Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 14 de 14
Filter
1.
Rev. esp. med. nucl. imagen mol. (Ed. impr.) ; 43(2): 84-90, Mar-Abr. 2024. tab, graf
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-231817

ABSTRACT

Objetivos: Evaluar el papel del radiofarmacéutico en un equipo multidisciplinar en la detección de contraindicaciones del regadenosón para su uso seguro en pacientes a los que se solicitó una SPECT de perfusión miocárdica. Métodos: Se estudió ambispectivamente su uso seguro en 1.905 pacientes (54,1% mujeres, edad media: 66,6±11,7 años, rango: 20-95años). Se registraron datos relativos al sexo, a la edad, al historial médico, a la medicación, a las alergias medicamentosas y a las contraindicaciones para el estrés farmacológico, así como las recomendaciones realizadas al médico nuclear responsable. Resultados: Las contraindicaciones detectadas y las correspondientes recomendaciones fueron las siguientes: riesgo de prolongación del intervalo QTc (7,5%): comprobación previa del intervalo QTc y monitorización del ECG; ictus o AIT previo (4,2%): evaluación de estenosis carotídea; alergia a salicilatos y/o sulfamidas (3,1%): empleo de [99mTc]Tc-MIBI; epilepsia o riesgo de convulsiones (2,4%): uso de adenosina o reconsiderar su indicación; tratamiento con corticosteroides sistémicos en EPOC severa (1,3%): reevaluar las condiciones del paciente; EPOC reagudizada (0,8%): posponer hasta la resolución del episodio agudo; asma grave (0,4%): no realizar la prueba; toma de metilxantinas (0,3%): evitar su consumo previo; otras (6,1%): evaluación de cada contraindicación. No se observaron contraindicaciones en el 73,6% de los pacientes. Se anularon el 2,9% de las peticiones debido a contraindicaciones absolutas. Conclusiones: Empleando una metodología de trabajo sistemática, el radiofarmacéutico detectó un elevado número de incidencias, presentando uno de cada cuatro pacientes alguna contraindicación clínica. Las recomendaciones emitidas fueron aceptadas por los médicos nucleares, que modificaron su enfoque, incrementando así la seguridad de estos pacientes.(AU)


Aim: To assess the radiopharmacist's role in a multidisciplinary team focused on the contraindications of regadenoson in order to ensure the safe use of pharmacologic vasodilator stress agents in patients undergoing SPECT-MPI. Methods: We ambispectively studied its safe use in 1905 patients (54.1% female, mean age: 66.6±11.7 years, range: 20-95years). Sex, age, medical history, medications, drug allergies, and contraindications for stress testing were registered together with recommendations for the nuclear physician in charge. Results: Detected contraindications and corresponding recommendations were as follows: risk factors for QTc interval prolongation 7.5% — measurement of QTc interval previously to test and monitor ECG; prior stroke or TIA 4.2% — consider carotid stenosis assessment; salicylates/sulfonamides allergy 3.1% — use 99mTc-sestamibi; epilepsy or risk factors for seizures 2.4% — use of adenosine or reconsider test indication; systemic corticosteroid therapy for severe COPD 1.3% — reassessment of patient's condition; acute exacerbation of COPD 0.8% — defer test until acute episode is over; severe asthma 0.4% — do not perform test; methylxanthine ingestion 0.3% — avoid consumption previously; other 6.1% — evaluation of other contraindications. No contraindications were detected in 73.6% of patients. The test was cancelled due to absolute contraindications in 2.9% of the requests. Conclusions: Working in a systematic way, the radiopharmacist was able to detect a high number of issues related to regadenoson, with one out of four patients presenting some clinical contraindication. The recommendations given by the radiopharmacist were well accepted by the nuclear physicians who changed their approach contributing to increase the safety of patients referred for MPI.(AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Patient Safety , Myocardial Perfusion Imaging/methods , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/chemically induced , Vasodilator Agents/adverse effects , Molecular Imaging , Nuclear Medicine , Retrospective Studies , Prospective Studies
2.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38184070

ABSTRACT

AIM: To assess the radiopharmacist's role in a multidisciplinary team focused on the contraindications of regadenoson in order to ensure the safe use of pharmacologic vasodilator stress agents in patients undergoing SPECT-MPI. METHODS: We ambispectively studied its safe use in 1905 patients (54.1% female, mean age: 66.6±11.7 years, range: 20-95 years). Sex, age, medical history, medications, drug allergies, and contraindications for stress testing were registered together with recommendations for the nuclear physician in charge. RESULTS: Detected contraindications and corresponding recommendations were as follows: risk factors for QTc interval prolongation 7.5% - measurement of QTc interval previously to test and monitor ECG; prior stroke or TIA 4.2% - consider carotid stenosis assessment; salicylates/sulfonamides allergy 3.1% - use 99mTc-sestamibi; epilepsy or risk factors for seizures 2.4% - use of adenosine or reconsider test indication; systemic corticosteroid therapy for severe COPD 1.3% - reassessment of patient's condition; acute exacerbation of COPD 0.8% - defer test until acute episode is over; severe asthma 0.4% - do not perform test; methylxanthine ingestion 0.3% - avoid consumption previously; other 6.1% - evaluation of other contraindications. No contraindications were detected in 73.6% of patients. The test was canceled due to absolute contraindications in 2.9% of the requests. CONCLUSIONS: Working in a systematic way, the radiopharmacist was able to detect a high number of issues related to regadenoson, with one out of four patients presenting some clinical contraindication. The recommendations given by the radiopharmacist were well accepted by the nuclear physicians who changed their approach contributing to increase the safety of patients referred for MPI.


Subject(s)
Myocardial Perfusion Imaging , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive , Humans , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Male , Vasodilator Agents/adverse effects , Myocardial Perfusion Imaging/methods , Patient Safety , Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon/methods , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/chemically induced
3.
Rev. esp. med. nucl. imagen mol. (Ed. impr.) ; 42(4): 218-222, jul.- ago. 2023. ilus, tab
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-223277

ABSTRACT

Objetivo Analizar la muestra de pacientes embarazadas a las que se les realizó una gammagrafía de perfusión pulmonar para descartar la sospecha de tromboembolismo pulmonar (TEP) durante el ingreso en nuestro centro por infección aguda por COVID-19. Material y métodos A todas las pacientes (n=5) se les realizó una gammagrafía SPECT con dosis reducida (111MBq) de 99mTc-macroagregados de albúmina. Las imágenes obtenidas se interpretaron comparando los hallazgos con la imagen radiológica según criterios PISAPED. Resultados De las 5 pacientes, tan solo en una se diagnosticó TEP. En 2 pacientes los hallazgos patológicos de la gammagrafía fueron atribuibles a alteraciones radiológicas por neumonía COVID-19, y otras 2 mostraron una perfusión pulmonar normal. Conclusión Dado lo inespecífico de las manifestaciones clínicas y los valores del dímero D dentro de la COVID-19, así como su similitud con los de TEP, la gammagrafía de perfusión pulmonar, por su alta sensibilidad y menor irradiación que la TC, tiene un papel crucial en el despistaje de TEP en estas pacientes. Los resultados obtenidos son de especial relevancia, a pesar del número limitado de pacientes, dada la ausencia de publicaciones científicas en este grupo de pacientes dentro de la situación excepcional por la pandemia de COVID-19 (AU)


Aim To analyze the sample of pregnant patients who underwent pulmonary perfusion scintigraphy to rule out the pulmonary embolism (PE) suspicion during the acute COVID-19 infection hospitalization period in our hospital. Material and methods SPECT scintigraphy with a reduced dose (111MBq) of 99mTc-macroaggregated albumin was performed in all of the patients (n=5). The obtained images were interpreted by comparing the findings with the radiological images according to the PISAPED criteria. Results Only one of the 5 patients was diagnosed with PE. Two patients obtained pathological findings of the scintigraphy attributable to radiological alterations due to COVID-19 pneumonia, and the other 2 had normal pulmonary perfussion. Conclusion Given the non-specific features of the clinical manifestations and D-dimer values in COVID-19, as well as their similarity to those of PE, the pulmonary perfusion scintigraphy plays a crucial role in the screening of PE in these patients due to its high sensitivity and lower irradiation compared to CT. Despite the limited number of patients, the results obtained have special relevance related to the absence of scientific publications on this group of patients within the context of COVID-19 pandemic exceptional situation (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Young Adult , Adult , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/diagnostic imaging , Pulmonary Embolism/diagnostic imaging , Pulmonary Embolism/virology , Coronavirus Infections/complications , Sensitivity and Specificity , Radionuclide Imaging
6.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36758829

ABSTRACT

AIM: To analyze a sample of pregnant patients who underwent pulmonary perfusion scintigraphy to rule out suspicion of pulmonary embolism (PE) during the acute COVID-19 infection hospitalization period in our hospital. MATERIAL AND METHODS: SPECT scintigraphy with a reduced dose (111MBq) of 99mTc-macroaggregated albumin was performed in all the patients (n=5). The images obtained were interpreted by comparing the findings with the radiological images according to the PISAPED criteria. RESULTS: Only one of the 5 patients was diagnosed with PE. Two patients showed pathological scintigraphy findings attributable to radiological alterations due to COVID-19 pneumonia, and the other two had normal pulmonary perfusion. CONCLUSION: Given the non-specific features of the clinical manifestations and d-dimer values ​​in COVID-19, as well as their similarity to those of PE, pulmonary perfusion scintigraphy plays a crucial role in the screening of PE in these patients due to its high sensitivity and lower irradiation compared to CT. Despite the limited number of patients, the results obtained have special relevance due to the absence of scientific publications in this group of patients within the exceptional context of the COVID-19 pandemic.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pulmonary Embolism , Pregnancy , Humans , Female , Pregnant Women , Pandemics , COVID-19/complications , SARS-CoV-2 , Pulmonary Embolism/diagnostic imaging
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...