Bevacizumab, Irinotecan, or Topotecan Added to Temozolomide for Children With Relapsed and Refractory Neuroblastoma: Results of the ITCC-SIOPEN BEACON-Neuroblastoma Trial.

PURPOSE: Outcomes for children with relapsed and refractory high-risk neuroblastoma (RR-HRNB) remain dismal. The BEACON Neuroblastoma trial (EudraCT 2012-000072-42) evaluated three backbone chemotherapy regimens and the addition of the antiangiogenic agent bevacizumab (B). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients age 1-21 years with RR-HRNB with adequate organ function and performance status were randomly assigned in a 3 × 2 factorial design to temozolomide (T), irinotecan-temozolomide (IT), or topotecan-temozolomide (TTo) with or without B. The primary end point was best overall response (complete or partial) rate (ORR) during the first six courses, by RECIST or International Neuroblastoma Response Criteria for patients with measurable or evaluable disease, respectively. Safety, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) time were secondary end points. RESULTS: One hundred sixty patients with RR-HRNB were included. For B random assignment (n = 160), the ORR was 26% (95% CI, 17 to 37) with B and 18% (95% CI, 10 to 28) without B (risk ratio [RR], 1.52 [95% CI, 0.83 to 2.77]; P = .17). Adjusted hazard ratio for PFS and OS were 0.89 (95% CI, 0.63 to 1.27) and 1.01 (95% CI, 0.70 to 1.45), respectively. For irinotecan ([I]; n = 121) and topotecan (n = 60) random assignments, RRs for ORR were 0.94 and 1.22, respectively. A potential interaction between I and B was identified. For patients in the bevacizumab-irinotecan-temozolomide (BIT) arm, the ORR was 23% (95% CI, 10 to 42), and the 1-year PFS estimate was 0.67 (95% CI, 0.47 to 0.80). CONCLUSION: The addition of B met protocol-defined success criteria for ORR and appeared to improve PFS. Within this phase II trial, BIT showed signals of antitumor activity with acceptable tolerability. Future trials will confirm these results in the chemoimmunotherapy era.

Comparison of two chemotherapy regimens in patients with newly diagnosed Ewing sarcoma (EE2012): an open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: Internationally, a single standard chemotherapy treatment for Ewing sarcoma is not defined. Because different chemotherapy regimens were standard in Europe and the USA for newly diagnosed Ewing sarcoma, and in the absence of novel agents to investigate, we aimed to compare these two strategies. METHODS: EURO EWING 2012 was a European investigator-initiated, open-label, randomised, controlled phase 3 trial done in 10 countries. We included patients aged 2-49 years, with any histologically and genetically confirmed Ewing sarcoma of bone or soft tissue, or Ewing-like sarcomas. The eligibility criteria originally excluded patients with extrapulmonary metastatic disease, but this was amended in the protocol (version 3.0) in September, 2016. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to either the European regimen of vincristine, ifosfamide, doxorubicin, and etoposide induction, and consolidation using vincristine, actinomycin D, with ifosfamide or cyclophosphamide, or busulfan and melphalan (group 1); or the US regimen of vincristine, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, ifosfamide, and etoposide induction, plus ifosfamide and etoposide, and consolidation using vincristine and cyclophosphamide, or vincristine, actinomycin D, and ifosfamide, with busulfan and melphalan (group 2). All drugs were administered intravenously. The primary outcome measure was event-free survival. We used a Bayesian approach for the design, analysis, and interpretation of the results. Patients who received at least one dose of study treatment were considered in the safety analysis. The trial was registered with EudraCT, 2012-002107-17, and ISRCTN, 54540667. FINDINGS: Between March 21, 2014, and May 1, 2019, 640 patients were entered into EE2012, 320 (50%) randomly allocated to each group. Median follow-up of surviving patients was 47 months (range 0-84). Event-free survival at 3 years was 61% with group 1 and 67% with group 2 (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0·71 [95% credible interval 0·55-0·92 in favour of group 1). The probability that the true HR was less than 1·0 was greater than 0·99. Febrile neutropenia as a grade 3-5 treatment toxicity occurred in 234 (74%) patients in group 1 and in 183 (58%) patients in group 2. More patients in group 1 (n=205 [64%]) required at least one platelet transfusion compared with those in group 2 (n=138 [43%]). Conversely, more patients required blood transfusions in group 2 (n=286 [89%]) than in group 1 (n=277 [87%]). INTERPRETATION: Dose-intensive chemotherapy with vincristine, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, ifosfamide, and etoposide is more effective, less toxic, and shorter in duration for all stages of newly diagnosed Ewing sarcoma than vincristine, ifosfamide, doxorubicin, and etoposide induction and should now be the standard of care for Ewing sarcoma. FUNDING: The European Union's Seventh Framework Programme for Research, Technological Development, and Demonstration; The National Coordinating Centre in France, Centre Léon Bérard; SFCE; Ligue contre le cancer; Cancer Research UK.

Comparative analysis of the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with Wilms tumor in the United Kingdom and Japan.

BACKGROUND: Wilms tumor (WT) demonstrates epidemiological differences by world region and ethnicity. To enhance understanding of these differences, we retrospectively analyzed clinical trial data sets from the UK and Japan over a 20-year period. PROCEDURE: We used data from three consecutive clinical trials in the UK and a single study in Japan that enrolled patients diagnosed during 1996-2015, to compare clinical characteristics and outcomes between countries. RESULTS: During 1996-2015, 1395 patients in the UK and 537 in Japan were included. Japanese patients have a significantly younger median age at diagnosis than those in the UK (28 months vs 39 months). The proportion of patients with stage IV, large tumors, and anaplastic histology appears to be higher in the UK than in Japan (18% vs 11%, 62% vs 49%, 8% vs 3%, respectively). During 2005-2015, 77 hospitals treated WT in Japan compared with only 20 hospitals in the UK. Five-year overall survival of patients with WT was over 90% in both countries, but five-year event-free survival of patients with stage IV was significantly lower in Japan than in the UK (50.0% vs 76.2%, P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Differences in age of onset, tumor size at diagnosis, and histology may reflect differences in the genetic background of patients with WT between countries, but population-based phenotype-genotype data are lacking. The difference in survival probability for stage IV patients may be due to different diagnostic criteria or different treatment strategies. Prospective, international clinical studies including genomic analyses are needed to confirm these findings and improve clinical practice.

The prognostic strength of serum LDH and serum ferritin in children with neuroblastoma: A report from the International Neuroblastoma Risk Group (INRG) project.

PURPOSE: Age, MYCN status, stage, and histology have been used as neuroblastoma (NB) risk factors for decades. Serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and serum ferritin are reproducible, easily obtained, and prognostic, though never used in risk stratification, except one German trial. We analyzed the prognostic strength of LDH and ferritin, overall, within high-risk NB, and by era, using the International Neuroblastoma Risk Group Data Commons. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Children with NB (1990-2016) were categorized into LDH (n = 8867) and ferritin (n = 8575) risk groups using EFS. Cox models compared the prognostic strength of LDH and ferritin to age, MYCN status, and INSS stage. RESULTS: Higher LDH conferred worse EFS, overall (5-year EFS) (100-899 IU/L: 76 ± 0.6%; 0-99 or 900-1399 IU/L: 60 ± 1.2%; ≥1400 IU/L: 36 ± 1.2%; P < .0001), and in high-risk NB post-2009 (3-year EFS) (117-381 IU/L: 67 ± 8.9%; 382-1334 IU/L: 58 ± 4.4%; 0-116 or ≥1335 IU/L: 46 ± 3.9%; P = .003). Higher ferritin conferred worse EFS, overall (5-year EFS) (1-29 ng/mL: 87 ± 0.9%; 0 or 30-89 ng/mL: 74 ± 0.8%; ≥90 ng/mL: 48 ± 0.9%; P < .0001), and in high-risk NB post-2009 (3-year EFS) (1-53 ng/mL: 71 ± 9.3%; 0 or 54-354 ng/mL: 55 ± 4.7%; ≥355 ng/mL: 34 ± 6.1%; P = .0008). In multivariable analyses adjusting for age, MYCN, and stage, LDH and ferritin maintained independent prognostic ability (P < .0001; adjusted HRs (95% CI): 1.7 (1.5-1.9), 2.3 (2.0-2.7), respectively). CONCLUSIONS: LDH and ferritin are strongly prognostic in NB, overall and within high-risk NB patients treated post-2009 with modern therapy. LDH and ferritin show promise for (a) identifying ultra-high-risk; (b) refining risk stratification; and (c) clinical utility in low-/middle-income countries. Routine collection of LDH and ferritin should be reinitiated for evolving NB risk stratification.

