Sex difference in outcomes and management of cardiogenic shock: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Cardiogenic shock (CS) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Sex differences in the outcomes and management of cardiogenic shock are not well established. The primary objective of this study is to investigate the differences inik cardiogenic shock outcomes between males and females. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) methodology. Studies were searched via the MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases from inception to December 2022. RESULTS: The analysis included 24 studies comprising 1,567,660 patients. Compared to females, males with CS had a significantly lower risk of in-hospital all-cause mortality (risk ratio [RR] 0.88, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.85-0.90, p < 0.001) and 1-year mortality (RR 0.90, 95 % CI 0.89-0.92, p < 0.001). Males were more likely to undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (RR 1.21, 95 % CI 1.13-1.31, p < 0.0001) and intra-aortic balloon pump placement (RR 1.21, 95 % CI 1.11-1.32, p < 0.0001), with no significant sex differences in the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation or Impella. During the index hospitalization, males were at higher risk of arrhythmias (RR 1.18, 95 % CI 1.05-1.34, p = 0.003) and less likely to develop acute kidney injury (RR 0.86, 95 % CI 0.79-0.94, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Men have a lower all-cause mortality risk in cardiogenic shock. Addressing disparities in management is crucial for improving CS outcomes, especially for women.

Bivalirudin versus unfractionated heparin in patients with myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Bivalirudin is an alternative accepted therapy to unfractionated heparin for patients with myocardial infarction (MI) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We aimed in this meta-analysis to compare bivalirudin versus unfractionated heparin in patients with MI undergoing PCI. METHODS: We have screened PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov (inception through January 8th, 2023) for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating bivalirudin versus unfractionated heparin in patients with MI undergoing PCI. The DerSimonian and Laird method was used for estimation of tau2 to calculate the risk ratio (RR) and 95 % confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: Ten RCTs with a total of 40,069 participants were included in our analysis. Bivalirudin as compared with unfractionated heparin was associated with significant decrease in major bleeding (RR 0.64 [0.52 to 0.79]; p < 0.01; I2 = 69 %) and cardiovascular mortality (RR 0.79 [0.67 to 0.92]; p < 0.01; I2 = 0 %). There was no significant difference between bivalirudin and unfractionated heparin groups in terms of major adverse cardiovascular events (RR 1.02 [0.91 to 1.14]; p = 0.73; I2 = 52 %), all-cause mortality (RR 0.89 [0.77 to 1.04]; p = 0.15; I2 = 23 %), MI (RR 1.02 [0.87 to 1.19]; p = 0.80; I2 = 36 %), stent thrombosis (RR 1.12 [0.52 to 2.40]; p = 0.77; I2 = 82 %), or stroke (RR 0.97 [0.73 to 1.29]; p = 0.85; I2 = 0 %). CONCLUSION: Our meta-analysis suggests that bivalirudin compared with unfractionated heparin in patients with MI undergoing PCI was associated with lower rates of major bleeding and cardiovascular mortality without a significant difference in major adverse cardiovascular events, all-cause mortality, MI, stroke, or stent thrombosis.

Short duration of dual antiplatelet therapy following complex percutaneous coronary intervention: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION AND AIM: The optimal composition and duration of antiplatelet therapy after complex percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains unclear. We conducted a meta-analysis to compare 1-3 months of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) followed by monotherapy vs. 12 months of DAPT. METHOD: MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were queried for studies comparing 1-3 months of DAPT followed by monotherapy vs. 12 months of DAPT in the outcomes of complex PCI from inception through January 2023. Outcomes of interest included major bleeding, all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), stent thrombosis, target vessel revascularization, and stroke. RESULTS: Compared to 12 months, 1-3 months of dual antiplatelet therapy had a weak association with less major bleeding (OR 0.67; 95 % CI, 0.44-1.00; p = 0.05; I2 = 28 %). There were no significant differences between the shorter and longer antiplatelet therapy in terms of all-cause mortality (OR 0.83; 95 % CI, 0.59-1.16; p = 0.21; I2 = 17 %), cardiovascular mortality (OR 0.87; 95 % CI, 0.53-0.42; p = 0.50; I2 = 0), MI (OR 0.97; 95 % CI, 0.69-1.35; p = 0.82; I2 = 32 %), stent thrombosis (OR 1.17, 95 % CI, 0.77-1.76; p = 0.38; I2 = 0 %), target vessel revascularization (OR 1.05, 95 % CI, 0.58-1.89; p = 0.82; I2 = 64 %), or stroke (OR 1.10, 95 % CI, 0.55-2.17; p = 0.37; I2 = 7 %);. CONCLUSION: Among patients undergoing complex PCI, DAPT for 1-3 months may be associated with less major bleeding but similar rates of cardiovascular events (death, MI, stroke, stent thrombosis, and revascularization) compared to DAPT for 12 months.

Safety and Efficacy of Cangrelor in Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Cangrelor is a potent intravenous non-thienopyridine P2Y12 inhibitor. We conducted a network meta-analysis to study the efficacy and safety of cangrelor as compared with the oral P2Y12 inhibition, clopidogrel, or placebo in acute coronary syndromes. METHODS: This meta-analysis followed the Cochrane collaboration guidelines and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) protocols. Outcomes of interest included all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, target vessel revascularization, major bleeding, minor bleeding, and the need for blood transfusion. RESULTS: The analysis was comprised of 6 studies including 26,444 patients treated with cangrelor, clopidogrel, or placebo. There were no statistically significant differences in the incidence of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, target vessel revascularization, or major bleeding. Cangrelor was associated with a higher risk of minor bleeding than clopidogrel or placebo, with no difference in requiring blood transfusion. CONCLUSION: Cangrelor has comparable outcomes to clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes and can be used as a reliable alternative in this population.

Successful Management of Severe Bupropion Toxicity with Lipid Emulsion Therapy: A Complex Case Report and Literature Review.

This case report presents the management of a 53-year-old female with a complex psychiatric history who ingested multiple medications, resulting in severe cardiovascular compromise and subsequent respiratory failure. The patient's ingestion included clonidine, fluoxetine, gabapentin, quetiapine and bupropion. Initial treatment involved supportive measures, including fluid resuscitation, bicarbonate infusion and correction of electrolyte imbalances. Despite these interventions, the patient remained haemodynamically unstable, requiring multiple vasopressors. Lipid emulsion therapy was initiated and led to a remarkable improvement in the patient's cardiovascular status. However, she developed acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and required prolonged mechanical ventilation. Steroid therapy was initiated to manage the ARDS, and the patient was successfully extubated on day 6. The case highlights the potential effectiveness of lipid emulsion therapy in managing bupropion toxicity, but emphasises the need for further research to establish clear guidelines on dosing, timing and safety protocols. Adverse effects associated with lipid emulsion therapy must be carefully considered. Individualised decision-making and patient-centred care is crucial in optimising outcomes in cases of bupropion toxicity. LEARNING POINTS: Recognise the cardiotoxic effects of bupropion toxicity: be vigilant in identifying cardiotoxic effects such as prolonged QTc, hypotension and arrhythmias in cases of bupropion toxicity.Consideration of intravenous lipid emulsion therapy for toxic injections of lipophilic drugs such as bupropion: in severe lipophilic drug ingestions, such as bupropion, consider using intravenous lipid emulsion therapy as a potential treatment option.Individualised decision-making and monitoring is necessary when using lipid emulsion therapy: tailor treatment based on the patient's condition and closely monitor for responses and potential adverse effects when using lipid emulsion therapy.

Meta-Analysis of the Outcomes of Peri-Device Leak After Left Atrial Appendage Closure.

Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) reduces the risk of thromboembolic stroke in atrial fibrillation. Peri-device leak (PDL) after LAAC may affect the subsequent risk of thromboembolism. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of PDL after LAAC. We searched PubMed/Medline, Embase, and Google Scholar for studies reporting outcomes of PDL after LAAC from inception through October 2022. The primary outcome was the composite of stroke, transient ischemic attack (TIA), or systemic embolism (SE). Secondary outcomes included all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, ischemic stroke, TIA, and device-related thrombus. Outcomes were pooled using random-effects models. We used I2 statistics to assess statistical heterogeneity; I2 >50% considered significant heterogeneity. This study included 54,279 patients from 11 studies (6 observational, 2 nonrandomized controlled trials [non-RCTs] primary results, 2 RCT post hoc analyses, and 1 analysis combining 2 RCTs data). PDL was associated with a significant increase in the composite outcome of stroke, TIA, or SE (odds ratio 1.63, 95% confidence interval 1.06 to 2.52, p = 0.03, I2 = 43%) as compared with cases with no PDL. There were no significant differences in all-cause or cardiovascular mortality, ischemic stroke, TIA, or device-related thrombus. In conclusion, PDL after LAAC is associated with an increased risk of thromboembolism (composite stroke, TIA, or SE) without impacting mortality.

