Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Cancer Res Commun ; 2024 Sep 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39248577

ABSTRACT

Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is the most prevalent kidney neoplasm; bone metastasis (BM) develops in 35-40% of metastatic patients and results in substantial morbidity and mortality, as well as medical costs. A key feature of ccRCC is the loss of function of the von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) protein, which enhances angiogenesis via vascular endothelial growth factor release. Consequently, anti-angiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) emerged as a treatment for ccRCC. However, limited data about their efficacy in BM is available, and no systematic comparisons have been performed. We developed mouse models of bone and lung ccRCC tumors and compared their anti-cancer efficacy, impact on mouse survival, and mechanisms of action, including effects on tumor cells and both immune and non-immune (blood vessels, osteoclasts) bone stromal components. This approach elucidates the efficacy of TKIs in ccRCC bone tumors to support rational interrogation and development of therapies.

2.
Cancers (Basel) ; 16(14)2024 Jul 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39061222

ABSTRACT

Brain metastases (BMs) are the most prevalent type of cerebral tumor, significantly affecting survival. In adults, lung cancer, breast cancer, and melanoma are the primary cancers associated with BMs. Symptoms often result from brain compression, and patients may present to the emergency department (ED) with life-threatening conditions. The goal of treatment of BMs is to maximize survival and quality of life by choosing the least toxic therapy. Surgical resection followed by cavity radiation or definitive stereotactic radiosurgery remains the standard approach, depending on the patient's condition. Conversely, whole brain radiation therapy is becoming more limited to cases with multiple inoperable BMs and is less frequently used for postoperative control. BMs often signal advanced systemic disease, and patients usually present to the ED with poorly controlled symptoms, justifying hospitalization. Over half of patients with BMs in the ED are admitted, making effective ED-based management a challenge. This article reviews the epidemiology, clinical manifestations, and current treatment options of patients with BMs. Additionally, it provides an overview of ED management and highlights the challenges faced in this setting. An improved understanding of the reasons for potentially avoidable hospitalizations in cancer patients with BMs is needed and could help emergency physicians distinguish patients who can be safely discharged from those who require observation or hospitalization.

3.
Curr Oncol ; 31(6): 3342-3349, 2024 Jun 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38920737

ABSTRACT

Small cell bladder cancer (SCBC) is a rare and aggressive disease, often treated with platinum/etoposide-based chemotherapy. Key molecular drivers include the inactivation of onco-suppressor genes (TP53, RB1) and amplifications in proto-oncogenes (MYC). We report a patient with SCBC who achieved an objective and prolonged response to lurbinectedin, which has been approved for metastatic small cell lung cancer, after developing disease progression on cisplatin/etoposide and nivolumab/ipilimumab. A genomic analysis of a metastatic biopsy prior to lurbinectedin initiation revealed a TP53 mutation and amplification of the cell cycle regulators E2F3 and MYCL. A repeat biopsy following the development of lurbinectedin resistance showed a new actionable ERBB2 alteration without significant change in the tumor mutation burden (six mutations/Mb). The present report suggests that lurbinectedin may be active and should be further explored in SCBC harboring TP53 mutations and amplifications in E2F3 and MYC family complexes.


Subject(s)
Carbolines , Heterocyclic Compounds, 4 or More Rings , Mutation , Tumor Suppressor Protein p53 , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms , Humans , Carbolines/therapeutic use , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/drug therapy , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/genetics , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/pathology , Heterocyclic Compounds, 4 or More Rings/therapeutic use , Heterocyclic Compounds, 4 or More Rings/pharmacology , Tumor Suppressor Protein p53/genetics , Male , Carcinoma, Small Cell/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Small Cell/genetics , Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Middle Aged
4.
Biomedicines ; 12(3)2024 Feb 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38540132

ABSTRACT

Cisplatin-based chemotherapy has been the standard of care in metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC) for more than two decades. However, many patients with comorbidities cannot receive cisplatin or its alternative, carboplatin. 'Cisplatin-ineligible' and 'platinum-ineligible' patients lacked effective therapy options. However, the recent combination of enfortumab vedotin (EV), an antibody-drug conjugate targeting Nectin-4, with pembrolizumab (P), an antibody targeting the programmed death-1 (PD-1) immune checkpoint, is changing the status quo of frontline mUC treatment, with potential synergy seen in the EV-103 and EV-302 clinical trials. First, we review the working definitions of 'cisplatin ineligibility' and 'platinum ineligibility' in mUC clinical trials and the standard of care in both categories. Then, we review select clinical trials for frontline treatment of cisplatin- and platinum-ineligible mUC patients on ClinicalTrials.gov. We classify the investigated drugs in these trials by their therapeutic strategies. Alongside chemotherapy combinations, the field is witnessing more immunotherapy combinations with fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) inhibitors, bicycle toxin conjugates, bispecific antibodies, innovative targeted therapies, and many others. Most importantly, we rethink the value of classifying patients by cisplatin or platinum ineligibility in the frontline setting in the post-EVP era. Lastly, we discuss new priority goals to tailor predictive, monitoring, and prognostic biomarkers to these emergent therapies.

5.
Eur Urol Oncol ; 6(6): 611-620, 2023 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37833193

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (neoCTX) has been recommended as the optimal strategy in surgically resectable neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) of the urinary tract (NEC-URO). OBJECTIVE: To determine the systemic therapy regimen and timing, which are most active against NEC-URO. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We used our institutional historical clinical and pathological database to study 203 patients (cT2, 74%; cT3/4a, 22%; and cTx, 4%) with surgically resectable NEC-URO between November 1985 and May 2020. A total of 141 patients received neoCTX and 62 underwent initial radical surgery, 24 of whom received adjuvant CTX (adjCTX). INTERVENTION: Neoadjuvant CTX with etoposide/cisplatin (EP), an alternating doublet of ifosfamide/doxorubicin (IA) and EP, dose-dense methotrexate/vinblastine/doxorubicin/cisplatin (MVAC), gemcitabine/cisplatin (GC), or others. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Overall survival (OS), downstaging rate, and pathological complete response using a multivariable model adjusting for tumor- and patient-related factors. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Downstaging rate was significantly improved with neoCTX versus initial surgery (49.6% vs 14.5%, p < 0.0001), stage cT2N0 versus cT3/4N0 (44% vs 25%, p = 0.01), or presence of carcinoma in situ (47% vs 28%, p = 0.01). Downstaging was greatest with IA/EP (65%) versus EP (39%), MVAC/GC (27%), or others (36%, p = 0.04). After adjusting for age and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, IA/EP was still associated with improved downstaging (odds ratio = 3.7 [1.3-10.2], p = 0.01). At a median follow-up of 59.7 mo, 5-yr OS rates for neoCTX followed by surgery, surgery alone, and surgery followed by adjCTX were 57%, 22%, and 30%, respectively. An NEC regimen (IA/EP or EP) versus a urothelial regimen (MVAC/GC or others) was associated with improved survival (145.4 vs 42.5 mo, hazard ratio = 0.49, 95% confidence interval: 0.25-0.94). CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant CTX remains the standard-of-care treatment for NEC-URO with an advantage for NEC regimens over traditional urothelial regimens. IA/EP improves pathological downstaging at the time of surgery compared with EP, but is reserved for younger and higher function patients. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this report, we looked at the outcomes from invasive neuroendocrine carcinoma of the urinary tract in a large US population. We found that the outcomes varied with treatment strategy. We conclude that the best outcomes are seen in patients treated with chemotherapy prior to surgery and regimens tailored to histology and tolerance.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Neuroendocrine , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms , Urinary Tract , Humans , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/pathology , Cisplatin/therapeutic use , Gemcitabine , Deoxycytidine/therapeutic use , Urinary Tract/pathology , Carcinoma, Neuroendocrine/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Neuroendocrine/surgery
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL