ABSTRACT
Contact tracing is a strategy implemented to minimize the spread of communicable diseases (1,2). Prompt contact tracing, testing, and self-quarantine can reduce the transmission of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) (3,4). Community engagement is important to encourage participation in and cooperation with SARS-CoV-2 contact tracing (5). Substantial investments have been made to scale up contact tracing for COVID-19 in the United States. During June 1-July 12, 2020, the incidence of COVID-19 cases in North Carolina increased 183%, from seven to 19 per 100,000 persons per day* (6). To assess local COVID-19 contact tracing implementation, data from two counties in North Carolina were analyzed during a period of high incidence. Health department staff members investigated 5,514 (77%) persons with COVID-19 in Mecklenburg County and 584 (99%) in Randolph Counties. No contacts were reported for 48% of cases in Mecklenburg and for 35% in Randolph. Among contacts provided, 25% in Mecklenburg and 48% in Randolph could not be reached by telephone and were classified as nonresponsive after at least one attempt on 3 consecutive days of failed attempts. The median interval from specimen collection from the index patient to notification of identified contacts was 6 days in both counties. Despite aggressive efforts by health department staff members to perform case investigations and contact tracing, many persons with COVID-19 did not report contacts, and many contacts were not reached. These findings indicate that improved timeliness of contact tracing, community engagement, and increased use of community-wide mitigation are needed to interrupt SARS-CoV-2 transmission.
Subject(s)
Contact Tracing/statistics & numerical data , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , COVID-19 , Humans , Incidence , North Carolina/epidemiologyABSTRACT
The geographic areas in the United States most affected by the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic have changed over time. On May 7, 2020, CDC, with other federal agencies, began identifying counties with increasing COVID-19 incidence (hotspots) to better understand transmission dynamics and offer targeted support to health departments in affected communities. Data for January 22-July 15, 2020, were analyzed retrospectively (January 22-May 6) and prospectively (May 7-July 15) to detect hotspot counties. No counties met hotspot criteria during January 22-March 7, 2020. During March 8-July 15, 2020, 818 counties met hotspot criteria for ≥1 day; these counties included 80% of the U.S. population. The daily number of counties meeting hotspot criteria peaked in early April, decreased and stabilized during mid-April-early June, then increased again during late June-early July. The percentage of counties in the South and West Census regions* meeting hotspot criteria increased from 10% and 13%, respectively, during March-April to 28% and 22%, respectively, during June-July. Identification of community transmission as a contributing factor increased over time, whereas identification of outbreaks in long-term care facilities, food processing facilities, correctional facilities, or other workplaces as contributing factors decreased. Identification of hotspot counties and understanding how they change over time can help prioritize and target implementation of U.S. public health response activities.
Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Rural Population/statistics & numerical data , Urban Population/statistics & numerical data , COVID-19 , Humans , Incidence , United States/epidemiologyABSTRACT
Healthcare personnel who perform invasive procedures and are living with HIV or hepatitis B have been required to self-notify the NC state health department since 1992. State coordinated review of HCP utilizes a panel of experts to evaluate transmission risk and recommend infection prevention measures. We describe how this practice balances HCP privacy and patient safety and health.
Subject(s)
Guideline Adherence/statistics & numerical data , HIV Infections/prevention & control , Health Personnel/legislation & jurisprudence , Health Policy/legislation & jurisprudence , Hepatitis B/prevention & control , Infectious Disease Transmission, Professional-to-Patient/prevention & control , Delivery of Health Care , Humans , North Carolina , Patient Safety , Self ReportABSTRACT
During cluster investigation, index patients name social contacts that are not sex or drug-sharing partners. The likelihood of identifying new HIV infections among social contacts is unknown. We hypothesized greater odds of identifying new infections among social contacts identified by men who report sex with men (MSM). We reviewed North Carolina HIV diagnoses during 2002-2005 and used logistic regression to compare testing results among social contacts of MSM, men who report sex with women only (MSW) and women. HIV was newly diagnosed among 54/601 (9.0 %) social contacts tested named by MSM, 16/522 (3.1 %) named by MSW, and 23/639 (3.6 %) named by women. Compared with those named by MSW, odds of new HIV diagnosis were greater among MSM social contacts (adjusted odds ratio: 2.5; 95 % confidence interval: 1.3-4.7). Testing social contacts identified previously undiagnosed HIV infections and could provide an opportunity to interrupt transmission.
