Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 24
Filter
5.
Top Clin Nutr ; 32(1): 69-86, 2017 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28232773

ABSTRACT

This 12-month prospective randomized cluster trial of 20 dietitians in India compared usual care (UC) and evidence-based nutrition practice guideline (EBNPG) care for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Baseline, 6-month, and 12-month data from 238 patients were analyzed. EBNPG implementation was evaluated using the Ottawa Model for Knowledge Transfer. EBNPG and UC groups achieved significant hemoglobin A1C improvements. EBNPG-treated participants were significantly more likely to meet low-density lipoprotein, high-density lipoprotein, and triglyceride goals at 6 or 12 months. Dietitian dropout, implementation barriers, and undetermined EBNPG intervention fidelity are limitations. Future research should assess barriers/supports and degree of EBNPG use.

6.
J Acad Nutr Diet ; 116(7): 1178-86, 2016 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27083988

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Clinical studies that establish the reliability and validity of nutrition diagnoses are absent from the literature. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the reliability and validity of the diagnoses, etiologies, and signs/symptoms within the clinical practice of registered dietitian nutritionists (RDNs). DESIGN: Nine pairs of RDNs randomly selected adult patients to diagnose. The two RDNs in each pair independently assessed nutritional data from the same patient. Each RDN chose one nutrition diagnosis and rated the presence or absence of the etiologies and signs/symptoms. Clinical reliability was determined with percentage of agreement for the diagnoses, and percentage agreement, kappa coefficient, and the proportions of positive agreement (p(pos)) and negative agreement (p(neg)) for the etiologies and signs/symptoms. Clinical validity was calculated according to a clinical diagnostic validity score for etiologies and signs/symptoms. RESULTS: These RDNs practiced either in an acute-care facility (n=10; 58.8%), ambulatory/outpatient facility (n=3; 17.6%), or both (n=4; 23.5%). Nutrition diagnoses were selected for 316 patients. Two raters selected the same diagnosis for 121 patients (38% agreement). Agreement was moderate (κ=0.54) for etiologies and at the lower end of substantial (κ=0.63) for signs/symptoms. For etiologies p(pos)=0.71 and p(neg)=0.78 and for signs/symptoms p(pos)=0.82 and p(neg)=0.79, indicating that the raters agreed on the presence of each as well as the absence. The overall clinical diagnostic validity score for etiologies was 0.33 and for signs/symptoms was 0.44, signifying they were not characteristic of the diagnoses. CONCLUSIONS: Although RDNs knew a nutrition problem was present, they were in poor agreement as to the most important diagnosis, etiologies, and signs/symptoms. The lack of agreement indicated inconsistencies in determining a primary diagnosis among these RDNs.


Subject(s)
Evidence-Based Practice , Nutrition Assessment , Nutritionists , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Child, Preschool , Dietetics , Humans , Infant , Malnutrition/diagnosis , Malnutrition/diet therapy , Reproducibility of Results , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States , Young Adult
8.
Child Obes ; 10(3): 251-9, 2014 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24783961

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Improving nutrition and physical activity behaviors associated with childhood obesity are significant national public health goals. Energy Balance for Kids with Play (EB4K with Play), developed through a partnership between the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics Foundation and Playworks, is a multi-component school-based intervention designed to address youth's nutrition and physical activity behaviors. This article describes the EB4K with Play intervention and evaluation study and presents the baseline data. METHODS: The evaluation is a 2-year cluster-randomized design targeting third- to fifth-grade students enrolled in a low-income, urban school district in northern California. Six schools were recruited to participate. Four were randomized to the intervention group and two into a control group. Baseline student-level data pertaining to nutrition, physical activity, fitness, and BMI were collected in the fall of 2011. The EB4K with Play program, which includes direct-to-student nutrition and physical activity interventions, a school wellness component, and parent/community partner outreach components, began immediately after baseline data collection. RESULTS: An ethnically diverse sample of students (n=844) was recruited to participate in the study. Baseline data showed a higher percent of eligibility for free and reduced-price school lunch and higher rates of obesity/overweight than the California state averages. Fitness levels and levels of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity were comparable to state averages. CONCLUSIONS: End-point data will be collected after 2 years of the intervention. The findings from this study should help guide future efforts to design effective intervention programs to support the prevention of pediatric obesity.


