Prevalence of and Risk Factors for Hypovitaminosis D in Patients with Rotator Cuff Tears.

BACKGROUD: It has been reported that vitamin D may play an important role in rotator cuff tears. However, there has been limited information about the prevalence of and risk factors for hypovitaminosis D in patients with rotator cuff tears. Therefore, the purpose of current study was to investigate the prevalence of and risk factors for hypovitaminosis D in patients with rotator cuff tears. METHODS: One hundred seventy-six patients (age, 61.9 ± 8.90 years) who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair for a full-thickness tear were enrolled in this retrospective study. Preoperative serum vitamin D levels (25-hydroxyvitamin D) were measured. Hypovitaminosis D was defined as a serum concentration of 25-hydroxyvitamin D < 20 ng/mL. We investigated whether age, sex, height, weight, body mass index, bone mineral density, alcohol consumption, smoking status, and outdoor occupation were associated with hypovitaminosis D. RESULTS: The prevalence of hypovitaminosis D in patients with rotator cuff tears was 44.3% (78/176). The mean serum concentration of 25-hydroxyvitamin D of total patients was 24.7 ± 13.7 ng/mL. A higher serum level of vitamin D was significantly associated with older age (p < 0.001). Young age was an independent risk factor for hypovitaminosis D. The prevalence of hypovitaminosis D was also lower in patients with an outdoor occupation than in those with an indoor occupation (19.0% vs. 31.4%, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of hypovitaminosis D in patients with rotator cuff tears was 44.3%. Age had a significant positive correlation with the serum concentration of 25-hydroxyvitamin D. Young age and indoor working were independent risk factors for hypovitaminosis D in patients with rotator cuff tears. Therefore, the possibility of hypovitaminosis D should be considered for young and indoor working patients who have rotator cuff tears.

Degree of Anterolateral Ligament Injury Impacts Outcomes After Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of anterolateral ligament (ALL) injury identified on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on postoperative outcomes after double-bundle (DB) anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). METHODS: For this retrospective study, the inclusion criteria were patients who were at least 3 years out of DB ACLR. Exclusion criteria included a delay in MRI over 4 weeks, delay in surgery over 6 months, single-bundle ACLR, and revision surgery. Enrolled patients were divided into 2 groups according to the ALL injury grade in preoperative MRI by a musculoskeletal radiologist who was blinded to the perioperative findings (the high-grade group with complete or nearly complete tear: n = 53 and the low-grade group with intact ALL or partial tear: n = 33). Knee laxity, clinical outcomes using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) examination form, and revision rates were compared at the last follow-up (8.1 ± 2.2 years). An independent t test was applied to compare continuous variables, and χ2 or Fisher exact test was used to compare the nominal variables. RESULTS: The anterior translation was 3.2 ± 1.9 mm in the high-grade group and 1.6 ± 1.0 mm in the low-grade group (P < .001). The high-grade group showed 18 cases with a pivot-shift grade of 2 or 3 (40.0%); however, the low-grade group showed only 1 case with a pivot-shift grade 2 or 3 (3.0%) (P = .002). The high-grade group also showed inferior outcomes in the IKDC objective grade (grade A: 49.0%; grade B: 17.0%; grade C: 30.2%; grade D: 3.8% vs grade A: 90.9%; grade B: 6.1%; grade C: 3.0%; grade D: 0%, P = .001) and IKDC subjective score (87.5 ± 9.9 vs 93.9 ± 5.3, P < .001). In addition, the high-grade group showed a greater revision rate (11.3% vs 0%, P = .045). CONCLUSIONS: DB ACLR for patients with high-grade ALL injury resulted in increased knee laxity, worse clinical outcomes, and higher revision rate compared to patients with low-grade ALL injury. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

A Retrospective Comparison of Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Lateral Extra-Articular Tenodesis With Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

PURPOSE: To compare postoperative objective knee stability and clinical outcomes between double-bundle (DB) anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and single-bundle (SB) ACLR combined with lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET). METHODS: ACL-injured patients with grade 3 pivot-shift who underwent either DB ACLR (DB ACLR group) or SB ACLR with LET (SB ACLR+LET group) were enrolled. All patients who met inclusion and exclusion criteria were retrospectively evaluated for knee laxity (the anterior translation and pivot-shift grade), clinical outcomes using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) examination form, Kellgren-Lawrence grade, graft maturation score on second-look arthroscopy, and revision rates at the last follow-up. RESULTS: From an initial cohort of 171 consecutive patients over a 3-year period, 95 (56%) met inclusion and exclusion criteria. The SB ACLR+LET group (n = 47) showed significantly better results in pivot-shift grade at the last follow-up as compared with the DB ACLR group (n = 48) (P = .021). In the SB ACLR+LET group, 93.6% (44/47) were grade 0, whereas 72.9% (35/48) in the DB ACLR group were grade 0. The SB ACLR+LET group (grade A: 42, grade B: 4 and grade C: 1) showed significantly superior results in IKDC objective grade compared with the DB ACLR group (grade A: 32; grade B: 8; and grade C: 8) (P = .017). However, no statistically significant difference could be shown in anterior translation, subjective functional IKDC score, or revision rate between the 2 groups. The mean follow-up duration was 49.7 ± 5.7 months. CONCLUSIONS: SB ACLR + LET demonstrated fewer pivot-shifts (P = .021) and superior IKDC objective grades (P = .017) than a DB ACLR at a mean follow-up of almost 50 months. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Temporary Bridge Occipitocervical Fixation for Comminuted Atlantoaxial Fracture.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate the feasibility of temporary bridge occipitocervical fixation temporary bridge occipitocervical fixation (T-BOCF) for comminuted atlantoaxial fractures. METHODS: A 57-year-old man presented with multiple trauma including a comminuted, undisplaced atlantoaxial fracture; subdural hemorrhage; skull base fracture; scalp laceration; right second finger tendon injury; and right distal femur open fracture. T-BOCF was performed to preserve neck motion while providing rigid stability to atlantoaxial fracture. Occipital plate and bilateral lateral mass screws were inserted at C3, C4, and C5, avoiding the fracture site; this was followed by rod connection without fusion. The screw-rod construct was removed after confirmation of bone union in the fracture site 12 months after the initial operation. RESULTS: Computed tomography performed at 12 months after the operation demonstrated solid bone union. Dynamic radiographs taken 12 months after implant removal demonstrated a flexion-extension range of motion of 16 degrees at C0‒C2 and 19.8 degrees at C2‒C7. The total flexion-extension range of motion was 35.8 degrees. CONCLUSIONS: T-BOCF is a viable option for treatment of comminuted, undisplaced atlantoaxial fractures. The technique is easier than direct C1‒C2 fusion and can avoid complications associated with occipitocervical fusion or C1‒C2 screw fixation. The blood supply to the fracture site is preserved by avoiding subperiosteal stripping, and semispinalis cervicis insertion at the C2 spinous process is also circumvented. Furthermore, neck motion is preserved after implant removal.