A phase IIa trial of molecular radiotherapy with 177-lutetium DOTATATE in children with primary refractory or relapsed high-risk neuroblastoma.

PURPOSE: The objective of this phase IIa, open-label, single-centre, single-arm, two-stage clinical trial was to evaluate the safety and activity of 177-lutetium DOTATATE (LuDO) molecular radiotherapy in neuroblastoma. METHODS: Children with relapsed or refractory metastatic high-risk neuroblastoma were treated with up to four courses of LuDO. The administered activity was 75 to 100 MBq kg-1 per course, spaced at 8- to 12-week intervals. Outcomes were assessed by the International Neuroblastoma Response Criteria (primary outcome), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: The trial recruited 21 patients; eight received the planned four courses. There was dose-limiting haematologic toxicity in one case, but no other significant haematologic or renal toxicities. None of 14 evaluable patients had an objective response at 1 month after completion of treatment (Wilson 90% CI 0.0, 0.16; and 95% CI is 0.0, 0.22). The trial did not therefore proceed to the second stage. The median PFS was 2.96 months (95% CI 1.71, 7.66), and the median OS was 13.0 months (95% CI 2.99, 21.52). CONCLUSION: In the absence of any objective responses, the use of LuDO as a single agent at the dose schedule used in this study is not recommended for the treatment of neuroblastoma. There are several reasons why this treatment schedule may not have resulted in objective responses, and as other studies do show benefit, the treatment should not be regarded as being of no value. Further trials designed to overcome this schedule's limitations are required. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN98918118; URL: https://www.isrctn.com/search?q=98918118.

International randomised controlled trial for the treatment of newly diagnosed EWING sarcoma family of tumours - EURO EWING 2012 Protocol.

BACKGROUND: Although there have been multiple randomised trials in newly diagnosed Ewing sarcoma family of tumours (ESFT) and these have been conducted over many years and involved many international cooperative groups, the outcomes for all stages of disease have plateaued. Internationally, the standard treatment of ESFT is not defined, and there is a need to add new agents other than conventional chemotherapy to improve outcomes. This trial will compare two different induction/consolidation chemotherapy regimens: (1) vincristine, ifosfamide, doxorubicin and etoposide (VIDE) induction and vincristine, actinomycin D, ifosfamide or cyclophosphamide, or busulfan and mephalan (VAI/VAC/BuMel) consolidation and (2) vincristine, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, ifosfamide and etoposide (VDC/IE) induction and ifosfamide and etoposide, vincristine and cyclophosphamide, vincristine, actinomycin D and ifosfamide, or busulfan and mephalan (IE/VC/VAI/BuMel) consolidation (randomisation 1, or R1). A second randomisation (R2) will determine whether the addition of zoledronic acid to consolidation chemotherapy, as assigned at R1, is associated with improved clinical outcome. METHODS: EURO EWING 2012 is an international, multicentre, phase III, open-label randomised controlled trial. There are two randomisations: R1 and R2. Patients are randomly assigned at two different time points: at entry to the trial (R1) and following local control therapy (R2). The primary outcome measure is event-free survival. The secondary outcome measures include overall survival, adverse events and toxicity, histological response of the primary tumour, response of the primary tumour, regional lymph nodes or metastases (or both), and achievement of local control at the end of treatment. DISCUSSION: This study will establish which is the "standard regimen" of chemotherapy, taking into account both clinical outcomes and toxicity. This will form the chemotherapy backbone for future interventional studies where we may want to add new targeted agents. It will also determine the role of zoledronic acid in conjunction with the separate EE2008 trial. Any trial in ESFT needs to take into account the rarity of the tumour and consider that international cooperation is needed to provide answers in a timely manner. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered with EudraCT number 2012-002107-17 on 26 February 2012. Registered with ISRCTN number 54540667 on 4 November 2013.