Checkpoint Inhibitor Colitis With Superimposed Clostridioides difficile Infection.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are commonly used for various malignancies. A particular checkpoint inhibitor is the anti-PD-1 antibody pembrolizumab. Immune-mediated diarrhea and colitis (IMDC) is the most frequently observed immune-related adverse event (irAE) involving the gastrointestinal system. Although immune-mediated colitis precipitated by pembrolizumab is rarely life-threatening, it often necessitates a detailed diagnostic workup, including stool studies, imaging, and colonoscopy, to establish an accurate diagnosis. The coexistence of IMDC and Clostridioides difficile infection is not well understood, but patients undergoing pembrolizumab treatment have comparable risk factors to those who develop C. difficile infection. We report a case of a 76-year-old female with nonmetastatic non-small cell lung cancer who was diagnosed with IMDC responsive to steroid treatment but later developed worsening diarrhea leading to a diagnosis of checkpoint inhibitor colitis with superimposed C. difficile infection.

Association of Aortic Valve Calcification and High Levels of Lipoprotein (a): Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

This study aimed to assess the association between aortic valve calcification and lipoprotein (a). We searched PUBMED, WOS, and SCOPUS databases. Inclusion criteria were any controlled clinical trials or observational studies that reported the level of Lipoprotein A in patients with aortic valve calcifications, excluding case reports, editorials and animal studies. RevMan software (5.4) was used to perform the meta-analysis. After complete screening, 7 studies were included with a total number of 446,179 patients included in the analysis. The pooled analysis showed a statistically significant association between the incidence of aortic valve calcium and increased levels of lipoprotein (a) compared with controls (SMD = 1.71, 95% CI = 1.04- 2.38, P-value < 0.00001). This meta-analysis showed a statistically significant association between the incidence of aortic valve calcium and increased levels of lipoprotein (a) compared with controls. Patients with high levels of lipoprotein (a) are at increased risk of developing aortic valve calcification. Medications targeting lipoprotein (a) in future clinical trials may be useful in primary prevention of aortic valve calcification in high risk patients.

Dieulafoy Lesion: Scope it Until You Find it.

A Dieulafoy lesion is an important consideration every gastroenterologist and internal medicine physician has to make in cases of recurrent, unidentifiable, and hemodynamically compromising gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. A Dieulafoy lesion is an aberrant vessel that does not reduce in caliber when it extends from the submucosa to the mucosa. Damage to this artery can result in severe, intermittent arterial bleeding from tiny, difficult-to-visualize vessel stumps. Furthermore, these catastrophic bleeding episodes frequently result in hemodynamic instability and the need for transfusion of multiple blood products. As the patients presenting with Dieulafoy lesions often have concomitant cardiac and renal disease, familiarity with this condition is relevant as these patients are at risk of transfusion-related injuries. This case is unique as the Dieulafoy lesion was not visualizable in a standard location despite multiple esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and CT angiography, illustrating the difficulty of accurately managing and diagnosing this condition.

Demographics and Trends of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy-Related Mortality in the United States, 1999-2020.

There are limited data on the mortality trends of HCM in the United States. To study the demographics and trends of mortality in patients with HCM, a retrospective cohort analysis was done with mortality data of patients with HCM listed as an underlying cause of death in the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research database (CDC-WONDER) from January 1999 to December 2020. The analysis took place in February 2022. First, we measured HCM-related age-adjusted mortality rate (AAMR) per 100,000 US population stratified by sex, race, ethnicity, and geographic area. We then calculated the Annual Percentage Change (APC) for AAMR for each. A total of 24,655 HCM-related deaths occurred between 1999 and 2020. The AAMR for HCM-related deaths declined from 0.5/100,000 patients in 1999 to 0.2 in 2020. The APC changes are as follows: -6.8 (95% CI: -11.8 to -1.5) from 2002 to 2009, -1.23 (95% CI -13.8 to 13.2) from 2009 to 2014, -6.71 (95% CI -46.2 to 61.7) from 2014 to 2017 and remained at 2.07 (95% CI -26.1 to 41.1) from 2017 to 2020. Men had consistently higher AAMR than women. Overall, AAMR in men was 0.4 (95% CI: 0.4-0.5), and in women was 0.3 (95% CI: 0.3-0.3). A similar trend was noticed in men and women over the years, starting from 1999 (AAMR men: 0.7 and women: 0.4) to 2020 (AAMR men: 0.3 and women: 0.2). AAMRs were highest among black or African American patients 0.6 (95% CI: 0.5-0.6), followed by non-Hispanic and Hispanic white 0.3 (95% CI 0.3-0.3) and Asian or Pacific Islander 0.2 (95% CI 0.2-0.2). There was substantial variation in each region in the US. States such as California, Ohio, Michigan, Oregon, and Wyoming had the highest AAMR. Large metropolitan cities had higher AAMR than non-metropolitan cities. During the study period from 1999 to 2020, HCM-related mortality steadily decreased. The highest AAMR was observed among men, black patients, and residents of metropolitan areas. States such as California, Ohio, Michigan, Oregon, and Wyoming had the highest AAMR.

ORGANIZING PNEUMONIA: AN UNUSUAL SEQUELA OF COVID-19 INFECTION.

Organizing pneumonia (OP) is a form of interstitial lung disease that develops in response to acute lung injury. SARS-CoV-2 causes a wide range of lung and extrapulmonary disease, but there are few data suggesting an association between COVID-19 and OP. We describe a patient with COVID-19 pneumonia who developed severe progressive OP with significant morbidity. LEARNING POINTS: COVID-19 pneumonia is one of the secondary causes of organizing pneumonia (OP).Early initiation of steroids in OP is associated with improvement in symptoms and prognosis.A prolonged course of steroids may be needed in COVID-induced OP.

Long-term Outcomes of Acute Myocardial Infarction in Pre-existing Coronary Artery Ectasia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Coronary artery ectasia is associated with an increased risk of acute myocardial infarction. This meta-analysis evaluates outcomes following acute myocardial infarction in patients with pre-existing coronary artery ectasia. A search strategy was designed to utilize PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, and Google scholar for studies including the outcomes of acute myocardial infarction in patients with coronary artery ectasia from inception to February 10, 2022. We reported effect sizes as odds ratio (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). We used I2 statistics to estimate the extent of unexplained statistical heterogeneity. There were 7 studies comprising 13,499 patients in the final analysis. There was no significant difference between patients with coronary ectasia and patients without coronary ectasia in terms of all-cause mortality (OR 0.95; 95% CI 0.58 to 1.56; P = 0.79; I2 = 0%), major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE; OR 4.04; 95% CI 0.34 to 47.57; P = 0.17; I2 = 95%), myocardial re-infarction (OR 2.13; 95% CI 0.83 to 5.47; P = 0.08; I2 = 59%), target vessel revascularization (OR 1.31; 95% CI 0.69 to 2.48; P = 0.21; I2 = 0%), or requiring mechanical supportive devices (OR 1.32; 95% CI 0.22 to 7.83; P = 0.57; I2 = 56%). Acute myocardial infarction in the presence of coronary artery ectasia is not associated with an increased risk of death, MACE, myocardial infarction, or the need for mechanical circulatory support.

Does usage of monetary incentive impact the involvement in surveys? A systematic review and meta-analysis of 46 randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Surveys are an effective method for collecting a large quantity of data. However, incomplete responses to these surveys can affect the validity of the studies and introduce bias. Recent studies have suggested that monetary incentives may increase survey response rates. We intended to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate the effect of monetary incentives on survey participation. METHODS: A systematic search of electronic databases was conducted to collect studies assessing the impact of monetary incentives on survey participation. The primary outcome of interest was the response rates to incentives: money, lottery, and voucher. We used the Cochrane Collaboration tool to assess the risk of bias in randomized trials. We calculated the rate ratio (RR) with its 95% confidence interval (95% CI) using Review Manager Software (version 5.3). We used random-effects analysis and considered the data statistically significant with a P-value <0.05. RESULTS: Forty-six RCTs were included. A total of 109,648 participants from 14 countries were involved. The mean age of participants ranged from 15 to more than 60 years, with 27.5% being males, 16.7% being females, and the other 55.8% not reported. Our analysis showed a significant increase in response rate in the incentive group compared to the control group, irrespective of the incentive methods. Money was the most efficient way to increase the response rate (RR: 1.25; 95% CI: 1.16,1.35; P = < 0.00001) compared to voucher (RR: 1.19; 95% CI: 1.08,1.31; P = < 0.0005) and lottery (RR: 1.12; 95% CI: 1.03,1.22; P = < 0.009). CONCLUSION: Monetary incentives encourage the response rate in surveys. Money was more effective than vouchers or lotteries. Therefore, researchers may include money as an incentive to improve the response rate while conducting surveys.

