Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters











Language
Publication year range
1.
Urology ; 165: 218-226, 2022 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35351485

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the differences in prostate cancer characteristics and treatment between Hispanic Americans with different countries of origin using the National Cancer Database. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 54,947 adult Hispanic Americans diagnosed with prostate cancer between 2004 and 2015. Origin was Mexican (N = 7844; 14.3%), South/Central American (N = 4010; 7.3%), Puerto Rican (N = 2938; 5.4%), Cuban (N = 2549; 4.6%), Dominican (N = 1535; 2.8%), Hispanic not specified (N = 36,269; 65.7%). Comparison between characteristics among Hispanic American sub-groups' categories was performed using chi-square and Kruskal-Wallis tests for categorical and continuous variables respectively. RESULTS: Mexicans had overall worse disease at presentation including highest median PSA (7.8 ng/mL), most prevalent T3/T4 stage (6.7%), M1 stage (8.9%), and high-grade Gleason scores (24.0%) when compared to all other Hispanic American groups. Cubans were most likely to receive hormone therapy and radiation therapy and least likely to receive surgical treatment. Compared to Mexicans, Cubans (hazards ratio [HR] = 1.30, 95% confidence interval = [1.16-1.44]) had worse overall survival, while Puerto Ricans (HR = 1.08 [0.95-1.19] had similar overall survival, and Dominicans (HR = 0.63 [0 0.53-0.75]), South/Central Americans (HR = 0.75, [0.66-0.84]) and not specified (HR = 0.84 [0.79-0.91]) had better survival. CONCLUSION: Among Hispanic Americans with different countries of origin, disparities in prostate cancer characteristics, treatment choice, and survival do exist. Mexicans had the least favorable prostate cancer characteristics at presentation. Cubans had the worst overall survival while they were also most likely to receive hormone and/or radiation as first-line treatment. Our analysis demonstrates significant heterogeneity in the Hispanic American population.


Subject(s)
Hispanic or Latino , Prostatic Neoplasms , Adult , Hormones , Humans , Male , Prostatic Neoplasms/therapy , Puerto Rico/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , United States/epidemiology
2.
Am J Clin Pathol ; 156(5): 934-938, 2021 Oct 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33939794

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To the best of our knowledge, no study has analyzed the association between cigarette smoking and prostate basal cell proliferation. Therefore, we sought to evaluate whether smoking status is associated with the presence of basal cell hyperplasia (BCH). METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 8,196 men aged 50 to 75 years with prostate-specific antigen values between 2.5 µg/mL and 10 µg/mL and prior negative biopsy who were enrolled in the (REDUCE) trial. Cigarette smoking status was divided into current, former, or never categories at enrollment. The association between smoking and baseline BCH was evaluated, with logistic regression in univariable and multivariable analysis. RESULTS: A total of 1,233 (15.1%) men were current smokers, 3,206 (39.1%) were former smokers, and 3,575 (45.8%) were never smokers. In univariable analysis, current smoking was associated with higher baseline BCH occurrence compared with never (odds ratio [OR], 1.87; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.14-3.10) and former smokers (OR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.06-2.95). Similar results were found after adjusting for patient characteristics (current vs never smokers: OR, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.14-3.26; current vs former smokers: OR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.01-2.91). CONCLUSIONS: Among men undergoing prostate biopsy, all of whom had a negative biopsy result, current smoking at enrollment was independently associated with BCH in standard peripheral zone prostate biopsies.


Subject(s)
Cigarette Smoking/adverse effects , Prostatic Hyperplasia/pathology , Aged , Animals , Biopsy , Humans , Hyperplasia/etiology , Hyperplasia/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Prostate/pathology , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors
3.
Arab J Urol ; 17(2): 114-119, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31285922

