Advances in systemic therapy for metastatic breast cancer: future perspectives.

Breast cancer (BC) is the most common cancer in women worldwide. One in eight women will develop the disease in her lifetime. Notwithstanding the incredible progress made in this field, BC still represents the second most common cause of cancer-related death in women. Targeted drugs have revolutionised breast cancer treatment and improved the prognosis as well as the life expectancy of millions of women. However, the phenomenon of primary and secondary pharmacological resistance is becoming increasingly evident, limiting the efficacy of these agents and calling for a better in-depth knowledge and understanding of the biology as well as the biochemical crosstalk underlying the disease. The advent of laboratory technologies in the clinical setting such as the routine use of next generation sequencing has allowed identification of new genetic alterations as well as providing a precise picture of the molecular landscapes of each tumour. Consequently, new specific therapeutic approaches are becoming available to minimise or delay the occurrence of resistance. In this review, we analyse the latest research and news from the clinical development side for each BC subtype.

HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: a changing scenario.

Adjuvant trastuzumab (AT) dramatically improved HER2-positive breast cancer prognosis. Relapsed disease after AT has different patterns and information is available from observational studies. In this Review Chemotherapy regimens combined to anti-HER2 blockade are discussed, focusing in particular the role of anthracyclines, taxanes and capecitabine. The use of trastuzumab beyond progression and the role of other anti-HER2 agents like lapatinib, pertuzumab and T-DM1 are explored, as also dual blockade and in trastuzumab resistant Patients. Metastatic "de novo" HER2 Luminal (co-expression of HER2 and hormone receptors) Patients are eligible for anastrozole and trastuzumab but if pretreated with trastuzumab they are also eligible for lapatinib and letrozole. In any case endocrine treatment plays a complementary role to chemotherapy which remains pivotal. The last topic explored is treatment options for patients with brain metastases where both trastuzumab given concurrent with radiotherapy or lapatinib and capecitabine appear as potentially active.

Observational study on adjuvant trastuzumab in HER2-positive early breast cancer patients.

AIM: This observational study investigates the use of adjuvant trastuzumab (AT) in HER2-positive breast cancer patients in a real-life setting, focusing on relapse and discontinuation rates. PATIENTS & METHODS: Data on a group of HER2-positive patients collected from 13 oncology centers of northeast Italy were analyzed. RESULTS: In total, 1245 patients were analyzed. 13.1% of patients were excluded from AT because of comorbidities, age, tumor stage, refusal or other reasons; 8.2% of patients who received AT interrupted the therapy, mainly for toxicity. Overall the relapse rate was 10.9% in the AT-treated population versus 22.6% in nontreated patients (follow-up: 37.4 and 62.1 months, respectively). Disease-free survival (DFS) was lower in AT-relapsed patients than in not-relapsed. Statistical analysis showed a correlation between DFS and estrogen receptor status in AT-treated patients. CONCLUSION: Relapse rates are lower in clinical setting compared to clinical trials. Overall, AT is effective in HER2-positive early-stage breast cancer patients.

Effect of adjuvant trastuzumab treatment in conventional clinical setting: an observational retrospective multicenter Italian study.

Clinical trials have shown the efficacy of trastuzumab-based adjuvant therapy in HER2-positive breast cancers, but routine clinical use awaits evaluation of compliance, safety, and effectiveness. Adjuvant trastuzumab-based therapy in routine clinical use was evaluated in the retrospective study GHEA, recording 1,002 patients treated according to the HERA protocol between March 2005 and December 2009 in 42 Italian oncology departments; 874 (87.23 %) patients completed 1-year trastuzumab treatment. In 128 patients (12.77 %), trastuzumab was withdrawn due to cardiac or non-cardiac toxicity (28 and 29 patients, respectively), disease progression (5 patients) or the clinician's decision (66 patients). In addition, 156 patients experienced minor non-cardiac toxicities; 10 and 44 patients showed CHF and decreased LVEF, respectively, at the end of treatment. Compliance and safety of adjuvant trastuzumab-based therapy in Italian hospitals were high and close to those reported in the HERA trial. With a median follow-up of 32 months, 107 breast cancer relapses were recorded (overall frequency, 10.67 %), and lymph node involvement, estrogen receptor negativity, lymphoid infiltration, and vascular invasion were identified as independent prognostic factors for tumor recurrence, indicating that relapses were associated with advanced tumor stage. Analysis of site and frequency of distant metastases showed that bone metastases were significantly more frequent during or immediately after trastuzumab (<18 months from the start of treatment) compared to recurrences in bone after the end of treatment and wash-out of the drug (>18 months from the start of treatment) (35.89 vs. 14.28 %, p = 0.0240); no significant differences were observed in recurrences in the other recorded body sites, raising the possibility that the protection exerted by trastuzumab is lower in bone metastases.

Acneiform rash due to epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors: high-level laser therapy as an innovative approach.

Acneiform rash associated with epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors frequently presents facial manifestations. The treatment modality for such lesions still needs to be elucidated. The aim of this original report was to evaluate the effectiveness of high-level laser therapy in reducing the severity of facial acneiform rash induced by cetuximab, an epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors. Four patients with metastatic colorectal cancer and two patients with head and neck cancer showing cetuximab-induced facial rash were treated by high-level laser therapy in two 8-min-long consecutive sessions/day over a 4-day treatment. Patients wore protective glasses to prevent eye damage related to laser light. Subsequently, patients were seen once a week for up to 21 days and after 180 days. During each day of treatment and each follow-up recall, patients were asked to complete a questionnaire about the onset and progression of their acneiform rash (for a total of eight sessions). Cetuximab-related toxicity and general discomfort visual analogue scales were also recorded in each of these eight sessions in the treated and control areas in each patient. After the fourth session of high-level laser therapy, the patients showed a noteworthy decrease in both cetuximab-related toxicity and visual analogue scales, up to a complete regression of the lesions at the end of the follow-up in all treated areas. The high-level laser therapy was effective in the healing of acneiform rash associated with epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors with no side effects.

Biological characteristics and medical treatment of breast cancer in young women-a featured population: results from the NORA study.

BACKGROUND: The present paper described the biological characteristics and clinical behavior of young women in the cohort NORA study PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 2000-2002, patients (N > 3500) were enrolled at 77 Italian hospitals. Women aged ≤50 years (N = 1013) were stratified into age groups (≤35, 36-40, 41-45, and 46-50 years). The relationship between age and patient characteristics, cancer presentation, and treatment was analyzed. RESULTS: Younger women more frequently had tumors with ER/PgR-negative(χ(2) = 7.07; P = .008), HER2 amplification (χ(2) = 5.76; P = .01), and high (≥10%) Ki67 labelling index (χ(2) = 9.53; P = .002). Positive nodal status, large tumors, and elevated Ki67 all associated with the choice for chemotherapy followed by endocrine therapy in hormone receptor-positive patients (P < .0001). At univariate analysis, ER-ve status, chemotherapy and age resulted as the only statistically significant variables (HR = 2.02, P = .004, and >40 versus ≤40, P < .0001, resp.). At multivariate analysis, after adjustment for significant clinical and pathological factors, age remains a significant prognostic variable (HR = 0.93, P = .0021). CONCLUSION. This cohort study suggests that age per sè is an important prognostic factor. The restricted role of early diagnosis and the aggressive behavior of cancer in this population make necessary the application of targeted medical strategies crucial.

Neo-adjuvant exemestane in elderly patients with breast cancer: a phase II, multicentre, open-label, Italian study.

BACKGROUND: The steroidal aromatase inhibitor exemestane has demonstrated efficacy for the treatment of breast cancer in the metastatic and adjuvant settings. Smaller trials have also reported efficacy in the neo-adjuvant setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This phase II, open-label, multicentre study examined the efficacy and safety of neo-adjuvant exemestane in women aged >70 years with operable, receptor-rich breast cancer. Consecutive eligible patients received exemestane 25 mg/day for 6 months before planned surgery. The primary end point was clinical response. RESULTS: Overall, 117 patients were recruited (median age 80 years). The objective response rate in 112 assessable patients (85 with clinical and mammographic evaluation; 27 with clinical evaluation only) was 69.6% (two complete responses; 76 partial responses). In patients who responded, median tumour size reduced from 4.81 to 2.12 cm. Seventy-seven patients (68.7%) continued to surgery. Of the 40 patients eligible for breast-conserving surgery, 34 (85%) deemed unfit for this procedure at baseline. Exemestane-related adverse events were unremarkable except for grade 3 allergic skin reactions in two patients (1.8%). CONCLUSION: Neo-adjuvant exemestane given for 6 months appears to be effective for receptor-rich breast cancer in older patients. There may now be sufficient evidence to support the use of neo-adjuvant in this patient population.

Biology, prognosis and response to therapy of breast carcinomas according to HER2 score.

BACKGROUND: The standardization of the HER2 score and recent changes in therapeutic modalities points to the need for a reevaluation of the role of HER2 in recently diagnosed breast carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A multicenter, retrospective study of 1794 primary breast carcinomas diagnosed in Italy in 2000/2001 and scored in HER2 four categories according to immunohistochemistry was conducted. RESULTS: Ductal histotype, vascular invasion, grade, MIB1 positivity, estrogen and progesterone receptor expression differed significantly in HER2 3+ tumors compared with the other categories. HER2 2+ tumors almost showed values intermediate between those of the negative and the 3+ subgroups. The characteristics of HER2 1+ tumors were found to be in between those of HER2 0 and 2+ tumors. With a median follow-up of 54 months, HER2 3+ status was associated with higher relapse rates in node-positive and node-negative subgroups, while HER2 2+ only in node positive. Analysis of relapses according to type of therapy provided evidence of responsiveness of HER2-positive tumors to chemotherapy, especially taxanes. CONCLUSIONS: The present prognostic significance of HER2 is correlated to receptor expression level and points to the need to consider HER2 2+ and HER2 3+ tumors as distinct diseases with different outcomes and specific features.

Adjuvant treatment of early breast cancer: do the St Gallen recommendations influence clinical practice? Results from the NORA study.

BACKGROUND: The NORA study is a prospective longitudinal cohort study aiming at investigating treatment in patients with early breast cancer. Here, we present the impact of the St Gallen recommendations on clinical practice. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We compared adjuvant strategies in patients enrolled in 2000-2002 to those in 2003-2004 to verify the impact of the 2003 St Gallen recommendations. RESULTS: The use of aromatase inhibitors (AIs) doubled: 65/629 patients (10.3%) vs 100/458 patients (21.8) (P < 0.0001). Following chemotherapy, AIs were administered in 8.5% of the retrospective cohort and in 15.1% of the prospective one (P < 0.0001). The use of taxanes plus hormones dropped (P = 0.0026), but not when used as single agents. A marked increase was observed in the use of anthracycline-based chemotherapy (46.3% vs 65.2%), mainly three-drug regimens (33.3% vs 46.6%). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that the St Gallen recommendations have had a major impact on clinical practice.

Breast cancer in elderly women: a different reality? Results from the NORA study.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of breast cancer increases with age, and the disease affects many older women; however, attitudes about prevention and treatment of breast cancer vary based on the patient's age. Older women have less access to clinical trials and fewer opportunities for treatment with innovative therapies. The National Oncological Research observatory on Adjuvant therapy in breast cancer (NORA) study was a cohort study designed to obtain information about adjuvant strategies for treatment of breast cancer after surgery, patterns of recurrence, and possible correlations between cancer-related events and biological factors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This report describes patient characteristics, disease status, and local and systemic adjuvant treatments in a population of breast cancer patients aged >or=65 years. The NORA study consecutively enrolled >3500 patients from 2000 through 2002 at 77 Italian hospitals; of these, 1085 were aged >or=65 years. Data on patient characteristics, cancer presentation, and treatments were analyzed to identify possible relationships between these factors and age. RESULTS: The findings indicate that age is significantly related to later diagnosis and different patterns of treatment. Choice of adjuvant systemic treatment was primarily related to hormone receptor status and tumor stage but was strongly influenced by the patient's age; there was a proportional relationship between endocrine treatment and increasing age. Cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil as well as anthracyclines were widely used, but the use of taxanes was limited to a very small percentage of patients. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of the NORA study may help to change attitudes that currently exclude a significant proportion of breast cancer patients from secondary prevention policies, more active treatment strategies, and clinical research trials based on age.

An induction dose of epoetin alpha of 40 000 IU daily for three consecutive days increases and maintains hemoglobin levels in anemic cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: This pilot study was conducted to evaluate the feasibility, activity, and safety of an induction dose of epoetin alpha in cancer patients with moderate or severe anemia who were receiving chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty patients with solid tumors and hemoglobin (Hb) levels <11.0 g/dl were enrolled. Patients received single s.c. injections of epoetin alpha, 40 000 IU for three consecutive days, and were then observed for the following 30 days. The primary efficacy variable was the response rate (Hb increase > or=1 g/dl) at day 15. Secondary efficacy variables included the proportion of patients given blood transfusions between baseline and the end of study, the duration of response (Hb level > or=1 g/dl), and ability to maintain the planned chemotherapy dose (dose intensity). RESULTS: At day 15, 23 of 30 (77%) patients had achieved increases in Hb levels of at least 1 g/dl. The mean Hb increase in responders was 2.0 g/dl [95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.7-2.3 g/dl]. The Hb increase was 2.3 +/- 0.7 g/dl in responders with baseline Hb levels <9.5 g/dl (median Hb value), and 1.7 +/- 0.6 g/dl in those with higher Hb levels (P = 0.012). The median duration of response was 6.1 weeks (95% CI = 1.6-10.6 weeks). Hematologic parameters were not significantly changed in nonresponders. Multivariate analysis detected no significant differences in Hb increase at day 15 on the basis of age, sex, weight, baseline Hb levels, type or stage of tumor, or treatment with platinum-based chemotherapy. No serious adverse event related to epoetin alpha treatment was observed. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that a higher initial dosing of epoetin alpha appears to be an efficient schedule for treating anemia in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy, conferring higher response rates than those seen with standard doses. Further evaluation of these and other epoetin alpha dosage regimens is warranted.

Adjuvant systemic treatment of early breast cancer: the NORA study.

BACKGROUND: Despite recommendations contained in international guidelines, factors such as the type of oncology centre, geographic distribution and the introduction of scientific advances into clinical practice can influence the choice of recommended treatment for early breast cancer. The NORA study is a prospective, longitudinal cohort study aimed at investigating tumour characteristics, treatment modalities, and other factors that influence therapeutic choices in early breast cancer patients who have undergone mastectomy or breast-conserving surgery (BCS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 2000 to early 2004, we collected data on methods of cancer diagnosis, type of surgery and adjuvant medical treatment administered to the first 10 consecutive patients treated in 2000-2002 and the first 20 consecutive patients in 2003 and 2004 at 71 oncology centres in Italy, with the approval of the ethical committee at each centre. RESULTS: Approximately one-quarter of the cases (26.5%) were detected through screening programmes. BCS was performed in 63.7% and sentinel node biopsy (SNB) occurred in 11.1% of the patients. Of the 3515 total cases, 56.5% were node-negative. Grade 2 cancers comprised 51.3%, and 66.2% were hormone-receptor positive (ER+/PgR+). Chemotherapy (CHT) followed by hormone therapy (HT) was the most prescribed treatment (48.5%). CHT was mainly anthracycline-based (52.9%) and most patients received tamoxifen alone (77.7%) or after CHT (85.2%). For node-negative patients, HR+ and menopause status are the factors influencing the choice to add HT after CHT; patients with HR+ and pT4 tumours are more likely to receive HT instead of CHT. In node-positive patients, the addition of HT is influenced by HR+ status, the opportunity to have HT instead of CHT, and menopause. CONCLUSIONS: NORA is the first large cohort study to describe the factors that influence therapeutic choices in early breast cancer. Understanding these findings can help physicians in daily clinical practice.

