Validation of the Manchester spoken language development scale (MSLDS).

Introduction: Standardized outcome measures are importantfor accurately monitoring the language development of pre-lingually deaf children receiving auditory implants. Current commonly used outcome measures are time-consuming,limiting the practicality of regular testing. To address these limitations, the Manchester Spoken Language Development Scale (MSLDS) was developed as a quick and easily applicable interim measurement. This is an 11-point scale designed to provide a streamlined overview of a child's expressive language development. This study describes the MSLDS, evaluates its ease of use and inter-rater reliability, and outlines its application in the paediatric auditory implant population. Methods: Sixteen speech therapists and teachers for the deaf reviewed videos of paediatric cochlear implant assessmentsand rehabilitation sessions at a UK auditory implant centre. Twenty-five videos from fourteen children were used in this validation study. Reviewers were asked to evaluate a child's language development using the MSLDS by assigning a score for each video and to evaluate the ease of use of the scale. Each video wasrated by three different reviewers. Results: MSLDS scores showed a high degree of consistency between raters for each child. 8/25 (32%) videos demonstrated perfect agreement on the MSLDS. In 15/25 (60%) videos, there was a one-point difference between MSLDS scores. The remaining 2/25 (8%) videos varied by 2 points. Statistical analysis demonstrated an intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.987, indicating a high level of agreement between users of the scale. Qualitative feedback from the raters suggested further modifications which have been incorporated into the scale. Conclusion: The high inter-rater agreement reflects the potential for the MSLDS to be a reliable tool for monitoring language development in the paediatric auditory implant population.

Cervical tuberculous lymphadenitis: diagnosis and demographics, a five-year case series in the UK.

Introduction Cervical tuberculous lymphadenitis is a low-volume condition in the UK with a potential for delayed diagnosis. This study describes typical demographic and clinical features of patients diagnosed with cervical tuberculous lymphadenitis in a UK population. The utility of cytological, histological and microbiological investigations is reviewed with comparison between fine-needle aspiration and open biopsy. This information can facilitate recognition of new cases and guide initial management. Methods Patients diagnosed with cervical tuberculous lymphadenitis between January 2009 and December 2013 at two district general hospitals were identified from local infectious disease databases. Retrospective case-note review was undertaken to collect demographic and diagnostic data and associated complications. Results Full data were available for 51 patients aged 19-70 years (mean 32.4 years) with mean follow-up of 370 days; 49/51 patients were immigrants to the UK with a wide geographic spread in the countries of origin and time since arrival; 42/51 had no significant comorbidities, although two patients had coexistent HIV infection. The clinical presentation was most frequently without constitutional symptoms (39/51) and often with no history of tuberculosis contact. Posterior triangle neck nodes were most commonly involved (26/51). Conclusion The 'typical' patient with cervical tuberculous lymphadenitis in our region is a young healthy individual who came to the UK from a high-risk country several years earlier. Diagnosis by fine-needle aspiration is as effective as open biopsy if fluid/pus is aspirated. Open biopsy is potentially associated with complications but does not appear to increase chronic wound discharge rates in our series.

The Cambridge Otology Quality of Life Questionnaire: an otology-specific patient-recorded outcome measure. A paper describing the instrument design and a report of preliminary reliability and validity.

OBJECTIVE: The Cambridge Otology Quality of Life Questionnaire (COQOL) is a patient-recorded outcome measurement (PROM) designed to quantify the quality of life of patients attending otology clinics. DESIGN: Item-reduction model. A systematically designed long-form version (74 items) was tested with patient focus groups before being presented to adult otology patients (n. 137). Preliminary item analysis tested reliability, reducing the COQOL to 24 questions. This was then presented in conjunction with the SF-36 (V1) questionnaire to a total of 203 patients. Subsequently, these were re-presented at T + 3 months, and patients recorded whether they felt their condition had improved, deteriorated or remained the same. Non-responders were contacted by post. A correlation between COQOL scores and patient perception of change was examined to analyse content validity. SETTING: Teaching hospital and university psychology department. PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients attending otology clinics with a wide range of otological conditions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Item reliability measured by item­total correlation, internal consistency and test­ retest reliability. Validity measured by correlation between COQOL scores and patient-reported symptom change. RESULTS: Reliability: the COQOL showed excellent internal consistency at both initial presentation (a = 0.90) and 3 months later (a = 0.93). Validity: One-way analysis of variance showed a significant difference between groups reporting change and those reporting no change in quality of life (F(2, 80) = 5.866, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The COQOL is the first otology-specific PROM. Initial studies demonstrate excellent reliability and encouraging preliminary criterion validity: further studies will allow a deeper validation of the instrument.