ABSTRACT

Objectives: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies to assess the comparative prophylactic effectiveness of fosfomycin trometamol (FMT) vs ciprofloxacin (CIP) in men who underwent transrectal ultrasonography-guided prostate needle biopsy (TRUS-PNB), as infectious complications are a major concern after TRUS-PNB and although fluoroquinolones are currently the first choice, an increase in resistance has raised the question about its recommendation and FMT is a broad-spectrum oral antibiotic with low bacterial resistance. Methods: A systematic review was performed between January 1970 and June 2017 using the Web of Science, Scopus and PubMed databases to identify relevant studies. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis criteria were used for article selection. Outcomes of interest were febrile and afebrile urinary tract infections (UTIs) and the presence of fluoroquinolone-resisitant (FQR)- or extended-spectrum ß-lactamase (ESBL)-producing uropathogens in urinary cultures. Results: Four studies including 2331 men were analysed; 1088 had FMT and 1243 CIP as antibiotic prophylaxis before TRUS-PNB. FMT prophylaxis resulted in significantly less afebrile (odds ratio [OR] 0.21, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.12-0.38; P < 0.001) and febrile (OR 0.15, 95% CI 0.07-0.31; P < 0.001) UTIs than CIP. Amongst all urine cultures, patients in the FMT arm also had a significantly lower prevalence of FQR and ESBL (E. coli or K. pneumoniae) microorganisms when compared to the CIP group (OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.12-0.21, P = 0.001; and OR 0.24, 95% CI 0.10-0.58, P = 0.001, respectively). Conclusions: Antibiotic prophylaxis with FMT before TRUS-PNB was associated with lower rates of infectious complications when compared to CIP. Abbreviations: CIP: ciprofloxacin; ESBL: extended-spectrum ß-lactamase; FMT: fosfomycin trometamol; FQR: fluoroquinolone-resisitant; OR: odds ratio; PRISMA: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses; TRUS-PNB: TRUS-guided prostate needle biopsy.

4.
Int Braz J Urol ; 39(3): 312-8; discussion 319, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23849564

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: To analyze the association between serum levels of folate and risk of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy among men from the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital (SEARCH) database. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 135 subjects from the SEARCH database treated between 1991-2009 with available preoperative serum folate levels. Patients' characteristics at the time of the surgery were analyzed with ranksum and linear regression. Uni- and multivariable analyses of folate levels (log-transformed) and time to biochemical recurrence were performed with Cox proportional hazards. RESULTS: The median preoperative folate level was 11.6 ng/mL (reference = 1.5-20.0 ng/mL). Folate levels were significantly lower among African-American men than Caucasians (P = 0.003). In univariable analysis, higher folate levels were associated with more recent year of surgery (P < 0.001) and lower preoperative PSA (P = 0.003). In univariable analysis, there was a trend towards lower risk of biochemical recurrence among men with high folate levels (HR = 0.61, 95 %CI = 0.37-1.03, P = 0.064). After adjustments for patients characteristics' and pre- and post-operative clinical and pathological findings, higher serum levels of folate were independently associated with lower risk for biochemical recurrence (HR = 0.42, 95 %CI = 0.20-0.89, P = 0.023). CONCLUSION: In a cohort of men undergoing radical prostatectomy at several VAs across the country, higher serum folate levels were associated with lower PSA and lower risk for biochemical failure. While the source of the folate in the serum in this study is unknown (i.e. diet vs. supplement), these findings, if confirmed, suggest a potential role of folic acid supplementation or increased consumption of folate rich foods to reduce the risk of recurrence.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers, Tumor/blood , Folic Acid/blood , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/blood , Prostatectomy/methods , Prostatic Neoplasms/blood , Age Factors , Aged , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Period , Proportional Hazards Models , Prostate-Specific Antigen/blood , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome , United States
5.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 39(3): 312-319, May/June/2013. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-680088

ABSTRACT

Introduction To analyze the association between serum levels of folate and risk of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy among men from the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital (SEARCH) database. Materials and Methods Retrospective analysis of 135 subjects from the SEARCH database treated between 1991-2009 with available preoperative serum folate levels. Patients' characteristics at the time of the surgery were analyzed with ranksum and linear regression. Uni- and multivariable analyses of folate levels (log-transformed) and time to biochemical recurrence were performed with Cox proportional hazards. Results The median preoperative folate level was 11.6ng/mL (reference = 1.5-20.0ng/mL). Folate levels were significantly lower among African-American men than Caucasians (P = 0.003). In univariable analysis, higher folate levels were associated with more recent year of surgery (P < 0.001) and lower preoperative PSA (P = 0.003). In univariable analysis, there was a trend towards lower risk of biochemical recurrence among men with high folate levels (HR = 0.61, 95%CI = 0.37-1.03, P = 0.064). After adjustments for patients characteristics' and pre- and post-operative clinical and pathological findings, higher serum levels of folate were independently associated with lower risk for biochemical recurrence (HR = 0.42, 95%CI = 0.20-0.89, P = 0.023). Conclusion In a cohort of men undergoing radical prostatectomy at several VAs across the country, higher serum folate levels were associated with lower PSA and lower risk for biochemical failure. While the source of the folate in the serum in this study is unknown (i.e. diet vs. supplement), these findings, if confirmed, suggest a potential role of folic acid supplementation or increased consumption of folate rich foods to reduce the risk of recurrence. .


Subject(s)
Aged , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Folic Acid/blood , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/blood , Prostatectomy/methods , Prostatic Neoplasms/blood , Biomarkers, Tumor/blood , Age Factors , Postoperative Period , Proportional Hazards Models , Prostate-Specific Antigen/blood , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL