Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
2.
J Public Health Manag Pract ; 23(6): 581-588, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27997480

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: In the United States, state laws require health care providers to report specific diseases and events to public health authorities, a fundamental facet of disease surveillance. However, reporting by providers is often inconsistent, infrequent, and delayed. OBJECTIVE: To examine knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding provider disease reporting and to understand current barriers to provider disease reporting. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study was conducted via an anonymous, standardized electronic survey. SETTING: The survey was conducted at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, a large, tertiary academic medical center in Nashville, Tennessee. PARTICIPANTS: Health care providers in 4 specialties (internal medicine, pediatrics, obstetrics-gynecology, and emergency medicine). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Knowledge of and attitudes regarding provider reporting of diseases to public health authorities in Tennessee. RESULTS: The majority of providers acknowledged they cared for patients with reportable diseases (362/435, 83.2%) and believed that it was their responsibility to report to public health authorities (429/436, 98.4%); however, less than half had ever reported a case (206/436, 47.2%). The median percent correct on the knowledge assessment of Tennessee reportable diseases and conditions was 81.3% (interquartile range = 68.8-87.5). Providers cited a lack of knowledge of which diseases are reportable (186/429, 43.3%) and the logistics of reporting (153/429, 35.7%) as the primary barriers for compliance. CONCLUSION: Most providers acknowledged they cared for patients with reportable diseases and believed they had an obligation to report to public health authorities. However, a lack of knowledge about reporting was frequently described as a limitation to report effectively. Many knowledge deficits were significantly greater among residents than other providers.The policy and practice implications of these findings include a demonstrated need for education of providers about disease reporting as well as development of more convenient reporting mechanisms. Fundamental knowledge of reportable disease requirements and procedures is critical for participation in the broader public health system.


Subject(s)
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Health Personnel/psychology , Mandatory Reporting , Cross-Sectional Studies , Health Personnel/standards , Humans , Population Surveillance/methods , Public Health/methods , Qualitative Research , Surveys and Questionnaires , Tennessee
3.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 65(38): 1039-40, 2016 Sep 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27685014

ABSTRACT

On April 15, 2016, local public health officials in Shelby County, Tennessee, were notified of a positive measles immunoglobulin M (IgM) test for a male aged 18 months (patient A). On April 18, 2016, a second positive measles IgM test was reported for a man aged 50 years (patient B). Both patients had rash onset on April 9, 2016. The Shelby County Health Department initiated an investigation, and confirmatory testing for measles virus on oropharyngeal swabs by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) at CDC was positive for both patients. On April 21, 2016, public health officials were notified of a third suspected measles case in a female aged 7 months (patient C) who had developed a rash on April 14; PCR testing was positive. Genotyping conducted at CDC identified genotype B3 measles virus in all three cases. Genotype B3 is known to be circulating globally and has previously been associated with imported cases in the United States (1).


Subject(s)
Disease Outbreaks , Measles virus/isolation & purification , Measles/diagnosis , Measles/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Immunoglobulin M/blood , Infant , Male , Measles/etiology , Measles virus/immunology , Middle Aged , Tennessee/epidemiology , Young Adult
4.
Foodborne Pathog Dis ; 12(12): 950-2, 2015 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26540115

ABSTRACT

We describe multidrug-resistant (MDR) Salmonella Heidelberg infections associated with mechanically separated chicken (MSC) served at a county correctional facility. Twenty-three inmates met the case definition. All reported diarrhea, 19 (83%) reported fever, 16 (70%) reported vomiting, 4 (17%) had fever ≥103°F, and 3 (13%) were hospitalized. A case-control study found no single food item significantly associated with illness. Salmonella Heidelberg with an indistinguishable pulsed-field gel electrophoresis pattern was isolated from nine stool specimens; two isolates displayed resistance to a total of five drug classes, including the third-generation cephalosporin, ceftriaxone. MDR Salmonella Heidelberg might have contributed to the severity of illness. Salmonella Heidelberg indistinguishable from the outbreak subtype was isolated from unopened MSC. The environmental health assessment identified cross-contamination through poor food-handling practices as a possible contributing factor. Proper hand-washing techniques and safe food-handling practices were reviewed with the kitchen supervisor.


