Cranial Nerve Injury After Carotid Endarterectomy: Incidence, Risk Factors, and Time Trends.

OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND: To review the incidence of post-carotid endarterectomy (CEA) cranial nerve injury (CNI), and to evaluate the risk factors associated with increased CNI risk. METHODS: The study was a meta-analysis. Pooled rates with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for CNIs after primary CEA. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated for potential risk factors. A fixed-effects model or a random effects model (Mantel-Haenszel method) was used for non-heterogeneous and heterogeneous data, respectively. Meta-regression analysis was performed to examine the influence of publication year upon CNI rate. RESULTS: Twenty-six articles, published between 1970 and 2015, were included in the meta-analysis, corresponding to 20,860 CEAs. Meta-analysis revealed that the vagus nerve was the most frequently injured cranial nerve (pooled injury rate 3.99%, 95% CI 2.56-5.70), followed by the hypoglossal nerve (3.79%, 95% CI 2.73-4.99). Fewer than one seventh of these injuries are permanent (vagus nerve: 0.57% [95% CI 0.19-1.10]; hypoglossal nerve: 0.15% [95% CI 0.01-0.39]). A statistically significant influence of publication year on the vagus and hypoglossal nerve injury rate was found, with the injury rate having decreased from about 8% to 2% and 1%, respectively, over the last 35 years. Urgent procedures (OR 1.59, 95% CI 1.21-2.10; p = .001), as well as return to the operating room for a neurological event or bleeding (OR 2.21, 95% CI 1.35-3.61; p = .002) were associated with an increased risk of CNI, whereas no statistically significant association was found between CNIs and the type of anaesthesia, the use of a patch, redo operation, and the use of a shunt. CONCLUSION: The vagus nerve appears to be the most frequently injured cranial nerve after CEA, followed by the hypoglossal nerve, with only a small proportion of these injuries being permanent. The CNI rate has significantly decreased over the past 35 years to a point indicating that CNIs should not be considered a major influencing factor in the decision making process between CEA and stenting.

A Review of Open and Endovascular Treatment of Superior Vena Cava Syndrome of Benign Aetiology.

BACKGROUND: The widespread use of central venous catheters, ports, pacemakers, and defibrillators has increased the incidence of benign superior vena cava syndrome (SVCS). This study aimed at reviewing the results of open and endovascular treatment of SVCS. METHOD: Medical literature databases were searched for relevant studies. Studies with more than five adult patients, reporting separate results for the SVC were included. Nine studies reported the results of endovascular treatment of SVCS including 136 patients followed up for a mean of 11-48 months. Causes of SVCS were central venous catheters and pacemakers (80.6%), mediastinal fibrosis (13.7%), and other (5.6%). Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) and stenting was performed in 73.6%, PTA only in 17.3%, and thrombolysis, PTA, and stenting in 9%. Four studies reported the results of open repair of SVCS including 87 patients followed up between 30 months and 10.9 years. The causes were mediastinal fibrosis (58.4%), catheters and pacemakers (28.5%), and other (13%). Operations performed included a spiral saphenous interposition graft, other vein graft, PTFE graft, and human allograft. Thirteen patients required re-operations (15%) before discharge mainly for graft thrombosis. RESULTS: In the endovascular group technical success was 95.6%. Thirty day mortality was 0%. Regression of symptoms was reported in 97.3%. Thirty-two patients (26.9%) underwent 58 secondary procedures. In the open group the 30 day mortality was 0%. Symptom regression was reported in 93.5%. Twenty-four patients (28.4%) underwent a total of 33 secondary procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular is the first line treatment for SVCS caused by intravenous devices, whereas surgery is most often performed for mediastinal fibrosis. Both treatments show good results regarding regression of the symptoms and mid-term primary patency, with a significant incidence of secondary interventions.

