Effect of cetamolol on epinephrine-induced hypokalemia.

The effect of cetamolol (an investigational cardioselective beta blocker with intrinsic sympathomimetic activity) on the hypokalemic response to epinephrine infusions in normal subjects was evaluated and compared with placebo and two other beta-adrenergic blocking drugs. After two daily doses of cetamolol 15 mg, atenolol (a cardioselective beta blocker) 50 mg; a long-acting propranolol preparation (a nonselective beta blocker) 80 mg; or placebo, 12 men (mean age, 26.7 years) were infused with epinephrine. The resulting average plasma epinephrine level was 1123 pg/mL, whereas average baseline serum potassium levels for the four treatment groups ranged from 3.94 to 4.07 mEq/L. Epinephrine-induced hypokalemia occurred in the placebo group (maximum potassium decrease of 1.00 mEq/L) and in the atenolol group (maximum potassium decrease of 0.59 mEq/L); potassium levels did not decrease but rose slightly in subjects receiving cetamolol or propranolol. Subjects treated with placebo or atenolol also demonstrated statistically significant prolongation of the QTc interval (0.039 seconds with placebo; 0.023 seconds with atenolol) and frequently developed T-wave flattening and U-wave appearance. After pretreatment with cetamolol or propranolol, however, the QTc interval was unaffected, T-wave abnormalities did not occur, and U waves appeared only rarely. The results of this study indicate that cetamolol blocks epinephrine-induced hypokalemia and associated electrocardiographic changes.

Cardioselectivity of cetamolol compared with atenolol and nadolol.

The selectivity of the beta-adrenoceptor blockade produced by single oral doses of cetamolol, atenolol, and nadolol was compared in normal male subjects. Study 1 established the dose at which each drug provides equivalent beta-1 blockade. Beta-1 blockade was estimated using the degree of inhibition of the increased heart rate (HR) response to graded exercise. Cetamolol (30 mg), atenolol (100 mg), and nadolol (80 mg) all attenuated the HR response to a comparable extent. This result established that the dose ratio of cetamolol:atenolol:nadolol of 1.00:3.33:2.67 provides equipotent beta-1 blockade. This ratio of doses was used in Studies 2 and 3 to evaluate the antagonism of beta-2-mediated responses to titrated doses of intravenous isoproterenol (ISO) by low and high doses of each drug. Beta-2 blockade was assessed using the attenuation of ISO-induced reductions in diastolic blood pressure (DBP) in Study 2 and ISO-induced increases in specific airway conductance (sGAW) in Study 3. For within drug comparisons, antagonism of the HR increase induced by ISO (a response mediated by both beta-1 and beta-2 receptors) was also examined. Treatments included cetamolol (15 and 60 mg), atenolol (50 and 200 mg), and nadolol (40 and 160 mg in Study 2; 40 mg only in Study 3). All drugs tested suppressed the HR, DBP, and sGAW responses to ISO, and this blockade was dose dependent. Cetamolol and nadolol produced approximately equipotent beta-1 blockade, whereas cetamolol at both doses produced a less potent beta-2 blockade. Atenolol antagonized ISO effects on all parameters less than either cetamolol or nadolol. Quantitative cardioselectivity indices revealed that cetamolol 60 mg was the most cardioselective and nadolol 40 mg the least. Data from the three studies demonstrate that cetamolol is cardioselective relative to nadolol and that, in contrast to atenolol, cardioselectivity appears to increase at the higher dose.

Antihypertensive efficacy of cetamolol: a dose-titrated study.