Subject(s)
Chickens/microbiology , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Drug Resistance, Multiple , Food Handling/methods , Food Microbiology , Salmonella/drug effects , Adult , Animals , Case-Control Studies , Cobalt , Disease Outbreaks , Feces/microbiology , Female , Food Contamination , Hand Disinfection , Humans , Male , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Middle Aged , Salmonella/isolation & purification , Salmonella Food Poisoning/microbiology , Salmonella Food Poisoning/prevention & control , Salmonella Food Poisoning/transmission
5.
Biosecur Bioterror ; 12(1): 42-8, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24552361

ABSTRACT

During routine screening in 2011, US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) identified 2 persons with elevated radioactivity. CBP, in collaboration with Los Alamos National Laboratory, informed the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) that these people could have increased radiation exposure as a result of undergoing cardiac Positron Emission Tomography (PET) scans several months earlier with rubidium Rb 82 chloride injection from CardioGen-82. We conducted a multistate investigation to assess the potential extent and magnitude of radioactive strontium overexposure among patients who had undergone Rb 82 PET scans. We selected a convenience sample of clinical sites in 4 states and reviewed records to identify eligible study participants, defined as people who had had an Rb 82 PET scan between February and July 2011. All participants received direct radiation screening using a radioisotope identifier able to detect the gamma energy specific for strontium-85 (514 keV) and urine bioassay for excreted radioactive strontium. We referred a subset of participants with direct radiation screening counts above background readings for whole body counting (WBC) using a rank ordering of direct radiation screening. The rank order list, from highest to lowest, was used to contact and offer voluntary enrollment for WBC. Of 308 participants, 292 (95%) had direct radiation screening results indistinguishable from background radiation measurements; 261 of 265 (98%) participants with sufficient urine for analysis had radioactive strontium results below minimum detectable activity. None of the 23 participants who underwent WBC demonstrated elevated strontium activity above levels associated with routine use of the rubidium Rb 82 generator. Among investigation participants, we did not identify evidence of strontium internal contamination above permissible levels. This investigation might serve as a model for future investigations of radioactive internal contamination incidents.


Subject(s)
Positron-Emission Tomography , Rubidium Radioisotopes , Strontium/isolation & purification , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Heart/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Rubidium Radioisotopes/analysis , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , United States
6.
Am J Epidemiol ; 175(11): 1110-9, 2012 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22582209

ABSTRACT

Because of widespread distribution of the influenza A (H1N1) 2009 monovalent vaccine (pH1N1 vaccine) and the prior association between Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) and the 1976 H1N1 influenza vaccine, enhanced surveillance was implemented to estimate the magnitude of any increased GBS risk following administration of pH1N1 vaccine. The authors conducted active, population-based surveillance for incident cases of GBS among 45 million persons residing at 10 Emerging Infections Program sites during October 2009-May 2010; GBS was defined according to published criteria. The authors determined medical and vaccine history for GBS cases through medical record review and patient interviews. The authors used vaccine coverage data to estimate person-time exposed and unexposed to pH1N1 vaccine and calculated age- and sex-adjusted rate ratios comparing GBS incidence in these groups, as well as age- and sex-adjusted numbers of excess GBS cases. The authors received 411 reports of confirmed or probable GBS. The rate of GBS immediately following pH1N1 vaccination was 57% higher than in person-time unexposed to vaccine (adjusted rate ratio = 1.57, 95% confidence interval: 1.02, 2.21), corresponding to 0.74 excess GBS cases per million pH1N1 vaccine doses (95% confidence interval: 0.04, 1.56). This excess risk was much smaller than that observed during the 1976 vaccine campaign and was comparable to some previous seasonal influenza vaccine risk assessments.


Subject(s)
Guillain-Barre Syndrome/etiology , Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype/immunology , Influenza Vaccines/adverse effects , Population Surveillance , Product Surveillance, Postmarketing , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Guillain-Barre Syndrome/epidemiology , Health Promotion , Humans , Incidence , Infant , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Male , Middle Aged , Risk Assessment , Time Factors , United States/epidemiology , Young Adult
7.
Clin Infect Dis ; 54 Suppl 5: S498-503, 2012 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22572675