Subject(s)
Contact Tracing/methods , HIV Infections/diagnosis , Sexuality/statistics & numerical data , Substance Abuse, Intravenous/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Black or African American/statistics & numerical data , Bisexuality/statistics & numerical data , Female , HIV Infections/epidemiology , HIV Infections/prevention & control , Heterosexuality/statistics & numerical data , Hispanic or Latino/statistics & numerical data , Homosexuality, Male/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , North Carolina/epidemiology , Substance-Related Disorders/epidemiology , White People/statistics & numerical data , Young AdultABSTRACT
On August 5, 2013, the South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control was notified of a case of acute respiratory failure in a previously healthy woman. A family interview revealed the patient's uncle and cousin had also been hospitalized with similar symptoms in North Carolina. The South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control and the North Carolina Division of Public Health collaborated to identify the cause of the respiratory illness cluster and to prevent additional illnesses.
Subject(s)
Family , Pneumonia, Mycoplasma/diagnosis , Adult , Cluster Analysis , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Mycoplasma pneumoniae/isolation & purification , North Carolina , Pneumonia, Mycoplasma/therapy , Severity of Illness Index , South Carolina , Young AdultABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Describe the epidemiology of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) and examine the effect of lower carbapenem breakpoints on CRE detection. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. SETTING: Inpatient care at community hospitals. PATIENTS: All patients with CRE-positive cultures were included. METHODS: CRE isolated from 25 community hospitals were prospectively entered into a centralized database from January 2008 through December 2012. Microbiology laboratory practices were assessed using questionnaires. RESULTS: A total of 305 CRE isolates were detected at 16 hospitals (64%). Patients with CRE had symptomatic infection in 180 cases (59%) and asymptomatic colonization in the remainder (125 cases; 41%). Klebsiella pneumoniae (277 isolates; 91%) was the most prevalent species. The majority of cases were healthcare associated (288 cases; 94%). The rate of CRE detection increased more than fivefold from 2008 (0.26 cases per 100,000 patient-days) to 2012 (1.4 cases per 100,000 patient-days; incidence rate ratio (IRR), 5.3 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.22-22.7]; P = .01). Only 5 hospitals (20%) had adopted the 2010 Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) carbapenem breakpoints. The 5 hospitals that adopted the lower carbapenem breakpoints were more likely to detect CRE after implementation of breakpoints than before (4.1 vs 0.5 cases per 100,000 patient-days; P < .001; IRR, 8.1 [95% CI, 2.7-24.6]). Hospitals that implemented the lower carbapenem breakpoints were more likely to detect CRE than were hospitals that did not (3.3 vs 1.1 cases per 100,000 patient-days; P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: The rate of CRE detection increased fivefold in community hospitals in the southeastern United States from 2008 to 2012. Despite this, our estimates are likely underestimates of the true rate of CRE detection, given the low adoption of the carbapenem breakpoints recommended in the 2010 CLSI guidelines.
Subject(s)
Carbapenems/therapeutic use , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Enterobacteriaceae Infections/epidemiology , Enterobacteriaceae/drug effects , Hospitals, Community/statistics & numerical data , Asymptomatic Infections/epidemiology , Carbapenems/pharmacology , Cross Infection/microbiology , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Enterobacteriaceae Infections/drug therapy , Enterobacteriaceae Infections/microbiology , Hospitals, Community/methods , Humans , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Prevalence , Retrospective Studies , Southeastern United States/epidemiology , beta-Lactam ResistanceABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Violence is a leading cause of death in North Carolina. The North Carolina Violent Death Reporting System (NC-VDRS) is part of the National Violent Death Reporting System (NVDRS), which monitors violent deaths and collects information about injuries and psychosocial contributors. Our objective was to describe and evaluate the quality, timeliness, and usefulness of the system. METHODS: We used the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's guidelines for evaluating public health surveillance systems to assess the system. We performed subjective assessment of system attributes by reviewing system documents and interviewing stakeholders. We estimated NC-VDRS's reporting completeness using a capture-recapture method. RESULTS: Stakeholders considered data provided by NC-VDRS to be of high quality. Reporting to the national system has taken place before the specified 6-month and 18-month deadlines, but local stakeholder reports have been delayed up to 36 months. Stakeholders reported using NC-VDRS data for program planning and community education. The system is estimated to capture all NVDRS-defined cases, but law enforcement officers report only 61% of suicides. LIMITATIONS: The law enforcement agencies we interviewed may not be representative of all participating agencies in the state. Data sources used to assess completeness were not independent. CONCLUSION: NC-VDRS is useful and well-accepted. However, completeness of suicide reporting is limited, and reporting to local stakeholders has been delayed. Improving these limitations might improve the usefulness of the system for planning and appropriately targeting violence prevention interventions.