High cutoff versus high-flux haemodialysis for myeloma cast nephropathy in patients receiving bortezomib-based chemotherapy (EuLITE): a phase 2 randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: In multiple myeloma, severe acute kidney injury due to myeloma cast nephropathy is caused by pathogenic free light chain immunoglobulin in serum. High cutoff haemodialysis (HCO-HD) can remove large quantities of free light chain immunoglobulin from serum, but its effect on clinical outcomes is uncertain. We therefore aimed to assess whether HCO-HD could increase the frequency of renal recovery in patients with de novo multiple myeloma, severe acute kidney injury, and myeloma cast nephropathy relative to treatment with standard high-flux haemodialysis (HF-HD). METHODS: In this open-label, phase 2, multicentre, randomised controlled trial (EuLITE), we recruited patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, biopsy-confirmed cast nephropathy, and acute kidney injury that required dialysis from renal services in 16 hospitals in the UK and Germany. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) by random number generation to receive intensive HCO-HD (in sessions lasting 6-8 h) or standard HF-HD and they were stratified by age and centre. Patients and the medical staff treating them were not masked to treatment allocation. Patients received bortezomib, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone chemotherapy, and were then followed up for 2 years. The primary outcome was independence from dialysis at 90 days after random allocation to groups, which was assessed in an intention-to-treat population. The trial has completed follow-up, and is registered at the ISRCTN registry, number ISRCTN45967602. FINDINGS: Between June 7, 2008, and Sept 18, 2013, we recruited 90 patients, of whom 43 (48%) were randomly assigned to receive HCO-HD and 47 (52%) were randomly assigned to receive HF-HD. All 90 patients were included in the analysis of the primary outcome. One (2%) patient from the HF-HD group withdrew consent before receiving treatment. During treatment, nine (21%) patients from the HCO-HD group and two (4%) patients in the HF-HD group discontinued trial treatment. After 90 days, 24 (56%) patients in the HCO-HD group and 24 (51%) patients in the HF-HD group were independent from dialysis (relative risk 1·09, 95% CI 0·74-1·61; p=0·81). During the 2-year follow-up, 98 serious adverse events were reported in the HCO-HD group and 82 serious adverse events were reported in the HF-HD group. The most common serious adverse events were infections and adverse events related to the cardiovascular and thrombotic and musculoskeletal systems. During the first 90 days, 26 infections were reported in the HCO-HD group and 13 infections were reported in the HF-HD group, including 14 lung infections in the HCO-HD group and three lung infections in the HF-HD group. INTERPRETATION: In this phase 2 study, HCO-HD did not improve clinical outcomes for patients with de novo multiple myeloma and myeloma cast nephropathy who required haemodialysis for acute kidney injury and who received a bortezomib-based chemotherapy regimen relative to those receiving HF-HD. These results do not support proceeding to a phase 3 study for HCO-HD in these patients. FUNDING: Gambro, Janssen, and Binding Site.

