Prospective, Multicenter Study of 5-Fluorouracil Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Treated in Routine Clinical Practice.

BACKGROUND: Studies have demonstrated that body surface area-based dosing of chemotherapy drugs leads to significant individual exposure variability, with a substantial risk of under- or overdosing. The present study was initiated to validate the use of therapeutic drug management (TDM) to personalize 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) dosing in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated in routine clinical practice. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 75 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer from 8 German medical centers received ≤ 6 administrations of infusional 5-FU according to the AIO (folinate, 5-FU; n = 16), FOLFOX6 (leucovorin calcium [folinic acid], 5-FU, and oxaliplatin; n = 26), or FUFOX (oxaliplatin plus 5-FU/folinic acid; n = 33) regimen. Initial infusional 5-FU dosing for all patients was determined by the BSA. Individual 5-FU exposure (area under the curve [AUC]) was measured using an immunoassay of a blood sample taken during each infusion. To achieve a target AUC of 20 to 30 mg × h/L, subsequent infusional 5-FU doses were adjusted according to the previous cycle's 5-FU AUC. The primary objective was to confirm that TDM of infusional 5-FU resulted in an increased proportion of patients in the target AUC range at the fourth versus the first administration. The secondary objective was to determine whether 5-FU TDM reduced the treatment-related toxicities compared with the historical data. RESULTS: The average 5-FU AUC at the first administration was 18 ± 6 mg × h/L, with 64%, 33%, and 3% of the patients below, within, or above the target AUC range, respectively. By the fourth administration, the average 5-FU AUC was 25 ± 7 mg × h/L (P < .001), with 54% of patients within the target 5-FU AUC range (P = .0294). The incidence of 5-FU-related grade 3 and 4 diarrhea (4.6%), nausea (3.4%), fatigue (0.0%), and mucositis (0.2%) was reduced compared with the historical data, despite 55% of the patients receiving increased doses. CONCLUSION: Personalization of 5-FU dosing using TDM in routine clinical practice resulted in significantly improved 5-FU exposure and suggested a lower incidence of 5-FU-related toxicities.

FOLFIRI and sunitinib as first-line treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer patients with liver metastases--a CESAR phase II study including pharmacokinetic, biomarker, and imaging data.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was the evaluation of pharmacokinetic parameters, biomarkers, clinical outcome, and imaging parameters in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients treated with FOLFIRI plus sunitinib. METHODS: mCRC patients with liver metastases were treated with FOLFIRI and sunitinib as 1st line therapy. At protocol-defined time points, multicontrast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)measurements, computed tomography (CT) scans, pharmacokinetics (PK), and biomarker analyses were performed during the first and second treatment cycle. Thereafter, patients were treated until tumor progression, investigator’s decision due to toxicity, or patient withdrawal. RESULTS: 28 patients were screened, 26 were included, and 23 received at least one study medication. Full safety analysis was performed in 23 patients. Full PK and biomarker analyses were performed in 21 patients. Strong responses in tumor size reduction forced a change from the original imaging timing scheme. This unforeseen change in the timing scheme resulted in subgroups too small for meaningful statistical analysis of most imaging parameters. Thus, only a descriptive analysis of the MRI data was possible. In 21/22 patients, MRI showeda decrease of the liver metastases. Best response was partial remission (PR) in 8/17 patients. Plasma concentrations of sVEGFR-2 and sVEGFR-3 decreased in all patients. The majority of the patients developed some kind of toxicity not always deducible to FOLFIRI or sunitinib. CONCLUSIONS: Due to the observed side effect profile, FOLFIRI plus sunitinib 37.5 mg per day cannot be recommended for previously untreated mCRC.

