ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Almajirai are male children in Northern Nigeria and Southern Niger who study Islam in the almajiranci system. Almajiranci has been associated with non-participation in formal education, abuse, poverty, and underdevelopment. However, the peer-reviewed literature around health among almajirai remains limited. We conduct a scoping review around almajiri health to synthesize evidence for health problems, draw links between findings, identify research gaps, indicate areas for intervention, and assess participatory approaches in this literature. METHODS: We searched the academic literature for articles concerning almajiri heath using a framework integrating the biopsychosocial and socio-ecological models of health. We included articles in English and French published between 2000 and 2022. For each study we collected information regarding authorship, study year and location(s), study design and aims, sample characteristics, findings, and almajiri participation in research design, execution, interpretation and dissemination. RESULTS: Of 1,944 studies, 17 were found relevant for data extraction. These included 14 cross-sectional studies, 2 descriptive articles, and one case-control study. All were conducted in Nigeria, though one included Nigerien almajirai. No study engaged almajirai in participatory roles. Domains evaluated included infectious disease (10 studies), oral health (2 studies), workplace injury, nutrition, health status, health determinants, and mental health (1 study each). Almajirai included ranged from 3 to 28 years old. Included studies found high rates of malaria, intestinal parasitosis, urinary tract infection, N. meningitidis, and occupational injury among almajirai. Studies comparing almajirai to controls found significantly higher rates of cholera, urinary schistosomiasis, and psychiatric disorders, lower levels of rabies awareness and poorer oral hygiene among almajirai (p<0.05). One study, concerning nutrition, described an intervention to improve almajiri health, though did not provide health outcomes for that intervention. CONCLUSION: We find that the literature around almajiri health has concerned a broad range of domains, though the number of studies within each domain remains limited. We further note limitations in the geographic scope of this literature, interventions to improve almajiri health, and the consideration of demographic features, like age, that may influence almajiri health. We stress the need for further study in these areas, and for participatory approaches, which may be more likely to effectively improve almajiri health.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Nigeria hosts much of Africa's morbidity and mortality from emergency medical conditions. We surveyed providers at seven Nigerian Accident & Emergency (A&E) units about (i) their unit's ability to manage six major types of emergency medical condition (sentinel conditions) and (ii) barriers to performing key functions (signal functions) to manage sentinel conditions. Here, we present our analysis of provider-reported barriers to signal function performance. METHODS: 503 Health Providers at 7 A&E units, across 7 states, were surveyed using a modified African Federation of Emergency Medicine (AFEM) Emergency Care Assessment Tool (ECAT). Providers indicating suboptimal performance ascribed this performance to any of eight multiple-choice barriers [infrastructural issues, absent and broken equipment, inadequate training, inadequate personnel, requirement of out-of-pocket payment, non-indication of that signal function for the sentinel condition, and hospital-specific policies barring signal function performance] or an open-ended "other" response. The average number of endorsements for each barrier was obtained for each sentinel condition. Differences in barrier endorsement were compared across site, barrier type and sentinel condition using a three-way ANOVA test. Open-ended responses were evaluated using inductive thematic analysis. Sentinel conditions were Shock, Respiratory Failure, Altered Mental Status, Pain, Trauma, and Maternal & Child Health. Study sites were the University of Calabar Teaching Hospital, the Lagos University Teaching Hospital, the Federal Medical Center, Katsina, the National Hospital Abuja, the Federal Teaching Hospital Gombe, the University of Ilorin Teaching Hospital (Kwara), and the Federal Medical Center Owerri (Imo). FINDINGS: Barrier distribution varied widely by study site. Just three study sites shared any one barrier to signal function performance as their most common. The two barriers most commonly endorsed were (i) non-indication of, and (ii) insufficient infrastructure to perform signal functions. A three-way ANOVA test found significant differences in barrier endorsement by barrier type, study site and sentinel condition (p<0.05). Thematic analysis of open-ended responses highlighted (i) considerations disfavoring signal function performance and (ii) lack of experience with signal functions as barriers to signal function performance. Interrater reliability, calculated using Fleiss' Kappa, was found to be 0.5 across 11 initial codes and 0.51 for our two final themes. INTERPRETATION: Provider perspective varied with regards to barriers to care. Despite these differences, the trends seen for infrastructure reflect the importance of sustained investment in Nigerian health infrastructure. The high level of endorsement seen for the non-indication barrier may signal need for better ECAT adaptation for local practice & education, and for improved Nigerian emergency medical education and training. A low endorsement was seen for patient-facing costs, despite the high burden of Nigerian private expenditure on healthcare, indicating limited representation of patient-facing barriers. Analysis of open-ended responses was limited by the brevity and ambiguity of these responses on the ECAT. Further investigation is needed towards better representation of patient-facing barriers and qualitative approaches to evaluating Nigerian emergency care provision.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Biological race, the fallacy that racial health disparities reflect differences in human biology, exerts undue influence on medicine. Interventions that teach against this myth are largely absent from required medical curricula. Here, we describe and present student and facilitator evaluations of an educational intervention, organised around Dorothy Roberts' book Fatal Invention: How Science, Politics, and Big Business Re-Create Race in the Twenty-First Century that included a discussion of preselected chapters from Fatal Invention, case studies illustrating strategies to prevent the misuse of race in medicine and a question-and-answer session with Dorothy Roberts. METHODS: Online feedback surveys were distributed to students and facilitators to capture their general perceptions of the session, how well it satisfied its objectives and the pre-session training materials provided to facilitators. Quantitative measures were analysed using descriptive statistics, and qualitative responses were evaluated using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Student and facilitator surveys garnered response rates of 59.8% (61/102) and 75% (30/40), respectively, and most expressed satisfaction with the session. Students felt more prepared to address the misuse of race in clinical contexts than in pre-clinical contexts (90.16% vs. 77.05%) and among peers than among superiors (95.08% vs. 72.13%) (p < 0.05). Some students (31.15%) felt that their small group facilitators were unprepared to address microaggressions. DISCUSSION: Our survey responses suggest that this intervention was effective in teaching against biological racism and equipped students with tools to address the misuse of race, particularly in clinical contexts. Future iterations should highlight strategies to confront biological racism in pre-clinical contexts and among superiors.