Improved Surface Layer Erosion of Pit and Fissure Caries Lesions in Preparation for Resin Infiltration.

The penetration of a low-viscosity resin (infiltrant) into caries lesions depends on the erosion of the relatively impermeable surface layer (SL) that covers the lesion body. The present study aimed to evaluate the effect of different abrasive pretreatments on erosion of the SL and on penetration of an infiltrant into occlusal caries lesions, simultaneously. Sixty extracted human molars showing International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS-2) lesions were randomly allocated to 5 groups. A small area of each lesion was covered with resin before etching. Twelve lesions each were etched with either 15% HCl-gel (H120) or 37% H3PO4-gel (P120) for 120 s. Furthermore, the standard 15% HCl-gel or either one of two experimental etchants (HCl-gel or H3PO4-gel, each including abrasives) were applied for either 120 s or 30 s using a brush (surface pressure 150 g) (H30B, P120BA, H30BA). After rinsing and drying, all lesions were infiltrated for 180 s (Icon; DMG). From each tooth sections were prepared and visualized using confocal microscopy. SL of unetched areas and the lesion depth were 33 (23/51) µm and 537 (274/876) µm, respectively, both not differing significantly between groups. H120, H30B, and H30BA showed significantly higher SL reduction compared with P120 or P120BA, but only for H30BA SL was eroded almost completely (p < 0.05; Mann-Whitney test). Compared to other groups, occlusal lesions were significantly more infiltrated in H30BA (p < 0.05; Mann-Whitney test). HCl-gel including abrasives that was rubbed onto the enamel surface with a brush seems to be most effective to erode SLs of caries lesion situated in fissures and enable an almost complete subsequent resin infiltration.

Is the Erosion-Protective Effect Still Maintained when Tin Concentrations Are Reduced in Mouth Rinse Solutions?

OBJECTIVE: As a preventive measure, tin (Sn2+)-containing products have a great potential to prevent enamel surface loss during erosive challenges, but adverse effects of high Sn2+ concentrations, such as astringent feeling of the teeth, are reported. Therefore, the main aim of this in vitro study was to develop a solution with lower Sn2+ concentrations that can still prevent dental erosion. METHODS: A total of 162 enamel specimens were prepared from human premolars, which were selected from a pool of extracted teeth. The specimens were randomly distributed to 9 groups (each group n = 18 enamel specimens) according to the different test treatments: a humid chamber (no treatment) as the negative control, the commercial Elmex® Erosion Protection mouth rinse as the positive control, and 7 solutions either with lower Sn2+ concentrations and/or containing flavoring. The experiment included 4 cycles, consisting of pellicle formation by incubating the specimens with 200 µL of human saliva at 37°C for 1 h, then placing the specimens in the treatment for 2 min (60 mL, 30°C, shaking at 70 rpm), and later submitting them to an erosive challenge for 1 min in citric acid (60 mL 1%, pH 3.6, 30°C). Surface hardness was measured with a Vickers diamond and surface reflection intensity was measured with a reflectometer. RESULTS: The control group performed significantly worse than all other solutions containing Sn2+. In general, there were no significant differences among the Sn2+-containing groups, and they presented similar protective effects on the enamel even when Sn2+ concentrations were reduced and flavorings were added. CONCLUSION: Sn2+ concentrations in mouth rinses may be lowered to 200 ppm without compromising the anti-erosive properties of the solution.

In-vitro antibiofilm activity of chlorhexidine digluconate on polylactide-based and collagen-based membranes.

BACKGROUND: In Guided Tissue Regeneration (GTR), barrier membranes are used to allow selective cell populations to multiply and to promote periodontal regeneration. A frequent complication is membrane exposure to the oral cavity followed by bacterial colonization. The purpose of this in-vitro-study was to elucidate, if rinsing with a chlorhexidine digluconate solution (CHX) prevents bacterial adhesion, and whether it interferes with attachment of periodontal ligament (PDL) fibroblasts and epithelial cells to membrane surfaces. METHODS: Firstly, two bioresorbable membranes (polylactide-based and collagen-based) were dipped into 0.06% CHX and 0.12% CHX, before biofilms (2-species representing periodontal health, 6-species representing a periodontitis) were formed for 2 h and 8 h. Subsequently, colony forming units (cfu) were counted. Secondly, the membranes were treated with CHX and inoculated in bacteria suspension two-time per day for 3 d before cfu were determined. In additional series, the influence of CHX and bacterial lysates on attachment of epithelial cells and PDL fibroblasts was determined. Parameter-free tests were applied for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Cfu in "healthy" biofilms did not differ between the two membranes, more cfu were counted in "periodontitis" biofilm on collagen than on polylactide membranes. One-time dipping of membranes into CHX solutions did not markedly influence the cfu counts of both biofilms on polylactide membrane; those on collagen-based membrane were significantly reduced with being 0.12% CHX more active than 0.06% CHX. More-fold CHX dipping of membranes reduced concentration-dependent the cfu counts of both biofilms on both membranes. In general, the number of attached gingival epithelial cells and PDL fibroblasts was higher on collagen than on polylactide membrane. Lysates of the periodontopathogenic bacteria inhibited attachment of PDL fibroblasts to membranes. CHX decreased in a concentration-dependend manner the number of attached gingival epithelial cells and PDL fibroblasts. CONCLUSIONS: The present in-vitro results appear to indicate that membranes in GTR should only be used when bacteria being associated with periodontal disease have been eliminated. An exposure of the membrane should be avoided. Rinsing with CHX may prevent or at least retard bacterial colonization on membrane exposed to the oral activity. However, a certain negative effect on wound healing cannot be excluded.