Subject(s)
Diet , Exercise , Health Promotion/organization & administration , Pediatric Obesity/prevention & control , Play and Playthings , School Health Services/organization & administration , Child , Child Nutritional Physiological Phenomena , Cluster Analysis , Female , Health Behavior , Humans , Male , Program Development , Program Evaluation
9.
J Acad Nutr Diet ; 113(7): 957-971.e1, 2013 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23706352

ABSTRACT

The Dietary Goals for the United States were introduced in 1977 and have been followed by the Dietary Guidelines for Americans (DGA) every 5 years from 1980 to 2010. The DGA provide science-based advice to promote health and reduce risk for major chronic diseases through diet and physical activity. The Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committees are charged to provide updates of the DGA topics using the best available science. The Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committees' reports also identified 169 research gaps. To date, these gaps have not been compiled and assessed. We evaluated trends in number, topics, and specificity of research gaps by year by placing them in the following topic categories: general, chronic diseases/conditions, diet/diet pattern, food/ingredient, and nutrient-specific research gaps. Some research topics (eg, sodium and hypertension and appropriate uses of DGA) have been identified consistently across the years, some emerged in later years (eg, increasingly specific research gaps between dietary fatty acids and cardiovascular disease), and others appeared intermittently (eg, relationships between dietary components and cancer). These results are a call to action for all DGA stakeholders to have an immediate dialogue about how the research enterprise can best address critical research needs in a timely way to support public policy.


Subject(s)
Biomedical Research/trends , Diet/standards , Guidelines as Topic , Nutrition Assessment , Academies and Institutes , Cardiovascular Diseases/diet therapy , Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control , Chronic Disease , Dietary Fats/administration & dosage , Humans , Motor Activity , Nutrition Policy , Retrospective Studies , Sodium, Dietary/administration & dosage , United States
10.
Manag Care ; 22(1): 40-5, 2013 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23373140

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the incremental cost of and health benefits attributable to medical nutrition therapy (MNT) for managed care members participating in an obesity-related health management program. DESIGN: Retrospective case-control. METHODOLOGY: Overweight or obese adult managed care members who utilized the MNT benefit (n = 291) were matched, using propensity score matching, with similar individuals (n = 1,104) who did not utilize the MNT benefit. Health outcomes data on weight, body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, and physical exercise were collected via surveys administered at baseline and approximately 2 years later. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Both groups experienced statistically significant reductions in weight, BMI, and waist circumference and increases in exercise frequency. Compared with matched controls, individuals who received MNT were about twice as likely to achieve a clinically significant reduction in weight, with an adjusted odds ratio of 2.2 (95% confidence interval, -1.7-2.9; P < .001). They also experienced greater average reductions in weight (3.1 vs. 1.4 kg; beta = -1.75; t[1314] = -2.21; P = .028) and were more likely to exercise more frequently after participating in the program (F[1,1358] = 4.07, P = .044). There was no difference between the groups in waist circumference. The MNT benefit was used by 5% of eligible members and cost $0.03 per member per month. CONCLUSION: MNT is a valuable adjunct to health management programs that can be implemented for a relatively low cost. MNT warrants serious consideration as a standard inclusion in health benefit plans.


Subject(s)
Insurance, Health/standards , Nutrition Therapy/standards , Obesity/diet therapy , Weight Reduction Programs/organization & administration , Adult , Body Mass Index , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Exercise , Female , Humans , Insurance Coverage/economics , Insurance Coverage/standards , Insurance, Health/economics , Male , Managed Care Programs , Middle Aged , North Carolina , Nutrition Therapy/economics , Nutrition Therapy/methods , Obesity/economics , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Retrospective Studies , United States , Waist Circumference , Weight Reduction Programs/economics , Weight Reduction Programs/methods
11.
PLoS One ; 6(12): e28437, 2011.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22163017

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The source of funding is one of many possible causes of bias in scientific research. One method of detecting potential for bias is to evaluate the quality of research reports. Research exploring the relationship between funding source and nutrition-related research report quality is limited and in other disciplines the findings are mixed. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to determine whether types of funding sources of nutrition research are associated with differences in research report quality. DESIGN: A retrospective study of research reporting quality, research design and funding source was conducted on 2539 peer reviewed research articles from the American Dietetic Association's Evidence Analysis Library® database. RESULTS: Quality rating frequency distributions indicate 43.3% of research reports were rated as positive, 50.1% neutral, and 6.6% as negative. Multinomial logistic regression results showed that while both funding source and type of research design are significant predictors of quality ratings (χ2 = 118.99, p≤0.001), the model's usefulness in predicting overall research report quality is little better than chance. Compared to research reports with government funding, those not acknowledging any funding sources, followed by studies with University/hospital funding were more likely to receive neutral vs positive quality ratings, OR = 1.85, P <0.001 and OR = 1.54, P<0.001, respectively and those that did not report funding were more likely to receive negative quality ratings (OR = 4.97, P<0.001). After controlling for research design, industry funded research reports were no more likely to receive a neutral or negative quality rating than those funded by government sources. CONCLUSION: Research report quality cannot be accurately predicted from the funding source after controlling for research design. Continued vigilance to evaluate the quality of all research regardless of the funding source and to further understand other factors that affect quality ratings are warranted.


Subject(s)
Nutritional Sciences/standards , Dietetics/methods , Drug Industry/economics , Foundations/economics , Humans , Industry/economics , Prejudice , Publications , Quality Control , Regression Analysis , Research Design , Research Report , Research Support as Topic , Retrospective Studies , Societies, Medical
12.
Ann Behav Med ; 38(1): 60-8, 2009 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19806417

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Youth obesity prevention practices would be enhanced if modifiable risk factors can be identified before children become overweight. PURPOSE: This study evaluated the predictive validity of the Family Nutrition and Physical Activity (FNPA) screening tool, a behaviorally based screening tool designed to assess family environments and behaviors that may predispose youth to becoming overweight. METHODS: Parents from a large urban school district completed the FNPA screening when children were in first grade. One-year change in measured body mass index (BMI) was used as the primary outcome, and this was computed using the relative change in distance from the BMI value at the 50th percentile. Descriptive, correlation, and mixed modeling analyses were used for survey validation. RESULTS: Over half of the participants exhibited an increase in BMI percentile over the 1-year follow-up with an average change of 0.51 +/- 11.5% which is indicative of trends to overweight. Although baseline BMI predicted BMI at follow-up, the FNPA total score explained unique variance in child BMI at follow-up after accounting for baseline BMI, parent BMI, and other demographic variables (p = 0.049). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the potential validity of a simple, easy-to-use screening tool for identifying children that may be at risk for becoming overweight.


Subject(s)
Body Mass Index , Family Characteristics , Motor Activity , Nutrition Surveys , Obesity/prevention & control , Overweight/prevention & control , Predictive Value of Tests , Adult , Body Weights and Measures/statistics & numerical data , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Models, Statistical , Reproducibility of Results , Risk Factors
14.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med ; 161(5): 495-501, 2007 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17485627

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether pediatricians and dietitians can implement an office-based obesity prevention program using motivational interviewing as the primary intervention. DESIGN: Nonrandomized clinical trial. Fifteen pediatricians belonging to Pediatric Research in Office Settings, a national practice-based research network, and 5 registered dietitians were assigned to 1 of 3 groups: (1) control; (2) minimal intervention (pediatrician only); or (3) intensive intervention (pediatrician and registered dietitian). SETTING: Primary care pediatric offices. PARTICIPANTS: Ninety-one children presenting for well-child care visits met eligibility criteria of being aged 3 to 7 years and having a body mass index (calculated as the weight in kilograms divided by the height in meters squared) at the 85th percentile or greater but lower than the 95th percentile for the age or having a normal weight and a parent with a body mass index of 30 or greater. INTERVENTIONS: Pediatricians and registered dietitians in the intervention groups received motivational interviewing training. Parents of children in the minimal intervention group received 1 motivational interviewing session from the physician, and parents of children in the intensive intervention group received 2 motivational interviewing sessions each from the pediatrician and the registered dietitian. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Change in the body mass index-for-age percentile. RESULTS: At 6 months' follow-up, there was a decrease of 0.6, 1.9, and 2.6 body mass index percentiles in the control, minimal, and intensive groups, respectively. The differences in body mass index percentile change between the 3 groups were nonsignificant (P=.85). The patient dropout rates were 2 (10%), 13 (32%), and 15 (50%) for the control, minimal, and intensive groups, respectively. Fifteen (94%) of the parents reported that the intervention helped them think about changing their family's eating habits. CONCLUSIONS: Motivational interviewing by pediatricians and dietitians is a promising office-based strategy for preventing childhood obesity. However, additional studies are needed to demonstrate the efficacy of this intervention in practice settings.


Subject(s)
Dietetics/methods , Directive Counseling/methods , Interviews as Topic/methods , Motivation , Obesity/prevention & control , Office Visits , Pediatrics/methods , Body Mass Index , Child , Child Behavior/psychology , Child, Preschool , Feasibility Studies , Female , Health Behavior , Humans , Male , Obesity/psychology , Overweight , Preventive Medicine , Primary Health Care
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...