Protamine Reduces Bleeding Complications without Increasing the Risk of Stroke after Carotid Endarterectomy: A Meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: The aim was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of heparin reversal with protamine after completion of carotid endarterectomy (CEA), summarising the available data from both randomised and non-randomised studies. METHODS: The study was a meta-analysis. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated for the outcomes of stroke and wound haematoma among patients receiving or not receiving protamine after CEA. Meta-regression analysis was performed to examine whether the documented differences were modified by potentially meaningful patient related or procedure related predictors, namely publication year, general anesthesia used, number of patients treated, mean age (years), males, neurological symptoms, use of patch, and use of shunt. RESULTS: Seven studies were included in the meta-analysis reporting on 3,817 patients receiving protamine after CEA and 6,070 patients not receiving protamine for heparin reversal. Only one study was randomised. A statistically significant reduction in wound haematoma requiring re-operation was recorded after heparin reversal with protamine in patients undergoing CEA (OR, 0.42, 95% CI, 0.22-0.80, p = .008). In contrast, no significant difference was observed in stroke rates between groups of patients that received and did not receive protamine (OR, 0.71, 95% CI, 0.49-1.03, p = .07). Meta-regression analysis did not reveal any significant effect mediated by the modifiers examined. CONCLUSION: On the basis of the available data, heparin reversal with protamine seems to reduce the risk of wound haematoma, without increasing the risk of procedural stroke. However, taking into account the limitations of the analysis, further studies are needed to increase the level of evidence provided by the current meta-analysis.

Brachial Artery-Brachial Vein Fistula for Hemodialysis: One- or Two-Stage Procedure-A Review.

Purpose The purpose of the study was to investigate the patency rate of the brachial vein transposition-arteriovenous fistula [BVT-AVF] and to review the available literature regarding the comparison of the one-stage with the two-stage procedure. Methods A multiple electronic health database search was performed, aiming to identify studies on brachial vein superficialization. Case reports and series with five or less patients were excluded from the study. End points of the study were the patency rates at 12, 24, and 36 months of follow-up. The patency of the one- or two-stage BVT-AVF procedure was investigated. Results Overall, 380 BVT-AVFs were analyzed. The primary patency rate at 12 months ranged between 24 and 77%. Rate of early fistula malfunction or failure of maturation of the fistula resulting in loss of functionality ranged from 0 to 53%. Forearm edema, hematomas, wound infection, and early thrombosis were among the most common complications. Limited data were available for the comparison of patency rates between the one- and the two-stage procedure because of the absence of sufficient comparative studies. However, series with one-stage procedure presented a lower patency rate at 12 months compared to series with two stages. Conclusion Patency rates after BVT-AVF, although not excellent, has encouraging results taking into account that patients undergoing these procedures do not have an accessible superficial vein network; failure of maturation and the increased rate of early postoperative complications remain a concern. The BVT-AVF is a valuable option for creating an autologous vascular access in patients lacking adequate superficial veins.

Factors Predisposing to Endograft Limb Occlusion after Endovascular Aortic Repair.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate risk factors for endograft limb occlusion after endovascular abdominal aneurysm repair (EVAR), using a case control design. METHODS: All patients presenting with endograft limb occlusion after elective EVAR between January 2010 and June 2013, along with age, sex, and type of endograft matched controls were included in the study. The impact of atherosclerotic risk factors, anatomic characteristics of the aneurysm, procedural details, and antiplatelet therapy was investigated. Multivariate logistic regression analysis and conditional logistic regression analysis for 1:3 matched pairs deriving adjusted odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) in order to detect significant risk factors for endograft limb occlusion among cases and controls were modeled. RESULTS: Of the 439 patients treated by EVAR, 18 patients (4.1%) presented with endograft limb occlusion. These patients were compared to 54 matched controls. Limb occlusion was associated with iliac artery angulation ≥ 60° (OR = 5.76, 95% CI =1.24-26.74; p = .03) or perimeter calcification ≥ 50% (OR =5.87, 95% CI = 1.10-31.32; p = .04). Limb occlusion was also associated with ≥ 15% endograft oversizing in the common iliac artery (OR = 5.54, 95% CI = 1.11-27.60; p = .04). No other risk factors for limb occlusion were recognized. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of significant angulation and calcification of the iliac arteries as well as excessive limb oversizing appear to be independent predictors of endograft limb occlusion after EVAR.

New possibility of AAA treatment with E-vita abdominal device.

The most dramatic shift in the management of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) occurred in 1991, when the first endovascular AAA repair was reported. Endovascular aneurysm repair has revolutionized the treatment of infrarenal AAAs. In the last few years, the companies have developed renewed models of grafts and have modified delivery systems tending to make them more atraumatic and flexible in order to deal with difficult anatomies and severely atheromatous and tortuous vessels. The aim of the present paper was to analyze the technical characteristics and properties of the new stent-graft system E-vita abdominal XT and to review the current literature. The E-vita abdominal XT stent-graft seems to be safe and reliable; however, long-term results are needed.

Current knowledge on EVAR with the ultra-low profile Ovation Abdominal Stent-graft System.

Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has revolutionized the treatment of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). The continuous collaboration of surgeons and bioengineers in the improvement of the devices the last two decades, lead to a continuous redesigning and improvement of the various endografts. In the last few years, the majority of companies have developed renewed models of grafts and have modified delivery systems tending to lower profile in order to deal with difficult anatomies. The ultra low profile 14F OD Ovation (Trivascular) Abdominal Stent-graft System with innovative sealing technology achieved through inflatable sealing rings, allows treatment of AAAs with small in diameter access vessels that might be unsuitable for EVAR with other currently available stent-grafts. The aim of the present paper was to analyze the technical characteristics and properties of this endograft and to review the current literature.

The chimney graft technique for preserving renal arteries in stent-graft sealing zones.

Patients with juxtarenal aneurysms require complex surgical open repair, which is associated with increased mortality and morbidity. An alternative procedure that can be used is the "chimney graft" technique. Three cases of abdominal aortic aneurysms were successfully treated in our department with this technique. One type-Ia endoleak occurred which was successfully treated with coiling and biological glue infusion. All of the chimney grafts have remained patent for the period of observation. The "chimney" technique has good results as a bail out procedure in complex EVAR or in well planned difficult cases. Long-term data is necessary to determine the efficacy of this technique.

Vascular manifestations of Behcet's disease: report of a case and review of the literature.

Adamantiades-Behçet's disease (ABD) is a relapsing vasculitis of unknown aetiology and variable clinical manifestations. The syndrome can be presented in a myriad of ways and can involve nearly every organ. Although vascular involvement is not included among the ABD diagnostic criteria, it is a unique clinical manifestation in adults with a potentially devastating outcome. We report an ABD case, presenting with a thrombotic occlusion of the inferior vena cava. The authors review the recent literature, emphasizing the spectrum of vascular manifestations accompanying Behçet's disease.

Current knowledge on E-vita abdominal endograft.

The field of endovascular abdominal aortic repair has changed remarkably compared to what it was prior to 1993, the year of the first commercial endograft deployment in the United States. Over the years of endovascular aneurysm repair experience, various companies have attempted to construct an ideal stent-graft for exclusion of an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). However, it has become evident that not all abdominal aortic anatomies are amenable to endovascular treatment and that the rationale "one device fits all AAAs" can lead to disastrous results. Different endografts have dissimilar properties and characteristics. Type of graft material, configuration and type of stent structural support, modularity, type of transrenal fixation, are potentially influential factors of endograft behavior. The self-expanding E-vita abdominal stent-graft (JOTEC, Hechingen, Germany) is a relatively new infrarenal, modular stent-graft with suprarenal fixation designed for AAA reconstruction. The present paper analyzes the technical characteristics and properties of this device. We also analyze our experience with the endoprosthesis and review the current literature.

Evidence that statins protect renal function during endovascular repair of AAAs.

OBJECTIVES: Several studies have documented a slight but significant deterioration of renal function after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) (EVAR). The aim of this retrospective study was therefore to investigate whether medication with statins may favourably affect perioperative renal function. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From January 2000 to January 2008, out of a total cohort of 287 elective patients receiving endovascular repair of their AAA or aortoiliac aneurysm, 127 patients were included in the present study, as their medication was reliably retrievable. Patients were divided according to whether their medication included statins (>3 months). Second, they were subdivided according to their supra- (SR) or infrarenal (IR) endograft fixation. Serum creatinine (SCr) and creatinine (CrCl) clearance were determined preoperatively, postoperatively, at 6 and 12 months. Patients with known pre-existing renal disease, with incorrect placement of the stent graft resulting in severe renal artery stenosis, and with occlusion or renal parenchymal infarction were excluded from the study. RESULTS: Patients receiving an infrarenal fixation of their graft had no change in the renal function, regardless whether they were on statins or not. In patients with SR fixation not receiving statins, a deterioration in renal function was observed in the early postoperative period ((SCr) preoperative vs. SCr postoperative: 1.02±0.2 vs. 1.11±0.28, p<0.001 and (Cr.Cl) preoperative vs. Cr.Cl postoperative: 74.1±21.4 vs. 68.0±21.4, p<0.001), whereas patients on statins experienced no change in renal function (SCr preoperative vs. SCr postoperative: 0.99±0.24 vs. 1.02±0.20n.s. and Cr.Cl preop vs. Cr.Clpostop.: 76.4±19.1 vs. 74.28±20.50, n.s.). During follow-up, a constant worsening of renal function at 6 and 12 months was observed, irrespective of the medication with statins. CONCLUSIONS: The present study suggests a slight immediate deterioration of the renal function using (SR) fixation, and this could be prevented by the use of statins. During follow-up, statins did not protect from further renal deterioration. Broader studies are needed to confirm a definitive relation between statin use and renal protection during the endovascular repair of AAA.

An update of the role of endovascular repair in blunt carotid artery trauma.

Blunt carotid injury (BCAI) is an increasingly recognised entity in trauma patients. Without a prompt diagnosis and a proper treatment, they can result in devastating consequences with cerebral ischaemia rate of 40-80% and mortality rate of 25-60%. Several applied screening protocols and continuously improving diagnostic modalities have been developed to identify patients with BCAI. The appropriate treatment of BCAI still remains controversial and strictly individualised. Besides anti-thrombotic/anticoagulation therapy and surgical intervention, continuously evolving endovascular techniques emerge as an additional treatment option for patients with BCAI. We provide an update on blunt carotid trauma, emphasising the role of endovascular approaches.

Persistent endoleak after endovascular exclusion of an aortocaval fistula, producing renal insufficiency.

This report presents a case of type II endoleak after endovascular exclusion of a primary aortocaval fistula, producing renal vein hypertension and renal insufficiency. A 74-year-old patient presented with acute renal insufficiency, hematuria, lower limb edema, and weight gain. The abdominal CT scan revealed an abdominal aortic aneurysm and an aortocaval fistula. An endograft was deployed but type II endoleak was present and persisted after surgical ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery and subsequent unsuccessful attempt of coil-embolization. The patients renal function continued to be impaired. Surgical ligation of aortocaval communication with preservation of the endograft was performed, resulting in restored renal function.

Giant abdominal aortic aneurysms: clinical and technical considerations.

The rupture risk of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) depends primarily on their diameter and increases substantially in large aneurysms. Only a few cases of giant AAAs, with a maximum diameter > 13 cm have been reported in the English literature. This case series report describes 3 cases of giant AAAs presented with rupture. All cases were managed with open surgical repair, since anatomic factors prevented us from choosing an endovascular approach. The huge size of the aneurysm, the short length of the neck and the dislodgement of abdominal organs, that may be densely adhered to its surface with fistula formation, make surgery of this entity very challenging. Open repair of giant AAAs is often the only available treatment, though not always with good results.

Cardiac troponin I in patients with acute upper and lower limb ischemia.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate the presence, etiology and clinical significance of elevated troponin I in patients with acute upper or lower limb ischemia. The high sensitivity and specificity of cardiac troponin for the diagnosis of myocardial cell damage suggested a significant role for troponin in the patients investigated for this condition. The initial enthusiasm for the diagnostic potential of troponin was limited by the discovery that elevated cardiac troponin levels are also observed in conditions other than acute myocardial infarction, even conditions without obvious cardiac involvement. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 71 consecutive patients participated in this study. 31 (44%) of them were men and mean age was 75.4 +/- 10.3 years (range 44-92 years). 60 (85%) patients had acute lower limb ischemia and the remaining (11; 15%) had acute upper limb ischemia. Serial creatine kinase (CK), isoenzyme MB (CK-MB) and troponin I measurements were performed in all patients. RESULTS: 33 (46%) patients had elevated peak troponin I (> 0.2 ng/ml) levels, all from the lower limb ischemia group (33/60 vs. 0/11 from the acute upper limb ischemia group; p = 0.04). Patients with lower limb ischemia had higher peak troponin I values than patients with upper limb ischemia (0.97 +/- 2.3 [range 0.01-12.1] ng/ml vs. 0.04 +/- 0.04 [0.01-0.14] ng/ml respectively; p = 0.003), higher peak CK values (2504 +/- 7409 [range 42-45 940] U/ml vs. 340 +/- 775 [range 34-2403] U/ml, p = 0.002, respectively, in the two groups) and peak CK-MB values (59.4 +/- 84.5 [range 12-480] U/ml vs. 21.2 +/- 9.1 [range 12-39] U/ml, respectively, in the two groups; p = 0.04). Peak cardiac troponin I levels were correlated with peak CK and CK-MB values. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with lower limb ischemia often have elevated troponin I without a primary cardiac source; this was not observed in patients presenting with acute upper limb ischemia. It is very important for these critically ill patients to focus on the main problem of acute limb ischemia and to attempt to treat the patient rather than the troponin elevation per se. Cardiac troponin elevation should not prevent physicians from providing immediate treatment for limb ischaemia to these patients, espescially when signs, symptoms and electrocardiographic findings preclude acute cardiac involvement.

A rare cause of intra-abdominal haemorrhage: spontaneous rupture of the splenic vein.

Spontaneous rupture of the splenic vein is rare, and is associated with high mortality. Few cases have been documented, associated with pregnancy, with hepatic cirrhosis and diseases predisposing to portal hypertension. We report a rare case with no evident symptoms or signs of liver deficiency, which was manifested with sudden massive intraperitoneal haemorrhage. An urgent laparotomy was performed and a tear of the splenic vein which was massively bleeding was found. The patient underwent urgent splenectomy and a biopsy of the liver was taken. The patient had an uneventful postoperative course. The histological examination documented the presence of micro-nodular liver cirrhosis. Rupture of the splenic vein is a rare condition, which should be considered in the differential diagnosis of intra-abdominal haemorrhage in a cirrhotic patient and in pregnant women. Control of haemorrhage and ligation of the splenic vein with urgent splenectomy is the appropriate treatment.

Acute mesenteric ischaemia, a highly lethal disease with a devastating outcome.

BACKGROUND: Acute mesenteric ischaemia remains a serious condition requiring emergency, surgical management. The mortality rate still remains high, due to the unspecific and delayed diagnosis and ranges from 59% to 100%. Purpose of our study is to present our experience in the management of the disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective study of 61 patients treated surgically for acute mesenteric ischaemia, between 1988 and 2004. All patients underwent a laparotomy. 75% of the patients were operated within the first 24 hours and the rest within 48 hours. RESULTS: Superior mesenteric artery embolism occurred in 36 (59%), thrombosis in 21 (34%) and superior mesenteric vein thrombosis in 4 (7%) cases. In 49 (80%) cases, embolectomy or thrombectomy of the superior mesenteric artery with resection of the necrotic segment of the bowel was performed. Twelve cases (20%) were considered inoperable because of massive bowel necrosis. According to our study mortality and morbidity rate amounts to 75% and 80% respectively. No significant difference in the mortality rate between patients with embolism (75%) and thrombosis (76%) was found. However a significant increase of mortality rate was observed when the surgical intervention became afterwards the first 24-hour period. (72% versus 87%). Patients who underwent embolectomy or thrombectomy with bowel resection presented an improved survival rate compared with patients that underwent only bowel resection. (p = 0.019) CONCLUSIONS: Acute mesenteric ischaemia has the characteristics of a highly lethal condition and only early recognition and appropriate treatment can reduce the potential for a devastating outcome. The reduction of time interval from the beginning of symptoms up to the treatment remains the main critical important factor.

Coexistence of primary adrenal hydatid cyst and arterial hypertension: report of a case and review of the literature.

Adrenal gland has been considered as an atypical localization of Echinococcus Granulosus and the reported incidence is 0.5%. We report a rare case of coexistence of primary adrenal hydatid cyst and arterial hypertension. The patient underwent surgical excision of the adrenal gland with a slight improvement of blood pressure's regulation, requiring antihypertensive medication postoperatively. Till today, two cases of coexistence of primary adrenal hydatid cyst and arterial hypertension have been reported in the literature. However there is not clear and acceptable explanation about the relation and the involved pathogenetic mechanism. Resection of the cyst with conservation of the gland remains the optimal procedure. In case of haemorrhage or failure to perform a cystectomy, ablation of the entire adrenal gland including the cyst should be performed.