Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Am J Med Qual ; 34(6): 577-584, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30693784

ABSTRACT

A key component of quality improvement (QI) is developing leaders who can implement QI projects collaboratively. A yearlong interprofessional, workplace-based, continuing professional development program devoted to QI trained 2 cohorts of teams (dyads or triads) to lead QI projects in their areas of work using Plan-Do-Study-Act methodology. Teams represented different specialties in both inpatient and outpatient settings. They spent 4 to 6 hours/week on seminars, online modules, bimonthly meetings with a QI coach, and QI project work. Evaluations conducted after each session included pre-post program QI self-efficacy and project milestones. Post-program participants reported higher levels of QI self-efficacy (mean = 3.47; SD = 0.39) compared with pre program (mean = 2.02, SD = 0.51; P = .03, Cohen's d = 3.19). Impact on clinical units was demonstrated, but varied. The coach was identified as a key factor for success. An interprofessional, workplace-based, continuing professional development program focused on QI increased QI knowledge and skills and translated to improvements in the clinical setting.


Subject(s)
Inservice Training , Interprofessional Relations , Quality Improvement/organization & administration , Quality of Health Care/organization & administration , Curriculum , Educational Measurement , Humans , Inservice Training/methods , Patient Care Team/organization & administration , Patient Care Team/standards , Self Efficacy
2.
J Healthc Manag ; 49(4): 227-35, 2004.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15328657

ABSTRACT

Following the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, bioterrorism preparedness was a priority in hospitals, but it did not remain a priority. As a result, hospitals are still unprepared to deal with the effects of a bioterrorist attack. The government has provided initial funding to state and local governments for bioterrorism preparedness; however, much of this money has yet to reach hospitals. With the inadequate funding available to hospitals, four initial measures must be focused on. These focus areas are community involvement, hospital staff education, information technology and disease surveillance improvement, and additional equipment and staff acquisition. Hospitals should also make bioterrorism-preparedness planning a regional effort.


Subject(s)
Bioterrorism , Disaster Planning/organization & administration , Hospital Administration , Community Participation , Disease Notification , Guidelines as Topic , Humans , Information Systems , Personnel Staffing and Scheduling , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...