ABSTRACT
This retrospective cohort study found that implementing source-specific antibiotic order sets for sepsis in the emergency department increased appropriate empiric antibiotic selection from 51% to 74% (P = .01).
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Current practice for patients with suspected or confirmed upper gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) is to utilize a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) bolus followed by a continuous infusion for 72 hours. Literature has shown similar outcomes with intermittent bolus dosing compared to continuous infusion. Substitution would lead to reduced costs and utilization of resources. METHODS: This was a retrospective case-control study conducted via chart review. Utilizing electronic healthcare record reports, patients in the control arm were screened for inclusion if they received a pantoprazole continuous infusion from December 1, 2020, to March 31, 2021. A total of 38 patients were included in the control arm. Patients in the experimental arm were screened for inclusion with pantoprazole intermittent therapy from January 1, 2022, to June 30, 2022. A total of 60 patients were included in the experimental arm. The primary outcome was a 30-day GIB recurrence. Secondary outcomes included 30-day hospital readmission, 30-day Clostridioides difficile (C. difficile), hospital length of stay (LOS), and number of pantoprazole vials utilized. RESULTS: There was a 65% reduction in the 30-day GIB recurrence in the intermittent bolus arm compared to the continuous infusion arm. Thirty-day hospital readmission was 57% lower in the intermittent bolus arm compared to the continuous infusion arm. The LOS between the two arms was almost identical with the median being five days for the intermittent bolus arm and the median being four days for the continuous infusion arm. The 30-day C. difficile infection rate had 5% of patients acquiring C. difficile in the intermittent bolus arm and 2.5% in the continuous infusion arm. The intermittent bolus arm used 55% fewer pantoprazole vials than the continuous infusion arm. CONCLUSION: In hospitalized patients, the utilization of pantoprazole intermittent bolus is not only comparably efficacious but potentially represents a safer and economically advantageous alternative compared to the current guideline recommendation of a 72-hour pantoprazole continuous infusion. Further studies could provide more robust data to support our findings and challenge the current recommendation for patients who meet the indication criteria.
ABSTRACT
Background and objective Acquired hemophilia A (AHA) is an uncommon autoimmune bleeding disorder caused by the formation of neutralizing antibodies against endogenous factor VIII (FVIII). Delays between the onset of symptoms and the correct diagnosis of the condition lead to poor outcomes and a higher mortality rate. In this study, we aimed to analyze the impact of delays in diagnosis on AHA patients. Methods We conducted a retrospective study at a single hospital system between March 1, 2010, and January 17, 2017, which included six patients meeting the criteria for AHA diagnosis. Results Initial analysis revealed a median age of 79.5 years and a median time to diagnosis from the onset of bleeding of 14 days. Among the six patients, three had cancer (bladder, renal, and prostate) and three had unknown etiologies. One of the patients died prior to the initiation of a bypassing agent. The remaining five patients received recombinant FVIIa (NovoSeven®, Novo Nordisk, Bagsværd, Denmark), and two of those five required a second-line bypassing agent, recombinant porcine sequence FVIII (Obizur®, Takeda Pharmaceutical, Tokyo, Japan) for refractory bleeding. All five patients achieved hemostasis; however, three died within a year, and none of the patients survived for five years. Four of these five patients died directly from bleeding complications. Conclusions Based on our study findings and review of the literature, we propose an algorithm to potentially aid in the early diagnosis and treatment of AHA in emergency and non-specialized settings.
ABSTRACT
Interpatient variability in the safety and efficacy of oral anticoagulation with warfarin presents several challenges to clinicians, thus underscoring the emergent need for new orally available anticoagulants with predictable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles and ability to target circulating clotting factors. Seven compounds including rivaroxaban, apixaban, betrixaban, and eribaxaban are orally available direct inhibitors of activated factor X currently in development for the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism and for thromboprophylaxis in patients with atrial fibrillation or following an acute coronary syndrome. At doses used in phase 2 and 3 clinical trials, rivaroxaban and apixaban demonstrated a predictable onset of effect, maximal plasma concentration, and half-life that was unaffected by age, renal, or hepatic disease. In clinical trials for the treatment and prevention of venous thromboembolism, rivaroxaban and apixaban produced equivalent or superior reductions in the development or progression of venous thromboembolism compared with either low molecular weight heparin or warfarin. Trials comparing the efficacy of rivaroxaban or apixaban to standard therapy for stroke prophylaxis in patients with atrial fibrillation are in process. Rivaroxaban, the sentinel compound in this class, is already approved in the European Union and Canada. It is likely to be approved for use in the United States in 2010.
