3D preoperative predictions of in vivo hip stability and edge loading for neutral and lipped liners.

Hip dislocation is one of the leading causes of failure and revision surgery for total hip arthroplasty. To reduce dislocation rates, lipped liners have been designed with an elevated portion of the rim, to increase jump distance and maintain greater contact area. While it has been documented that lipped liners help reduce dislocation, the objective of this study is to investigate whether lipped liners also help reduce smaller instances of hip micromotion, separation, and edge loading. This study uses an advanced three-dimensional preoperative planning tool to analyze 10 patients, each implanted with both a neutral and lipped liner. Patients within the simulation performed stance phase of gait, and each cup was implanted with the rotation center aligned with the preoperative acetabulum center as well as shifted medially by 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 mm, yielding 120 total simulations. Specific postoperative outcomes-of-interest included specified component offset, resultant in vivo hip forces, hip separation, and contact area to evaluate edge loading. The planner predicted a reduction in hip separation and an increase in articulating contact area for when using a lipped liner compared to a neutral liner. Additionally, regardless of liner type, increases in hip separation corresponded to decreases in contact area, therefore resulting in edge loading of the liner. Together, this indicates that improper component alignment and offsets may lead to an increase in hip separation and edge loading, but the use of a lipped liner may provide improved stability and resistance to this micromotion.

Determination of optimal component positioning in THA using 3D preoperative planning.

Advancements in three-dimensional (3D) preoperative planning tools can offer surgeons and design engineers detailed feedback and additional opportunities for clinical advancements. The objective of this study is to use a 3D total hip arthroplasty preoperative planning tool to compare femoral component alignment for three different stem systems. The planning tool in this study used morphology data of femoral bones gathered from a CT database, seven from postoperative patients and 63 from statistical shape models (SSMs), to suggest specific implant sizes and optimal placements in 3D to match each specific bone model. Retrospective validations of predicted stem size and femoral version were first performed by comparing planner-chosen and surgeon-implanted stem sizes and version angles for the seven postoperative patients. Next, the alignment of three different stem systems was evaluated using bone models generated from SSMs, with a quantitative focus on component head positioning. In the validation study, the planner accurately selected stem size and orientation compared to the surgeon for all assessed subjects. In the stem evaluation, the three stem systems yielded different accuracies in component placement, with the newest stem system demonstrating the closest restoration of anatomical head center location. It is evident that new stem designs may have the potential for increased accuracy over their predecessors, demonstrating that new stem designs can offer improved intraoperative and postoperative alignment potential. The 3D preoperative planning tools can provide novel and reliable data to both surgeons and design engineers, which can ultimately improve clinical outcomes and future implant designs.

Alignment and mechanics evaluation for a compaction broach stem versus a blade style proximal press fit stem using 3-Dimensional planning.

Three-dimensional (3D) preoperative planning tools can be used to help plan and compare component alignment scenarios for different total hip arthroplasty systems to ultimately improve postoperative outcomes and patient satisfaction. The objective of this study is to use 3D preoperative planning tools based on patient-specific bone models to compare two different stem designs, specifically a compaction broach stem and a proximal press fit stem. The planner uses patient-specific proximal femoral bone morphology to suggest a specific implant size and placement. The planner then allows for preoperative predictions of component head positioning, stem fit within the canal, and potential cortical bone reaming that must be done, as well as postoperative predictions of stability and mechanics. The stems were evaluated to determine the accuracy of stem placement, the theoretical volumetric bone removal/reaming required to achieve a desired fit, and the associated postoperative mechanics. This study demonstrated that there was a difference in component alignment and predicted postoperative mechanics between a compaction broach stem and a press fit stem, with the compaction broach stem allowing for more accurate alignment with less required bone removal, resulting in improved postoperative stability and mechanics. This study also demonstrated that much of the stem misalignment for both systems occurred in the anterior/posterior direction. Overall, 3D preoperative planning offers significant benefits and novel intraoperative insight, and the industry should continue to enhance their THA preoperative planning tools.

In Vivo Knee Kinematics: How Important Are the Roles of Femoral Geometry and the Cruciate Ligaments?

BACKGROUND: While posterior cruciate-retaining (PCR) implants are a more common total knee arthroplasty (TKA) design, newer bicruciate-retaining (BCR) TKAs are now being considered as an option for many patients, especially those that are younger. While PCR TKAs remove the ACL, the BCR TKA designs keep both cruciate ligaments intact, as it is believed that the resection of the ACL greatly affects the overall kinematic patterns of TKA designs. The objectives of this study are to assess the in vivo kinematics for subjects implanted with either a PCR or BCR TKA and to compare the in vivo kinematic patterns to the normal knee during flexion. These objectives were achieved with an emphasis on understanding the roles of the cruciate ligaments, as well as the role of changes in femoral geometry of nonimplanted anatomical femurs vs implanted subjects having a metal femoral component. METHODS: Tibiofemoral kinematics of 50 subjects having a PCR (40 subjects) or BCR (10 subjects) TKA were analyzed using fluoroscopy while performing a deep knee bend activity. The kinematics were compared to previously published normal knee data (10 subjects). Kinematics were determined during specific intervals of flexion where the ACL or PCL was most dominant. RESULTS: In early flexion, subjects having a BCR TKA experienced more normal-like kinematic patterns, possibly attributed to the ACL. In mid-flexion, both TKA groups exhibited variable kinematic patterns, which could be due to the transitional cruciate ligament function period. In deeper flexion, both TKA functioned more similar to the normal knee, leading to the assumption that the PCL was properly balanced and functioning in the TKA groups. Interestingly, during late flexion (after 90°), the kinematic patterns for all three groups appeared to be statistically similar. CONCLUSION: Subjects having a PCR TKA experienced greater weight-bearing flexion than the BCR TKA group. Subjects having a BCR TKA exhibited a more normal-like kinematic pattern in early and late flexion. The normal knee subjects achieved greater lateral condyle rollback and axial rotation compared to the TKA groups.

In Vivo Determination and Comparison of Total Hip Arthroplasty Kinematics for Normal, Preoperative Degenerative, and Postoperative Implanted Hips.

BACKGROUND: The study objective is to analyze subjects having a normal hip and compare in vivo kinematics to subjects before and after receiving a total hip arthroplasty. METHODS: Twenty subjects, 10 with a normal hip and 10 with a preoperative, degenerative hip were analyzed performing normal walking on level ground while under fluoroscopic surveillance. Seven preoperative subjects returned after receiving a total hip arthroplasty using the anterior surgical approach by a single surgeon. Using 3-dimensional to 2-dimensional registration techniques, joint models were overlayed on fluoroscopic images to obtain transformation matrices in the image space. From these images, displacements of the femoral head and acetabulum centers were computed, as well as changes in contact patches between the 2 surfaces throughout the gait cycle. RESULTS: Implanted hips experienced the least amount of separation, compression, and overall sliding throughout the entire gait cycle, but they did show signs of edge loading contact patterns. Conversely, the degenerative hips experienced the most compression, sliding, and separation, with the maximum amount of sliding being 6.9 mm. The normal group ranged in the middle, with the maximum amount of sliding being 1.75 mm. CONCLUSION: Current analysis revealed trends that degenerative hips experience more abnormal hip kinematics that leads to higher articulating surface forces and stresses within the acetabulum. None of the implanted hips experienced hip separation.