ABSTRACT
La uveítis es la tercera causa de ceguera evitable, siendo una de sus complicaciones el glaucoma uveítico. Presentamos el caso de una paciente de 25 años tratada con extracción extra capsular de cristalino y trabeculectomía AO, con posterior ciclocrioterapia bilateral, llegando a controlar la enfermedad inflamatoria de fondo y presión intraocular (PIO) en el ojo derecho por siete años con posterior pérdida de la visión (pthisis bulbi). El ojo izquierdo se mantuvo estable por 15 años, presentando luego una PIO de 50 mmHg, por lo que se implanta una válvula de Ahmed por vía pars plana con previa vitrectomía, debido a las alteraciones anatómicas del segmento anterior. Se controló la PIO y se obtuvo una visión de 20/70 con correctores, sin uso de antihipertensivo ocular. El manejo adecuado de la enfermedad de fondo y el uso de dispositivos de drenaje valvulados son la mejor opción para el glaucoma uveítico. Una gran alternativa de abordaje es el implante vía pars plana, previa vitrectomía.
Uveitis is the third preventable cause of blindness, and uveitic glaucoma is one of its complications. We present the case of a 25-year old female patient who underwent an extracapsular lens excision and AO trabeculectomy, and afterwards bilateral cyclocryotherapy was performed. The underlying inflammatory condition was controlled, and the intraocular pressure (IOP) in the right eye was also controlled for seven years, although she later lost sight (pthisis bulbi). The left eye remained in a stable condition for 15 years, but afterwards it developed 50 mm Hg IOP, so an Ahmed Valve through the pars plana was placed, after having performed a vitrectomy because of the anatomic alterations in the anterior segment. The IOP got controlled and 20/70 vision using glasses was attained, without the use of an ocular antihypertensive compound. Adequate management of the underlying disease and the use of valve drainage systems constitute the best choice for the management of uveitic glaucoma. A good approach option is placing the device through the pars plana, after having performed a vitrectomy.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To determine the characteristics of mistreatment among medical students at a public university in the province Ica, Peru. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This cross-sectional study was performed in 2012, and used a probability sample of medical students (freshman to sixth year) at the Universidad Nacional San Luis Gonzaga. A 23-item survey with a Likert scale was used to measure the students' perceptions of psychological, physical, academic and sexual mistreatment. Univariate and bivariate statistical analysis were performed. RESULTS: A total of 281 students were surveyed. The perception of psychological mistreatment was 96.8%; academic, 86.8%; physical, 62.6% and sexual, 20.6%. Physical abuse increased during the clinical-surgical study cicle (p = 0.001). Medical doctors and residents were the main aggressors. Male students reported of receiving assignments as a punishment, not receiving credits for their work, physical mistreatment, verbal threats, insults, or being teased because of their etnic background. Female students were more likely to have experienced sexual abuse. Report of sexual abuse frequently ocurred at the university (45.3%, p=0.002) and hospital (45.0%, p=0.046). Women frequently reported not knowing to whom or where to denounce the abuse (54.6%, p=0.042) and not reporting it because it stopped (56.9%, p=0.048). CONCLUSIONS: There is a high prevalence of abuse among students in which their characteristics as sex, level of study and aggressor allow to identify the types of abuse that they receive.
Subject(s)
Punishment , Sexual Harassment , Social Behavior , Students, Medical , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Peru , Surveys and Questionnaires , Universities , Young AdultABSTRACT
Determinar las características del maltrato hacia estudiantes de Medicina de una universidad pública en la provincia de Ica, Perú. Materiales y métodos. Investigación transversal realizada el 2012 en una muestra probabilística de estudiantes de Medicina de primer a sexto año de la Universidad Nacional San Luis Gonzaga. Se elaboró una encuesta con un total de 23 ítems en una escala likert, para medir la percepción de maltrato de tipo psicológico, físico, académico y sexual; se usaron análisis estadísticos univariados y bivariados. Resultados. Se encuestaron 281 estudiantes. La percepción de maltrato psicológico fue 96,8%, académico 86,8%, físico 62,6% y sexual 20,6%; el maltrato físico se incrementó durante el ciclo de estudio clínico-quirúrgico (p=0,001). Los médicos docentes y médicos residentes fueron los principales agresores. Estudiantes hombres reportaron con mayor frecuencia haber recibido tareas como castigo, no recibir los créditos por su trabajo, maltrato físico, amenazas verbales, insultos o recibir burlas con respecto a su etnia; mientras que el maltrato sexual fue mayor en mujeres. El reporte de maltrato sexual fue más frecuente en la universidad (45,3%, p=0,002) y el hospital (45,0%, p=0,046). Las mujeres reportaron con mayor frecuencia no saber a quién o dónde acudir para denunciar el maltrato (54,6%, p=0,042) y no denunciarlo porque se detuvo el maltrato (56,9%, p=0,048). Conclusiones. Existe una alta prevalencia de maltrato, donde las características de los estudiantes según el sexo, los ciclos de estudio y el agresor permiten identificar los tipos de maltrato que reciben los estudiantes de medicina...
To determine the characteristics of mistreatment among medical students at a public university in the province Ica, Peru. Materials and methods. This cross-sectional study was performed in 2012, and used a probability sample of medical students (freshman to sixth year) at the Universidad Nacional San Luis Gonzaga. A 23-item survey with a Likert scale was used to measure the students' perceptions of psychological, physical, academic and sexual mistreatment. Univariate and bivariate statistical analysis were performed. Results. A total of 281 students were surveyed. The perception of psychological mistreatment was 96.8%; academic, 86.8%; physical, 62.6% and sexual, 20.6%. Physical abuse increased during the clinical-surgical study cicle (p = 0.001). Medical doctors and residents were the main aggressors. Male students reported of receiving assignments as a punishment, not receiving credits for their work, physical mistreatment, verbal threats, insults, or being teased because of their etnic background. Female students were more likely to have experienced sexual abuse. Report of sexual abuse frequently ocurred at the university (45.3%, p=0.002) and hospital (45.0%, p=0.046). Women frequently reported not knowing to whom or where to denounce the abuse (54.6%, p=0.042) and not reporting it because it stopped (56.9%, p=0.048). Conclusions. There is a high prevalence of abuse among students in which their characteristics as sex, level of study and aggressor allow to identify the types of abuse that they receive...