Outcomes of non-anaplastic stage III and 'inoperable' Wilms tumour treated in the UKW3 trial.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To describe the outcome of patients with stage III Wilms tumours (WT) treated in the UKW3 trial. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients with a pathologically confirmed stage III non-anaplastic WT at nephrectomy (Group A) or with an 'inoperable' tumour at diagnosis managed by biopsy and pre-operative chemotherapy (Actinomycin D-Vincristine-Doxorubicin) but stage I or II at subsequent nephrectomy (Group B) were included. RESULTS: The 4-year overall (OS)/event free survival (EFS) for Group A (n = 117) patients was 90%(95%CI:83-94)/81%(CI:73-87) and for Group B (n = 32) 94%(CI:77-98)/88%(CI:70-95). The 4-year OS/EFS of patients with pathological stage III WT according to whether they received flank/abdominal radiotherapy (95 patients) or not (37 patients, 22 from UKW3 pooled with 17 patients from UKW2) were 91%(CI:83-95)/82%(CI:73-89), and 84%(CI:67-92)/78%(CI:61-89), respectively. The 4-year OS/EFS for patients having one reason to be stage III versus two or three was 92%(CI:84-96)/83%(CI:73-90) and 85%(CI:70-93)/78%(CI:61-88), respectively. CONCLUSION: Our findings question the inclusion of biopsy or pre-operative chemotherapy as sole criterion for assigning a tumour stage III. Selected patients with pathological stage III WT can survive without radiotherapy. Whilst cautious interpretation is needed due to the post hoc nature of these analyses, further biological studies may better characterise those who could benefit from reduced therapy.

Immunohistochemical evaluation of molecular radiotherapy target expression in neuroblastoma tissue.

PURPOSE: Neuroblastoma may be treated with molecular radiotherapy, 131I meta-Iodobenzylguanidine and 177Lu Lutetium DOTATATE, directed at distinct molecular targets: Noradrenaline Transporter Molecule (NAT) and Somatostatin Receptor (SSTR2), respectively. This study used immunohistochemistry to evaluate target expression in archival neuroblastoma tissue, to determine whether it might facilitate clinical use of molecular radiotherapy. METHODS: Tissue bank samples of formalin fixed paraffin embedded neuroblastoma tissue from patients for whom clinical outcome data were available were sectioned and stained with haematoxylin and eosin, and monoclonal antibodies directed against NAT and SSTR2. Sections were examined blinded to clinical information and scored for the percentage and intensity of tumour cells stained. These data were analysed in conjunction with clinical data. RESULTS: Tissue from 75 patients was examined. Target expression scores varied widely between patients: NAT median 45%, inter-quartile range 25% - 65%; and SSTR2 median 55%, interquartile range 30% - 80%; and in some cases heterogeneity of expression between different parts of a tumour was observed. A weak positive correlation was observed between the expression scores of the different targets: correlation coefficient = 0.23, p = 0.05. MYCN amplified tumours had lower SSTR2 scores: mean difference 23% confidence interval 8% - 39%, p < 0.01. Survival did not differ by scores. CONCLUSIONS: As expression of both targets is variable and heterogeneous, imaging assessment of both may yield more clinical information than either alone. The clinical value of immunohistochemical assessment of target expression requires prospective evaluation. Variable target expression within a patient may contribute to treatment failure.

Nephrogenic rests in Wilms tumors treated with preoperative chemotherapy: The UK SIOP Wilms Tumor 2001 Trial experience.

BACKGROUND: Nephrogenic rests (NRs) are abnormally persistent foci of embryonal cells, thought to be the precursor lesion of Wilms tumors (WTs). To date, their presence has not been systematically examined in WTs treated with preoperative chemotherapy. METHODS: A systematic analysis of the data on NRs in WTs treated with preoperative chemotherapy obtained from the UK cohort of the International Society of Pediatric Oncology (SIOP) WT 2001 Trial. The study was based on central pathology review of full sets of slides from pathological specimens, with a median of 28 slides reviewed per case. RESULTS: NRs were identified in 40% of unilateral WTs, including 25% perilobar nephrogenic rest (PLNR), 9% intralobar nephrogenic rest (ILNR), 5% both PLNR and ILNR, and 1% nephroblastomatosis, and in 93% of cases with bilateral lesions. ILNRs were associated with stromal histology and a younger age at diagnosis and found frequently in patients with congenital anomalies associated with WT1 mutation. PLNRs were found frequently in patients with overgrowth syndromes. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of NRs in WTs after preoperative chemotherapy observed in SIOP UK WT 2001 Trial is similar to the previously published data on NRs not treated with preoperative chemotherapy. Their epidemiology supports at least two pathways to Wilms tumorigenesis.

Comparison of anticipated and actual control group outcomes in randomised trials in paediatric oncology provides evidence that historically controlled studies are biased in favour of the novel treatment.

BACKGROUND: Historically controlled studies are commonly undertaken in paediatric oncology, despite their potential biases. Our aim was to compare the outcome of the control group in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in paediatric oncology with those anticipated in the sample size calculations in the protocols. Our rationale was that, had these RCTs been performed as historical control studies instead, the available outcome data used to calculate the sample size in the RCT would have been used as the historical control outcome data. METHODS: A systematic search was undertaken for published paediatric oncology RCTs using the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) database from its inception up to July 2013. Data on sample size assumptions and observed outcomes (timetoevent and proportions) were extracted to calculate differences between randomised and historical control outcomes, and a one-sample t-test was employed to assess whether the difference between anticipated and observed control groups differed from zero. RESULTS: Forty-eight randomised questions were included. The median year of publication was 2005, and the range was from 1976 to 2010. There were 31 superiority and 11 equivalence/noninferiority randomised questions with time-to-event outcomes. The median absolute difference between observed and anticipated control outcomes was 5.0% (range: -23 to +34), and the mean difference was 3.8% (95% CI: +0.57 to +7.0; P = 0.022). CONCLUSIONS: Because the observed control group (that is, standard treatment arm) in RCTs performed better than anticipated, we found that historically controlled studies that used similar assumptions for the standard treatment were likely to overestimate the benefit of new treatments, potentially leading to children with cancer being given ineffective therapy that may have additional toxicity.

A systematic review of 131I-meta iodobenzylguanidine molecular radiotherapy for neuroblastoma.

The optimal use and effectiveness of (131)I-meta iodobenzylguanidine ((131)I-mIBG) molecular radiotherapy for neuroblastoma remain unclear despite extensive clinical experience. This systematic review aimed to improve understanding of the current data and define uncertainties for future clinical trials. Bibliographic databases were searched for neuroblastoma and (131)I-mIBG. Clinical trials and non-comparative case series of (131)I-mIBG therapy for neuroblastoma were included. Two reviewers assessed papers for inclusion using the title and abstract with consensus achieved by discussion. Data were extracted by one reviewer and checked by a second. Studies with multiple publications were reported as a single study. The searches yielded 1216 citations, of which 51 publications reporting 30 studies met our inclusion criteria. No randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were identified. In two studies (131)I-mIBG had been used as induction therapy and in one study it had been used as consolidation therapy. Twenty-seven studies for relapsed and refractory disease were identified. Publication dates ranged from 1987 to 2012. Total number of patients was 1121 with study sizes ranging from 10 to 164. There was a large amount of heterogeneity between the studies with regard to patient population, treatment schedule and response assessment. Study quality was highly variable. The objective tumour response rate reported in 25 studies ranged from 0% to 75%, mean 32%. We conclude that (131)I-mIBG is an active treatment for neuroblastoma, but its place in the management of neuroblastoma remains unclear. Prospective randomised trials are essential to strengthen the evidence base.

Intensity-modulated arc therapy to improve radiation dose delivery in the treatment of abdominal neuroblastoma.

