Loss of spinal glycinergic neurons is not necessary for development of neuropathic pain in transgenic mice expressing enhanced green fluorescent protein in glycinergic neurons.

It has been proposed that alterations in spinal inhibitory neurotransmission are critically involved in the pathophysiology of neuropathic pain. The mechanisms by which a relief from inhibitory tone contributes to pathological pain are not fully understood. Hitherto it is still under debate whether there is a loss of inhibitory neurons in the spinal cord in neuropathic pain. The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether a specific loss of glycinergic neurons is necessary to develop hyperalgesia and allodynia in the chronic constriction injury (CCI) model of neuropathic pain. The experiments were performed in bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) transgenic mice which specifically express enhanced green fluorescent protein under the control of the promotor of the glycine transporter 2 gene, which is a reliable marker for glycinergic neurons. Thus, possible technical inconsistencies due to immunoreactivity in fixed tissues could be ruled out. Twelve days after CCI, in neuropathic animals and in sham-operated and naive animals, lumbar and thoracic segments were analyzed using the physical disector method. Although all animals that had undergone CCI showed pathological nociceptive behavior, stereology revealed no significant difference in glycinergic neurons-neither between the different groups nor between the ipsilateral and contralateral side of the thoracic and lumbar spinal segments. Our findings suggest that a loss of glycinergic neurons is not necessary for the development of pathological nociceptive behavior in the chronic constriction injury model of neuropathic pain in mice. A different mechanism may account for the decrease in inhibitory transmission in neuropathic pain.

The effect of mirtazapine in patients with chronic pain and concomitant depression.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety, tolerability and efficacy of mirtazapine in patients with the primary diagnosis of chronic pain and concomitant depression in an open post-marketing surveillance study. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: 594 patients with a primary diagnosis of at least one chronic pain syndrome (minimum duration of 3 months) and the diagnosis of concomitant depression, appropriately made by a neurologist or psychiatrist, were recruited at psychiatric and/or neurological outpatient facilities throughout Germany. The primary efficacy parameter was pain at baseline and endpoint using a patient self-assessment scale. Secondary analyses were performed at baseline, week 1 (day 7 +/- 2), week 4 (day 28 +/- 4) and at endpoint (day 42 +/- 4 or early termination) and included safety and tolerability assessments. Investigators rated the severity of different potential co-morbidities (including depression) with a four-step rating scale (not present, mild, moderate, severe). RESULTS: 594 patients were enrolled and treated with mirtazapine (mean daily dose of 34.5 +/- 10.4 mg at study endpoint). A statistically significant (p < 0.0001; one sample sign test) reduction of pain from baseline to endpoint was found for the overall population. The percentage of patients free of pain or with only moderate pain increased significantly, irrespective of patients' age or pain syndromes. Furthermore, we found a substantial improvement from baseline to endpoint regarding co-morbidities such as sleep disturbance, irritability and exhaustion. The number of adverse events was low (<7%; n = 37), with fatigue (n = 13) and weight gain (n = 11) occurring most frequently. No previously-unknown side effects occurred. One hundred and six patients (18%) discontinued mirtazapine during the study. The main reason was lack of efficacy (6%, n = 33), which may be a reflection of sub-optimal response to the anti-depressant or analgesic effect of the drug, but no appropriate rating scale was used to clarify this question. Only a small number of patients stopped the drug due to adverse events (3%; n = 15). At study endpoint, the majority of physicians and patients rated the overall efficacy and tolerability of mirtazapine as good or very good. Most patients (80%) continued the therapy after 6 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the limitations of an open observational study, our findings suggest that mirtazapine is a safe and well-tolerated drug for use in daily clinical practice. It still remains unclear whether the reduction of pain, the enhancement of the depressed mood or the combination of both effects led to these results. Nevertheless, our data point to a potential beneficial effect of mirtazapine in the treatment of patients with pain and concomitant depression. However, more systematic research, including placebo-controlled studies, and further empirical testing are necessary.

Simultaneous fitting of R- and S-ibuprofen plasma concentrations after oral administration of the racemate.

AIMS: To assess the pharmacokinetic equivalence of two different formulations of ibuprofen lysinate with special focus on the expected effects. METHODS: Sixteen healthy volunteers received cross-over ibuprofen lysinate as either one tablet of 400 mg ('test') or two tablets of 200 mg ('reference'). Ibuprofen plasma concentrations were followed up for 10 h. Bioequivalence was assessed by standard noncompartmental methods. Ibuprofen plasma concentrations were fitted with a model that took bioinversion of R- to S-ibuprofen into account. RESULTS: Peak plasma concentrations of R- and S-ibuprofen were 18.1 and 20 microg ml(-1) (test), and 18.2 and 20 microg ml(-1) (reference). Areas under the plasma concentration vs. time curves were 39.7 and 67.5 microg ml(-1) h (test), and 41.1 and 68.2 microg ml(-1) h (reference). Clearance of R-ibuprofen was 5.2 (test) and 5 l h(-1) (reference). A specific plasma concentration was reached with the test formulation about 5 min later than with the reference. Parameters from compartmental modelling were (given for R-and then for S-ibuprofen): body clearance: 4.9 and 4.64 l h(-1), central volume of distribution: 2.8 and 4.1 l, intercompartment clearance: 5.1 and 5.45 l h(-1), peripheral volume of distribution: 4.1 and 5.2 l. The absorption rate constant was 1.52 h(-1), and the test but not the reference formulation had a lag time of 0.1 h. Simulations showed similarity between formulations of the expected effects except for a calculated delay of 6 min with the test formulation. CONCLUSIONS: Ibuprofen formulations were bioequivalent. The pharmacokinetic model may serve as a basis for future pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic calculations after administration of racemic ibuprofen.

[The significance of nitric oxide in nociception and spinal pain processing]. / Die Bedeutung von Stickstoffmonoxid (NO) für Nozizeption und spinale Schmerzverarbeitung.

Nitric oxide (NO) has been shown to be involved in the generation and processing of pain signals. Most experimental studies on animals and also the few observations in humans point to an involvement of the NO-system in inflammatory pain, whereas acute pain and chronic pain without inflammatory component seem to be independent of NO. It is yet unknown whether specific inhibition of the NO pathway is useful for treatment or prevention of inflammatory pain in humans.

Risperidone-induced cholestatic hepatitis.

Risperidone, a widely used atypical and potent neuroleptic drug, is assumed to induce fewer hepatic side-effects than phenothiazine anti-psychotics. Recently, we observed a case of risperidone-induced cholestatic hepatotoxicity. A 37-year-old male developed a rapid increase in liver enzymes and cholestatic parameters after starting treatment with risperidone for paranoid psychosis. Work-up for other potential aetiologies was negative. The results of a percutaneous liver biopsy were consistent with drug-induced liver injury and cholestasis. Over the course of one month after the discontinuance of all anti-psychotic agents, the liver function test results returned to near-normal values. This observation supports the need to monitor cholestatic parameters in addition to liver function enzymes during initiation and the first weeks of risperidone intake.

Adverse drug reactions in patients with gastroenterological diseases: does age increase the risk?

BACKGROUND: It has been claimed that the risk of adverse drug reactions increases with age. However, only limited data exist for disease-group specific risks and none for patients with liver and gastrointestinal diseases. AIMS: To determine the incidence and characteristics of adverse drug reactions and the physicians' awareness of adverse drug reactions. METHODS: During a 7-month period, a prospective survey of 532 male patients (158 aged 65 years or older; 30%) was conducted on a hepatogastroenterological ward of a tertiary-care university hospital, using intensive bedside and computer-assisted drug surveillance methods. RESULTS: No difference was found in the overall rate of adverse drug reactions between older and younger patients (25.9% vs. 24.2%) during 6213 treatment days. However, a significantly higher risk for developing adverse drug reactions could be shown for the elderly with biliary tract diseases (P < 0.01). Independently of age, patients suffering from gastric ulcers, acute episodes of pancreatitis, cholangitis or inflammatory bowel diseases were at high risk of adverse drug reactions. Adverse drug reaction-associated mortality was encountered in four elderly and none of the younger patients. Secondary pharmacological effects and drug toxicity were the main types of adverse drug reactions for both age groups. Although 75.3% of the adverse drug reactions were predictable, only 37.5% of all adverse drug reactions were recognized by the staff physicians. CONCLUSION: In hepatogastroenterological patients, advancing age was not associated with an overall increased risk of adverse drug reactions except for patients with biliary tract diseases. In the elderly, adverse drug reactions were more severe and carried higher mortality. Guidelines and educational programs should be developed to increase the awareness of adverse drug reactions and their prevention, especially in high risk patients and, thus, to improve patient outcomes.

Inhibition of noxious stimulus-induced spinal prostaglandin E2 release by flurbiprofen enantiomers: a microdialysis study.

Peripheral noxious stimuli have been shown to induce prostaglandin (PG) E2 release at the site of inflammation and in the spinal cord. The antiinflammatory and antinociceptive effects of cyclooxygenase-inhibiting drugs are thought to depend on the inhibition of PG synthesis. R-Flurbiprofen, however, does not inhibit cyclooxygenase activity in vitro but still produces antinociceptive effects. To find out whether R-flurbiprofen acts via inhibition of spinal PG release, concentrations of PGE2 and flurbiprofen in spinal cord tissue were assessed by microdialysis. The catheter was transversally implanted through the dorsal horns of the spinal cord at level L4. R- and S-flurbiprofen (9 and 27 mg kg(-1), respectively) were administered intravenously 10-15 min before subcutaneous injection of formalin into the dorsal surface of one hindpaw. Flurbiprofen was rapidly distributed into the spinal cord with maximal concentrations after 30-45 min. Baseline PGE2 dialysate concentrations were 100.6 +/- 6.4 pg ml(-1) (mean +/- SEM). After formalin injection they rose about threefold with a maximum of 299.4 +/- 68.4 pg ml(-1) at 7.5 min. After approximately 1 h PGE2 levels returned to baseline. Both flurbiprofen enantiomers completely prevented the formalin-induced increase of spinal PGE2 release and reduced PGE2 concentrations below basal levels. S- and R-flurbiprofen at 9 mg kg(-1) produced a minimum of 15.8 +/- 5.2 and 27.7 +/- 14.9 pg ml(-1), respectively, and 27 mg kg(-1) S- and R-flurbiprofen resulted in 11.7 +/- 1.7 and 9.3 +/- 4.7 pg ml(-1), respectively. PGE2 levels remained at the minimum up to the end of the observation period at 5 h. When 27 mg kg(-1) R-flurbiprofen was injected intravenously without subsequent formalin challenge, baseline immunoreactive PGE2 concentrations were not affected. S-Flurbiprofen (27 mg kg(-1)), however, led to a moderate reduction (approximately 40%). The data suggest that antinociception produced by R-flurbiprofen is mediated at least in part by inhibition of stimulated spinal PGE2 release and support the current view that increased spinal PGE2 release significantly contributes to nociceptive processing.

Incidence and costs of adverse drug reactions during hospitalisation: computerised monitoring versus stimulated spontaneous reporting.

OBJECTIVE: To implement a computer-based adverse drug reaction monitoring system and compare its results with those of stimulated spontaneous reporting, and to assess the excess lengths of stay and costs of patients with verified adverse drug reactions. DESIGN: A prospective cohort study was used to assess the efficacy of computer-based monitoring, and case-matching was used to assess excess length of stay and costs. SETTING: This was a study of all patients admitted to a medical ward of a university hospital in Germany between June and December 1997. PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS: 379 patients were included, most of whom had infectious, gastrointestinal or liver diseases, or sleep apnoea syndrome. Patients admitted because of adverse drug reactions were excluded. METHODS: All automatically generated laboratory signals and reports were evaluated by a team consisting of a clinical pharmacologist, a clinician and a pharmacist for their likelihood of being an adverse drug reaction. They were classified by severity and causality. For verified adverse drug reactions, control patients with similar primary diagnosis, age, gender and time of admission but without adverse drug reactions were matched to the cases in order to assess the excess length of hospitalisation caused by an adverse drug reaction. RESULTS: Adverse drug reactions were detected in 12% of patients by the computer-based monitoring system and stimulated spontaneous reporting together (46 adverse reactions in 45 patients) during 1718 treatment days. Computer-based monitoring identified adverse drug reactions in 34 cases, and stimulated spontaneous reporting in 17 cases. Only 5 adverse drug reactions were detected by both methods. The relative sensitivity of computer-based monitoring was 74% (relative specificity 75%), and that of stimulated spontaneous reporting was 37% (relative specificity 98%). All 3 serious adverse drug reactions were detected by computer-based monitoring, but only 2 out of the 3 were detected by stimulated spontaneous reporting. The percentage of automatically generated laboratory signals associated with an adverse drug reaction (positive predictive value) was 13%. The mean excess length of stay was 3.5 days per adverse drug reaction. 48% of adverse reactions were predictable and detected solely by computer-based monitoring. Therefore, the potential for savings on this ward from the introduction of computer-based monitoring can be calculated as EUR56 200/year ($US59 600/year) [ 1999 values]. CONCLUSION: Computer monitoring is an effective method for improving the detection of adverse drug reactions in inpatients. The excess length of stay and costs caused by adverse drug reactions are substantial and might be considerably reduced by earlier detection.

Acetaminophen inhibits spinal prostaglandin E2 release after peripheral noxious stimulation.

BACKGROUND: Prostaglandin play a pivotal role in spinal nociceptive processing. At therapeutic concentrations, acetaminophen is not a cyclooxygenase inhibitor. inhibitor. Thus, it is antinociceptive without having antiinflammatory or gastrointestinal toxic effects. This study evaluated the role of spinal prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) in antinociception produced by intraperitoneally administered acetaminophen. METHODS: The PGE2 concentrations in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord were measured after formalin was injected into the hind paw of rats. The effect of antinociceptive doses of acetaminophen (100, 200, and 300 mg/kg given intraperitoneally) on PGE2 levels and flinching behavior was monitored Spinal PGE2 and acetaminophen concentrations were obtained by microdialysis using a probe that was implanted transversely through the dorsal horn of the spinal cord at L4. Furthermore, the effects of acetaminophen on urinary prostaglandin excretion were determined. RESULTS: Intraperitoneal administration of acetaminophen resulted in a significant decrease in spinal PGE2 release that was associated with a significant reduction in the flinching behavior in the formalin test Acetaminophen was distributed rapidly into the spinal cord with maximum dialysate concentrations 4560 min after intraperitoneal administration. Urinary excretion of prostanoids (PGE2, PGF2alpha, and 6-keto-PGF1alpha) was not significantly altered after acetaminophen administration. CONCLUSIONS: The data confirm the importance of PGE2 in spinal nociceptive processing. The results suggest that antinociception after acetaminophen administration is mediated, at least in part, by inhibition of spinal PGE2 release. The mechanism, however, remains unknown. The finding that urinary excretion of prostaglandins was not affected might explain why acetaminophen is antinociceptive but does not compromise renal safety.

Comparison of inhibitory effects of meloxicam and diclofenac on human thromboxane biosynthesis after single doses and at steady state.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the extent of human cyclooxygenase-1 (COX-1) inhibition by meloxicam, which has been reported to preferentially inhibit cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2). The effects of meloxicam were compared with those of diclofenac, a nonselective COX inhibitor. METHODS: COX-1 inhibition was determined by measuring thromboxane B2 (TXB2)-generation from clotting whole blood ex vivo after single oral doses of 7.5 and 15 mg meloxicam and 75 mg diclofenac and at steady state (15 mg meloxicam daily and 150 mg diclofenac daily). The effect was expressed as percentage inhibition of serum TXB2 generation and was directly related to the serum drug concentration with use of a standard sigmoidal E(max) model. RESULTS: In terms of inhibition of TXB2 generation, diclofenac was about 1 order of magnitude more potent than meloxicam, indicated by a diclofenac EC50 (concentration of drug required to cause 50% of maximum effect) that was about 10 times lower than that of meloxicam (EC50 diclofenac single doses: 37.50+/-29.64; EC50 meloxicam single doses: 677.50+/-189.08). However, serum concentrations of meloxicam after administration of 15 mg were approximately 10-fold higher than those of diclofenac. Therefore there was no statistically significant difference in the area under the effect time curve (P = .115) and the mean effect (P = .424) between meloxicam and diclofenac. The EC50 of both drugs was significantly higher at steady state (diclofenac steady state: 87.07+/-55.24 ng/mL; meloxicam steady state: 1850.12+/-829.93 ng/mL) than after a single dose (P < .001). CONCLUSION: These data show that meloxicam inhibits TXB2 generation at clinically relevant doses, although less potently than diclofenac. Thus our data suggest that the COX-2 preference of meloxicam observed in vitro may not result in clinical advantages when the higher dose of 15 mg is needed. Because of the increase in EC50 at steady state, COX-1 is relatively spared when the lower dose of 7.5 mg is administered.

Retrospective analysis of the frequency and recognition of adverse drug reactions by means of automatically recorded laboratory signals.

AIMS: To estimate the frequency of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) identified through the use of automatic signals generated from laboratory data (ALS) in hospitalised patients. To determine the frequency of spontaneous recognition of these ADRs by the attending physicians and to assess the potential value of ALS for detection of ADRs. METHODS: Laboratory results of patients hospitalised in a nine bed medical ward were automatically recorded over a period of 17 months. Values exceeding defined boundaries were used as ALS. Charts of every third patient were analysed retrospectively with regard to adverse drug related reactions and causality was evaluated as well as whether the ADR had been recognised during the period of hospitalisation. RESULTS: The charts and ALS of 98 patients were analysed. In 18 cases a drug-related adverse reaction was probable. Awareness to the reaction by the treating physicians was evident in 6 out of these 18 ADRs. Approximately 80% of the ADRs were considered predictable. Three ADRs were regarded as serious. CONCLUSIONS: Adverse drug reactions are common and often preventable. Only one third of ADRs which could have been detected through ALS were recognised by the attending physicians. An increased doctor's awareness of the frequency of drug related abnormal laboratory results by means of ALS is likely to increase the recognition rate of ADRs and might help to prevent them.

Application of microdialysis for the determination of muscle and subcutaneous tissue concentrations after oral and topical ibuprofen administration.

BACKGROUND: The topical administration of non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) is widely used for the treatment of soft tissue pain. However, it is not known whether effective tissue concentrations are reached with the topical route. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and compare unbound muscle and subcutaneous tissue ibuprofen concentrations with use of microdialysis after topical and oral administration. METHODS: In a 2-way crossover design, 11 healthy volunteers received either 800 mg oral ibuprofen or 16 g of 5% ibuprofen gel applied onto the skin of the thigh (defined area, 17 x 19 cm). Microdialysis catheters were inserted into the medial vastus muscle (25 to 30 mm) and into the subcutaneous adipose layer of the thigh (4 to 5 mm). Dialysate was collected in 20-minute intervals up to 5 hours. RESULTS: Essentially all of the orally administered dose was recovered in urine as ibuprofen or metabolites during 24 hours, but only about 0.55% of the topically administered dose was recovered. The relative systemic bioavailability of ibuprofen gel, based on urine recovery data, was (mean +/- SD) 0.57%+/-0.30%. Mean values of the dialysate areas under the drug concentration-time curves after topical and oral administration were 731.2+/-605.0 and 176.6+/-122.9 ng x h x mL(-1) for subcutaneous tissue and 63.5+/-90.3 and 213.4+/-117.2 ng x h x mL(-1) for muscle, respectively. Muscle dialysate concentrations after topical administration varied considerably among the subjects. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that, if target tissue concentrations correlate directly with the degree of pain relief, patients with pain caused by dermal or subcutaneous tissue damage will have greater pain relief after topical administration of ibuprofen accompanied with less systemic side effects. In addition, a proportion of patients with muscle pain may also experience pain relief from topical ibuprofen.