Significantly reducing implant loss rates in immediate implant-based breast reconstruction: A protocol and completed audit of quality assurance.

INTRODUCTION: Immediate implant-based breast reconstruction (IBR) rates have increased considerably with the advent of acellular dermal matrices. Implant loss is a significant complication and is costly to patients and the NHS. National Mastectomy and Breast Reconstruction Audit and Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Audit data have demonstrated national implant loss rate of 9% at 3 months. National Oncoplastic Guidelines for Best Practice cite a < 5% target. We aimed to reduce implant loss by introducing a protocol with pre-, intra- and post-operative interventions. METHODS: Audit of IBR at a single oncoplastic breast unit was commenced and implant loss at 3 months was recorded (May 2012-July 2014). Patients were identified from a prospectively maintained database, and case notes were examined by identifying factors associated with implant loss. A team involving microbiology, theatre staff, infection control and surgeons was established. A novel, evidence-based intervention bundle, including more than 25 protocol changes, was introduced. Prospective re-audit of IBR (April 2015-December 2017) was completed following introduction of the new protocol and implant loss was recorded at 3 months. RESULTS: The first retrospective audit of 77 reconstructions (54 patients) demonstrated 11 implant losses at 3 months (14%). Re-audit, post-intervention, comprised 129 reconstructions (106 patients) with no implant loss at 3 months. Fisher's exact analysis revealed statistically significant reduction in implant loss rate (P < 0.00001) following protocol introduction. CONCLUSIONS: Implant loss rate following IBR can be reduced to an exceptionally low level, well below national targets, by adhering to this evidence-based intervention bundle. Our protocol could improve outcomes nationally.

Clinical presentations, medical complications, and functional outcomes of individuals with gunshot wound-induced spinal cord injury.

Gunshot wounds are currently the second leading cause of spinal cord injury in the United States, and coexisting injuries or complications accompanying penetrating wounds often increase patient morbidity. A review of 217 traumatic spinal cord injury rehabilitation admissions to a tertiary care hospital during a 5-yr period revealed 49 individuals (23%) with gunshot wound-induced spinal cord injury. A single bullet entry site was seen in 54%, whereas 17% had greater than 3 sites of entry. Common (>25%) sites of bullet entry included the back, abdomen, neck, and chest. Common gunshot wound-related medical complications included pain (54%), infections (40%), pneumothorax (24%), nonspinal fractures (22%), colonic perforation (17%), cerebrospinal fluid leak (10%), and retroperitoneal hematoma (10%). When compared with nonviolence-related traumatic spinal cord injury (motor vehicle accidents and falls), patients with gunshot wound-induced spinal cord injury were significantly more frequently (P < 0.01) younger, non-Caucasian, unmarried, and unemployed. Injury characteristics revealed significantly (P < 0.01) more paraplegia and complete spinal cord injury within the gunshot wound-induced spinal cord injury group. Gunshot wound-induced spinal cord injury and nonviolent traumatic spinal cord injury groups had similar lengths of stay, Functional Independence Measure scores, and discharge to home rates. This article adds to the growing body of literature examining clinical, medical, and functional outcome characteristics of individuals with spinal cord injury secondary to violence-related cause.

Rehabilitation outcome of individuals with nontraumatic myelopathy resulting from spinal stenosis.

A study was undertaken of 46 patients (19 cervical and 27 lumbar) admitted to an inpatient rehabilitation unit following surgical decompression for myelopathy or cauda equina syndrome resulting from spinal stenosis (SS). Individuals with SS represented 16 percent of all spinal cord injury (SCI) admissions. When compared to patients with traumatic SCI, patients with SS were significantly (t-test, p < .01) older (mean age 68 versus 39 years), more frequently retired/unemployed (89 percent versus 43 percent), more often married (57 percent versus 36 percent) and less often male (54 percent versus 82 percent) but with similar ethnicity. Significant (p < .01) Functional Independence Measurement (FIM) changes for the SS patients were noted after rehabilitation in the categories of self-care, sphincter control and mobility/locomotion. Additionally, outcome comparisons with a group of traumatic SCI patients who had similar motor function revealed similar lengths of stay, discharge FIM scores and discharge-to-community rates. This study suggests that individuals with weakness secondary to SS represent a significant proportion of individuals with SCI, make significant functional gains following inpatient rehabilitation and can achieve functional outcomes similar to those of traumatic SCI individuals.