This double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized multicenter study evaluated the antihypertensive efficacy and safety of cetamolol hydrochloride in 108 patients diagnosed as having mild to moderate hypertension. After a placebo lead-in period, patients received either cetamolol 5-10-15 mg/d (low dose), cetamolol 15-25-50 mg/d (high dose), or placebo, once daily for four weeks. Patients began at the lowest dose and were titrated to higher doses based on the first two assessments of diastolic blood pressure and heart rate, which were conducted each week after double-blind treatment was dispensed. After four weeks of treatment 82.4%, 81.3%, and 93.3% of the low-dose group, high-dose group, and placebo group, respectively, were titrated to the maximum dose level. After four weeks of treatment and 24 hours since the patient's last dose, both cetamolol groups showed a significantly greater (P less than or equal to .05) reduction in supine systolic/diastolic blood pressure (-18.1 +/- 2.3/-9.2 +/- 1.5 mm Hg [low dose] and -17.3 +/- 2.3/-8.3 +/- 1.6 mm Hg [high dose]) than the placebo group (-9.9 +/- 2.5/-3.5 +/- 1.7 mm Hg). In general, the changes in standing (stabilized) systolic and diastolic blood pressure were similar to those seen in supine measurements. Significantly more patients receiving cetamolol than those receiving placebo showed a "good response" (a decrease in diastolic blood pressure of 10 mm Hg or more or measuring less than 90 mm Hg with a decrease of at least 4 mm Hg).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Gastrointestinal blood loss in arthritic patients receiving chronic dosing with etodolac and piroxicam.

Etodolac, a new anti-inflammatory analgesic drug found to be effective in treating arthritis in a dose range of 100 to 300 mg bid, has been shown to induce significantly less gastrointestinal microbleeding in normal men than several other NSAIDs. In this study, the effect on gastrointestinal blood loss of high-dose etodolac, 300 and 500 mg bid, versus piroxicam at its normal therapeutic dose of 20 mg qd, was investigated by the 51Cr method in 23 men with osteo- or rheumatoid arthritis. Placebo periods preceded and followed 28 days of active drug treatment. Blood and stool analyses were performed by an analyst not aware of drug assignment or study design. Patients receiving piroxicam, but not those receiving either dose of etodolac, had a significantly higher mean level of fecal blood loss in the active treatment phase compared with the pretreatment placebo level (p less than 0.01). Further, microbleeding was significantly greater for the piroxicam group during treatment than for either of the etodolac groups (p less than 0.01). There were no significant differences in fecal blood loss between the two groups receiving etodolac compared with pretreatment. Even at doses two to three times those found effective in the treatment of arthritis, etodolac produces no increase in fecal blood loss, in contrast to blood loss seen with the recommended dose of piroxicam. Fecal blood loss in osteoarthritic patients, not receiving an NSAID, was similar to normal subjects in previous studies.

The effect of etodolac administration on renal function in patients with arthritis.

The effect of etodolac 50-600 mg/d on renal function was assessed in four- to 52-week trials in 1,382 patients with arthritides. No patient was withdrawn from treatment due to an abnormal renal function test related to etodolac administration. There were no significant differences in the incidence of definite renal function abnormalities between patients receiving etodolac and those receiving placebo. Both etodolac and placebo groups had a significantly lower incidence of deviant BUN results than either aspirin- or sulindac-treated patients. Fewer than 2% of patients receiving etodolac showed either a persistent or variably persistent pattern of deviant renal function tests. The results in these studies indicate that chronic etodolac therapy did not adversely affect renal function in patients with arthritis.

Effect of tolrestat on red blood cell sorbitol levels in patients with diabetes.

The effect of the aldose reductase inhibitor, tolrestat, on red blood cell (RBC) sorbitol levels was studied in 23 patients with diabetes after oral dosing with tolrestat, 25 or 100 mg b.i.d. The mean (+/- SE) RBC sorbitol levels (measured 12 hours after the preceding dose) after 3, 7, and 13 days of dosing decreased after both dose levels. After 25 mg tolrestat the RBC sorbitol levels fell from 25.1 +/- 4.0 to 20.0 +/- 5.7 nmol/gm hemoglobin (21%) and after 100 mg tolrestat the level fell from 26.7 +/- 3.7 to 11.4 +/- 1.7 nmol/gm hemoglobin (57%; P less than 0.001). This latter RBC sorbitol concentration is similar to levels in individuals without diabetes. At both dosage levels the maximum decrease in RBC sorbitol levels occurred after only 3 days of dosing. Tolrestat had no effect on plasma glucose or hemoglobin A1 concentrations. The overall mean plasma unbound drug concentration measured 12 hours after 100 mg tolrestat (11.7 +/- 3.0 ng/ml; 3.3 X 10(-8) mol/L) was similar to the median inhibitory level (3 X 10(-8) mol/L) of tolrestat for sorbitol accumulation in human RBCs incubated in a high-glucose medium. Our results demonstrate the systemic bioavailability of tolrestat and its aldose reductase inhibitory activity in erythrocytes of patients with diabetes.