Evaluation of a pharmacology-driven dosing algorithm of 3-weekly paclitaxel using therapeutic drug monitoring: a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic simulation study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Severe neutropenia is the most frequent and important toxicity of 3-weekly paclitaxel and puts patients at substantial risk of infectious complications. It is well known that the time during which paclitaxel plasma concentrations exceed 0.05 µmol/L (T(C>0.05)) correlates with the extent of neutropenia. This study was initiated to develop a dosing algorithm that would be able to reduce severe neutropenia by targeting an individual paclitaxel T(C>0.05) between 26 and 31 hours, and could be validated in a prospective randomized trial by comparing it to conventional dosing of paclitaxel. METHODS: Paclitaxel plasma concentration-time (n = 273) and absolute neutrophil count (ANC) data (152 of the 273 patients) were pooled from two previous studies and submitted to population pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modelling using nonlinear mixed-effects modelling software NONMEM® version VII. To fit the data, we used a previously described 3-compartment model with saturable elimination and distribution, coupled to a semiphysiological model with a linear function to describe the myelotoxic effect of paclitaxel (E(paclitaxel)) on circulating neutrophils (neutropenia). Patient age, sex, body surface area (BSA), bilirubin and renal function were tested as potential covariates on the maximum elimination capacity of paclitaxel (VM(EL)). Limited sampling strategies were tested on the pharmacokinetic model for their accuracy to predict paclitaxel T(C>0.05). Subsequently, we proposed a first-cycle dosing algorithm that accounted for BSA, patient age and sex, while later cycles accounted for the previous-cycle paclitaxel T(C>0.05) (target: 26 to 31 hours) and ANC nadir to adapt the paclitaxel dose for the next treatment cycle. To test the adequacy of the proposed dosing algorithm, we used extensive data simulations on the final pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model, generating datasets of 1000 patients for six subsequent treatment cycles. Grade 4 neutropenia was tested as a potential endpoint for a prospective clinical trial and simulated for two scenarios, i.e. conventional dosing of paclitaxel 200 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks, and personalized, pharmacology-driven dosing as outlined above. RESULTS: Concentration-time data for paclitaxel were adequately described by the 3-compartment model. Also, individual ANC counts were adequately described by the semiphysiological model using a linear function to describe E(paclitaxel) on neutropenia. Patient age, sex, bilirubin and BSA were significant and independent covariates on the elimination of paclitaxel. Paclitaxel VM(EL) was 16% higher in males than in female patients, and a 10-year increase in age led to a 13% decrease in VM(EL). A single paclitaxel plasma concentration 24 hours after the start of infusion was adequate to predict paclitaxel T(C>0.05) (root squared mean error [RSME] = +0.5%), and the addition of an end-of-infusion sample did not further improve precision (RSME = -0.6%). Data simulations on the final pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model and using the proposed dosing algorithm resulted in a first-cycle paclitaxel dose ranging from 150 to 185 mg/m(2) for women and from 165 to 200 mg/m(2) for men. Dose adaptations for cycles two to six ranged from -40% to +30%, with a final median paclitaxel dose of 167 mg/m(2) (range 76 to 311 mg/m(2)). When compared with conventional dosing (paclitaxel 200 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks), personalized dosing reduced grade 4 neutropenia in cycle one from 15% to 7%, and further to 4% in cycle 2. CONCLUSION: This study proposes a pharmacology-driven dosing algorithm of 3-weekly paclitaxel to reduce the incidence of grade 4 neutropenia. A randomized clinical trial comparing this dosing algorithm with conventional BSA-based dosing of paclitaxel in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer is currently ongoing.

Activation of protein C following infusion of protein C concentrate in children with severe meningococcal sepsis and purpura fulminans: a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, dose-finding study.

BACKGROUND: Meningococcal septic shock in children results in high mortality and morbidity, and decreased protein C levels in these patients are associated with a poor outcome. We carried out a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study by supplying protein C concentrate. This phase 2 study was designed to assess the activation process of protein C and to study the dosing regimen of protein C concentrate in children with purpura fulminans and meningococcal septic shock in the perspective of a possible phase 3 trial. METHODS: Forty children were randomized to receive placebo or protein C concentrate (200 IU/kg, 400 IU/kg, or 600 IU/kg), for a maximum of 7 days. Clinical and laboratory data, including plasma levels of protein C and activated protein C (APC), were collected at various time points. All patients received standard therapy for septic shock, including antibiotics, inotropic/vasoactive drugs, and blood products. RESULTS: Increased APC levels relative to baseline were observed for the 27 of 28 patients treated with protein C concentrate, and the areas under the curve of protein C and APC were correlated with the dosage of protein C concentrate administered. Activation of coagulation, as evidenced by d-dimer levels, as well as the ratio of thrombin vs. APC normalized significantly faster with increasing dosages of protein C concentrate. No adverse reactions related to protein C concentrate were observed. Nine of the 40 (23%) patients died, and five survivors required amputations, with no differences in these rates among the randomized groups. Baseline APC levels were positively correlated with sequential organ failure assessment and pediatric risk of mortality scores and with d-dimers, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, interleukin-1, interleukin-6, interleukin-8, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1, TAT complexes, and PAP complexes. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with protein C concentrate is safe in children with purpura fulminans and meningococcal septic shock and leads to dose-related increases of plasma APC and resolution of coagulation imbalances.