Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis ; 28(5): 243-248, 2024 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38659142

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUNDThe inclusion of adolescents in TB drug trials is essential for the development of safe, child-friendly regimens for the prevention and treatment of TB. TB Trials Consortium Study 31/AIDS Clinical Trials Group A5349 (S31/A5349) enrolled adolescents as young as 12 years old. We assessed investigator and coordinator described facilitators and barriers to adolescent recruitment, enrollment, and retention.METHODSInterviews were conducted with six investigators from sites that enrolled adolescent participants and six investigators from non-enrolling sites. Additionally, two focus groups were conducted with study coordinators from enrolling sites and two focus groups with non-enrolling sites. Discussions were transcribed, analyzed, summarized, and summaries were reviewed by Community Research Advisors Group members and research group representatives for content validity.RESULTSInvestigators and coordinators attributed the successful enrollment of adolescents to the establishment and cultivation of external partnerships, flexibility to accommodate adolescents' schedules, staff engagement, recruitment from multiple locations, dedicated recruitment staff working onsite to access potential participants, creation of youth-friendly environments, and effective communications. Non-enrolling sites were mainly hindered by regulations. Suggestions for improvement in future trials focused on study planning and site preparations.CONCLUSIONProactive partnerships and collaboration with institutions serving adolescents helped identify and reduce barriers to their inclusion in this trial..


Subject(s)
Focus Groups , Patient Selection , Tuberculosis , Humans , Adolescent , Tuberculosis/drug therapy , Female , Male , Child , Antitubercular Agents/administration & dosage , Clinical Trials as Topic , Research Personnel
2.
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis ; 22(3): 306-308, 2018 03 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29471909

ABSTRACT

The sputum smear-positive, culture-negative state poses a challenge for clinicians. Previous studies have shown that most samples with positive smears during the later stages of treatment are culture-negative. Earlier studies generally used solid culture media, which tend to be less sensitive than current liquid culture systems. We examined the smear-positive, culture-negative state in the era of MGIT™ 960™ liquid cultures. We found that the smear-positive, culture-negative state occurred less frequently with MGIT culture, and that the majority of the samples with late positive smears were culture-negative, regardless of media type.


Subject(s)
Bacteriological Techniques/methods , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/isolation & purification , Sputum/microbiology , Tuberculosis, Pulmonary/diagnosis , Antitubercular Agents/therapeutic use , Culture Media , Humans , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/growth & development , Predictive Value of Tests , Retrospective Studies
3.
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis ; 16(4): 480-5, 2012 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22640513

ABSTRACT

SETTING: Clinical trials can provide a high standard of patient care and contribute to scientific knowledge; however, only a fraction of the patients screened participate and receive treatment as part of a trial. OBJECTIVE: To explore reasons why patients were not enrolled in an international tuberculosis (TB) treatment trial and to compare experiences among study sites. DESIGN: An analysis of reasons why patients were not enrolled was conducted among patients screened for a TB clinical trial at 26 sites in North and South America, Africa, and Europe. RESULTS: Staff at study sites screened 1119 potential candidates for the trial: 61% (n = 686) were not enrolled due to 1) failure to meet eligibility criteria (n = 405, 59%), 2) site's decision (n = 168, 24%), or 3) candidate's choice (n = 113, 16%). Study staff recorded a total of 144 reasons for why they believed patients chose not to participate, including concerns over research (28%), conflicts with work or school (21%), and lifestyle and family issues (20%). Socio-demographic and geographic factors also influenced participation. CONCLUSION: Increased evaluation of screening outcomes and of specific interventions, such as improved education and communication about trial procedures, may increase the efficiency of screening and enrollment in clinical trials.


Subject(s)
Antitubercular Agents/therapeutic use , Patient Selection , Refusal to Participate/psychology , Tuberculosis/drug therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Child , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Refusal to Participate/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...