Gastrointestinal microbleeding associated with the use of etodolac, ibuprofen, indomethacin, and naproxen in normal males.

Etodolac, a nonsteroidal antiinflammatory and analgesic drug, was used in a randomized, parallel group, open-label design study, with stool analysis conducted in a blind fashion, to compare its effect in normal men in doses of 400 mg (N = 11) and 600 mg (N = 12) b.i.d. on gastrointestinal microbleeding with that of 600 mg ibuprofen, q.i.d. (N = 12), 50 mg indomethacin in the morning, 50 mg at noon, and 100 mg h.s. (N = 9), and 375 mg naproxen b.i.d. (N = 9). Etodolac was given at about 2 1/2 and 3 1/2 times the mean effective dose used for treating patients with rheumatoid arthritis. The other drugs were given at their manufacturers' maximum recommended doses. Lead-in placebo was given for one week, active drug for one week, and washout placebo for one week. Fecal blood loss was measured by the 51Cr-tagged red cell method, and was averaged over days 4-7 (baseline), 11-14 (treatment period), and 17-20 (washout). The mean increase in blood loss for the treatment period for the 400 mg etodolac b.i.d. group (0.13 ml) and 600 mg etodolac b.i.d. group (0.10 ml) was significantly less (P = 0.001) than the corresponding values for ibuprofen (1.14 ml), indomethacin (1.20 ml), and naproxen (0.87 ml). There was no tendency for greater blood loss at higher doses of etodolac. Etodolac at doses in excess of the mean effective dose in osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis caused significantly less microbleeding in normal male volunteers during the seven-day treatment period than the other drugs tested, and not clinically more than that occurring during baseline placebo.

Etodolac, aspirin, and gastrointestinal microbleeding.

The effects of etodolac, a new nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, on gastrointestinal (GI) microbleeding were quantitatively assessed in two studies in healthy adult men. The first was a two-group, open-label, parallel comparison of etodolac, 600 mg/day, aspirin, 2600 mg/day, and placebo in 20 subjects; the second was a four-group, double-blind, parallel comparison of etodolac, 600, 800, and 1200 mg/day, aspirin, 2600 mg/day, and placebo in 41 subjects. Subjects in both studies received a single-blind placebo on days 1 through 7, either etodolac or aspirin on days 8 through 14, and a single-blind placebo on days 15 through 19. GI blood loss (milliliters per day) was estimated by the radiolabeled (51Cr) erythrocyte method and was based on daily radioactivity counts of stool specimens and regression-estimated daily blood radioactivity. Etodolac, 600 mg/day, induced no significant GI blood loss at any time during the experiments, nor was there significant blood loss after 800 and 1200 mg/day in experiment 2. Blood loss was noted after aspirin in both.

Bioavailability studies with etodolac in dogs and man.

The effects of formulation, particle size, coadministration of food, antacids, or antiulcer agents on the bioavailability of etodolac (ULTRADOL, 1,8-diethyl-1,3,4,9-tetrahydropyrano[3,4-b]indole-1-acetic acid), a novel non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agent, have been evaluated in dogs and man. The effects of dosage regimen and/or repetitive dosing on bioavailability were also determined. In man, capsule and tablet dosage forms containing micronized etodolac were shown to have a bioavailability (AUC) equal to that of the reference etodolac solution. Etodolac from tablets and capsules was rapidly absorbed since only minor decreases in Cmax and increases in tmax were observed compared to the etodolac solution. In a comparison of regular and micronized etodolac dosage forms, both in dogs and man, similar findings, i.e. no change in AUC but small parallel changes in Cmax and tmax, were noted. Administration of etodolac with food had no effect on etodolac bioavailability in dogs but tended to cause a delay in its absorption. Coadministration of an antacid, magaldrate, or the antiulcer agent, sucralfate, had no effect on the bioavailability of etodolac in dogs, although with the latter, a significant reduction in Cmax was noted. In man, etodolac may be administered as a single bolus dose or in divided (b.i.d.) doses without any loss in bioavailability. With either regimen, on repeat administration for 7 days, no etodolac accumulation was noted.

