ABSTRACT
Traumatic injuries of the limbs are very common and account for a large number of imaging examinations, especially in emergency departments. These injuries can often be resolved if they are recognized and treated appropriately. Their diagnosis requires a complete clinical assessment and the correct interpretation of the appropriate imaging tests. Radiologists play an important role, especially in diagnosing lesions that can go undetected. To this end, radiologists need to know the normal anatomy and its variants, the mechanisms of injury, and the indications for different imaging tests, among which plain-film X-rays are the main technique for the initial evaluation. This article aims to review the relevant characteristics of limb fractures in adults and of lesions that can be associated with these fractures, as well as how to describe them to ensure appropriate clinical management.
Subject(s)
Fractures, Bone , Humans , Fractures, Bone/diagnostic imaging , Radiography , Emergency Service, HospitalABSTRACT
En la actualidad, el número de tomografías computarizadas realizadas en el ámbito de las urgencias ha aumentado sustancialmente, y con ello la controversia sobre si realmente es útil el contraste oral positivo en todos los pacientes. La gran calidad de imagen que ofrecen los equipos de tomografía computarizada multidetector, el incremento de la grasa intraabdominal (como elemento natural de contraste para separar las asas intestinales) relacionado con el aumento de la tasa de obesidad poblacional, así como los potenciales inconvenientes que asocia el contraste oral de alta densidad son argumentos que cuestionan su uso generalizado. El propósito de este artículo es valorar el efecto de omitir el uso de este contraste oral para las TC requeridas en la urgencia por sospecha de patología abdominal aguda a partir de una búsqueda eficiente en las publicaciones recientes
The number of computed tomography studies done in emergency departments has increased substantially, and with this increase the controversy about whether positive oral contrast agents are necessary in all patients has also grown. The great image quality provided by multidetector computed tomography scanners, the increase in intraabdominal fat (as a natural element that provides contrast for separating the bowel loops) related with the increased prevalence of obesity in the population, and the potential drawbacks associated with the use of high-density oral contrast agents argue against the generalized us of these agents. This article aims to evaluate the effects of omitting the use of this type of oral contrast material for computed tomography examinations required in the emergency department for suspicion of acute abdominal pathology through an efficient literature search among recent publications
Subject(s)
Humans , Abdomen, Acute/diagnostic imaging , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Contrast Media/administration & dosage , Appendicitis/diagnostic imaging , Administration, Oral , Surgical Wound Dehiscence/diagnostic imagingABSTRACT
The number of computed tomography studies done in emergency departments has increased substantially, and with this increase the controversy about whether positive oral contrast agents are necessary in all patients has also grown. The great image quality provided by multidetector computed tomography scanners, the increase in intraabdominal fat (as a natural element that provides contrast for separating the bowel loops) related with the increased prevalence of obesity in the population, and the potential drawbacks associated with the use of high-density oral contrast agents argue against the generalized us of these agents. This article aims to evaluate the effects of omitting the use of this type of oral contrast material for computed tomography examinations required in the emergency department for suspicion of acute abdominal pathology through an efficient literature search among recent publications.
Subject(s)
Abdomen, Acute/diagnostic imaging , Contrast Media/administration & dosage , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Abdominal Pain/diagnostic imaging , Acute Disease , Administration, Oral , Appendicitis/diagnostic imaging , Emergency Service, Hospital , Humans , Injections, Intravenous , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity , Unnecessary ProceduresABSTRACT
No disponible