Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Dermatitis ; 34(6): 480-483, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37327018

ABSTRACT

Eyelid and periorbital dermatitis remains a distressing and recalcitrant disease. Contact dermatitis remains the most common cause of eyelid and periorbital dermatitis. Ophthalmic solutions used in the treatment of ophthalmic conditions can often be the cause. This article is an update of our previous study, summarizing the contact allergens involved and the new test concentrations reported to investigate through patch testing. New insights found during the review are also documented.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Allergic Contact , Humans , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/diagnosis , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/etiology , Allergens/adverse effects , Eyelids , Ophthalmic Solutions/adverse effects , Patch Tests/adverse effects
2.
Contact Dermatitis ; 85(6): 693-697, 2021 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34418105

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: How many patients should we be patch testing? A previous study suggested that the minimum proportion of a population to be patch tested for allergic contact dermatitis was 1:700 annually. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate if the current minimum rate for patch testing has changed over the 20 years since the previous study in order to maximize the value. METHODS: In cooperation with the British Society for Cutaneous Allergy, a proforma for collation of retrospective data between January 2015 and December 2017 was sent to patch-test centers in the United Kingdom (UK) and the Republic of Ireland (ROI). The number of positive tests was analyzed against the proportion of population tested to see what proportion of the population would yield the greatest number of positive results. RESULTS: Responses from 11 centers showed that the minimum number needed to patch test had increased to 1:550 per head of population per year using the current criteria. CONCLUSIONS: In agreement with previous studies, we should be patch testing more people than we are. We could reduce the threshold for referral of patients we patch test to derive the most benefit from this investigation.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/diagnosis , Patch Tests/statistics & numerical data , Referral and Consultation , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/epidemiology , Facilities and Services Utilization , Humans , Ireland/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , United Kingdom/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...