Subject(s)
Data Collection/methods , Mortality/trends , Violence/statistics & numerical data , Cause of Death , Humans , North Carolina , Population Surveillance , Program EvaluationABSTRACT
We investigated an outbreak initially attributed to norovirus; however, Clostridium perfringens toxicoinfection was subsequently confirmed. C. perfringens is an underrecognized but frequently observed cause of food-borne disease outbreaks. This investigation illustrates the importance of considering epidemiologic and laboratory data together when evaluating potential etiologic agents that might require unique control measures.
Subject(s)
Clostridium Infections/epidemiology , Clostridium perfringens/isolation & purification , Disease Outbreaks , Foodborne Diseases/epidemiology , Norovirus/isolation & purification , Acute Disease , Caliciviridae Infections/diagnosis , Caliciviridae Infections/epidemiology , Clostridium Infections/diagnosis , Clostridium Infections/microbiology , Diagnosis, Differential , Feces/microbiology , Feces/virology , Foodborne Diseases/diagnosis , Foodborne Diseases/microbiology , Foodborne Diseases/virology , Gastroenteritis/diagnosis , Gastroenteritis/epidemiology , Gastroenteritis/microbiology , Gastroenteritis/virology , Humans , North Carolina/epidemiology , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
Protection of older persons, particularly those with diabetes, against hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is of growing concern because of increased reports of outbreaks among long-term care facility residents receiving assisted blood glucose monitoring. We evaluated hepatitis B vaccine immunogenicity among residents immunized in response to two such outbreaks in skilled nursing facilities during June 2009-July 2010. One hundred forty-eight (71%) of 209 residents were found to be susceptible to HBV infection. Of 105 patients who began a vaccination series with Twinrix(®) (0-, 1-, 6-month dosing), 86 (82%) completed the series and postvaccination testing. Of these, most were elderly (median age 79.5 years; range 45-101), female (56%), and African-American (51%). Twenty-nine (34%) vaccinated residents had post-vaccination hepatitis B surface antibody levels ≥10 mIU/ml. There were no significant differences in vaccine response by age, gender, race, diabetes status, body mass index, or current smoking status. Our findings indicate that a low proportion of skilled nursing facility residents achieved a seroprotective response after hepatitis B vaccination.
Subject(s)
Cross Infection/epidemiology , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Disease Outbreaks , Hepatitis A Vaccines/immunology , Hepatitis B Vaccines/immunology , Hepatitis B/epidemiology , Hepatitis B/prevention & control , Long-Term Care , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Health Facilities , Hepatitis A Vaccines/administration & dosage , Hepatitis B Vaccines/administration & dosage , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Vaccines, Combined/administration & dosage , Vaccines, Combined/immunologyABSTRACT
Reports of health care--associated viral hepatitis transmission have been increasing in the United States. Transmission due to poor infection control practices during myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) has not previously been reported. The aim of this study was to identify the source of incident hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in a patient without identified risk factors who had undergone MPI 6 weeks before diagnosis. Practices at the cardiology clinic and nuclear pharmacy were evaluated, and HCV testing was performed in patients with shared potential exposures. Clinical and epidemiologic information was obtained for patients with HCV infection, and molecular testing was performed to assess viral relatedness. Evidence of HCV transmission among patients who had undergone MPI at the cardiology clinic on 2 separate dates was found, involving 2 potential source patients and a total of 5 newly infected patients. Molecular testing identified a high degree of genetic homology among viruses from patients with common procedure dates. The nuclear medicine technologist routinely drew up flush from multidose vials of saline solution using the same needle and syringe that had been used to administer radiopharmaceutical doses. Multipatient use of vials was not observed, but a review of purchasing invoices and interviews with staff members suggested that this had occurred. No evidence of transmission via contamination of radiopharmaceuticals at the nuclear pharmacy was found. In conclusion, transmission of HCV occurred because of unsafe injection practices during MPI. Cardiologists should carefully review their infection control practices and the practices of other staff members involved with these procedures.
Subject(s)
Ambulatory Care Facilities , Cross Infection/transmission , Drug Contamination , Hepatitis C/transmission , Myocardial Perfusion Imaging/adverse effects , Syringes/virology , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Cross Infection/virology , DNA, Viral/analysis , Follow-Up Studies , Hepacivirus/genetics , Hepatitis C/virology , Humans , Incidence , Injections/adverse effects , Male , Middle Aged , North Carolina/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Syringes/adverse effectsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Oseltamivir resistance among 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1) viruses (pH1N1) is rare. We investigated a cluster of oseltamivir-resistant pH1N1 infections in a hospital ward. METHODS: We reviewed patient records and infection control measures and interviewed health care personnel (HCP) and visitors. Oseltamivir-resistant pH1N1 infections were found with real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction and pyrosequencing for the H275Y neuraminidase (NA) mutation. We compared hemagglutinin (HA) sequences from clinical samples from the outbreak with those of other surveillance viruses. RESULTS: During the period 6-11 October 2009, 4 immunocompromised patients within a hematology-oncology ward exhibited symptoms of pH1N1 infection. The likely index patient became febrile 8 days after completing a course of oseltamivir; isolation was instituted 9 days after symptom onset. Three other case patients developed symptoms 1, 3, and 5 days after the index patient. Three case patients were located in adjacent rooms. HA and NA sequences from case patients were identical. Twelve HCP and 6 visitors reported influenza symptoms during the study period. No other pH1N1 isolates from the hospital or from throughout the state carried the H275Y mutation. CONCLUSIONS: Geographic proximity, temporal clustering, presence of H275Y mutation, and viral sequence homology confirmed nosocomial transmission of oseltamivir-resistant pH1N1. Diagnostic vigilance and prompt isolation may prevent nosocomial transmission of influenza.
Subject(s)
Antiviral Agents/pharmacology , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Immunocompromised Host , Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype/drug effects , Influenza, Human/epidemiology , Oseltamivir/pharmacology , Adult , Aged , Case-Control Studies , Cross Infection/virology , Disease Outbreaks , Drug Resistance, Viral , Hospitals , Humans , Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype/classification , Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype/genetics , Influenza, Human/drug therapy , Interviews as Topic , Middle Aged , North Carolina/epidemiology , Pandemics , Phylogeny , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Acute infections with HIV account for a disproportionate share of forward transmission in certain populations. We hypothesized that persons with acute HIV infection (AHI) would identify more named partners than those with established HIV infection (EHI). METHODS: We reviewed North Carolina surveillance databases to identify all persons aged > or =18 years in whom HIV was diagnosed during November 1, 2002 to October 31, 2007. We compared the number of named partners identified by persons with AHI versus EHI (based on nucleic acid amplification plus serologic testing) using a multivariable model and also compared information regarding HIV testing among partners identified by these groups. RESULTS: EHI was diagnosed in 9044 persons and AHI in 120 persons during the study period. Persons with AHI named 2.5 times more partners per index patient [95% confidence interval: 2.1 to 3.0] and 1.9 times more partners newly diagnosed with HIV infection per index patient (95% confidence interval: 1.1 to 3.5) as did persons with EHI. DISCUSSION: In North Carolina, persons with AHI identified proportionately more named partners and more partners newly diagnosed with HIV infections than persons with EHI. Improved detection of AHI offers critical opportunities to intervene and potentially reduce transmission of HIV.
Subject(s)
Contact Tracing , HIV Infections/epidemiology , Sexual Partners , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , North Carolina/epidemiology , Young AdultABSTRACT
An outbreak of acute hepatitis A virus in North Carolina was linked to drinking water from a contaminated shallow spring by phylogenetic analysis of hepatitis A virus (HAV) genomic sequences. Detection of HAV and fecal indicators in the water provided useful and timely information to assist with public health prevention and control measures.
Subject(s)
Disease Outbreaks , Fresh Water/virology , Hepatitis A virus/classification , Hepatitis A virus/isolation & purification , Hepatitis A/epidemiology , Hepatitis A/virology , Colony Count, Microbial , Enterobacteriaceae/isolation & purification , Genotype , Hepatitis A virus/genetics , Humans , Molecular Epidemiology , Molecular Sequence Data , North Carolina/epidemiology , Phylogeny , RNA, Viral/genetics , Sequence Analysis , Sequence HomologyABSTRACT
School closure is a proposed strategy for reducing influenza transmission during a pandemic. Few studies have assessed how families respond to closures, or whether other interactions during closure could reduce this strategy's effect. Questionnaires were administered to 220 households (438 adults and 355 children) with school-age children in a North Carolina county during an influenza B virus outbreak that resulted in school closure. Closure was considered appropriate by 201 (91%) households. No adults missed work to solely provide childcare, and only 22 (10%) households required special childcare arrangements; 2 households incurred additional costs. Eighty-nine percent of children visited at least 1 public location during the closure despite county recommendations to avoid large gatherings. Although behavior and attitudes might differ during a pandemic, these results suggest short-term closure did not cause substantial hardship for parents. Pandemic planning guidance should address the potential for transmission in public areas during school closure.
