Successful prevention of stenosis after circumferential endoscopic resection of esophageal cancer.

Circumferential resection of a >5-cm longitudinal mucosal defect following esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a risk factor for refractory stenosis. Circumferential ESD was performed in 3 patients with 64, 69, and 70 mm longitudinal mucosal defects. A local steroid injection was used to treat the postoperative ulcer, followed by an oral steroid. In all three cases, the ulcer healed without the need for endoscopic dilation. A combination of local injection and oral steroids effectively prevented esophageal stenosis in patients with high-risk stenosis after ESD.

Diagnostic Performance of Endocytoscopy for Esophageal Eosinophilia.

INTRODUCTION: Eosinophils in the esophageal epithelium are unevenly distributed in eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). Esophageal eosinophilia (EE) may be observable by endocytoscopy (EC). This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of EC for the diagnosis of EE. METHODS: A total of 33 EoE patients underwent EC with methylene blue staining from March 2020 to April 2021. A total of 194 EC images with corresponding biopsies were obtained. Three findings of EC, increased squamous cells (item I), increased inflammatory cells (item II), and cells with bilobed nuclei (item III), were established. These findings were reviewed by two endoscopists to diagnose EE. Another four endoscopists reviewed the images for interobserver agreement. RESULTS: When all three items were met by EC, the sensitivity and the accuracy for the diagnosis of EE were 88% and 76%, respectively. The integrated diagnostic odds ratios (ORs) for the diagnosis of EE of the four endoscopists were significant (OR: 3.98, 95% CI: 2.94-5.40, p < 0.001). The results were similar when only item III was met. Interobserver agreement was good for item III to diagnose EE (kappa value = 0.653). DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: The diagnostic performance of EC for EE is acceptable and has good interobserver agreement. It may be useful for targeted biopsy in EoE patients.

Novel endoscopic approaches using the endocytoscopy for the target biopsy in esophageal eosinophilia.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Multiple biopsies are recommended for the diagnosis of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) because inflammatory changes are frequently patchy. Reports on EoE using endocytoscopy (ECS) are limited. This present study aimed to assess if diagnostic yield improves by adding ECS on conventional white light imaging (WLI) in patients with esophageal eosinophilia (EE). METHODS: A total of 284 biopsy specimens from 71 patients with a known diagnosis of EE were enrolled and divided into the WLI group (156 specimens) or the ECS group (128 specimens). Four biopsies from 5 and 10 cm proximal to the esophagogastric junction were taken from each patient. In the ECS group, the biopsy was performed where bilobed nuclei were observed. The biopsy sensitivity for EE, eosinophil count of a single specimen and the biopsy sensitivity of each endoscopic finding were evaluated between both groups. RESULTS: The sensitivity of a single biopsy specimen was higher in the ECS group than that of the WLI group (62.5 vs. 41.7%, P < 0.001). In addition, the median eosinophil count in the ECS group was significantly higher [19 vs. 6.5/high-power field (HPF), P < 0.001]. For each endoscopic finding, ECS-based biopsy had higher sensitivity than that of WLI in the diagnosis of edema (33.1 vs. 11.3%, P = 0.007) and linear furrows (75.8 vs. 52%, P = 0.005). CONCLUSION: This study showed that adding ECS to WLI improved the biopsy sensitivity and eosinophil detection in patients with EE.

Effects of steroid use for stenosis prevention after endoscopic submucosal dissection for cervical esophageal cancer.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Esophageal stenosis is a serious complication after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for thoracic esophageal cancer (TEC), and steroid has been applied for stenosis prevention. However, the rate of stenosis and effect of steroid for ESD of cervical esophageal cancer (CEC) remain unknown. The aim was to clarify the rate and managements of post-ESD stenosis for CEC. METHODS: A total of 325 lesions with 272 patients who underwent ESD for esophageal cancers were enrolled and were divided to the CEC group (43 lesions) or the TEC group (282 lesions). Patient characteristics, clinicopathological features, procedure-related outcomes of esophageal ESD, stenosis rate and clinical outcome of steroid use cases were evaluated. RESULTS: More patients in the CEC group received preventive steroid treatment compared to the TEC group (37.2% vs 14.5%, P = 0.001). The rate of post-ESD stenosis tended to be higher in the CEC group (11.6%) than in the TEC group (6.7%). For cases of 3/4 ≤ of circumference, local injection with oral steroid had lower stenosis rate than local injection only in both groups (CEC 40% vs 100%, TEC 30.7% vs 56.3%). More sessions and longer duration of dilation were needed to release the stenosis in the CEC group (20 times vs. 5 times, P = 0.015; 196 days vs. 55 days, P = 0.043). CONCLUSION: The post-ESD stenosis rate of CEC tended to be higher than that of TEC. More intensive preventive measures for post-ESD stenosis may be needed for CEC than TEC.

A novel scoring system to predict therapeutic intervention for non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Various scoring systems have been developed to predict the need for endoscopic treatment in patients with non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (NVUGIB). However, they have rarely been applied in clinical practice because the processes are complicated. The aim of this study was to establish a simple scoring system that predicts the need for endoscopic intervention in patients with NVUGIB. We retrospectively enrolled 509 consecutive patients with suspected NVUGIB who underwent emergency endoscopy. In the development cohort (from January 2016 to December 2018), risk factors that predict the need for endoscopic intervention were determined from 349 patients' data by multivariate logistic regression analysis. This led to the development of a novel scoring system named the Nagoya University score (N score). In the validation cohort (from January 2019 to September 2020), we evaluated the diagnostic value of the N score, the Hirosaki score, and the Glasgow-Blatchford scores (GBS) by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves using another 160 patients' data. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed syncope, hematemesis, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), and BUN/Cr as significant predictive factors for endoscopic intervention. In the validation study, the N score was superior to the GBS and equal to the Hirosaki score in predicting the endoscopic intervention (AUC, N score 0.776 [95% CI 0.702-0.851] vs. GBS 0.615 [0.523-0.708], Hirosaki 0.719 [0.636-0.803]). The N score revealed a sensitivity of 84.5% and a specificity of 61.8%. Our N score, which is consisted of only four factors, would select patients who require endoscopic intervention with high probability.

Collision Tumors of Gastric Adenocarcinoma and Mucosa-associated Lymphoid Tissue Lymphoma.

A 65-year-old woman with a history of treatment for splenic marginal zone B-cell lymphoma and gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy. A reddish elevated lesion was found in the fundus of the stomach. On image-enhanced endoscopy, several findings, such as glandular structures of varying sizes suggesting well-differentiated adenocarcinoma, pruned blood vessels, and dilated blood vessels in deeper mucosa suggesting MALT lymphoma, were observed. The final pathological diagnosis after surgical resection was collision tumors of well-differentiated adenocarcinoma and MALT lymphoma. The features of both tumors could be observed simultaneously with image-enhanced endoscopy.

Comparison of High-Resolution Manometry in Patients Complaining of Dysphagia among Patients with or without Diabetes Mellitus.

INTRODUCTION: Dysphagia is a common symptom that occurs in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). There have been few prospective observational studies on esophageal motility disorders in DM using high-resolution manometry (HRM). This study aimed to clarify the characteristics of esophageal motility disorders using HRM in patients with dysphagia and compare them between DM and non-DM patients. METHODS: Patients with dysphagia were prospectively recruited between October 2018 and July 2019. Patients (n = 89) underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy and HRM and completed the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) questionnaire. Manometry parameters and motility disorder classifications were compared between DM and non-DM patients. We also investigated the differences in clinical backgrounds and questionnaire scores among DM patients with normal and abnormal manometry results. RESULTS: A higher prevalence of esophageal motility disorder was observed in DM patients (60%, 21/35) compared to non-DM patients (29.6%, 16/54) (p = 0.001). The prevalence of minor disorders such as ineffective esophageal motor disorder and fragmented peristalsis was significantly higher (45 vs. 11%), and the distal contractile integral, integrated relaxation pressure, and contractile front velocity values were lower in the DM group. Among DM patients, those with abnormal esophageal motility had a significantly higher prevalence of neuropathy, retinopathy, and nephropathy, as well as higher reflux or constipation scores on the GSRS, than those with normal results. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with dysphagia, the frequency of minor esophageal motility disorders was higher in DM patients than in non-DM patients. Abnormal esophageal motility related to poor esophageal clearance was associated with higher prevalence of diabetic complications.

Subjective Symptoms in Patients with Eosinophilic Esophagitis Are Related to Esophageal Wall Thickness and Esophageal Body Pressure.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and high-resolution manometry (HRM) can be used in the evaluation of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) for frequent symptoms such as dysphagia. However, the role of these examinations is not clear. AIMS: The aim of this study was to objectively evaluate the subjective symptoms of EoE patients with EUS and HRM. METHODS: Patients who had endoscopic findings indicative of EoE and matched the number of eosinophil infiltrates used as diagnostic criteria were recruited between September 2018 and August 2019. Evaluable subjects underwent EUS and HRM and completed the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) questionnaire. The esophageal wall thickness (evaluated with EUS) and HRM parameters between patients with and without symptoms were retrospectively compared. Symptomatic patients were re-examined using EUS and HRM 6 months after treatment. RESULTS: A total of 35 patients (29 males, median age of 49 years) were divided into symptomatic (20 patients) and asymptomatic groups (15 patients). The esophageal wall was thicker, and the distal contractile integral (DCI) values were higher in the symptomatic group (P < 0.001). In addition, DCI values were positively correlated with esophageal wall thickness. After treatment, the GSRS scores showed an improving trend for each item. Esophageal wall thickness and DCI values were significantly decreased (Ps < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Esophageal wall thickening and increased esophageal body pressure may be involved in subjective symptoms. In addition, treatment may reduce esophageal thickness and pressure along with improvement of subjective symptoms.