Intraocular lens calcification in a patient with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome.

Introduction: Calcification of hydrophilic intraocular lenses (IOL) is a rare complication following cataract surgery. Secondary calcification is described as due to host factors or changes in the IOL environment and uveitis, proliferative diabetic retinopathy and sequelae of ocular surgery are recognised potentiators. The impact of systemic connective tissue disease on IOL opacification is yet to described. Purpose: To describe the clinical presentation and management of a young patient, with a rare subtype of Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, who presented with secondary IOL calcification 14 years after primary IOL insertion. Observations: Floret-like lesions were observed on the IOL surface. Positive staining for calcification was observed with Alizarin red and von Kossa method on laboratory analysis. Conclusions and importance: Patients with systemic connective tissue disease, such as a subtype of Ehlers-Danlos, may present with secondary IOL calcification many years after primary lens insertion. This poses an additional consideration when implanting IOLs in these patients.Good visual acuity can be achieved with IOL exchange.

Dispersive viscosurgical devices demonstrate greater efficacy in protecting corneal endothelium in vitro.

OBJECTIVE: During phacoemulsification, the corneal endothelium is protected by an ophthalmic viscosurgical device (OVD). In this in vitro study, we assessed six different OVDs for their effectiveness in protecting the corneal endothelium. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Phacoemulsification was performed in cadaver eyes of young pigs. Five syringe units of six different OVDs were tested (Healon EndoCoat, Viscoat, Methylvisc, Healon, Healon GV, ProVisc). After surgery, the area of endothelium coated with OVD was determined in relation to the total endothelial surface. Additionally, an endothelial cell count was obtained. As a control, an endothelial cell count was obtained from freshly trephined corneas. Statistical analysis was performed using the Mann-Whitney U test and the Spearman correlation. RESULTS: The least postoperative endothelial coating and cell count were observed in the cohesive OVDs while the dispersive OVDs showed statistically significant higher values. Healon EndoCoat and Viscoat yielded a coating area of 86 (85-92)% and 85 (85-90)%, respectively. Endothelial cell count was highest in the two dispersive groups with 4065 (3928-4088) cells/mm2 (Methylvisc) and 4032 (4015-4115) cells/mm2 (Viscoat). Endothelial coating area and endothelial cell count correlated statistically significantly. CONCLUSION: Dispersive OVDs from this study showed greater adherence to the endothelial surface than the cohesive ones. Furthermore, postoperative endothelial cell counts of corneas treated with dispersive OVDs were higher than of corneas treated with cohesive OVDs. Our in vitro results suggest that dispersive OVDs protect the corneal endothelium better during phacoemulsification than cohesive OVDs.