Positive Circumferential Resection Margin in Rectal Cancer Is a Robust Predictor of Poor Long-term Prognosis With Clinicopathological Bias Between Groups Compensated by Propensity-score Matching Analysis.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Circumferential resection margin (CRM) is the most reliable predictor of local and distant recurrence in locally-advanced rectal cancer (LARC). The present study was conducted to compare the long-term outcomes between CRM (+) and (-) groups using propensity-score (PS) matching analysis to compensate for bias between groups. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Of 563 consecutive patients with Stage II/III rectal cancer who were treated surgically with curative-intent at Juntendo University Hospital between Jan 1989 and Mar 2018, 412 patients were enrolled retrospectively in the study. The patients were divided into a CRM (+) group (n=21; 5.1%) and a CRM (-) group (n=391; 94.9%). RESULTS: In the entire cohort, recurrence-free survival (RFS), local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), non-local recurrence-free survival (NLRFS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were significantly worse among patients in the CRM (+) group compared with those in the CRM (-) group. Univariate analysis demonstrated patients in the CRM (+) group had significantly larger primary tumors (p=0.02), more frequently had open surgery (p=0.009), had an abdominoperineal resection (APR) procedure (p=0.01) and a T4 primary tumor (p<0.0001). After PS matching analysis, in the propensity-matched cohort, RFS, LRFS, NLRFS and CSS were significantly worse among patients in the CRM (+) group compared with those in the CRM (-) group. CONCLUSION: PS matching analysis demonstrated that RFS, LRFS, NLRFS, and CSS were significantly worse among patients in the CRM (+) group compared with those in the CRM (-) group. The present results indicate that CRM (+) is a robust predictor of long-term outcome of LARC, independent of tumor size.

Local recurrence of submucosal invasive colorectal cancer after endoscopic submucosal dissection revealed by copy number variation.

We report a case in which analysis of copy number variation revealed local recurrence of submucosal invasive colorectal cancer after curative endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). An 86-year-old man with a history of abdominoperineal resection of the rectum for rectal cancer underwent resection with ESD for early-stage sigmoid cancer 5 cm away from the stoma opening. At the same time, ileocecal resection was performed for advanced cecal cancer. Twelve months after ESD, advanced cancer occurred in the area of the ESD lesion. It was unclear if the cancer was a local recurrence after ESD, implantation of cecal cancer, or a new lesion. Copy number variation analysis performed for the three lesions revealed that the new lesion originated from residual tumor cells from ESD and was unlikely to be cecal cancer.

Examination of colorectal cancer cases with metal allergy.

PURPOSE: To report our initiatives and treatment results for patients with colorectal cancer with metal allergy. METHODS: A total of 27 patients (2.6%) with a history of metal contact dermatitis were identified among 1027 patients who underwent curative resection of colorectal cancer from 2014 to 2020. The results of the patch test, perioperative results, and postoperative colonoscopy findings were also investigated. RESULTS: The patch test for metal allergens and staples was performed in 21 patients (77.8%), and 13 of them (61.9%) tested positive for at least one metal allergen. Ni (38.1%), Co (28.6%), and Pd (19.0%) showed higher positive rates than other metals, and 1 patient (4.8%) tested positive for staples. Stapled anastomosis/suturing was performed as planned in 15 of 27 patients. In 10 patients, the anastomosis method was changed from stapled to hand-sewn according to the no-patch test results (60%), positivity for multiple metals (20%), positivity for staples (10%), and surgeon's judgment (10%). No complications and abnormal colonoscopy findings were found to be associated with stapled anastomosis/suturing. CONCLUSION: The patch test is useful for selecting an optimal anastomosis method for patients with suspected metal allergy.

[Management of a perforated duodenal diverticulum using an endoscopic nasobiliary drainage tube:a case report].

A man in his 70s visited our hospital for abdominal pain. Upon admission, abdominal computed tomography findings suggested a duodenal diverticular perforation. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy revealed an incarcerated enterolith in the periampullary diverticulum. We achieved conservative management by inserting an endoscopic nasobiliary drainage tube into the duodenal diverticulum to aid drainage. The patient was discharged without serious complications 35 days after admission. We report a case of duodenal diverticular perforation with an incarcerated enterolith managed conservatively using endoscopic therapy.

Effectiveness of Endoscopic Sclerotherapy with Aluminum Potassium Sulfate and Tannic Acid as a Non-Surgical Treatment for Internal Hemorrhoids.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Sclerotherapy with aluminum potassium sulfate and tannic acid (ALTA) has a potent effect on internal hemorrhoids. In this retrospective study, we compared the effects of endoscopic ALTA therapy and standard ALTA therapy. METHODS: We investigated patients who underwent treatment for internal hemorrhoids at our institution between 2014 and 2016. They were divided into a standard ALTA group (n=33, treated using proctoscopy) and an endoscopic ALTA group (n=48). We compared the clinical findings between the 2 groups. RESULTS: There were no intergroup differences in background factors. The mean ALTA dose was 21.9±7.2 mL and 17.8±3.4 mL in the standard and endoscopic ALTA groups, respectively (p<0.01). Adverse events occurred in 4 patients (12.1%) from the standard ALTA group and 6 patients (12.5%) from the endoscopic ALTA group. In both groups, the patients reported good satisfaction with the therapeutic effect at 1 month after the procedure. Hemorrhoids recurred in 2 patients (6.3%) from the standard ALTA group and 4 patients (8.3%) from the endoscopic ALTA group. CONCLUSION: Endoscopic ALTA sclerotherapy is equivalent to standard ALTA therapy in terms of efficacy, adverse events, and recurrence. Therefore, it is a useful non-surgical option for patients with internal hemorrhoids who prefer a less invasive treatment.

[A Case of Good Quality of Life(QOL)and Favorable Response to Transarterial Chemoembolization(TACE)against Synchronous Multiple Liver Metastases].

We report a case of good quality of life(QOL)and favorable response to transarterial chemoembolization(TACE)against synchronous multiple liver metastases. An 85-year-old man was admitted to our hospital because of melena. Colonoscopy showed multiple type 2 tumors in the sigmoid colon and upper rectum. CT and EOB-MRI examinations revealed that there were multiple liver metastases. Because of his age and surgical stress, he underwent a laparoscopic Hartmann's procedure. After the resection of the primary tumor, he received tegafur/uracil for his liver metastases. However, he discontinued receiving the drugs 2 weeks later because of the development of adverse events. Instead of systemic chemotherapy, he chose to undergo TACE. He underwent TACE with irinotecan and HepaSphereTM(BioSphere Medical)8 times for his multiple liver metastases. Consequently, all multiple liver metastases disappeared. Therefore, TACE may be useful for patients who are not suitable for systemic chemotherapy.

Significance of Serum p53 Antibody as a Tumor Marker in Colorectal Cancer.

OBJECTIVE: We examined serum anti-p53 antibodies (S-p53Ab) in colorectal cancer. Specifically, we retrospectively investigated the use of S-p53Ab as a prognostic marker after surgery for colorectal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The levels of S-p53Ab, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) were measured in 160 colorectal cancer patients who underwent surgical treatment. The rate of postoperative change (RPC) in the S-p53Ab titer was calculated as [subsequent antibody titer-lowest titer]/lowest titer. RESULTS: A relationship between recurrence and RPC in the S-p53Ab titer was not observed in patients who tested negative for S-p53Ab preoperatively. In addition, no patients, who tested negative for S-p53Ab preoperatively, tested positive for S-p53Ab at the follow-up after surgery. Of the patients who tested positive for S-p53Ab preoperatively, those recurrences had a significantly higher RPC compared with those who did not (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Although S-p53Ab is not a significant tumor marker in patients who test negative preoperatively, increases in the S-p53Ab titer should be continuously monitored and measured in patients who are positive for this antibody preoperatively, regardless of whether they later test negative.

Case report of perineal hernia after laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection.

Perineal hernia (PH) is a rare complication following laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection (APR) for rectal cancer. We present a case report of perineal hernia after laparoscopic APR and discuss its management. The patient was a 77-year-old man who was diagnosed with lower rectal cancer. He underwent laparoscopic APR and bilateral lateral lymph node dissection. Two months after the surgery, pain and bulging in the perineal region developed, and PH was diagnosed by CT. Repair with a polypropylene mesh was performed using a combination of laparoscopic abdominal and transperineal approaches. Reportedly, the incidence of secondary PH after APR has increased along with the rate of laparoscopic surgery. Treatment of secondary PH with transperineal repair alone may cause injuries to other organs because of adhesion of the pelvic viscera. In the present case, we safely repaired the hernia repair using a laparoscopy-assisted perineal approach.

[A Study of Treatment for Pathological T1(SM)Colorectal Cancer Patients after Endoscopic Resection at Our Department].

Approximately 10% of pathological T1(SM)colorectal cancer patients develop lymph node metastases. Therefore additional colectomy with lymph node dissection is recommended when it applies to the specific criteria in the current JSCCR guidelines. However, additional colectomy would not be done in some cases, because surgery is too invasive for some patients. Endoscopic treatment(ESD or EMR)for T1(SM)cancer was performed in 324 cases between 2008 and 2016. Of those, 231 cases had satisfied the criteria for additional colectomy. Among them, 74 cases(32.0%)did not undergo, and additional colectomy(+)groupwas 153 cases(66.2%). Between the 2 groups, no difference in prognosis could be found. We considered there was no difference, because the prognosis of SM cancer is relatively good. In consideration of patient background, the treatment policy has to be chosen according to feasibility.