Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Int J Equity Health ; 19(1): 145, 2020 11 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33131498

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The community score card (CSC) is a participatory monitoring and evaluation tool that has been employed to strengthen the mutual accountability of health system and community actors. In this paper we describe the influence of the CSC on selected maternal and newborn service delivery and utilization indicators. METHODS: This was a mixed methods study that used both quantitative and qualitative data collection methods. It was implemented in five sub-counties and one town council in Kibuku district in Uganda. Data was collected through 17 key informant interviews and 10 focus group discussions as well as CSC scoring and stakeholder meeting reports. The repeated measures ANOVA test was used to test for statistical significance. Qualitative data was analyzed manually using content analysis. The analysis about the change pathways was guided by the Wild and Harris dimensions of change framework. RESULTS: There was an overall improvement in the common indicators across sub-counties in the project area between the 1st and 5th round scores. Almost all the red scores had changed to green or yellow by round five except for availability of drugs and mothers attending Antenatal care (ANC) in the first trimester. There were statistically significant differences in mean scores for men escorting their wives for ante natal care (ANC) (F(4,20) = 5.45, P = 0.01), availability of midwives (F(4,16) =5.77, P < 0.01), availability of delivery beds (F(4,12) =9.00, P < 0.01) and mothers delivering from traditional birth attendants (TBAs), F(4,16) = 3.86, p = 0.02). The qualitative findings suggest that strengthening of citizens' demand, availability of resources through collaborative problem solving, increased awareness about targeted maternal health services and increased top down performance pressure contributed to positive changes as perceived by community members and their leaders. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The community score cards created opportunities for community leaders and communities to work together to identify innovative ways of dealing with the health service delivery and utilization challenges that they face. Local leaders should encourage the availability of safe spaces for dialogue between communities, health workers and leaders where performance and utilization challenges can be identified and solutions proposed and implemented jointly.


Subject(s)
Community Participation , Facilities and Services Utilization/statistics & numerical data , Maternal-Child Health Services/organization & administration , Maternal-Child Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Female , Focus Groups , Health Services Research , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Pregnancy , Qualitative Research , Social Responsibility , Uganda
2.
Glob Health Action ; 10(sup4): 1346925, 2017 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28849723

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Evidence on effective ways of improving maternal and neonatal health outcomes is widely available. The challenge that most low-income countries grapple with is implementation at scale and sustainability. OBJECTIVES: The study aimed at improving access to quality maternal and neonatal health services in a sustainable manner by using a participatory action research approach. METHODS:  The  study consisted of a quasi-experimental design, with a participatory action research approach to implementation in three rural districts (Pallisa, Kibuku and Kamuli) in Eastern Uganda. The intervention had two main components; namely, community empowerment for comprehensive birth preparedness, and health provider and management capacity-building. We collected data using both quantitative and qualitative methods using household and facility-level structured surveys, record reviews, key informant interviews and focus group discussions. We purposively selected the participants for the qualitative data collection, while for the surveys we interviewed all eligible participants in the sampled households and health facilities. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the data, while the difference in difference analysis was used to measure the effect of the intervention. Qualitative data were analysed using thematic analysis. CONCLUSIONS: This study was implemented to generate evidence on how to increase access to quality maternal and newborn health services in a sustainable manner using a multisectoral participatory  approach.


Subject(s)
Capacity Building/organization & administration , Health Services Accessibility/organization & administration , Maternal Health Services/organization & administration , Quality of Health Care/organization & administration , Rural Health Services/organization & administration , Adult , Female , Focus Groups , Health Services Research , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Maternal Health Services/standards , Power, Psychological , Pregnancy , Prenatal Care/organization & administration , Quality of Health Care/standards , Research Design , Rural Health Services/standards , Uganda
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...