Meta-Analysis Comparing Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement Versus Redo Surgical Mitral Valve Replacement in Degenerated Bioprosthetic Mitral Valve.

Valve-in-valve transcatheter mitral valve replacement (ViV-TMVR) and redo surgical mitral valve replacement (redo-SMVR) are 2 treatment strategies for patients with bioprosthetic mitral valve dysfunction. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the outcomes of ViV-TMVR versus redo-SMVR. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, and Google Scholar for studies comparing outcomes of ViV-TMVR versus redo-SMVR in degenerated bioprosthetic mitral valves. We used a random-effects model to calculate odd ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Outcomes included in-hospital, 30-day, 1-year, and 2-year mortality, stroke, bleeding, acute kidney injury, arrhythmias, permanent pacemaker insertion, and hospital length of stay (LOS). A total of 6 observational studies with 707 subjects were included. The median follow-up was 2.7 years. Despite their older age and greater co-morbidity burden, patients who underwent ViV-TMVR had a similar in-hospital mortality (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.22 to 1.23, p = 0.14), 30-day mortality (OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.36 to 1.17, p = 0.15), 1-year mortality (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.63 to 1.49, p = 0.89), and 2-year mortality (OR 1.17, 95% CI 0.65 to 2.13, p = 0.60) compared with redo-SMVR. ViV-TMVR was associated with significantly lower periprocedural complications, including stroke, bleeding, acute kidney injury, arrhythmias, and permanent pacemaker insertion, and shorter hospital LOS than redo-SMVR. In conclusion, ViV-TMVR was associated with better outcomes than redo-SMVR in patients with degenerated bioprosthetic mitral valves, including lower complication rates and shorter hospital LOS, with no significant difference in mortality rates. Large-scale randomized trials are needed to mitigate biases and confirm our findings.

IMPELLA VERSUS EXTRACORPOREAL MEMBRANE OXYGENATION IN CARDIOGENIC SHOCK: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS.

ABSTRACT: Background: Cardiogenic shock (CS) carries high mortality. The roles of specific mechanical circulatory support (MCS) systems are unclear. We compared the clinical outcomes of Impella versus extracorporal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in patients with CS. Methods: This is a systematic review and meta-analysis that was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analyses guidelines. We searched PubMed, Cochrane Central Register, Embase, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and ClinicalTrials.gov (inception through May 10, 2022) for studies comparing the outcomes of Impella versus ECMO in CS. We used random-effects models to calculate risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence interval (CIs). End points included in-hospital, 30-day, and 12-month all-cause mortality, successful weaning from MCS, bridge to transplant, all reported bleeding, stroke, and acute kidney injury. Results: A total of 10 studies consisting of 1,827 CS patients treated with MCS were included in the analysis. The risk of in-hospital all-cause mortality was significantly lower with Impella compared with ECMO (RR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.65-1.00; P = 0.05), whereas there was no statistically significant difference in 30-day (RR, 0.97, 95% CI, 0.82-1.16; P = 0.77) and 12-month mortality (RR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.74-1.11; P = 0.32). There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of successful weaning (RR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.81-1.15; P = 0.70) and bridging to transplant (RR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.58-1.35; P = 0.56). There was less risk of bleeding and stroke in the Impella group compared with the ECMO group. Conclusions: In patients with CS, the use of Impella is associated with lower rates of in-hospital mortality, bleeding, and stroke than ECMO. Future randomized studies with adequate sample sizes are needed to confirm these findings.

