Randomized feasibility trial of remote ischemic conditioning to enhance resuscitation (RICE).

RATIONALE: Restoration of blood flow after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is associated with inflammation that causes cellular injury. The extent of this reperfusion injury (RI) is associated with the duration of ischemia and adequacy of resuscitation. Remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) consists of repeated application of non-lethal ischemia then reperfusion to a limb distal to the heart by inflating a blood pressure (BP) cuff. Trials in animal models in cardiac arrest and in humans with acute infarction show RIC reduces RI. OBJECTIVE: We sought to demonstrate the feasibility and safety of RIC in patients resuscitated from OHCA and transported to hospital. METHODS: This study was conducted under exception from informed consent (EFIC) for emergency research. Eligible subjects were randomized with masked allocation to control (standard care) versus intervention (standard care and RIC). Included were adults with non-traumatic OHCA. The primary outcome was attrition, the proportion of patients enrolled and not on allocated therapy for the study duration. Key secondary outcomes were survival to discharge, neurologic status at discharge, hospital-free survival, and adverse events. Results were summarized descriptively as recommended for pilot studies. RESULTS: N = 30 patients were enrolled (n = 14 control, n = 16 intervention). Mean age of enrolled patients was 52.5 ± 16.2 years. Eight (27%) were female gender and 7 (23%) had a shockable first recorded rhythm. 100% of enrolled patients completed their allocated study intervention (i.e., 0% attrition). The RIC group had 7 (44%) survival to discharge and median Rankin score of 6 (IQR 1, 6) at discharge as compared to the standard care group which had 6 (43%) survival to discharge and median Rankin score of 6 (IQR 1.5, 6) at discharge. A single patient (6%) in the intervention group had transient occlusion of their upper extremity intravenous line, which immediately resolved on repositioning of the blood pressure cuff. CONCLUSION: Application of RIC to patients resuscitated from CA and transported to an ED is feasible and safe. An adequately powered trial is required to assess whether RIC is effective at decreasing morbidity and mortality after CA.

A qualitative study of people who use methamphetamine during the early COVID-19 pandemic to inform future ED harm reduction strategies.

BACKGROUND: Morbidity and mortality rates related to methamphetamine are on the rise. Simultaneously, social-distancing guidelines were issued in March 2020 to decrease transmission of COVID-19. The aim of this study was to explore concerns regarding methamphetamine use during the COVID-19 pandemic and subsequent harm reduction strategies with patients who use methamphetamine to inform emergency department (ED)-based harm reduction approaches. METHODS: A mixed-methods study of adults residing in Washington with high-risk methamphetamine use and a recent ED visit from April-September 2020 was performed. Participants completed a survey and a semi-structured interview on perceptions and experiences of COVID-19. Descriptive statistics were used for survey responses. Interview transcripts were analyzed and guided by modified grounded theory using an iterative approach to refine the guide and codebook. Interviews were independently coded by 2 investigators and discussed until consensus. RESULTS: Twenty-five participants completed the survey; 20 participants were interviewed (45% recently used heroin, 40% unstably housed). Thirty-five percent was worried about COVID-19 infection. Three themes emerged from the interviews: (1) increase in meth use, (2) interplay of meth obtention and COVID-19, and (3) interactions with healthcare and social services. CONCLUSIONS: People who use methamphetamine noted an increase in use along with the social distancing guidelines put in place for COVID-19 and employed a variety of harm reduction profiles when obtaining methamphetamine. Also, the pandemic brought difficulties in accessing care and amplified mistrust in healthcare instructions and public health messages. Based on these qualitative interviews, further work should consider aligning methamphetamine and COVID-19 harm reduction messages and working with trusted community resources to improve harm reduction strategies for methamphetamine use and COVID-19. IRB: Informed Consent by the University of Washington Human Subjects Division (approval number, STUDY00009277).

"That Line Just Kept Moving": Motivations and Experiences of People Who Use Methamphetamine.

INTRODUCTION: Methamphetamine use is on the rise with increasing emergency department (ED) visits, behavioral health crises, and deaths associated with use and overdose. Emergency clinicians describe methamphetamine use as a significant problem with high resource utilization and violence against staff, but little is known about the patient's perspective. In this study our objective was to identify the motivations for initiation and continued methamphetamine use among people who use methamphetamine and their experiences in the ED to guide future ED-based approaches. METHODS: This was a qualitative study of adults residing in the state of Washington in 2020, who used methamphetamine in the prior 30 days, met criteria for moderate- to high-risk use, reported recently receiving care in the ED, and had phone access. Twenty individuals were recruited to complete a brief survey and semi-structured interview, which was recorded and transcribed prior to being coded. Modified grounded theory guided the analysis, and the interview guide and codebook were iteratively refined. Three investigators coded the interviews until consensus was reached. Data was collected until thematic saturation. RESULTS: Participants described a shifting line that separates the positive attributes from the negative consequences of using methamphetamine. Many initially used methamphetamine to enhance social interactions, combat boredom, and escape difficult circumstances by numbing the senses. However, continued use regularly led to isolation, ED visits for the medical and psychological sequelae of methamphetamine use, and engagement in increasingly risky behaviors. Because of their overwhelmingly frustrating experiences in the past, interviewees anticipated difficult interactions with healthcare clinicians, leading to combativeness in the ED, avoidance of the ED at all costs, and downstream medical complications. Participants desired a non-judgmental conversation and linkage to outpatient social resources and addiction treatment. CONCLUSION: Methamphetamine use can lead patients to seek care in the ED, where they often feel stigmatized and are provided little assistance. Emergency clinicians should acknowledge addiction as a chronic condition, address acute medical and psychiatric symptoms adequately, and provide positive connections to addiction and medical resources. Future work should incorporate the perspectives of people who use methamphetamine into ED-based programs and interventions.

Improving transitions of care for patients initiated on buprenorphine for opioid use disorder from the emergency departments in King County, Washington.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Opioid use disorder (OUD) is on the rise nationwide with increasing emergency department (ED) visits and deaths secondary to overdose. Although previous research has shown that patients who are started on buprenorphine in the ED have increased engagement in addiction treatment, access to on-demand medications for OUD is still limited, in part because of the need for linkages to outpatient care. The objective of this study is to describe emergency and outpatient providers' perception of local barriers to transitions of care for ED-initiated buprenorphine patients. METHODS: Purposive sampling was used to recruit key stakeholders, identified as physicians, addiction specialists, and hospital administrators, from 10 EDs and 11 outpatient clinics in King County, Washington. Twenty-one interviews were recorded and transcribed and then coded using an integrated deductive and inductive content analysis approach by 2 team members to verify accuracy of the analysis. Interview guides and coding were informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), which provides a structure of domains and constructs associated with effective implementation of evidence-based practice. RESULTS: From the 21 interviews with emergency and outpatient providers, this study identified 4 barriers to transitions of care for ED-initiated buprenorphine patients: scope of practice, prescribing capacity, referral incoordination, and loss to follow-up. CONCLUSION: Next steps for implementation of this intervention in a community setting include establishing a standard of care for treatment and referral for ED patients with OUD, increasing buprenorphine prescribing capacity, creating a central repository for streamlined referrals and follow-up, and supporting low-barrier scheduling and navigation services.

Wound Care Follow-Up From the Emergency Department Using a Mobile Application: A Pilot Study.

BACKGROUND: Many patients presenting to emergency departments (EDs) do not have primary care and risk being lost to follow-up. Technology has been used successfully in surgical populations for wound care follow-up yet this is not well studied in ED populations. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to conduct a pilot study demonstrating "smartphone" application-based follow-up after wound care in the ED. METHODS: We enrolled participants in 2 urban EDs using a smartphone application called Mobile Post-Operative Wound Evaluator (mPOWEr) and defined participation as photographic submission at any time during the study period. We collected demographic data, frequency of use of mPOWEr, number of photographs uploaded, and timing of uploads. RESULTS: We approached patients for study enrollment, and 67 patients (28%) were not enrolled because they had no access to a smartphone. Seventy-one patients (30%) declined to enroll, leaving 100 (42%) successfully enrolled. Smartphone ownership was more common among patients <40 years of age (81% vs. 64%, p = 0.004), more common among white patients than nonwhite patients (75% vs. 15%, p = 0.046), more common among patients approached at the university medical center than the trauma center (84% vs. 66%, p = 0.003), and among patients with commercial or other insurance than those with Medicare or Medicaid (92% vs. 54%, p < 0.001). Of those enrolled, 58% submitted a photograph. CONCLUSIONS: Patients presenting for wound care to the ED will participate in smartphone-based app communication for wound care follow-up and are satisfied with this option. Disparities in smartphone access must be considered when using this follow-up method.