Dynamics of propranolol dosing schedules.

Kinetic and dynamic data from 27 healthy male subjects were evaluated in a double-blind, randomized, double-crossover study to test the hypothesis that 180 mg/day propranolol twice and three times a day would provide much the same plasma levels and beta 1-blockade. The data indicate that propranolol twice rather than three times a day should be favored when beta 1-blockade is needed in therapy. The dynamic efficacy of the two schedules was the same and maximum concentration, AUC0-24, and 0-hr plasma propranolol values were higher after twice-than after three-times-daily dosing. The degree of beta 1-blockade (reduction in exercise tachycardia) was much the same on both dosing regimens at trough concentrations. These data indicate that both twice- and three-times-a-day dosing schedules provide well-sustained 24-hr beta-blockade and are probably interchangeable for therapeutic purposes.

Propranolol-hydralazine combination in essential hypertension.

The efficacy of a propranolol-hydralazine combination tablet was compared with that of each of its two components in the twice-daily treatment of mild to moderate essential hypertension (diastolic blood pressure: 100 to 125 mmHg). After a three-week, single-blind, placebo period, a 9- to 18-week, single-blind, dose-finding phase with the combination was performed. The daily doses of propranolol/hydralazine were 40 mg/25 mg, 80 mg/25 mg, 80 mg/50 mg, 120 mg/50 mg, 160 mg/50 mg, and 160 mg/100 mg. Of 83 patients, 73 (88%) had decreases in diastolic blood pressure equal to or greater than 10 mmHg. Thirty-eight (46%) patients had a diastolic blood pressure equal to or less than 90 mmHg while taking 80 mg propranolol/50 mg hydralazine or less given BID. Mean systolic and diastolic pressures were reduced by 16.8 mmHg (10.9%) and 17.6 mmHg (16.7%), respectively (P less than 0.001). A ten-week, double-blind, parallel-treatment phase followed in which patients were randomly assigned to the combination tablet or to propranolol or hydralazine. There were significantly larger increases in mean systolic (P less than 0.01) and mean diastolic (P less than 0.03) blood pressure when the components were taken alone than with the combination from the mean of the last three weekly dose-finding visits to the mean of the last four biweekly parallel-treatment visits. The changes in systolic/diastolic blood pressures were: hydralazine (n = 30), 14.43/8.62 mmHg; propranolol (n = 24), 9.87/6.09 mmHg; and the combination (n = 27), 1.47/1.53 mmHg. During the parallel-treatment phase, the proportions of patients with new complaints were: hydralazine, 16/31 (52%); propranolol, 10/25 (40%); and the combination, 11/27 (41%). In the hydralazine group, three patients had cardiovascular events (severe tachycardia, mild palpitations, and skipped heart beats) and two patients had mild anxiety; no such occurrences were noted in the propranolol or combination group. The mean change (increase) in heart rate from the end of dose-finding to the end of the double-blind period was significantly larger for patients taking hydralazine than for patients taking propranolol or the combination. Mean changes for these groups were: hydralazine, 12.4 beats/min; propranolol, 2.9 beats/min; and the combination, 1.8 beats/min (P = 0.0001). This study found the combination of propranolol plus hydralazine to be safe and more effective than either component.

Propranolol dosage, plasma concentration, and beta blockade.

One hundred sixty-nine normal men received varying propranolol dosage regimens and placebo. Dose level and frequency were compared with plasma propranolol levels and beta blockade, as assessed by reduction of exercise tachycardia. Propranolol levels above 20 ng/ml induced significant beta blockade. An average daily propranolol dose slightly in excess of 160 mg led to a minimum plasma level above 20 ng/ml. Approximately 50% of subjects achieved 20 bpm or greater decrease in exercise tachycardia with 160 mg per day. The degree of beta blockade at the daily minimum propranolol level was related to dose and not dose frequency. The relation of propranolol dose and plasma levels to beta blockade in normal subjects appears to reflect observations in large clinical trials.

Propranolol-hydrochlorothiazide combination in essential hypertension.

The effect of a propranolol-hydrochlorothiazide combination tablet was compared with the effects of its two components alone in the twice-daily treatment of mild to moderate essential hypertension (100 to 125 mmHg diastolic blood pressure). Propranolol alone or in combination was given at 80, 160, 240, or 320 mg/day; hydrochlorothiazide, at 50 mg/day. After a 3-week placebo period, a 12-week single-blind dose-finding test with the combination was held: 149/158 (94%) patients had decreases greater than or equal to 10 mmHg in diastolic blood pressure. Mean systolic and diastolic pressures were reduced by 26.6 mmHg 917%) and 19.2 mmHg (18.6%), respectively (P less than 0.001). A 10-week double-blind parallel treatment test followed, in which patients were assigned by random code to combination tablet, propranolol, or hydrochlorothiazide. There were significantly larger increases (P less than 0.05) in mean systolic or diastolic pressure with each component than with the combination from the end of dose-finding to each of the last four biweekly visits, to the mean of those four visits, and to the endpoint (last visit). The mean increases in pressure at the endpoint evaluation were (systolic/diastolic): combination (n = 47), 3.0/1.5 mmHg; propranolol (n = 51), 10.2/6.3 mmHg; hydrochlorothiazide (n = 52), 13.1/9.3 mmHg. During the double-blind period, no significant differences were demonstrated between the proportions of patients in each treatment group reporting new complaints. This study showed the combination to be as safe as, and more effective than, either component given at the same dose strength.

Comparative bioavailability of propranolol: twice-daily versus four times-daily administration.

Nineteen healthy male volunteers were given daily 160 mg propranolol hydrochloride in divided doses, either four 40-mg tablets or two 80-mg tablets, and the plasma propranolol concentration profiles were compared after one and seven consecutive days of drug administration. The results indicate that the relative rate and extent of propranolol absorption were greater after 80 mg given twice daily than after 40 mg given four times per day. Both differences were statistically significant at steady state attained with the seven-day treatment. The variability in the areas under the concentration-time curves of propranolol appeared to be smaller after the 80-mg twice-a-day dosing schedule. The results are in accordance with the observed therapeutic equivalence of the two dosing regimens.

Portal hypertension and gastric lesions in the rat.

Gastric lesions occurred spontaneously and were increased in number by seven hours of restraint stress in rats with portal vein constriction (PVC). Vagotomy and pyloroplasty protected the congested stomach from erosion formation with stress. Major weight loss occurred two days after PVC, but not thereafter. Platelet counts were decreased in intact and splenectomized rats with portal hypertension, but prothrombin time, partial thromboplastin time, and fibrinogen were unaffected, and histological stains failed to demonstrate thrombin in the gastric blood vessels. The oxygen pressure (PO2) of the gastric luminal fluid was decreased at day 2, but was normal at day 4 after PVC. Hypersection of acid and abnormal acid equilibration were not observed in the stomach. Gastric congestion, weight loss, and possibly portasystemic shunting of blood contributed to the higher incidence of gastric erosions with portal hypertension.

Aspiration of blood and pulmonary host defense mechanisms.

The effect of aspiration of blood on pulmonary host defenses was studied in the rat. Sham and experimental rats had 0.2 ml of saline or blood/100 g body weight injected into their tracheas. One or 24 hours after aspiration rats were challenged with aerosolized, radiolabeled ((32)P), S. aureus. Fourteen hours after bacterial challenge, lungs were removed and intrapulmonary bacterial inactivation was quantified. Significant impairment of bacterial inactivation occurred at both 15 and 38 hours after aspiration of blood, but not after saline. The pulmonary consolidation after aspiration of blood was focal in nature. The lung weight increased but fractional water content decreased. Arterial pH, pCO(2), or pO(2) were unaffected by aspiration of blood. The number and viability of macrophages recovered by lavage were similar in control, sham and experimental groups. If similar impairment in pulmonary host defenses occurred in man following aspiration of blood, the patient with aspiration of blood would have an increased susceptibility to bacterial infection.