Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 32(7): 719-22, 2011 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21666406

ABSTRACT

Risk factors for development of intestinal colonization by imipenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (IRPA) may differ between those who acquire the organism via patient-to-patient transmission versus by antibiotic selective pressure. The aim of this study was to quantify potential risk factors for the development of IRPA not due to patient-to-patient transmission.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Cross Infection/transmission , Imipenem/therapeutic use , Intensive Care Units , Pseudomonas Infections/transmission , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/isolation & purification , beta-Lactam Resistance , Cohort Studies , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Intestines/microbiology , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Pseudomonas Infections/epidemiology , Risk Factors
2.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother ; 54(8): 3143-8, 2010 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20479207

ABSTRACT

The present study aimed to determine the frequency of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)-positive clinical culture among hospitalized adults in different risk categories of a targeted MRSA active surveillance screening program and to assess the utility of screening in guiding empiric antibiotic therapy. We completed a prospective cohort study in which all adults admitted to non-intensive-care-unit locations who had no history of MRSA colonization or infection received targeted screening for MRSA colonization upon hospital admission. Anterior nares swab specimens were obtained from all high-risk patients, defined as those who self-reported admission to a health care facility within the previous 12 months or who had an active skin infection on admission. Data were analyzed for the subcohort of patients in whom an infection was suspected, determined by (i) receipt of antibiotics within 48 h of admission and/or (ii) the result of culture of a sample for clinical analysis (clinical culture) obtained within 48 h of admission. Overall, 29,978 patients were screened and 12,080 patients had suspected infections. A total of 46.4% were deemed to be at high risk on the basis of the definition presented above, and 11.1% of these were MRSA screening positive (colonized). Among the screening-positive patients, 23.8% had a sample positive for MRSA by clinical culture. Only 2.4% of patients deemed to be at high risk but found to be screening negative had a sample positive for MRSA by clinical culture, and 1.6% of patients deemed to be at low risk had a sample positive for MRSA by clinical culture. The risk of MRSA infection was far higher in those who were deemed to be at high risk and who were surveillance culture positive. Targeted MRSA active surveillance may be beneficial in guiding empiric anti-MRSA therapy.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Hospitalization , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Population Surveillance/methods , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Staphylococcal Infections/epidemiology , Academic Medical Centers , Adult , Baltimore/epidemiology , Cross Infection/drug therapy , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Male , Mass Screening/methods , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects , Middle Aged , Nasal Cavity/microbiology , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Staphylococcal Infections/drug therapy , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology
3.
Am J Infect Control ; 36(7): 468-71, 2008 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18786448

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Patients in long-term acute care (LTAC) facilities often have many known risk factors for acquisition of antibiotic-resistant bacteria. However, the prevalence of resistance in these facilities has not been well described. METHODS: We performed a single-day, point-prevalence study of a 180-bed, university-affiliated LTAC facility in Baltimore to assess the prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and Acinetobacter baumannii in the anterior nares, perirectal area, sputum, and wounds. RESULTS: Among the 147 patients evaluated, we found a high prevalence of colonization by both MRSA (28%) and A baumannii (30%). Of the A baumannii isolates, 90% were susceptible to imipenem and 92% were susceptible to ampicillin-sulbactam. No isolates were resistant to both imipenem and ampicillin-sulbactam. CONCLUSION: The high prevalence of resistance found in this study supports the need for increased surveillance of patients in the LTAC environment. The fact that these patients are often frequently transferred to tertiary care facilities also supports the need for coordination and collaboration among facilities within the same health care system and the broader geographic area.


Subject(s)
Acinetobacter Infections/epidemiology , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Methicillin Resistance , Staphylococcal Infections/epidemiology , Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects , Academic Medical Centers , Acinetobacter Infections/microbiology , Acinetobacter baumannii/isolation & purification , Adult , Aged , Anal Canal/microbiology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Baltimore/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Long-Term Care , Male , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Middle Aged , Nose/microbiology , Prevalence , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology , Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Wounds and Injuries/microbiology
4.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 13(8): 1144-9, 2007 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17953083

ABSTRACT

Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing bacteria are emerging pathogens. To analyze risk factors for colonization with ESBL-producing bacteria at intensive care unit (ICU) admission, we conducted a prospective study of a 3.5-year cohort of patients admitted to medical and surgical ICUs at the University of Maryland Medical Center. Over the study period, admission cultures were obtained from 5,209 patients. Of these, 117 were colonized with ESBL-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella spp., and 29 (25%) had a subsequent ESBL-positive clinical culture. Multivariable analysis showed the following to be statistically associated with ESBL colonization at admission: piperacillin-tazobactam (odds ratio [OR] 2.05, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.36-3.10), vancomycin (OR 2.11, 95% CI 1.34-3.31), age > 60 years (OR 1.79, 95% CI 1.24-2.60), and chronic disease score (OR 1.15; 95% CI 1.04-1.27). Coexisting conditions and previous antimicrobial drug exposure are thus predictive of colonization, and a large percentage of these patients have subsequent positive clinical cultures for ESBL-producing bacteria.


Subject(s)
Escherichia coli Infections/microbiology , Escherichia coli/enzymology , Klebsiella Infections/microbiology , Klebsiella/enzymology , beta-Lactamases/biosynthesis , Aged , Cohort Studies , Cross-Sectional Studies , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Escherichia coli/drug effects , Escherichia coli/isolation & purification , Escherichia coli Infections/drug therapy , Female , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Klebsiella/drug effects , Klebsiella/isolation & purification , Klebsiella Infections/drug therapy , Male , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , beta-Lactam Resistance
5.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother ; 51(3): 839-44, 2007 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17194829

ABSTRACT

The impact of appropriate empirical antimicrobial therapy for Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteremia on patient outcomes has not been clearly established. We assessed the effect of appropriate empirical therapy on in-hospital mortality and length of stay (LOS) among patients with P. aeruginosa bacteremia. This was a retrospective cohort study of inpatients with a positive blood culture for P. aeruginosa between January 2001 and June 2005. Empirical therapy was defined as appropriate if the patient received an antibiotic the organism was susceptible to between 8 h before culture collection and the time the susceptibility results were available. The severity of the illness was measured 24 h before culture collection. The data were analyzed using logistic regression (in-hospital mortality) and linear regression (LOS). Overall, there were 167 episodes of P. aeruginosa bacteremia, 123 (86%) of which received appropriate empirical antibiotics. Sixty-one patients died (36.5%). The median time from culture collection to susceptibility results was 3.4 days. After we adjusted for age, severity of illness, and time at risk, we found that the appropriate empirical therapy was not significantly associated with mortality (odds ratio = 0.96; 95% confidence interval = 0.31 to 2.93). There was a 7% reduction in the mean LOS for patients who had received appropriate therapy at the time susceptibility results were available compared to those who did not (P = 0.74). These data suggest that the use of appropriate empirical therapy, i.e., before susceptibility results are known may not be as critical to patient outcomes as other studies have suggested.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Bacteremia/drug therapy , Pseudomonas aeruginosa , Aged , Bacteremia/microbiology , Bacteremia/mortality , Cohort Studies , Data Interpretation, Statistical , Female , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Length of Stay , Male , Middle Aged , Regression Analysis , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...