ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The Access, Watch and Reserve (AWaRe) list of antibiotics was developed by the WHO to support antibiotic stewardship programmes (ASP). The Access group incorporates first-line options, while Watch antibiotics have higher resistance potential or toxicity, and Reserve drugs should be used only for complex infections. ASP implementation has been challenged during the COVID-19 pandemic. There is a knowledge gap regarding in-hospital prescribing patterns of antibiotics nationally during the COVID-19 pandemic, and on the characteristics of hospitalised patients prescribed antibiotics during this time. We aimed to evaluate quality of antibiotic use according to AWaRe classification in Scottish hospitals, including assessing the impact of COVID-19 on trends. METHODS: Cross-sectional study of antibiotics prescribed to hospitalised patients from 1 January 2019 to 30 June 2022 in a selection of Scottish hospitals, covering approximately 60% (3.6 million people) of the Scottish population. Data were obtained from the Hospital Electronic Prescribing and Medicines Administration system. Prescribing trends were explored over time, by age and by sex. RESULTS: Overall, a total 1 353 003 prescriptions were identified. An increase in Access antibiotics was found from 55.3% (31 901/57 708) to 62.3% (106 449/170 995) over the study period, alongside a decrease in Watch antibiotics from 42.9% (24 772/57 708) to 35.4% (60 632/170 995). Reserve antibiotic use was limited throughout, with minor changes over time. Changes in prescribing were most pronounced in the older age group (>65 years): proportions of Access antibiotics increased from 56.4% (19 353/34 337) to 65.8% (64 387/97 815, p<0.05), while Watch antibiotics decreased from 41.9% (14 376/34 337) to 32.3% (31 568/97 815, p<0.05) between Q1 2019 and Q2 2022. Differences between males and females were insignificant. CONCLUSIONS: Findings showed encouraging trends in Access and Watch use among hospitalised patients, in line with Scottish national standards. There was no noteworthy effect of COVID-19 on prescribing trends despite reports indicating stewardship programmes being negatively impacted by the pandemic.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Little is known about the duration of antibiotic use in hospital settings. We evaluated the duration of hospital antibiotic therapy for four commonly prescribed antibiotics (amoxicillin, co-amoxiclav, doxycycline, and flucloxacillin) including the assessment of COVID-19 impact. METHODS: A repeated, cross-sectional study using the Hospital Electronic Prescribing and Medicines Administration system (January/2019-March/2022). Monthly median duration of therapy/duration categories was calculated, stratified by routes of administration, age, and sex. The impact of COVID-19 was assessed using segmented time-series analysis. RESULTS: There were significant variations in the median duration of therapy across routes of administration (P < 0.05), with the highest value among those antibiotic courses composed of both oral and IV antibiotics ('Both' group). Significantly higher proportions of prescriptions within the 'Both' group had a duration of >7 days compared to oral or IV. The duration of therapy differed significantly by age. Some small statistically significant changes in the level/trends of duration of therapy were observed in the post-COVID-19 period. CONCLUSIONS: No evidence for prolonged duration of therapy were observed, even during COVID-19 pandemic. The duration of IV therapy was relatively short, suggesting timely clinical review and consideration of IV to oral switch. Longer duration of therapy was observed among older patients.