Tamoxifen alone versus adjuvant tamoxifen for operable breast cancer of the elderly: long-term results of the phase III randomized controlled multicenter GRETA trial.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the efficacy of tamoxifen as primary treatment in women aged over 70 years with operable breast cancer versus surgery followed by adjuvant tamoxifen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients randomly received tamoxifen alone (160 mg day 1, then 20 mg/day) for 5 years or surgery followed by tamoxifen (20 mg/day) for 5 years. Overall survival was the main study end point; secondary objectives included breast cancer survival and local control of the disease. RESULTS: Between 1987 and 1992, 239 patients were assigned to surgery plus tamoxifen and 235 to tamoxifen alone. Treatment arms were comparable for tumor size, clinical nodal status and performance status. At a median follow-up of 80 months 274 patients had died. No difference between groups had emerged in overall and breast cancer survival. There were 27 local progressions in the surgery plus tamoxifen group and 106 in the tamoxifen-alone group (P = 0.0001). In the surgery plus tamoxifen group, no difference in overall survival had emerged according to the extension of operation. CONCLUSIONS: The long-term results of the study confirm the 3-year interim analysis already reported. Surgery (radical or minimal) followed by adjuvant tamoxifen does not modify overall and breast cancer survival as compared with tamoxifen alone in early breast cancer of older women. Because of the high rate of local progressions with tamoxifen alone, minimal surgery followed by tamoxifen appears to be the appropriate treatment in such patients. More extensive surgery is not useful. Tamoxifen alone is an adequate alternative treatment in very old or frail patients.

A phase II study of cisplatin and vinorelbine in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination of cisplatin and vinorelbine in metastatic breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Cisplatin (80 mg/m(2) day 1) and vinorelbine (25 mg/m(2) days 1 and 8) were administrated every 3 weeks to 52 patients (mean age 57 years; range 35-75 years) with metastatic breast cancer. Thirty-two patients were previously untreated for metastatic disease. Treatment was repeated for a maximum of six cycles. RESULTS: Objective responses were obtained in 27 patients (52.9%; complete response 9.8%). The response rate was similar in pretreated and untreated patients (50% and 54.7%, respectively; P = 0.7). ECOG performance status was good (grade 0 or 1) in 55.7% of patients at baseline assessment and in 90.3% at the end of treatment (P = 0.0001). Median time to progression was 8.5 months (8.5 months in first-line and 8.7 months in second-line patients). Median survival was 16.6 months (21.2 months in first-line and 16.1 months in second-line patients). Grade 3/4 toxicity included neutropenia (44% in first-line, 60% in second-line patients), nausea (17.3%), anemia (17%), asthenia (3.8%) and thrombocytopenia (1.9%). There were no cases of febrile neutropenia or treatment-related deaths. Alopecia did not develop in any of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: Cisplatin plus vinorelbine is active and tolerable in metastatic breast cancer, in untreated and pretreated patients.

Sequential tamoxifen and aminoglutethimide versus tamoxifen alone in the adjuvant treatment of postmenopausal breast cancer patients: results of an Italian cooperative study.

PURPOSE: To determine whether switching patients from tamoxifen to antiaromatase treatment would prevent some of the relapses or deaths that we assume would occur if tamoxifen were continued. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three hundred eighty postmenopausal breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant tamoxifen treatment for 3 years were randomized to either continue tamoxifen for 2 more years or to switch to low-dose aminoglutethimide (250 mg daily) for 2 years. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 61 months (range, 5 to 94 months), 59 events occurred in the tamoxifen group, and 55 occurred in the aminoglutethimide group. More treatment failures at distant sites, such as viscera (P =.02), were observed in the tamoxifen group. Although no differences in disease-free survival between the two groups have emerged so far, a significant trend favors aminoglutethimide in overall survival (P =.005) and breast cancer-specific survival (P =.06). Even if more patients in the antiaromatase group complained of drug-related side effects and more of them discontinued treatment (P =.0001), the number of cardiovascular events and, in general, of life-threatening adverse events was higher in the tamoxifen arm. CONCLUSION: Switching patients from tamoxifen to aminoglutethimide treatment resulted in comparable event-free survival, but longer overall survival was achieved in patients who were switched to aminoglutethimide as compared with those who continued to receive tamoxifen. Should these preliminary results be confirmed by larger studies with a similar design, which are now testing the effectiveness of the new, more active, and tolerable aromatase inhibitors, sequencing tamoxifen with an aromatase inhibitor could become a preferable alternative to tamoxifen alone in early breast cancer patients.

Modulating effect of lonidamine on response to doxorubicin in metastatic breast cancer patients: results from a multicenter prospective randomized trial.

Previous results from our preclinical studies have shown that lonidamine (LND) can positively modulate the antiproliferative activity of doxorubicin (DOX) on breast cancer cell lines. To evaluate the effect of LND in a clinical setting, a multicenter randomized trial was carried out on patients with advanced breast cancer. From September 1991 to July 1993, 181 patients were enrolled in the trial and received an initial treatment of DOX at 75 mg/m2 for 3 cycles. The 137 patients who reached complete remission, partial remission, or stable disease were randomized to receive either DOX alone (75 mg/m2 day 1) (arm A) or DOX plus LND (600 mg orally/day) (arm B). The patients enrolled in the two arms were fairly homogeneous in terms of major clinical characteristics. Toxicity was similar in both arms except for myalgia: WHO grade > or=2 was observed in 57% of arm B patients. Overall response rate to DOX + LND was 50% and to DOX alone 38% in evaluable patients, and 48% vs 37% in all registered patients, as determined by an intention-to-treat analysis. The differences did not reach statistical significance. Conversely, in agreement with previous findings, we observed a significant difference in response rate in the subgroup of patients with liver metastases, regardless of the extent of hepatic involvement (DOX + LND 68% vs DOX 33%, p=0.03). This observation makes LND an important tool in association with anthracyclines in the treatment of this subgroup of patients.

[Gastroprotection in cancer patients: rational approach, pharmacologic role of antisecretory agents and eventual ulterior prospectives in oncology]. / La gastroprotezione nel paziente oncologico: approccio razionale, ruolo dei farmaci antisecretori ed eventuali ulteriori prospettive in oncologia.

In view of the large number of cancer patients treated with FANS and/or corticosteroids for long periods of time. Authors discuss how the use of antisecretory drugs for gastroprotection has become common practice in spite of the lack of clear scientific evidence. The paper analyses the principal mechanisms of gastrotoxicity of FANS, essentially associated with the inhibition of prostaglandins and consequent reduction of the secretion of mucous and bicarbonate. It also discusses the numerous controlled trials evaluating the efficacy of ranitidine for gastroprotection versus placebo and versus the analogous synthetic substance, misoprostole, derived from prostaglandin E1. This analysis shows that misoprostole provides significant protection against both gastric and duodenal ulcers, whilst the antisecretory drug protects only against localised duodenal ulcer. The conclusion is that optimum protection against FANS is provided by misoprostole. In any case more than 30% of patients are destined to develop ulcerous or minor lesions for which treatment with antisecretory drugs is correct. After analysis of the available literature on the gastrotoxicity of corticosteroids, it is clear that this risk is real only for a small sub-population of patients (treated in dual therapy with FANS, for long periods, with high doses or in presence of ulcer anamnesis). It is not known in these cases whether prophylactic treatment is suitable, nor which would be the best prophylactic treatment. In other cases the problem does not arise since the number of patients developing ulcers is similar with corticosteroids treatment or with placebo. Some further interesting features of ranitidine compared to cimetidine (its better pharmacological profile due to the lack of side effects, lack of medullary depression, lack of interference with the immunological system, lack of antiandrogen effects) are also discussed. Particularly interesting is the lack of interference with cyclophosphamide metabolism, such interference having shown for cimetidine. Studies involving ranitidine treatment in association with interleukin-2 for renal carcinoma and metastatic melanoma are also of interest although no statistically significant results are available as yet.