Outcomes of atherectomy in treating severely calcified coronary lesions in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Severely calcified coronary lesions with reduced left ventricular (LV) function result in worse outcomes. Atherectomy is used in treating such lesions when technically feasible. However, there is limited data examining the safety and efficacy of atherectomy without hemodynamic support in treating severely calcified coronary lesions in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Objective: To evaluate the clinical outcomes of atherectomy in patient with reduced LVEF. Methods: We searched PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL Register and ClinicalTrials.gov (inception through July 21, 2021) for studies evaluating the outcomes of atherectomy in patients with severe LV dysfunction. We used random-effect model to calculate risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). The endpoints were in-hospital and long term all-cause mortality, cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), and target vessel revascularization (TVR). Results: A total of 7 studies consisting of 2,238 unique patients were included in the analysis. The median follow-up duration was 22.4 months. The risk of in-hospital all-cause mortality using atherectomy in patients with severely reduced LVEF compared to the patients with moderate reduced or preserved LVEF was [2.4vs.0.5%; RR:5.28; 95%CI 1.65-16.84; P = 0.005], the risk of long term all-cause mortality was [21 vs. 8.8%; RR of 2.84; 95% CI 1.16-6.95; P = 0.02]. In-hospital TVR risk was 2.0 vs. 0.6% (RR: 4.15; 95% CI 4.15-15.67; P = 0.04) and long-term TVR was [6.0 vs. 9.9%; RR of 0.75; 95% CI 0.39-1.42; P = 0.37]. In-hospital MI was [7.1 vs. 5.4%; RR 1.63; 95% CI 0.91-2.93; P = 0.10], long-term MI was [7.5 vs. 5.7; RR 1.74; 95%CI 0.95-3.18; P = 0.07). Conclusion: Our meta-analysis suggested that the patients with severely reduced LVEF when using atherectomy devices experienced higher risk of clinical outcomes in the terms of all-cause mortality and cardiac mortality. As we know that the patients with severely reduced LVEF are inherently at increased risk of adverse clinical outcomes, this information should be considered hypothesis generating and utilized while discussing the risks and benefits of atherectomy in such high risk patients. Future studies should focus on the comparison of outcomes of different atherectomy devices in such patients. Adjusting for the inherent mortality risk posed by left ventricular dysfunction may be a strategy while designing a study.

Ticagrelor use in patients after percutaneous coronary intervention: one year follow up in a community hospital.

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines from American College of Cardiology (ACC) recommend ticagrelor over clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndrome. We have observed many patients being switched from ticagrelor to clopidogrel after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in our hospital. Our goal is to evaluate the use rate of ticagrelor and categorize the reasons for non-use. METHODS: We performed a retrospective data analysis of all patients who underwent PCI at Unity Hospital of Rochester, New York, from January 2019 to January 2020. A total of 330 patients underwent PCI for ACS over the year. After exclusions, 277 patients were enrolled in the analysis. RESULTS: Of the 277 patients, 179 (65%) completed one year of ticagrelor therapy, and 98 (35%) stopped ticagrelor and transitioned to clopidogrel. The most common reason for switching from ticagrelor was dyspnea (42 patients), followed by cost concerns (41 patients). CONCLUSION: At our community hospital, completion of one-year use of ticagrelor post-PCI occurred in 65% of patients. The most common reasons for discontinuation are dyspnea and medication cost.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the prevalence of transthyretin amyloidosis in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

BACKGROUND: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction is a complex clinical syndrome marked by different phenotypes and related comorbidities. Transthyretin amyloidosis is an underestimated phenotype. We aim to evaluate the prevalence of transthyretin amyloidosis in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. METHODS: This meta-analysis was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. A search strategy was designed to utilize PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, and Google scholar to locate studies whose primary objective was to analyze the prevalence of transthyretin amyloidosis in heart failure preserved ejection fraction. RESULTS: Of 271 studies initially identified, 5 studies comprising 670 patients were included in the final analysis. The prevalence of transthyretin amyloidosis was 11%. Patients with transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy were more likely to be males (RR 1.38; 95% CI 1.09 to 1.75; P<0.01; I2=37%), and more likely to have low voltage criteria on ECG (RR 2.98; 95% CI 1.03 to 8.58; P=0.04; I2=75%) compared with transthyretin negative group. They also have higher SMD of age (SMD 0.73; 95% CI 0.48 to 0.97; P<0.01; I2=0%), and NT-proBNP (SMD 0.48; 95% CI 0.02 to 0.93; P=0.04; I2=36%) compared with transthyretin negative group. On reported echocardiogram, they have higher SMD of mass index (SMD 0.77; 95% CI 0.27 to 1.27; P<0.01; I2=65%), posterior wall thickness (SMD 0.92; 95% CI 0.62 to 1.21; P<0.01; I2=0%), and septal wall thickness (SMD 1.49; 95% CI 0.65 to 2.32; P<0.01; I2=87%) compared with transthyretin negative group. CONCLUSION: Transthyretin amyloidosis affects 11% of HFpEF patients. Therefore, screening HFpEF patients at risk of cardiac amyloidosis is warranted.