The standard European radiotherapy technique for children with neuroblastoma is a conventional parallel opposed pair. This frequently results in compromise on planning target volume coverage to stay within normal tissue tolerances. This study investigates the use of an intensity-modulated arc therapy (IMAT) technique to improve dose distribution and allow better protocol compliance. Among 20 previously treated patients, ten had received the full prescribed dose with conventional planning (protocol compliant) and ten had a compromise on planning target volume coverage (protocol noncompliant). All patients were replanned with IMAT. Dosimetric parameters of the conventional radiotherapy and IMAT were compared. The dose received by 98% of the planning target volume, homogeneity and conformity indices were all improved with IMAT (p < 0.001). IMAT would have enabled delivery of the full protocol dose in eight out of ten protocol-noncompliant patients. IMAT may improve outcomes through improved protocol compliance and better dose distributions.

An international strategy to determine the role of high dose therapy in recurrent Wilms' tumour.

PURPOSE: To review event-free (EFS) and overall survival (OS) from publications describing outcome for children with relapsed Wilms' tumour. Comparisons are made between those receiving myeloablative high dose chemotherapy with autologous stem-cell rescue (HDT) and those not (NoHDT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Relevant information was extracted from individual patient or summary data and 3-year EFS and OS rates established. These rates were combined in a weighted manner to derive hazard ratios (HRs). RESULTS: Nineteen publications were identified (5 HDT, 6 NoHDT, 8 both). Pooling all studies suggested an advantage to HDT with a hazard ratio (HR) for EFS of 0.87 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.67-1.12) and 0.94 (0.71-1.24) for OS. A stratified analysis confined to studies that provided individual patient data on both HDT and NoHDT gave HRs of 0.83 (0.56-1.24) and 0.92 (0.59-1.41). Further, analyses of risk groups, defined by treatment and/or histology prior to first relapse, suggested a HR for EFS of 0.90 (95% CI 0.62-1.31) for those of high and 0.50 (CI 0.31-0.82) for the very high risk patients. CONCLUSION: The evidence suggests, although there are many caveats since the information summarised here is not from randomised trials, a great deal of uncertainty concerning the role of HDT in patients following relapse after treatment for their Wilms' tumour. For each risk group we propose a randomised trial comparing a standard with a more intensive therapy with specific choice of regimen tailored to the risk group (and co-operative groups) concerned. A synthesis of updated evidence from studies in this overview together with any emerging studies and future trial information will form the basis for future evidence-based clinical decision-making.

Changes over three decades in outcome and the prognostic influence of age-at-diagnosis in young patients with neuroblastoma: a report from the International Neuroblastoma Risk Group Project.

PURPOSE: Increasing age has been an adverse risk factor in children with neuroblastoma (NB) since the 1970's, with a 12-month age-at-diagnosis cut-off for treatment stratification. Over the last 30 years, treatment intensity for children >12 months with advanced-stage disease has increased; to investigate if this strategy has improved outcome and/or reduced the prognostic influence of age, we analysed the International Neuroblastoma Risk Group (INRG) database. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data from 11,037 children with NB (1974-2002) from Australia, Europe, Japan, North America. Cox modelling of event-free survival (EFS) tested if the era and prognostic significance of age-of-diagnosis, adjusted for bone marrow (BM) metastases and MYCN status, effects on outcome had changed. RESULTS: Outcome improved over time: 3-year EFS 46% (1974-1989) and 71% (1997-2002). The risk for those >18 months against ≤12 decreased: hazard ratio (HR); 4.61 and 3.94. For age 13-18 months, EFS increased from 42% to 77%. Outcome was worse if: >18 months (HR 4.47); BM metastases (HR 4.00); and MYCN amplified (HR 3.97). For 1997-2002, the EFS for >18 months with BM involvement and MYCN amplification was 18%, but 89% for 0-12 months with neither BM involvement nor MYCN amplification. CONCLUSIONS: There is clear evidence for improving outcomes for children with NB over calendar time. The adverse influence of increasing age-at-diagnosis has declined but it remains a powerful indicator of unfavourable prognosis. These results support the age-of-diagnosis cut-off of greater than 18 months as a risk criterion in the INRG classification system.