[Single center experience of (18F)-fluorocholine positron emission tomography: analysis of its impact on salvage local therapy in patients with prostate adenocarcinoma]. / Expérience monocentrique de la tomographie par émission de positons à la (18F)-fluorocholine : analyse de son impact sur les indications de traitement local de rattrapage dans la prise en charge des adénocarcinomes prostatiques.

PURPOSE: To assess usefulness of ((18)F)-fluorocholine positron emission tomography (PET) for localizing relapse in patients with biochemical relapse from prostate adenocarcinoma and its impact on indications of salvage local therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: An ((18)F)-fluorocholine PET coupled with computed tomography was performed in 28 patients with biochemical progression from prostate adenocarcinoma. At the time of ((18)F)-fluorocholine PET, median prostate specific antigen (PSA) was 3.0 ng/mL (from 0.34 to 93 ng/mL) and 17 patients (60.7%) received hormone therapy. Eighteen patients from this cohort were potentially candidates to salvage radiotherapy. RESULTS: A pathologic uptake was shown in 11 patients (39.3%) and 17 patients (60.7%) had no pathologic uptake. Median PSA was 2.4 ng/mL (0.33 to 36 ng/mL) in case of negative ((18)F)-fluorocholine PET, versus 6.75 ng/mL (1.21 to 93 ng/mL) in case of pathologic uptake (P=0.04). Among the 17 patients candidates to salvage radiotherapy, ((18)F)-fluorocholine PET helped deciding for salvage radiotherapy in five patients, since it showed only centropelvic pathologic uptake (27.7%). In one patient, it showed metastatic and radiotherapy was contraindicated. After prostatectomy, ((18)F)-fluorocholine PET was positive in only one patient candidate to salvage radiotherapy (9.1%), showing anastomotic relapse. CONCLUSION: ((18)F)-fluorocholine was positive in about a third of patients with biochemical progression. Its clinical impact is being prospectively investigated.

[Fever and cancer: components of diagnosis for optimal management]. / Fièvre et cancer : éléments de diagnostic pour une prise en charge adaptée.

Fever is defined as a body temperature above 37.8°C in the absence of antipyretic drug. It is a frequent and potentially severe event and its interpretation can be difficult in patients with solid tumors. It is usually alleged that more than half of cancer patients will be affected by the occurrence of this event during the course of their disease. Underlying causes are multiple but most frequent and severe causes include infections, the most life-threatening causes being, firstly, febrile neutropenia and secondly, healthcare-associated infections and more particularly infections related to catheter. Opportunistic infections are much less frequent than in hematology oncology but clinicians should be aware of two severe opportunistic infections: systemic candidiasis and Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia. Fever related to paraneoplastic or tumor necrosis complicates the diagnosis process. Other common causes of fever include venous thromboembolic disease or more rarely treatment related fever. We aim at examining the optimal diagnostic and therapeutic strategies when facing a cancer patient with fever.