Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Am J Infect Control ; 52(6): 712-718, 2024 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38181901

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: During the COVID-19 pandemic, health service practices underwent significant changes, impacting the occurrence of health care-associated infections (HAIs). This study presents the epidemiology of bacterial infections and compares clinical data on nosocomial infections in hospitalized patients before and during the pandemic. METHODS: A unicentric, observational, retrospective cohort study was conducted with descriptive analyses on the microorganism identification and resistance profile. Patient's clinical data who had hospital-acquired infection (HAI), during their hospitalization in a tertiary hospital before and during the COVID-19 pandemic was compared by descriptive and inferential analyses. RESULTS: A total of 1,581 bacteria were isolated from 1,183 hospitalized patients. Among patients coinfected with COVID-19, there was a statistically significant increase in HAI-related deaths (P < .001) and HAI caused by multidrug-resistant organisms (P < .001), mainly by Acinetobacter baumannii and Staphylococcus aureus. A higher odds ratio of HAI-related deaths compared to the prepandemic period was observed (odds ratio 6.98 [95% confidence interval 3.97-12.64]). CONCLUSIONS: The higher incidence of multidrug-resistant bacteria and increased deaths due to HAI, especially in patients with COVID-19 coinfection, might be related to various factors such as increased workload, broad-spectrum antibiotic use, and limited resources. The pandemic has changed the profile of circulating bacteria and antimicrobial resistance. Prevention strategies should be considered to reduce the impact of these infections.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Cross Infection , Tertiary Care Centers , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , Tertiary Care Centers/statistics & numerical data , Male , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Cross Infection/microbiology , Retrospective Studies , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , SARS-CoV-2 , Adult , Aged, 80 and over , Bacterial Infections/epidemiology , Bacterial Infections/microbiology , Bacteria/isolation & purification , Bacteria/classification , Bacteria/drug effects , Pandemics , Cohort Studies , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data
2.
PLoS One ; 18(12): e0291701, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38064470

ABSTRACT

Since the first case of COVID-19, Brazil has undergone infection waves with distinct characteristics. The description of new variants has alerted the emergence of more contagious or virulent viruses. The variant of concern Gamma emerged in Brazil and caused an epidemic wave, but its spread outside the country was limited. We report the clinical-epidemiological profile of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 by comparing two periods. A retrospective cohort study was performed. The primary outcome was to assess individuals with COVID-19 admitted in wards and intensive care units at the academic hospital of the Federal University of Parana (CHC-UFPR) between March 2020 and July 2021, correlating demographic, clinical-epidemiologic, and survival data with the most prevalent viral variant found in each period. We used Kaplan-Meier analysis to estimate the probability of survival and ROC curves to evaluate laboratory tests to find a cutoff point for poor outcomes. Data from 2,887 individuals were analyzed, 1,495 and 1,392 from the first and second periods, respectively. Hospitalization predominated among males in both periods, and the median age was significantly lower in the second one. The frequency of comorbidities was similar. Various demographic factors, clinical assessments, and laboratory tests were examined in relation to greater severity. When comparing the two periods, we observed predominance of the Wild virus during the first wave and the Gamma variant during the second, with no significant difference in outcomes. The findings suggest that despite the association of many factors with increased severity, the temporal variation between the two periods did not result in a notable divergence in the measured outcomes. The COVID-19 pandemic has lasted for a long time, with periods marked by peaks of cases, often caused by the emergence of viral variants, resulting in higher infection rates and rapid dissemination but, for variant Gamma, no apparent greater virulence.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Patient Admission , Humans , Male , Brazil/epidemiology , COVID-19/epidemiology , Pandemics , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Tertiary Care Centers , Female
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL