Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Scand J Surg ; 110(1): 22-28, 2021 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31578130

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The choice of anesthesia method may influence mortality and postoperative urological complications after open groin hernia repair. We aimed to investigate the association between type of anesthesia and incidence of urinary retention, urethral stricture, prostate surgery, and 1-year mortality after open groin hernia repair. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were linked from the Danish Hernia Database, the national patient register, and the register of causes of death. We investigated data on male adult patients receiving open groin hernia repair from 1999 to 2013 with either local anesthesia, regional anesthesia, or general anesthesia. In relation to the type of anesthesia, we compared mortality and urological complications up to 1 year postoperatively. We adjusted for covariates in a logistic regression assessing urological complications and with the Cox regression assessing mortality. RESULTS: We included 113,069 open groin hernia repairs in local anesthesia, regional anesthesia, or general anesthesia. The risk of urinary retention adjusted for covariates was higher after both general anesthesia (adjusted odds ratio = 1.64, 95% confidence interval = 1.05-2.57, p = 0.031) and regional anesthesia (odds ratio = 2.99, 95% confidence interval = 1.67-5.34, p < 0.0005) compared with local anesthesia. The adjusted risk of prostate surgery was also higher for both general anesthesia (odds ratio = 1.58, 95% confidence interval = 1.23-2.03, p < 0.0005) and regional anesthesia (odds ratio = 1.90, 95% confidence interval = 1.40-2.58, p < 0.0005) compared with local anesthesia. Type of anesthesia did not influence 1-year mortality or the risk for urethral stricture. CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing open groin hernia repair in local anesthesia experience the lowest rate of urological complications and have equally low mortality compared with patients undergoing repair in general anesthesia or regional anesthesia.


Subject(s)
Anesthesia/methods , Hernia, Inguinal/surgery , Herniorrhaphy/methods , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Urologic Diseases/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anesthesia/mortality , Anesthesia, Conduction , Anesthesia, General , Anesthesia, Local , Denmark/epidemiology , Groin/surgery , Hernia, Inguinal/mortality , Herniorrhaphy/mortality , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications/mortality , Prospective Studies , Registries , Urologic Diseases/mortality
2.
Hernia ; 23(2): 245-254, 2019 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30637615

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Surgical repair is recommended for all children with inguinal hernia due to fear of incarceration. The aim of this study was to assess the risk of incarceration and strangulation of inguinal hernias in children treated with delayed surgery or no surgery. METHODS: Systematic searches were conducted in three databases. We included studies reporting on children with inguinal hernia, with the majority ≤ 10 years old. The interventions were non-acute inguinal hernia surgery or no surgery. The main outcomes were incarceration and strangulation. Secondary outcomes were postoperative complications. Randomized controlled trials, non-randomized controlled trials, and observational studies were included. RESULTS: We included 22 studies with 14,959 children. All studies reported on elective repairs. None of the studies specifically reported on watchful waiting. Of the studies reporting wait time as mean or median, the median wait time was 46 days (range 1-552). The crude incarceration rate across the included studies was 7% for all children and 11% for preterm children. The testicular atrophy rate was 1% and the recurrence rate was 1%. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of incarceration in children awaiting inguinal hernia surgery is substantial. In general, we cannot support delaying surgery unnecessarily. However, there may be benefits of delaying surgery in individual cases. In such cases, the surgeon should assess if the benefits may overrule the risk of incarceration.


Subject(s)
Hernia, Inguinal/complications , Hernia, Inguinal/surgery , Intestinal Obstruction/etiology , Atrophy , Child , Child, Preschool , Herniorrhaphy , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Intestinal Obstruction/surgery , Intestines/blood supply , Intestines/surgery , Ischemia/surgery , Male , Risk Factors , Testis/pathology , Testis/surgery
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL