Paclitaxel and epirubicin followed by cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil for patients with stage IIIC breast cancer with ten or more involved axillary lymph nodes.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of a combination of epirubicin and paclitaxel followed by intravenous (iv) cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracile (CMF) as adjuvant treatment of breast cancer patients with 10 or more metastatic axillary lymph nodes. METHODS: Forty-four patients entered this multicenter study and received 4 cycles of epirubicin (E 120 mg/m2 day 1, q3 weeks) and paclitaxel (T 135 mg/m2 day 1, q3 weeks), followed by 4 cycles of iv CMF (days 1 and 8, q4 weeks). Patients with positive hormonal receptors received sequentially tamoxifen associated with LH-RH analogue if premenopausal. The endpoints were the evaluation of the feasibility of this schedule and disease free survival (DFS). RESULTS: Median age of patients was 55; median number of positive axillary nodes was 14 (range, 10-47). Hormonal receptor status was positive in 57% of patients. The combination of epirubicin and paclitaxel was well tolerated; NCI grade 3/4 events were: leucopenia in 27% of patients, neutropenic fever in 5 patients, anemia in 7%, thrombocytopenia in 7%, nausea in 18%, vomiting in 14%, and neurotoxicity in 4%. CMF regimen caused a few cases of grade 3/4 hematologic toxicity. No cardiac toxicity was recorded. With a median follow-up of 59 months, 18 (41%) patients relapsed. Sites of relapse were mainly bone, skin/soft tissues, liver, and lung. Median DFS was 78 months, with a 5-year rate of 60%. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of paclitaxel at low dose and epirubicin followed by CMF is a feasible regimen, which seems to be effective in high-risk node positive breast cancer patients and requires further investigations.

Randomized, multicenter, phase II study of gemcitabine plus cisplatin versus gemcitabine plus carboplatin in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: We conducted a phase II randomized study to assess the efficacy, with response as the primary endpoint, and the toxicity of gemcitabine/cisplatin (GP) and gemcitabine/carboplatin (GC) in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Patients were randomized to GP (gemcitabine 1200 mg/m(2), days 1 and 8 plus cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) day 2) or GC (gemcitabine 1200 mg/m(2), days 1 and 8 plus carboplatin AUC=5 day 2). Cycles were repeated every 3 weeks. RESULTS: Sixty-two patients were randomized to GP and 58 to GC. A total of 533 cycles were delivered (264 GP, 269 GC), with a median of four cycles/patient. The objective response rate was 41.9% (95% C.I., 29.6-54.2%) for GP and 31.0% (95% C.I., 18.2-42.8%) for GC (P=0.29). No significant differences between arms were observed in median survival (10.4 months GP, 10.8 months GC) and median time to progression (5.4 months GP, 5.1 months GC). Both regimens were very well tolerated with no statistical differences between arms in grade 3/4 toxicities. When all toxicity grades were combined, emesis, neuropathy and renal toxicity occurred more frequently on the GP arm (P<0.005). CONCLUSIONS: GC arm did not provide a significant difference in response rate compared with GP arm, with better overall tolerability. Carboplatin could be a valid alternative to cisplatin in the palliative setting.