A Narrative Review of the 2023 Korean Thyroid Association Management Guideline for Patients with Thyroid Nodules.

The 2023 Korean Thyroid Association (KTA) Management Guideline for Patients with Thyroid Nodules constitute an update of the 2016 KTA guideline for thyroid nodules and cancers that focuses specifically on nodules. The 2023 guideline aim to offer updated guidance based on new evidence that reflects the changes in clinical practice since the 2016 KTA guideline. To update the 2023 guideline, a comprehensive literature search was conducted from January 2022 to May 2022. The literature search included studies, reviews, and other evidence involving human subjects that were published in English in MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, and other relevant databases. Additional significant clinical trials and research studies published up to April 2023 were also reviewed. The limitations of the current evidence are discussed, and suggestions for areas in need of further research are identified. The purpose of this review is to provide a summary of the 2023 KTA guideline for the management of thyroid nodules released in May 2023 and to give a balanced insight with comparison of recent guidelines from other societies.

Malignancy risk stratification and subcategorization of K-TIRADS intermediate suspicion thyroid nodules: a retrospective multicenter study.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to develop the ultrasonography (US) criteria for risk stratification of the Korean Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (K-TIRADS) 4 nodules, and to evaluate the diagnostic yield of a modified biopsy criterion in a multicenter cohort. METHODS: In total, 1,542 K-TIRADS 4 nodules (≥1 cm) were included in the study. US criteria for the subcategorization of K-TIRADS 4 nodules were developed based on high-risk US features. The diagnostic yields and false referral rates of biopsy criterion 1 (size cut-off of 1 cm), biopsy criterion 2 (size cut-off of 1.5 cm), and modified biopsy criterion 3 (size cut-off of 1 cm for K-TIRADS 4B and 1.5 cm for K-TIRADS 4A) were evaluated. RESULTS: The five high-risk US features (solid composition, marked hypoechogenicity, macrocalcification, punctate echogenic foci, and irregular margin) independently increased the malignancy risk of the K-TIRADS 4 nodules (P<0.001). The K-TIRADS 4 nodules could be subcategorized into higher- and lower-risk subcategories according to the number of high-risk US features: K-TIRADS 4B (≥2 US features) and K-TIRADS 4A (≤1 US feature). The modified biopsy criterion increased the diagnostic yield by 7.8% compared with criterion 2 and reduced the false referral rate by 15.3% compared with criterion 1 (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: The K-TIRADS 4 nodules were subcategorized as K-TIRADS 4B and K-TIRADS 4A based on high-risk US features. The modified biopsy criterion 3 showed a similar diagnostic yield and reduced false referral rate compared to criterion 1.

Malignancy risk of indeterminate lymph node at the central compartment in patients with thyroid cancer and concomitant sonographic thyroiditis.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the malignancy risk of sonographic (US) indeterminate lymph node (LN)s at the central compartment in thyroid cancer patients with US-thyroiditis (ST). METHODS: Among the central compartments of suspicious, indeterminate, and probably benign LN US categories, the malignancy rates were compared between ST and non-US-thyroiditis (non-ST) groups. Those of indeterminate category were compared with suspicious and probably benign categories. RESULTS: At 531 central compartments from 349 patients, the malignancy rate was lower in ST group (34.4% [44/128]) than non-ST group (43.4% [175/403]), although statistically not significant (p = 0.08). The malignancy rate of indeterminate category in ST group (35.7% [5/14]) was lower than non-ST group (71.9% [23/32]) (p = 0.047). Within ST group, the malignancy rate of indeterminate category (35.7% [5/14]) did not differ from probably benign category (29.1% [30/103]) (p = 0.756), but was lower than suspicious category (81.8% [9/11]) (p = 0.042). CONCLUSIONS: The malignancy risk of US indeterminate LNs at the central compartment in thyroid cancer patients with US thyroiditis was lower than that in patients without US thyroiditis.

Artificial Intelligence Model Assisting Thyroid Nodule Diagnosis and Management: A Multicenter Diagnostic Study.

CONTEXT: It is not clear how to integrate artificial intelligence (AI)-based models into diagnostic workflows. OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a deep-learning-based AI model (AI-Thyroid) for thyroid cancer diagnosis, and to explore how this improves diagnostic performance. METHODS: The system was trained using 19 711 images of 6163 patients in a tertiary hospital (Ajou University Medical Center; AUMC). It was validated using 11 185 images of 4820 patients in 24 hospitals (test set 1) and 4490 images of 2367 patients in AUMC (test set 2). The clinical implications were determined by comparing the findings of six physicians with different levels of experience (group 1: 4 trainees, and group 2: 2 faculty radiologists) before and after AI-Thyroid assistance. RESULTS: The area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve of AI-Thyroid was 0.939. The AUROC, sensitivity, and specificity were 0.922, 87.0%, and 81.5% for test set 1 and 0.938, 89.9%, and 81.6% for test set 2. The AUROCs of AI-Thyroid did not differ significantly according to the prevalence of malignancies (>15.0% vs ≤15.0%, P = .226). In the simulated scenario, AI-Thyroid assistance changed the AUROC, sensitivity, and specificity from 0.854 to 0.945, from 84.2% to 92.7%, and from 72.9% to 86.6% (all P < .001) in group 1, and from 0.914 to 0.939 (P = .022), from 78.6% to 85.5% (P = .053) and from 91.9% to 92.5% (P = .683) in group 2. The interobserver agreement improved from moderate to substantial in both groups. CONCLUSION: AI-Thyroid can improve diagnostic performance and interobserver agreement in thyroid cancer diagnosis, especially in less-experienced physicians.

International Expert Consensus on US Lexicon for Thyroid Nodules.

Multiple US-based systems for risk stratification of thyroid nodules are in use worldwide. Unfortunately, the malignancy probability assigned to a nodule varies, and terms and definitions are not consistent, leading to confusion and making it challenging to compare study results and craft revisions. Consistent application of these systems is further hampered by interobserver variability in identifying the sonographic features on which they are founded. In 2018, an international multidisciplinary group of 19 physicians with expertise in thyroid sonography (termed the International Thyroid Nodule Ultrasound Working Group) was convened with the goal of developing an international system, tentatively called the International Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System, or I-TIRADS, in two phases: (phase I) creation of a lexicon and atlas of US descriptors of thyroid nodules and (phase II) development of a system that estimates the malignancy risk of a thyroid nodule. This article presents the methods and results of phase I. The purpose herein is to show what has been accomplished thus far, as well as generate interest in and support for this effort in the global thyroid community.

US Features of the Parathyroid Glands: An Intraoperative Surgical Specimen Study.

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the US features of the parathyroid glands (PTGs) using surgical specimens of normal PTGs obtained during thyroid surgery. Materials and Methods: This study included 34 normal PTGs from 17 consecutive patients who underwent thyroid surgery between December 2020 and March 2021. All normal PTGs were histologically confirmed by intraoperative frozen-section biopsy for autotransplantation. Surgically resected parathyroid specimens were scanned in sterile normal saline using high-resolution US prior to autotransplantation. The US features of echogenicity (hyperechogenicity or hypoechogenicity), echotexture (homogeneous or heterogeneous), size, and shape (ovoid or round) were retrospectively evaluated. The echogenicity of the three PTGs was compared with that of the thyroid parenchyma of the resected thyroid specimens in two patients. Results: All PTGs showed hyperechogenicity similar to that of gauze soaked in normal saline. Homogeneous hyperechogenicity was observed in 32/34 (94.1%) patients, and the echogenicity of the three PTGs was hyperechoic compared with that of the thyroid parenchyma. The long diameter of the PTGs ranged from 5.1 mm to 9.8 mm (mean, 7.1 mm) and the shape of the PTGs was ovoid in 33/34 (97.1%) patients. Conclusion: The echogenicity of normal PTG specimens was consistently hyperechoic, and the small ovoid homogeneously hyperechoic structure was a characteristic US feature of the PTGs.

