Maxillofacial Trauma Patterns in Bare-Knuckle Fighting.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to analyze patterns and trends of maxillofacial injuries in bare-knuckle fighting. Results comparisons with other combat sports are provided in the Discussion section. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study design is a retrospective cohort study. Data were collected by a single ringside physician who participated in all bouts. Predictor variables were number of rounds and final fight result (ie, knockout, technical knockout, and decision). The primary outcome variable was the frequency of maxillofacial injury, and secondary outcome variables were type of injury (laceration/fracture) and traumatic brain injury. The chi-square test was used to determine if there was any statistical significance between the predictor variables. RESULTS: Study sample consisted in fighters who suffered maxillofacial injuries during the matches from June 2018 to March 2022 (n = 177). A total of 177 fighters sustained maxillofacial trauma in 301 matches, and a total of 211 maxillofacial injuries were identified. Of the 211 injuries, 184 were lacerations and 27 were fractures. Proportionally more injuries occurred in matches that lasted 5 rounds (33%), and a significant association was found between the number of rounds fought and the frequency of injury (P < .00001). From a total of 107 technical knockouts, 74% of them caused at least 1 injury; from 96 knockouts, 60% caused at least 1 injury; and from 89 fights that ended in decision, 83% of them caused at least 1 injury. A statistically significant association was found between final fight result and frequency of injury (P < .00001). P value less than 0.05 (95% confidence interval) was considered statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Maxillofacial injuries were predominantly associated with longer fights and fights which result were knockout/technical knockout. Traumatic brain injury was associated with knockout results, which mostly occurred in the first and second rounds.

Epidemiology of professional bare-knuckle fighting injuries.

BACKGROUND: Professional bare-knuckle fighting (BKF) is a variation of boxing which held its first modern legal event in 2018 in Wyoming. Since then, the sport has expanded with state-sanctioned events held in Florida, Missouri, Mississippi, Kansas, and Alabama. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the epidemiology of injuries in bare-knuckle fighting bouts and to discern any trends which may distinguish it from traditional boxing with padded gloves. METHODS: Observational data collection for all state-sanctioned professional bare-knuckle fighting bouts was conducted sequentially over a two-year period from June of 2018 through November of 2020. Information related to fight outcome, injury diagnosis, and injury location was documented. This data was then analyzed and the incidence rates by injury type and location were calculated. RESULTS: There were 141 bouts conducted during the study period. Out of the 282 individual combatants, 105 (36.6%) sustained at least one injury during the event and 123 total injuries were recorded. In total, 98 (34.8%) lacerations were recorded; on average, 6.2 +- 4.5 sutures were required per laceration. There were 5 superficial hand lacerations and 80 facial lacerations. Seventeen (6.0%) fractures occurred, with 8 hand fractures, 6 nasal fractures, 2 orbital fractures, and 2 dental fractures. There were 8 (2.8%) periorbital hematomas sustained by fighters. Transfer to the hospital was required on 5 (1.8%) separate occasions, twice for orbital fractures and 3 times for traumatic brain injuries. In all, there were 8 (2.8%) concussions with symptoms. CONCLUSION: The most frequent injuries in BKF include lacerations and hand fractures. Concussions are relatively uncommon compared to other injuries.

Concussion management in combat sports: consensus statement from the Association of Ringside Physicians.

Various organisations and experts have published numerous statements and recommendations regarding different aspects of sports-related concussion including definition, presentation, treatment, management and return to play guidelines. 1-7 To date, there have been no written consensus statements specific for combat sports regarding management of combatants who have suffered a concussion or for return to competition after a concussion. In combat sports, head contact is an objective of the sport itself. Accordingly, management and treatment of concussion in combat sports should, and must, be more stringent than for non-combat sports counterparts.The Association of Ringside Physicians (an international, non-profit organisation dedicated to the health and safety of the combat sports athlete) sets forth this consensus statement to establish management guidelines that ringside physicians, fighters, referees, trainers, promoters, sanctioning bodies and other healthcare professionals can use in the ringside setting. We also provide guidelines for the return of a combat sports athlete to competition after sustaining a concussion. This consensus statement does not address the management of moderate to severe forms of traumatic brain injury, such as intracranial bleeds, nor does it address the return to competition for combat sports athletes who have suffered such an injury. These more severe forms of brain injuries are beyond the scope of this statement. This consensus statement does not address neuroimaging guidelines in combat sports.