Controlled antegrade and retrograde subintimal tracking (CART) for recanalisation of chronic total occlusions.

BACKGROUND: Controlled antegrade and retrograde subintimal tracking (CART) is rarely performed in contemporary chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). AIMS: We aimed to analyse the indications, procedural characteristics, and outcomes of CART at a high-volume CTO programme. METHODS: We included all patients undergoing a retrograde CTO PCI in which CART was performed at our institution between January 2019 and November 2023. The primary endpoint was technical success. RESULTS: Of 1,582 CTO PCI, the retrograde approach was performed in 603 procedures (38.1%), and CART was used in 45 cases (7.5%). The mean age was 69.1±10.3 years, 93.3% were male, and prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery was present in 68.9%. The most common target CTO vessel was the right coronary artery (48.9%). Anatomical complexity was high (Multicentre CTO Registry of Japan [J-CTO] score of 3.6±0.9). The most common collateral used for CART was a saphenous vein graft (62.2%). Advanced calcium modification was required in 15.6% of cases. CART was successful in 73.3%. Technical and procedural success was 82.2%. Coronary perforation was diagnosed in 4 subjects (8.9%), but only 1 patient (2.2%) suffered tamponade and required pericardiocentesis. No other in-hospital major adverse cardiac events were diagnosed. CONCLUSIONS: CART is a useful technique in selected, very complex CTOs tackled with the retrograde approach. Success rates were high, while complication rates were low, considering the high anatomical complexity and baseline patient risk.

Mechanical Circulatory Support for High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review will focus on the indications of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) for high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and then analyze in detail all MCS devices available to the operator, evaluating their mechanisms of action, pros and cons, contraindications, and clinical data supporting their use. RECENT FINDINGS: Over the last decade, the interventional cardiology arena has witnessed an increase in the complexity profile of the patients and lesions treated in the catheterization laboratory. Patients with significant comorbidity burden, left ventricular dysfunction, impaired hemodynamics, and/or complex coronary anatomy often cannot tolerate extensive percutaneous revascularization. Therefore, a variety of MCS devices have been developed and adopted for high-risk PCI. Despite the variety of MCS available to date, a detailed characterization of the patient requiring MCS is still lacking. A precise selection of patients who can benefit from MCS support during high-risk PCI and the choice of the most appropriate MCS device in each case are imperative to provide extensive revascularization and improve patient outcomes. Several new devices are being tested in early feasibility studies and randomized clinical trials and the experience gained in this context will allow us to provide precise answers to these questions in the coming years.

Intracoronary snaring of the retrograde guidewire: A novel method to solve compartment mismatch in complex retrograde CTO PCI.

The retrograde approach has allowed a remarkable improvement in the success rate of chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). After collateral channel crossing, the most crucial aspect of retrograde CTO PCI is creating the connection between the antegrade and retrograde system. Currently, the most common technique to achieve this is reverse controlled antegrade and retrograde subintimal tracking. However, this maneuver sometimes fails due to compartment mismatch (intraplaque situation of one wire and extraplaque situation of the other). New approaches are therefore needed to overcome challenges in this important step of the procedure. Here we present an innovative solution to this problem, which involved capturing the retrograde guidewire (advanced into a side branch at the distal cap) with a microsnare that had been advanced antegradely: this severed the dissection flap separating the antegrade and retrograde system, thus allowing us to successfully recanalize the CTO.

Aortic Valve Stenosis and Cancer: Problems of Management.

Aortic valve stenosis and malignancy frequently coexist and share the same risk factors as atherosclerotic disease. Data reporting the prognosis of patients with severe aortic stenosis and cancer are limited. Tailoring the correct and optimal care for cancer patients with severe aortic stenosis is complex. Cancer patients may be further disadvantaged by aortic stenosis if it interferes with their treatment by increasing the risk associated with oncologic surgery and compounding the risks associated with cardiotoxicity and heart failure (HF). Surgical valve replacement, transcatheter valve implantation, balloon valvuloplasty, and medical therapy are possible treatments for aortic valve stenosis, but when malignancy is present, the choice between these options must take into account the stage of cancer and associated treatment, expected outcome, and comorbidities. Physical examination and Doppler echocardiography are critical in the diagnosis and evaluation of aortic stenosis. The current review considers the available data on the association between aortic stenosis and cancer and the therapeutic options.

Case Report: A rare homozygous patient affected by TTR systemic amyloidosis with a prominent heart involvement.

Hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis is a severe, adult-onset autosomal dominant inherited systemic disease predominantly affecting the peripheral and autonomic nervous system, heart, kidney, and the eyes. We present a case of a Caucasian 65-year-old man with cardiac amyloidosis and the homozygous mutation Val142Ile (classically, Val122Ile) in the transthyretin gene. We provide a genotype-phenotype correlation regarding the genetic status of both heterozygous and homozygous individuals and their clinical conditions at the time of genetic testing.