Diagnostic Performance of Ultrasound-Based Risk Stratification Systems for Thyroid Nodules: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGRUOUND: This study investigated the diagnostic performance of biopsy criteria in four society ultrasonography risk stratification systems (RSSs) for thyroid nodules, including the 2021 Korean (K)-Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TIRADS). METHODS: The Ovid-MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, and KoreaMed databases were searched and a manual search was conducted to identify original articles investigating the diagnostic performance of biopsy criteria for thyroid nodules (≥1 cm) in four widely used society RSSs. RESULTS: Eleven articles were included. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 82% (95% confidence interval [CI], 74% to 87%) and 60% (95% CI, 52% to 67%) for the American College of Radiology (ACR)-TIRADS, 89% (95% CI, 85% to 93%) and 34% (95% CI, 26% to 42%) for the American Thyroid Association (ATA) system, 88% (95% CI, 81% to 92%) and 42% (95% CI, 22% to 67%) for the European (EU)-TIRADS, and 96% (95% CI, 94% to 97%) and 21% (95% CI, 17% to 25%) for the 2016 K-TIRADS. The sensitivity and specificity were 76% (95% CI, 74% to 79%) and 50% (95% CI, 49% to 52%) for the 2021 K-TIRADS1.5 (1.5-cm size cut-off for intermediate-suspicion nodules). The pooled unnecessary biopsy rates of the ACR-TIRADS, ATA system, EU-TIRADS, and 2016 K-TIRADS were 41% (95% CI, 32% to 49%), 65% (95% CI, 56% to 74%), 68% (95% CI, 60% to 75%), and 79% (95% CI, 74% to 83%), respectively. The unnecessary biopsy rate was 50% (95% CI, 47% to 53%) for the 2021 K-TIRADS1.5. CONCLUSION: The unnecessary biopsy rate of the 2021 K-TIRADS1.5 was substantially lower than that of the 2016 K-TIRADS and comparable to that of the ACR-TIRADS. The 2021 K-TIRADS may help reduce potential harm due to unnecessary biopsies.

US features of normal parathyroid glands: a comparison with metastatic lymph nodes in thyroid cancer.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to determine the ultrasound (US) features of normal parathyroid glands (PTGs) and to evaluate whether normal PTGs can be differentiated from metastatic lymph nodes (LNs) in thyroid cancer. METHODS: This retrospective study included 10 normal PTGs and 95 metastatic LNs from thyroid cancer showing suspicious US features. The echogenicity, echotexture, echogenic foci (calcifications), cystic change, abnormal vascularity, size, shape, and location were retrospectively assessed and compared between normal PTGs and metastatic LNs. RESULTS: The echogenicity of normal PTGs was significantly different from that of metastatic LNs (P<0.001). Normal PTGs exhibited marked hyperechogenicity (100%), homogeneous echotexture (80%), focal intraglandular hypoechogenicity (20%), ovoid shape (90%), and focal cystic change in one case (10%). The echogenicity of metastatic LNs was markedly hyperechoic (0%), moderately hyperechoic (15.8%), mildly hyperechoic (53.7%), and hypoechoic (28.4%). The size and long axis/short axis ratios of normal PTGs were significantly smaller and larger than those of metastatic LNs (P<0.01 and P=0.022, respectively). CONCLUSION: Marked hyperechogenicity was found only in normal PTGs, and small, ovoid, markedly hyperechoic structures in the paramedian central neck characterized normal PTGs. Normal PTGs may be differentiated from metastatic LNs in thyroid cancer.

[Clinical Application of the 2021 Korean Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (K-TIRADS)]. / 2021 한국 ê°‘ìƒì„ ì˜ìƒ íŒë ê³¼ 자료체계의 ìž„ìƒì ìš©.

In patients with thyroid nodules, ultrasonography (US) has been established as a primary diagnostic imaging method and is essential for treatment decision. The Korean Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (K-TIRADS) is a pattern-based, US malignancy risk stratification system that can easily diagnose nodules during real-time ultrasound examinations. The 2021 K-TIRADS clarified the US criteria for nodule classification and revised the size thresholds for nodule biopsy, thereby reducing unnecessary biopsies for benign nodules while maintaining the appropriate sensitivity to detect malignant tumors in patients without feature of high risk thyroid cancer. Thyroid radiology practice has an important clinical role in the diagnosis and non-surgical treatment of patients with thyroid nodules, and should be performed according to standard practice guidelines for proper and effective clinical care.

Standardized Imaging and Reporting for Thyroid Ultrasound: Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology Consensus Statement and Recommendation.

Ultrasonography (US) is a primary imaging modality for diagnosing nodular thyroid disease and has an essential role in identifying the most appropriate management strategy for patients with nodular thyroid disease. Standardized imaging techniques and reporting formats for thyroid US are necessary. For this purpose, the Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology (KSThR) organized a task force in June 2021 and developed recommendations for standardized imaging technique and reporting format, based on the 2021 KSThR consensus statement and recommendations for US-based diagnosis and management of thyroid nodules. The goal was to achieve an expert consensus applicable to clinical practice.

Development of a machine learning-based fine-grained risk stratification system for thyroid nodules using predefined clinicoradiological features.

OBJECTIVE: We constructed and validated a machine learning-based malignancy risk estimation model using predefined clinicoradiological features, and evaluated its clinical utility for the management of thyroid nodules. METHODS: In total, 5708 benign (n = 4597) and malignant (n = 1111) thyroid nodules were collected from 5081 consecutive patients treated in 26 institutions. Seventeen experienced radiologists evaluated nodule characteristics on ultrasonographic images. Eight predictive models were used to stratify the thyroid nodules according to malignancy risk; model performance was assessed via nested 10-fold cross-validation. The best-performing algorithm was externally validated using data for 454 thyroid nodules from a tertiary hospital, then compared to the Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TIRADS)-based interpretations of radiologists (American College of Radiology, European and Korean TIRADS, and AACE/ACE/AME guidelines). RESULTS: The area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curves of the algorithms ranged from 0.773 to 0.862. The sensitivities, specificities, positive predictive values, and negative predictive values of the best-performing models were 74.1-76.6%, 80.9-83.4%, 49.2-51.9%, and 93.0-93.5%, respectively. For the external validation set, the ElasticNet values were 83.2%, 89.2%, 81.8%, and 90.1%, respectively. The corresponding TIRADS values were 66.5-85.0%, 61.3-80.8%, 45.9-72.1%, and 81.5-90.3%, respectively. The new model exhibited a significantly higher AUROC and specificity than did the TIRADS risk stratification, although its sensitivity was similar. CONCLUSION: We developed a reliable machine learning-based predictive model that demonstrated enhanced specificity when stratifying thyroid nodules according to malignancy risk. This system will contribute to improved personalized management of thyroid nodules. KEY POINTS: • The area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve, sensitivity, and specificity of our model were 0.914, 83.2%, and 89.2%, respectively (derived using the validation dataset). • Compared to the TIRADS values, the AUROC and specificity are significantly higher, while the sensitivity is similar. • An interactive version of our AI algorithm is at http://tirads.cdss.co.kr .

Orientation of the ultrasound probe to identify the taller-than-wide sign of thyroid malignancy: a registry-based study with the Thyroid Imaging Network of Korea.

PURPOSE: Although the taller-than-wide (TTW) sign has been regarded as one of the most specific ultrasound (US) features of thyroid malignancy, uncertainty still exists regarding the US probe's orientation when evaluating it. This study investigated which US plane would be optimal to identify the TTW sign based on malignancy risk stratification using a registry-based imaging dataset. METHODS: A previous study by 17 academic radiologists retrospectively analyzed the US images of 5,601 thyroid nodules (≥1 cm, 1,089 malignant and 4,512 benign) collected in the webbased registry of Thyroid Imaging Network of Korea through the collaboration of 26 centers. The present study assessed the diagnostic performance of the TTW sign itself and fine needle aspiration (FNA) indications via a comparison of four international guidelines, depending on the orientation of the US probe (criterion 1, transverse plane; criterion 2, either transverse or longitudinal plane). RESULTS: Overall, the TTW sign was more frequent in malignant than in benign thyroid nodules (25.3% vs. 4.6%). However, the statistical differences between criteria 1 and 2 were negligible for sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) based on the size effect (all P<0.05, Cohen's d=0.19, 0.10, and 0.07, respectively). Moreover, the sensitivity, specificity, and AUC of the four FNA guidelines were similar between criteria 1 and 2 (all P>0.05, respectively). CONCLUSION: A longitudinal US probe orientation provided little additional diagnostic value over the transverse orientation in detecting the TTW sign of thyroid nodules.

Diagnostic performance of the 2021 Korean thyroid imaging reporting and data system in pediatric thyroid nodules.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of 2021 K-TIRADS biopsy criteria for detecting malignant thyroid nodules in a pediatric population, making comparisons with 2016 K-TIRADS. METHODS: This retrospective study included pediatric patients with histopathologically confirmed diagnoses. The diagnostic performance of 2021 K-TIRADS was compared with that of 2016 K-TIRADS. Simulation studies were performed by changing biopsy cut-off sizes for K-TIRADS 5 to 1.0 cm (K-TIRADS5-1.0cm) and 0.5 cm (K-TIRADS5-0.5cm), and for K-TIRADS 4 to 1.0 cm (K-TIRADS4-1.0cm) and 1.0-1.5 cm (K-TIRADS4-1.0~1.5cm). Subgroup analysis was performed in small (< 1.5 cm) and large nodules (≥ 1.5 cm). RESULTS: Two hundred seventy-seven thyroid nodules (54.9% malignant) from 221 pediatric patients were analyzed. All simulated 2021 K-TIRADS showed higher accuracy than 2016 K-TIRADS. Compared with 2021 K-TIRADS5-1.0cm, 2021 K-TIRADS5-0.5cm showed lower specificity (51.6% vs. 47.9%; p = 0.004) but higher sensitivity (77.2% vs. 90.3%; p < 0.001) and accuracy (62.7% vs. 68.9%; p < 0.001). Compared with 2021 K-TIRADS4-1.0cm, 2021 K-TIRADS4-1.0~1.5cm showed higher specificity (44.9% vs. 47.9%; p = 0.018) without significant difference in other diagnostic measures. Compared with 2016 K-TIRADS, 2021 K-TIRADS (biopsy cut-offs, 0.5 cm for K-TIRADS 5; 1.0-1.5 cm for K-TIRADS 4) showed higher sensitivity (34.0% vs. 67.3%; p < 0.001) while maintaining specificity (89.4% vs. 88.2%; p = 0.790) in small nodules, and higher specificity (5.9% vs. 25.4%; p < 0.001) while maintaining sensitivity (100% vs. 98.7%; p = 0.132) in large nodules. CONCLUSIONS: In pediatric patients, 2021 K-TIRADS showed superior diagnostic accuracy to 2016 K-TIRADS, especially with a biopsy cut-off of 0.5 cm for K-TIRADS 5 and 1.0-1.5 cm for K-TIRADS 4. KEY POINTS: • All simulated 2021 K-TIRADS showed higher accuracy than 2016 K-TIRADS. • 2021 K-TIRADS with cut-off size for K-TIRADS 5 of 0.5 cm showed lower specificity but higher sensitivity and accuracy than that of 1.0 cm. • Compared with 2016 K-TIRADS, 2021 K-TIRADS (biopsy cut-offs, 0.5 cm for K-TIRADS 5; 1.0-1.5 cm for K-TIRADS 4) showed higher sensitivity while maintaining specificity in small nodules, and higher specificity while maintaining sensitivity in large nodules.

Malignancy risk stratification of thyroid nodules according to echotexture and degree of hypoechogenicity: a retrospective multicenter validation study.

Various risk stratification systems show discrepancies in the ultrasound lexicon of nodule echotexture and hypoechogenicity. This study aimed to determine the malignancy risk of thyroid nodules according to their echotexture and degree of hypoechogenicity. From June to September 2015, we retrospectively evaluated 5601 thyroid nodules with final diagnoses from 26 institutions. Nodules were stratified according to the echotexture (homogeneous vs. heterogeneous) and degree of hypoechogenicity (mild, moderate, or marked). We calculated the malignancy risk according to composition and suspicious features. Heterogeneous hypoechoic nodules showed a significantly higher malignancy risk than heterogeneous isoechoic nodules (P ≤ 0.017), except in partially cystic nodules. Malignancy risks were not significantly different between homogeneous versus heterogeneous nodules in both hypoechoic (P ≥ 0.086) and iso- hyperechoic nodules (P ≥ 0.05). Heterogeneous iso-hyperechoic nodules without suspicious features showed a low malignancy risk. The malignancy risks of markedly and moderately hypoechoic nodules were not significantly different in all subgroups (P ≥ 0.48). Marked or moderately hypoechoic nodules showed a significantly higher risk than mild hypoechoic (P ≤ 0.016) nodules. The predominant echogenicity effectively stratifies the malignancy risk of nodules with heterogeneous echotexture. The degree of hypoechogenicity could be stratified as mild versus moderate to marked hypoechogenicity.

Can the ultrasound echogenicity of normal parotid and submandibular glands be used as a reference standard for normal thyroid echogenicity?

PURPOSE: This study aimed to determine whether the normal parotid gland (PG) and submandibular gland (SMG) can be used as reference standards for normal thyroid echogenicity. METHODS: In total, 1,302 consecutive patients with normal salivary glands were included in this study. The echogenicity of the SMG and PG was assessed during real-time ultrasound examinations, and the glands were categorized as hyperechogenic, isoechogenic, and hypoechogenic relative to the thyroid parenchyma in patients without diffuse thyroid disease (group 1, n=1,106) and with diffuse thyroid disease (group 2, n=196). The frequency of the echogenicity categories of the normal PG and SMG was assessed according to patients' age. RESULTS: In group 1, the normal PG showed isoechogenicity in 94.0% and hypoechogenicity or hyperechogenicity in 6.0%, and the normal SMG showed isoechogenicity in 73.6% and hypoechogenicity in 26.4% of patients (P<0.001). There was no significant association of the frequency of isoechoic PG with age (P=0.834); however, there was a trend for an increasing frequency of isoechoic SMG with aging (22.9%-81.4%) (P<0.001). Similar findings were found in group 2 patients without decreased thyroid echogenicity. CONCLUSION: The normal PG was mostly isoechoic to the normal thyroid parenchyma, whereas the normal SMG showed hypoechogenicity at various frequencies according to age. The echogenicity of the normal PG can be used as an alternative reference standard for normal thyroid echogenicity; however, the normal SMG is not suitable for a reference standard when assessing thyroid nodule echogenicity in patients who have diffuse thyroid disease with decreased parenchymal echogenicity.

Malignancy risk of thyroid nodules with minimal cystic changes: a multicenter retrospective study.

PURPOSE: The aim of this multicenter study was to investigate the malignancy risk of minimally cystic thyroid nodules (MCTNs) using cyto-histopathologic diagnoses as the reference standard. METHODS: From June 2015 to September 2015, 5,601 thyroid nodules (≥1 cm) from 4,989 consecutive patients who underwent thyroid ultrasonography (US) at 26 institutions were retrospectively analyzed. Each thyroid nodule was categorized according to its cystic proportion: purely solid, minimally cystic (≤10%), and partially cystic (>10%). The malignancy risk of MCTNs was compared with those of purely solid nodules and partially cystic thyroid nodules (PCTNs). The malignancy risk of MCTNs was assessed according to echogenicity and the presence of suspicious US features. RESULTS: The prevalence of MCTNs was 22.5%. The overall malignancy risk of MCTNs was 8.8%, which was significantly lower than that of purely solid nodules (29.5%) (P<0.001), and slightly higher than that of PCTNs (6.2%) (P=0.013). The risk of malignancy associated with MCTNs was similar to that of PCTNs regardless of echogenicity or the presence of suspicious US features (all P>0.05). MCTNs were associated with a higher risk of malignancy in hypoechoic nodules than in isohyperechoic nodules and in nodules with suspicious US features than in those without suspicious US features (all P<0.001). CONCLUSION: The malignancy risk of MCTNs was significantly lower than that of purely solid nodules. MCTNs could be categorized as PCTNs rather than as solid nodules to increase the accuracy of the risk stratification system for thyroid nodules.

