Diaphragmatic dysfunction is associated with postoperative pulmonary complications and phrenic nerve paresis in patients undergoing thoracic surgery.

PURPOSE: We aimed to quantify perioperative changes in diaphragmatic function and phrenic nerve conduction in patients undergoing routine thoracic surgery. METHODS: A prospective observational study was performed in patients undergoing esophageal resection or pulmonary lobectomy. Examinations were carried out the day prior to surgery, 3 days and 10-14 days after surgery. Endpoints for diaphragmatic function included ultrasonographic measurements of diaphragmatic excursion and thickening fraction. Endpoints for phrenic nerve conduction included baseline-to-peak amplitude, peak-to-peak amplitude, and transmission delay. Measurements were assessed on both the surgical side and the non-surgical side of the thorax. RESULTS: Forty patients were included in the study. Significant reductions in diaphragmatic excursion were seen on the surgical side of the thorax for all excursion measures (posterior part of the right hemidiaphragm, p < 0.001; hemidiaphragmatic top point, p < 0.001; change in intrathoracic area, p < 0.001). Significant changes were seen for all phrenic nerve measures (baseline-to-peak amplitude, p < 0.001; peak-to-peak amplitude, p < 0.001; transmission delay, p = 0.041) on the surgical side. However, significant changes were also seen on the non-surgical side for all phrenic nerve measures (baseline-to-peak amplitude, p < 0.001; peak-to-peak amplitude, p < 0.001; transmission delay, p = 0.022). A postoperative reduction in posterior diaphragmatic excursion of more than 50% was significantly associated with postoperative pulmonary complications (coefficient: 2.69 (95% CI [1.38, 4.01], p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Thoracic surgery caused a significant unilateral reduction in diaphragmatic excursion on the surgical side of the thorax, which was accompanied by significant changes in phrenic nerve conduction. However, phrenic nerve conduction was also significantly affected on the non-surgical side to a lesser extent, which was not mirrored in diaphragmatic excursion. Our findings suggest that phrenic nerve paresis plays a role in postoperative diaphragmatic dysfunction, which may be a contributing factor in the pathogenesis of postoperative pulmonary complications. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04507594.

The haemodynamic effects of phenylephrine after cardiac surgery.

BACKGROUND: Phenylephrine increases systemic- and pulmonary resistances and therefore may increase blood pressures at the expense of blood flow. Cardio-pulmonary bypass alters vasoreactivity and many patients exhibit chronotropic insufficiency after cardiac surgery. We aimed to describe the haemodynamic effects of phenylephrine infusion after cardiac surgery. METHODS: Patients in steady state after low-risk cardiac surgery received incremental infusion rates of phenylephrine up to 1.0 µg/kg/min with the aim of increasing systemic mean arterial blood pressure 20 mmHg. Invasive haemodynamic parameters, including pulmonary wedge pressures, were captured along with echocardiographic measures of biventricular function before, during phenylephrine infusion at target systemic blood pressure, and 20 min after phenylephrine discontinuation. RESULTS: Thirty patients were included. Phenylephrine increased mean arterial pressure increased from 78 (±9) mmHg to 98 (±10) mmHg with phenylephrine infusion. Also, pulmonary blood pressure as well as systemic- and pulmonary resistances increased. The ratio between systemic- and pulmonary artery resistances did not change statistically significantly (p = .59). Median cardiac output was 4.35 (interquartile range [IQR] 3.6-5.4) L/min at baseline and increased significantly with phenylephrine infusion (median Δcardiac output was 0.25 [IQR 0.1-0.6] L/min) (p = .012). Pulmonary artery wedge pressure increased from 10.2 (±3.0) mmHg to 11.9 (±3.4) mmHg (p < .001). This was accompanied by significant increases in central venous pressure. Phenylephrine infusion increased left ventricular end-diastolic volume from 105 (±46) mL to 119 (±44) mL (p < .001). All results of phenylephrine infusion were reversed with discontinuation. CONCLUSION: In haemodynamically stable patients after cardiac surgery, phenylephrine increased PVR and SVR, but did not change the PVR/SVR ratio. Phenylephrine increased biventricular filling pressures and left ventricular end-diastolic area. Consequently, CO increased as ejection fraction was maintained. These findings do not discourage the use of phenylephrine after low-risk cardiac surgery. REGISTRATION: clinicaltrial.gov (identifier NCT04419662).

Effects of changes in position, positive end-expiratory pressure and mean arterial pressure on renal, portal and hepatic Doppler ultrasound perfusion indices: a randomized crossover study in cardiac surgery patients.

Point-of-care ultrasound perfusion indices can be used for detection of AKI and venous congestion. Patients in the postoperative- and intensive care units are frequently exposed to alternating treatment and loading conditions. We aimed to study the effects of changes in preload (patient positioning), positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and afterload (phenylephrine) on renal, portal and hepatic ultrasound indices. We hypothesized that renal resistive index was not influenced by changes in PEEP and patient positioning. This was a single-site, randomized, crossover study. Patients above 18 years scheduled for elective open-heart surgery at Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark, were available for inclusion. Patients were randomized to a sequence of six combinations of PEEP and position in addition to an increase in mean arterial pressure by phenylephrine. Thirty-one patients participated in the study. Resistive index was influenced by positional change (P = 0.007), but not by change in PEEP (P = 0.50) (Table 1). Renal venous stasis index and portal pulsatility fraction increased in the raised legs position (P ≤ 0.019), but not with increases in PEEP. Renal venous flow pattern and hepatic venous flow pattern were affected by position (P ≤ 0.019), but not by PEEP. None of the ultrasound indices were significantly changed by infusion of phenylephrine. Doppler perfusion indices were significantly affected by changes in preload, but not by changes in PEEP or afterload. Although the changes in the Doppler ultrasound indices were significant, they were small in absolute numbers. Therefore, from a clinical perspective, the ultrasound indices were robust.Trial registration Registered at clinicaltrials.com, first posted online June 5th 2020, identifier: NCT04419662.