Evolving Evidence Supporting Use of Rectal Irrigation in the Management of Bowel Dysfunction: An Integrative Literature Review.

Disorders of bowel function are prevalent, particularly among patients with spinal cord injuries and other neurological disorders. An individual's bowel control significantly impacts quality of life, as predictable bowel function is necessary to actively and independently participate in everyday activities. For many patients with bowel dysfunction, initial lifestyle adjustments and other conservative therapeutic interventions (eg, digital stimulation, oral laxatives, suppositories) are insufficient to reestablish regular bowel function. In addition to these options, rectal irrigation (RI) is a safe and effective method of standard bowel care that has been used for several decades in adults and children suffering from bowel dysfunction associated with neurogenic or functional bowel etiologies. Rectal irrigation is an appropriate option when conservative bowel treatments are inadequate. Unlike surgical options, RI can be initiated or discontinued at any time. This report summarizes the clinical, humanistic, and economic evidence supporting the use of RI in clinical practice, noting features (eg, practical considerations, patient education) that can improve patients' success with RI treatment.

Spinal cord injuries: overcoming barriers to seamless care for patients.

Patients with spinal cord injuries (SCIs) often have complex needs that require multidisciplinary support in specialist centres. Optimal management depends on seamless transitions between service providers. Delays at any point potentially compromise clinical outcomes and efficient resource utilisation. The Spinal Advisory Working Group aims to develop and implement practical initiatives to improve SCI care, initially focusing on admission and discharge. A literature review identified few relevant papers. In addition, the generalisability of the findings of these papers to SCI centres in the UK is unclear. Therefore, further research is needed to, for example: establish best practice in the UK; quantify the associations between admission criteria and clinical and economic outcomes from a UK perspective; and determine the extent and impact of barriers that influence the transition of SCI patients between NHS care providers. Such research would enable the development of evidence-based strategies to overcome or minimise these barriers. In the meantime, pragmatic consensus guidelines would help standardise management, aid service optimisation, overcome inequities and, potentially, reduce bed blocking. The working group agreed that the robust inclusion and exclusion criteria developed by the Welsh Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation Centre could form the basis of a consensus guideline, to be piloted across the five SCI centres represented by members of the group.