Subject(s)
Communicable Disease Control , Disease Outbreaks/prevention & control , Influenza B virus , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Public Opinion , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Child, Preschool , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , Influenza, Human/epidemiology , Interviews as Topic , Male , North Carolina/epidemiology , SchoolsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Staphylococcus aureus (SA) is an important pathogen among patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). Inducible clindamycin resistance (ICR) has been described as a cause of treatment failure in non-CF related infections. The prevalence of ICR among SA from patients with CF is unknown. METHODS: We compared clindamycin susceptibilities of SA isolated from patients with and without cystic fibrosis (CF) using hospital microbiology data. Patients with CF were primarily identified using CF registry data. We evaluated all patients who had SA isolated at the Children's Healthcare of Atlanta microbiology laboratory during May 2004-May 2005. We performed antimicrobial susceptibility testing using broth microdilution and performed D-zone testing for ICR in accordance with the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) document M100-S16. Proportions were compared using a 2-sided Pearson's Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test to assess for significance. RESULTS: Of 703 patients with methicillin-resistant SA (MRSA), 48% of CF patients (68/143) had at least one isolate demonstrating ICR, compared to 8% of non-CF patients (43/560) (P<0.01). Of 762 patients with methicillin-susceptible SA (MSSA), 29% of CF patients (73/254) had at least one isolate demonstrating ICR compared to 17% of non-CF patients (88/508) (P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: SA demonstrating ICR are significantly more prevalent among patients with CF than among those without CF.
Subject(s)
Clindamycin/pharmacology , Cystic Fibrosis/microbiology , Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects , Drug Resistance, Microbial , Humans , Methicillin Resistance , Microbial Sensitivity TestsABSTRACT
The WHO declared smallpox eradicated in 1980. However, concern over its potential use by terrorists or in biowarfare has led to striking growth in research related to this much-feared disease. Modern molecular techniques and new animal models are advancing our understanding of smallpox and its interaction with the host immune system. Rapid progress is likewise being made in smallpox laboratory diagnostics, smallpox vaccines, and antiviral medications. WHO and several nations are developing stockpiles of smallpox vaccine for use in the event the disease is reintroduced. National and international public-health agencies have also drawn up plans to help with early detection of and response to a smallpox outbreak. These plans hinge on physicians' ability to recognise the clinical features of smallpox and to distinguish it from other illnesses characterised by rashes.
Subject(s)
Smallpox Vaccine/adverse effects , Smallpox , Contraindications , Disaster Planning , Humans , Smallpox/diagnosis , Smallpox/physiopathology , Smallpox/prevention & controlABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The ability to differentiate chickenpox from smallpox is important for early recognition of bioterrorism events and prevention of false alarms. The febrile prodrome is a clinical feature used to differentiate these conditions. However, the prevalence of prodromal manifestations in chickenpox has not been well established. METHODS: We evaluated prodrome characteristics of all chickenpox cases identified through an active varicella surveillance program over a 21-month period. The frequencies of various prodromal manifestations among vaccinated and unvaccinated case patients were assessed, and the impact of other demographic features on these manifestations was evaluated. Data were analyzed to determine what proportion met the smallpox febrile prodrome criteria as elaborated in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention algorithm for evaluating patients suspected of having smallpox. Finally, we compared our data with historical data on smallpox prodromes. RESULTS: Data on prodrome characteristics were available for 932 chickenpox cases. Prodromal fever was present in 37% of unvaccinated chickenpox case patients and in 25% of vaccinated case patients. Among unvaccinated case patients, adults were 70% more likely than children to have fever in the prodrome period. We found that prodromes are less common and less severe in chickenpox than in smallpox. Nevertheless, 7%-17% of unvaccinated chickenpox case patients meet the smallpox febrile prodrome criteria. CONCLUSIONS: Febrile prodromes occur in a significant proportion of patients with chickenpox, particularly among unvaccinated case patients and adults. Therefore, the febrile prodrome alone is not a sufficient marker of smallpox risk. All major and minor smallpox criteria should be considered together in assessing the likelihood of smallpox.