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A mean of ≥ 1000 foodborne disease outbreaks (FBDOs) causing ≥ 20,000 illnesses are reported to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) annually. We evaluated characteristics of successful outbreak investigations (ie, those that identified an etiologic agent or food vehicle) in the Foodborne Diseases Active Surveillance Network (FoodNet). METHODS: FBDOs were defined as the occurrence of ≥ 2 cases of a similar illness resulting from ingestion of a common food. FBDOs reported to CDC Foodborne Disease Outbreak Surveillance System during 2003-2008 with FoodNet supplemental data available were included in the analyses. RESULTS: Data regarding 1200 FBDOs were available. An etiologic agent was confirmed in 715 (60%); a food vehicle was identified in 387 (32%). At least 4 fecal specimens were collected in 425 of 639 outbreaks (67%) with a confirmed etiologic agent and 48 of 232 (21%) without a confirmed etiologic agent (odds ratio [OR], 7.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 5.3-10.9). A food vehicle was identified in 314 (47%) of 671 outbreaks investigated using a case-control or cohort study, compared with only 73 (14%) of 529 outbreaks investigated by using other methods (OR, 5.5; 95% CI, 4.1-7.3). At least 1 barrier affecting the success of the investigation was reported for 655 outbreaks, including too few patients (n = 172; 26%), too few stool specimens (n = 167; 25%), and too few control subjects (n = 152; 23%). CONCLUSIONS: Etiologic agent and vehicle are frequently undetermined in FBDOs. Greater emphasis on fecal specimen collection and overcoming barriers to pursuing analytic epidemiologic studies can improve ascertainment of these factors.


Subject(s)
Disease Outbreaks/statistics & numerical data , Feces/microbiology , Food Contamination/statistics & numerical data , Food Microbiology/statistics & numerical data , Foodborne Diseases/epidemiology , Case-Control Studies , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Cohort Studies , Food Microbiology/methods , Humans , Population Surveillance , United States/epidemiology
8.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 17(3): 366-71, 2011 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21392425

ABSTRACT

In 2009, the Tennessee Department of Health received reports of 5 tuberculin skin test (TST) conversions among employees of an elephant refuge and isolation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from a resident elephant. To determine the extent of the outbreak and identify risk factors for TST conversion, we conducted a cohort study and onsite assessment. Risk for conversion was increased for elephant caregivers and administrative employees working in the barn housing the M. tuberculosis-infected elephant or in offices connected to the barn (risk ratio 20.3, 95% confidence interval 2.8-146.7). Indirect exposure to aerosolized M. tuberculosis and delayed or inadequate infection control practices likely contributed to transmission. The following factors are needed to reduce risk for M. tuberculosis transmission in the captive elephant industry: increased knowledge about M. tuberculosis infection in elephants, improved infection control practices, and specific occupational health programs.


Subject(s)
Disease Outbreaks , Elephants/microbiology , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/isolation & purification , Tuberculosis/transmission , Zoonoses/transmission , Adult , Aged , Animals , Female , Humans , Infection Control , Male , Middle Aged , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/classification , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/genetics , Occupational Exposure , Occupational Health , Tennessee/epidemiology , Tuberculin Test , Tuberculosis/diagnosis , Tuberculosis/epidemiology , Tuberculosis/microbiology , Young Adult , Zoonoses/epidemiology , Zoonoses/microbiology
9.
Mil Med ; 174(4): 419-25, 2009 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19485114

ABSTRACT

Amblyomma americanum is an aggressive human-biting tick that transmits several known human pathogens and is associated with a Lyme disease-like illness of unknown etiology. To determine the frequency, distinguishing clinical characteristics, and etiology ofA. americanum-associated illness and identify associated risk factors, a prospective study of adult tick-bite victims was conducted at Fort Campbell from 2005-2007. Forty-two participants submitted ticks, none of which contained Borrelia lonestari or B. burgdorferi DNA. Thirty-three participants completed a follow-up health survey; 14 reported at least one symptom; two had erythema migrans-like rash; eight sought medical evaluation for their symptoms. Findings suggest that a variety of symptoms are temporally associated with tick bite but data provide no clear evidence that reported symptoms were caused by an infectious process. Removing a tick by hand or being bitten on a limb may be a risk factor for illness.


Subject(s)
Bites and Stings/epidemiology , Military Personnel , Tick Infestations/epidemiology , Ticks/classification , Adult , Aged , Animals , Female , Humans , Kentucky/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Risk Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL