Initial Characterization of Focal Bone Lesions with Conventional Radiographs or Computed Tomography: Diagnostic Performance and Interobserver Agreement Assessment.

Objectives: To ascertain the role of CT and conventional radiographs for the initial characterization of focal bone lesions.Methods: Images from 184 patients with confirmed bone tumors included in an ethics committee-approved study were retrospectively evaluated. The reference for benign-malignant distribution was based on histological analysis and long-term follow-up. Radiographs and CT features were analyzed by 2 independent musculoskeletal radiologists blinded to the final diagnosis. Lesion margins, periosteal reaction, cortical lysis, endosteal scalloping, presence of pathologic fracture, and lesion mineralization were evaluated. Results: The benign-malignant distribution in the study population was 68.5-31.5% (126 benign and 58 malignant). In the lesions that could be seen in both radiographs and CT, the performance of these methods for the benign-malignant differentiation was similar (accuracy varying from 72.8% to 76.5%). The interobserver agreement for the overall evaluation of lesion aggressiveness was considerably increased on CT compared to radiographs (Kappa of .63 vs .22). With conventional radiographs, 18 (9.7%) and 20 (10.8%) of the lesions evaluated were not seen respectively by readers 1 and 2. Among these unseen lesions, 50%-61.1% were located in the axial skeleton. Compared to radiographs, the number of lesions with cortical lysis and endosteal scalloping was 26-34% higher with CT. Conclusion: Although radiographs remain the primary imaging tool for lesions in the peripheral skeleton, CT should be performed for axial lesions. CT imaging can assess the extent of perilesional bone lysis more precisely than radiographs with a better evaluation of lesion fracture risk.

Imaging assessment of dorsal scaphoid displacement in patients with scapholunate ligament tears: what is the best option for quantitative assessment?

OBJECTIVE: To compare four different methods for the quantitative assessment of dorsal scaphoid displacement in patients with scapholunate ligament tears. METHODS: A total of 160 consecutive patients who underwent CT arthrography to evaluate a suspected scapholunate ligament tear were prospectively included in this study approved by the local ethics committee. MR images were available for 65 of these patients. Two readers independently evaluated the dorsal scaphoid displacement on conventional radiographs with the dorsal tangential line (DTL) method, the posterior radioscaphoid angle (PRSA) on both CT and MR, and the radioscaphoid congruency ratio on MR. These measurements were compared in groups of patients with and without scapholunate ligament tears. RESULTS: The measurement interobserver agreement was considered excellent for the DTL and the PRSA on CT (ICC = 0.93 and 0.88, respectively), good for the PRSA (ICC = 0.65) on MR, and moderate for the RSCR (ICC = 0.49). There was a significant increase in the values of DTL and PRSA on CT between patients with normal and ruptured SLIL (p < 0.0001). The same tendency was seen on MR-based methods, but these differences were only significant for one reader. The only method that allowed the differentiation between patients with normal and partially ruptured SLIL was the PRSA on CT. PRSA on CT yielded the best diagnostic performance for SLIL rupture (a sensitivity and a specificity of 70-82% and 70-72%). CONCLUSION: DTL on standard radiographs and the PRSA on CT are the most consistent imaging indicators of SDD with an excellent interobserver reproducibility. KEY POINTS: • Dorsal scaphoid displacement is an important prognostic factor in patients with scapholunate instability. • Quantitative assessment of dorsal scaphoid displacement can be performed on conventional radiographs and CT with an excellent reproducibility. • The posterior radioscaphoid angle on CT yielded the best diagnostic performance for the identification of scapholunate ligament tears and the only method allowing differentiation between patients with normal and partially torn ligaments.