Diagnostic Performance of Five Adult-based US Risk Stratification Systems in Pediatric Thyroid Nodules.

Background The validation of adult-based US risk stratification systems (RSSs) in the discrimination of malignant thyroid nodules in a pediatric population remains lacking. Purpose To estimate and compare the diagnostic performance of pediatric US RSSs based on five adult-based RSSs in the discrimination of malignant thyroid nodules in a pediatric sample. Materials and methods Pediatric patients (age ≤18 years) with histopathologically confirmed US-detected thyroid nodules at a tertiary referral hospital between January 2000 and April 2020 were analyzed retrospectively. The diagnostic performance of US-based fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) criteria in thyroid cancer detection was estimated. The following sensitivity analyses were performed: (a) scenario 1: nodules smaller than 1 cm, with the highest category additionally biopsied; (b) scenario 2, application of American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System nodule size cutoffs to other RSSs; (c) scenario 3, scenarios 1 and 2 together. Generalized estimating equations (GEEs) were used for estimation. Results A total of 277 thyroid nodules in 221 pediatric patients (median age, 16 years [interquartile range {IQR}, 13-17]; 172 female; 152 of 277 patients [55%] malignant) were analyzed. The GEE-estimated sensitivity and specificity ranged from 70% to 78% (104 to 119 of 152 patients, based on each reader's interpretation) and from 42% to 78% (49 of 124 patients to 103 of 125 patients). In scenario 1, the missed malignancy rate was reduced from 32%-38% (41 of 134 patients to 34 of 83 patients) to 15%-21% (eight of 59 patients to 28 of 127 patients). In scenario 2, the unnecessary biopsy rate was reduced from 35%-39% (60 of 176 patients to 68 of 175 patients) to 20%-34% (18 of 109 patients to 62 of 179 patients). The highest accuracy was noted in scenario 3 (range, 71%-81%; 199 of 277 patients to 216 of 262 patients). Conclusion The diagnostic performances of the fine-needle aspiration biopsy criteria of five adult-based risk stratification systems were acceptable in the pediatric population and were improved by applying the American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System size cutoff for nodules 1 cm or larger and allowing biopsy of the highest category nodules smaller than 1 cm. © RSNA, 2022 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Comparison of Core Needle Biopsy and Repeat Fine-Needle Aspiration in Avoiding Diagnostic Surgery for Thyroid Nodules Initially Diagnosed as Atypia/Follicular Lesion of Undetermined Significance.

OBJECTIVE: To compare core needle biopsy (CNB) and repeat fine-needle aspiration (rFNA) to reduce the rate of diagnostic surgery and prevent unnecessary surgery in nodules initially diagnosed as atypia/follicular lesions of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included 231 consecutive patients (150 female and 81 male; mean age ± standard deviation, 51.9 ± 11.7 years) with 235 thyroid nodules (≥ 1 cm) initially diagnosed as AUS/FLUS, who later underwent both rFNA and CNB. The nodules that required diagnostic surgery after the biopsy were defined using three different scenarios according to the rFNA and CNB results: criterion 1, surgery for low-risk indeterminate (categories I and III); criterion 2, surgery for high-risk indeterminate (categories IV and V); and criterion 3, surgery for all indeterminate nodules (categories I, III, IV, and V). We compared the expected rates of diagnostic surgery between CNB and rFNA in all 235 nodules using the three surgical criteria. In addition, the expected rates of unnecessary surgery (i.e., surgery for benign pathology) were compared in a subgroup of 182 nodules with available final diagnoses. RESULTS: CNB showed significantly lower rates of nondiagnostic, AUS/FLUS, and suspicious for malignancy diagnoses (p ≤ 0.016) and higher rates of follicular neoplasm or suspicious for a follicular neoplasm (p < 0.001) and malignant diagnoses (p = 0.031). CNB showed a significantly lower expected rate of diagnostic surgery than rFNA for criterion 1 (29.8% vs. 48.1%, p < 0.001) and criterion 3 (46.4% vs. 55.3%, p = 0.029), and a significantly higher rate for criterion 2 (16.6% vs. 7.2%, p = 0.001). CNB showed a significantly lower expected rate of unnecessary surgery than rFNA for criterion 1 (18.7% vs. 29.7%, p = 0.024). CONCLUSION: CNB was superior to rFNA in reducing the rates of potential diagnostic surgery and unnecessary surgery for nodules initially diagnosed as AUS/FLUS in a scenario where nodules with low-risk indeterminate results (categories I and III) would undergo surgery.

Impact of the ultrasonography assessment method on the malignancy risk and diagnostic performance of five risk stratification systems in thyroid nodules.

PURPOSE: Ultrasonographic (US) assessment methods may affect the estimated malignancy risk of thyroid nodules. This study aimed to investigate the impact of retrospective and prospective US assessments on the estimated malignancy risk of US features, classified categories, and diagnostic performance of five risk stratification systems (RSSs) in thyroid nodules. METHODS: A total of 3685 consecutive thyroid nodules (≥1 cm) with final diagnoses (retrospective dataset, n = 2180; prospective dataset, n = 1505) were included in this study. We compared the estimated malignancy risk of US features, classified categories, and diagnostic performances of the five common RSSs between retrospective (static US images without cine clips) and prospective datasets of real-time US assessment. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the prevalence and histological type of malignant tumours between the two datasets (p ≥ 0.216). The malignancy risk of solid composition and nonparallel orientation was higher and that of microcalcification was lower in the prospective dataset than in the retrospective dataset (p < 0.001, p = 0.018, p = 0.007, respectively). The retrospective US assessment showed slightly higher malignancy risk of intermediate- or high-risk nodules according to the RSSs. Prospective US assessment showed lower specificities and higher unnecessary biopsy rates by all RSSs compared to the retrospective US assessment (p ≤ 0.006, p ≤ 0.045, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The retrospective US assessment showed higher malignancy risk of microcalcification and some classified categories by RSSs, and overestimated the specificities and underestimated the unnecessary biopsy rates by all RSSs compared to prospective US assessment.

A comprehensive review of interventional ablation techniques for the management of thyroid nodules and metastatic lymph nodes.

Thyroidectomy remains the gold standard treatment for benign, symptomatic, or enlarging thyroid nodules, malignant nodules, and metastatic lymph node disease. However, in the past 2 decades, image-guided interventional techniques have emerged as promising alternative treatments for these conditions. Percutaneous ethanol ablation is now an accepted first-line treatment for recurring cystic thyroid nodules. Thermal ablation techniques such as high-intensity focused ultrasound, laser ablation, radiofrequency ablation, and microwave ablation have shown efficacy in producing a nodular volume reduction of greater than 50% that is maintained for several years with resolution of local compressive symptoms. There is also increasing evidence that these techniques can effectively treat papillary thyroid microcarcinomas and recurrent metastatic lymph node disease. Because these interventional ablation techniques are performed safely in an outpatient setting, are well tolerated, and the risk for needing thyroid hormone supplementation is negligible, they are becoming a popular alternative treatment to surgical resection. In this comprehensive review, we discuss each of these percutaneous interventions: the devices and techniques, the advantages and disadvantages of each energy, and summarize the outcomes published in the literature.