. RESULTS: Eight diagnostic studies (n = 691) and two intervention studies (n = 70) met inclusion criteria. No diagnostic studies were low-ROB. Both intervention studies were critical-ROB, and not pooled. Pooled sensitivity and specificity of prehospital LUS for ADHF were 86.7% (95%CI:70.8%-94.6%) and 87.5% (78.2%-93.2%), respectively, with similar performance by physician vs. paramedic LUS and number of lung zones evaluated. Pooled LR+ and LR- were 7.27 (95% CI: 3.69-13.10) and 0.17 (95% CI: 0.06-0.34), respectively. Area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.922. At the observed 42.4% ADHF prevalence (pre-test probability), positive pre-hospital LUS exceeded the 70% threshold to initiate treatment (post-test probability 84%, 80-88%). CONCLUSIONS: LUS had similar diagnostic test characteristics for ADHF diagnosis in the prehospital setting as in the ED. A positive prehospital LUS may be sufficient to initiate early ADHF treatment based on published test-treatment thresholds. More studies are needed to determine the clinical impact of prehospital LUS.

Impact of interhospital transfer on patients with Alzheimer's disease and other related dementias.

Older adults are often transferred from one emergency department (ED) to another hospital for speciality care, but little is known about whether those transfers positively impact patients, particularly those with Alzheimer's disease and other related dementias (ADRD). In this study we aimed to describe the impact of interhospital transfer on older adults with and without ADRD. In a retrospective review of electronic medical records, we collected data on demographics, insurance type, initial code status, intensive care, length of stay, specialist consult, procedure within 48 hours, and discharge disposition for older adults (≥65years). We included older adults with at least one ED visit, who were transferred to a tertiary care hospital. With logistic regression, we estimated odds of death, intensive care stay, or procedure within 48 hours by ADRD diagnosis. Patients with ADRD more often received a geriatrics (p < 0.001) or palliative care consult (p = 0.038). They were less likely to be full code at admission (p < 0.001) or to be discharged home (p < 0.001). Patients living with ADRD less often received intensive care or a procedure within 48 hours of transfer (odds ratio [OR] 1.87, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.22-2.88). Patients with ADRD were less likely to receive intensive care unit admission or specialist procedures after transfer. Further study is indicated to comprehensively understand patient-centered outcomes.

The significance of historical troponin elevation in acute heart failure: Not as reassuring as previously assumed.

BACKGROUND: Historical cardiac troponin (cTn) elevation is commonly interpreted as lessening the significance of current cTn elevations at presentation for acute heart failure (AHF). Evidence for this practice is lacking. Our objective was to determine the incremental prognostic significance of historical cTn elevation compared to cTn elevation and ischemic heart disease (IHD) history at presentation for AHF. METHODS: A total of 341 AHF patients were prospectively enrolled at five sites. The composite primary outcome was death/cardiopulmonary resuscitation, mechanical cardiac support, intubation, new/emergent dialysis, and/or acute myocardial infarction (AMI)/percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)/coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) at 90 days. Secondary outcomes were 30-day AMI/PCI/CABG and in-hospital AMI. Logistic regression compared outcomes versus initial emergency department (ED) cTn, the most recent electronic medical record cTn, estimated glomerular filtration rate, age, left ventricular ejection fraction, and IHD history (positive, negative by prior coronary workup, or unknown/no prior workup). RESULTS: Elevated cTn occurred in 163 (49%) patients, 80 (23%) experienced the primary outcome, and 29 had AMI (9%). cTn elevation at ED presentation, adjusted for historical cTn and other covariates, was associated with the primary outcome (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.39, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.30-4.38), 30-day AMI/PCI/CABG, and in-hospital AMI. Historical cTn elevation was associated with greater odds of the primary outcome when IHD history was unknown at ED presentation (aOR 5.27, 95% CI 1.24-21.40) and did not alter odds of the outcome with known positive (aOR 0.74, 95% CI 0.33-1.70) or negative IHD history (aOR 0.79, 95% CI 0.26-2.40). Nevertheless, patients with elevated ED cTn were more likely to be discharged if historical cTn was also elevated (78% vs. 32%, p = 0.025). CONCLUSIONS: Historical cTn elevation in AHF patients is a harbinger of worse outcomes for patients who have not had a prior IHD workup and should prompt evaluation for underlying ischemia rather than reassurance for discharge. With known IHD history, historical cTn elevation was neither reassuring nor detrimental, failing to add incremental prognostic value to current cTn elevation alone.

Safety of an Alternative Care Protocol for EMS Non-Transport in the COVID-19 Pandemic.

AIM: Our primary goal was to evaluate safety of a new emergency medical services (EMS) protocol directing non-transport of low-acuity patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of all patients in Marion County, Indiana, from March 23, 2020 to May 25, 2020 for whom a novel non-transport protocol was used by EMS for patients with low-acuity COVID-19 symptoms. We assessed paramedic compliance with the protocol to determine numbers and types of deviations. We further reviewed a statewide health information exchange database to identify any patients with emergency department (ED) visits, hospital admissions, or death within 30 days of the EMS non-transport. For ED and hospital visits, we collected ED or admission diagnoses to determine if the etiologies were COVID-related. RESULTS: Between March 24, 2020 and May 25, 2020, 222 patients were documented as "Treated, Released (per protocol)." The protocol was correctly applied 144 times (64.8%). The other 78 times, although the EMS clinicians documented use of the protocol, it was not actually used (e.g., another protocol such as "no medical emergency" was used). Of the 144 patients for whom the protocol was used, in 55 cases (38.2%), the clinicians documented patient factors that should have contraindicated use of the protocol (e.g., chest pain, past medical history of asthma). The protocol was applied 5 times (3.5%) in pediatric patients. Two patients were admitted to the hospital within 72 hours of incorrect application of the protocol; both were for COVID-related complaints. Two patients were admitted to the hospital within 72 hours of correct protocol use; one was for a COVID-related complaint. CONCLUSION: In this case series, paramedics demonstrated large deviations from the novel non-transport protocol. Several patients were admitted to the hospital within 72 hours of non-transport both when the protocol was used correctly, and when it was used incorrectly.

Factors Affecting Interfacility Transport Intervals in Stroke Patients Transferred for Endovascular Therapy.

OBJECTIVE: To describe interfacility transfer (IFT) intervals, transfer vehicle type, and levels of care in patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) strokes transferred for emergent endovascular therapy (EVT). METHODS: We included all patients transferred by a single IFT agency in the state of Indiana from July 1, 2018 to December 1, 2020 to a comprehensive stroke center in Indianapolis for emergent EVT. Data were collected from the transfer center electronic medical records and matched to IFT and receiving hospital data. RESULTS: Two hundred eighty-eight patients were included, of which 150 (52.0%) received EVT. The median call-to-needle interval (from call to the transfer center to EVT needle puncture) was 155.5 minutes (IQR 135.8-195.3). The median resource activation interval (call to the transfer center to IFT deployment) was 16 minutes (IQR 10-27 minutes); the median IFT response interval (call to IFT to arrival of the transferring unit) was 34 minutes (IQR 25-43 minutes); the median pre-transfer interval (call to the transfer center until departure from the sending hospital) was 60.4 minutes (IQR 47.1-72.6); and the median sending hospital interval at bedside was 25 minutes (IQR 20-30 minutes). Most patients (197, 68.4%) were sent via critical care rotor. Only 61 (21.2%) required interventions other than tissue plasminogen administration, such as titration of actively transfusing medications (e.g., nicardipine, propofol) (37 of 61, 59.7%), or intubation or ventilator management (25 of 61, 40.3%). Patients sent via critical care rotor had longer sending hospital intervals (26 minutes, IQR 22-32, vs 19 minutes, IQR 16-25; p < 0.001) but shorter transfer intervals than those sent via critical care ground. CONCLUSIONS: At longer distances, rotor transport saved significant time specifically in the total IFT interval of patients with LVO strokes. Emphasizing processes to reduce the resource activation interval and the sending hospital interval may help reduce the overall time-to-EVT.