Use and Implications of Echocardiography in the Hemodynamic Assessment of Cardiogenic Shock.

Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a complex multisystem syndrome due to pump failure, associated with high mortality and morbidity. Its hemodynamic characterization is key to the diagnostic algorithm and management. Pulmonary artery catheterization is the gold standard for the left and right hemodynamic evaluation, but some concerns exist for invasivity and untoward mechanical and infective complications. Transthoracic echocardiography is a robust noninvasive diagnostic tool for hemodynamic multiparametric assessment that well applies to the management of CS. Its applications expand from etiology definition to the choice of therapeutic intervention and their monitoring. The present review aims at detailing the role of ultrasounds in CS emphasizing the clinical implications of combining cardiac and non-cardiac ultrasounds examinations that may correlate with prognosis.

The Global Burden of Valvular Heart Disease: From Clinical Epidemiology to Management.

Valvular heart disease is a leading cause of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality and a major contributor of symptoms and functional disability. Knowledge of valvular heart disease epidemiology and a deep comprehension of the geographical and temporal trends are crucial for clinical advances and the formulation of effective health policy for primary and secondary prevention. This review mainly focuses on the epidemiology of primary (organic, related to the valve itself) valvular disease and its management, especially emphasizing the importance of heart valve centers in ensuring the best care of patients through a multidisciplinary team.

Management of Dyslipidemia in Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease: The Gap between Theory and Practice.

Hypercholesterolemia is one of the most important modifiable risk factors for cardiovascular events (CV) representing the principal driving force in the development of atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (ASCVD) [...].

Long-Term Outcomes of Chronic Total Occlusion Recanalization Versus Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Complex Non-Occlusive Coronary Artery Disease.

The durability of chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is uncertain. We aimed to compare the long-term outcomes of CTO PCI with those of complex non-CTO PCI. We built a single-center registry including all patients who underwent CTO and complex non-CTO PCI between 2012 and 2017. Complex non-CTO PCI was defined as: 3 vessels treated, ≥3 stents implanted, total stent length >60 mm, saphenous vein graft intervention, 2-stent bifurcation intervention, left main PCI, protected PCI, or rotational/laser atherectomy. The primary endpoint was target-lesion failure, a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and target-lesion revascularization. A total of 2,396 patients were included (n=609 CTO PCI, n=1,787 complex non-CTO PCI). Patients who underwent CTO PCI were younger and had higher prevalence of cardiovascular comorbidities. CTO PCI patients exhibited worse procedural metrics and success rate (74% vs 98%, p <0.001). They also suffered a higher incidence of coronary perforation (3.5% vs 2.0%, p = 0.04) and cardiac tamponade (0.8% vs 0.1%, p = 0.001). However, there was no difference in the overall incidence of in-hospital major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (4.1% vs 5.0%, p = 0.40). At 36 months, there were no differences in the incidence of target-lesion failure (10.1% vs 9.9%, p = 0.91) or its individual components, between the CTO and complex non-CTO group. This finding was confirmed on multivariable analysis. In conclusion, CTO PCI is associated with lower success rates and higher risk for coronary perforation and tamponade compared with complex non-CTO PCI. The incidence of other in-hospital and long-term adverse events is similar and reasonably low.

Risk of contrast-induced nephropathy in patients undergoing complex percutaneous coronary intervention.

BACKGROUND: Complex percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is associated with increased procedural challenges and high contrast load. We aimed to evaluate the association between complex PCI and contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN). METHODS: This single-center retrospective study included all-comers undergoing PCI between January 2012 and December 2016. Complex PCI was defined as a procedure with ≥1 of the following characteristics: 3 vessels treated, ≥3 stents implanted, two-stent bifurcation intervention, total stent length >60 mm, PCI on a chronic total occlusion, saphenous vein graft, or left main, protected PCI, use of rotational/laser atherectomy. CIN was defined as an increase in post-PCI creatinine of ≥0.3 mg/dl or ≥50% from baseline. RESULTS: We included 2660 patients (n = 1128 complex PCI, n = 1532 non-complex PCI). Complex PCI patients tended to be older, and had higher cardiovascular comorbidity and Mehran CIN risk score. They also had a higher prevalence of type B2/C lesions and need for mechanical circulatory support, and received a higher mean contrast volume (284 ±â€¯137 vs. 189 ±â€¯90 ml, p < 0.001). CIN incidence was similar in complex vs. non-complex PCI patients (12.1% vs. 11.5%, p = 0.63), as was the need for in-hospital dialysis (0.5% vs. 0.2%, p = 0.25). Upon multivariable adjustment, age, female sex, diabetes, ejection fraction, periprocedural hypotension, presentation with acute coronary syndrome, and contrast volume were independently associated with CIN, while complex PCI was not. CONCLUSIONS: Complex PCI is not associated with an increased risk of CIN in all-comers. Further studies should confirm our findings and investigate novel effective strategies to decrease the risk of this serious complication.