ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: 18Fluorine-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) CT imaging has been used in many inflammatory and infectious conditions to differentiate areas of increased metabolic activity. FDG uptake differs between areas of normal lung parenchyma and interstitial lung disease (ILD). OBJECTIVES: In this study, we investigated whether FDG-PET/CT parameters were associated with a change in the quality of life (QoL) in patients with ILD over 4 years of follow-up. METHODS: Patients underwent PET-CT imaging at diagnosis and were followed up with annual QoL assessment using the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) until death or 4 years of follow-up. Maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax) and Tissue-to-Background Ratio (TBR) were assessed against SGRQ overall and subscale scores. RESULTS: 193 patients (94 patients in the idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) subgroup and 99 patients in the non-IPF subgroup) underwent baseline FDG-PET/CT imaging and QoL assessment. Weak-to-moderate correlation was observed between baseline SUVmax and SGRQ scores in both ILD subgroups. No relationship was observed between baseline SUVmax or TBR and change in SGRQ scores over 4 years of follow-up. In the IPF subgroup, surviving patients reported a decline in QoL at 4 years post diagnosis whereas an improvement in QoL was seen in surviving patients with non-IPF ILD. CONCLUSIONS: Weak-to-moderate positive correlation between baseline SUVmax and SGRQ scores was observed in both ILD subgroups (IPF:rs=0.187, p=0.047, non-IPF: rs=0.320, p=0.001). However, baseline SUVmax and TBR were not associated with change in QoL in patients with IPF and non-IPF ILD over 4 years of follow-up. At 4 years post diagnosis, surviving patients with IPF reported declining QoL whereas improvement was seen in patients with ILD who did not have IPF.
Subject(s)
Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 , Lung Diseases, Interstitial , Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography , Quality of Life , Radiopharmaceuticals , Humans , Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography/methods , Male , Female , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/diagnostic imaging , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/metabolism , Prospective Studies , Aged , Middle Aged , United Kingdom , Surveys and Questionnaires , Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis/diagnostic imaging , Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis/metabolismABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The first case of novel SARS-COV-2 (COVID-19) in Pakistan was detected on 26 February 2020. Pharmacological and non-pharmacological strategies have been tried to lessen the mortality and morbidity burden. Various vaccines have been approved. The Drug Regulatory Authority of Pakistan gave emergency approval for Sinopharm (BBIBP-CorV) COVID-19 vaccine in December 2021. The phase 3 trial of BBIBP-CorV included only 612 participants aged 60 years and above. The primary aim of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of BBIBPP-CorV (Sinopharm) vaccine within the Pakistani adult population aged 60 or above. The study was carried out in the Faisalabad district of Pakistan. METHODS: A test negative case-control study design was used to assess safety and efficacy of BBIBP-CorV in individuals aged 60 and above against symptomatic infection, hospitalisations and mortality due to SARS-CoV-2 among vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals. ORs were calculated using logistic regression model at 95% CI. ORs were used to calculate the vaccine efficacy (VE) by using the following formula.VE= (1-OR) ×100. RESULTS: 3426 individuals with symptoms of COVID-19 were PCR tested between 5 May 2021 and 31 July 2021. The results showed that Sinopharm vaccine 14 days after the second dose was efficient in reducing the risk of symptomatic COVID-19 infection, hospitalisations and mortality by 94.3%, 60.5% and 98.6%, respectively, among vaccinated individuals with a significant p value of 0.001. CONCLUSION: Our study showed that BBIBP-CorV vaccine is highly effective in preventing infection, hospitalisations and mortality due to COVID-19.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Vaccines , Aged , Humans , Case-Control Studies , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines , Pakistan/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2 , Middle AgedABSTRACT
This article contains a selection of scientific highlights in the field of interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) presented at the hybrid European Respiratory Society International Congress 2022. Early Career Members of Assembly 12 summarise recent advances in translational and clinical research in idiopathic interstitial pneumonias, ILDs of known origin, sarcoidosis and other granulomatous diseases, and rare ILDs. Many studies focused on evaluation of diagnostic and prognostic (bio)markers, and novel pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatment options for different ILDs. In addition, new insights in clinical, physiological and radiological features of various rare ILDs were presented.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Preliminary data suggest that the prevalence of pulmonary hypertension (PH) in patients with COVID-19 is around 13%, but its prognostic role remains unclear. Approximately 3% of patients develop chronic thrombo-embolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) following diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism (PE). It is recommended that patients are screened for CTEPH if they remain symptomatic 3 months following diagnosis of PE. The primary aim of the study was to assess the chances of persistent PH following PE secondary to COVID-19. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study at a District General Hospital (DGH) in the United Kingdom. All patients diagnosed with COVID-19 and PE between April 2020 and October 2021 were examined. Patients were divided into two groups:·COVID-19 and PE with comorbidities (excluding pre-existing PH) and·COVID-19 and PE without comorbidities. We compared the ECHO features suggestive of PH between the two groups at the time of diagnosis of PE and at 3 months following treatment. RESULTS: 80 patients were included in the study (49 with comorbidities and 31 with no comorbidities). Average age of comorbidities and no comorbidities groups were 73 years and 70 years, respectively. Average PaO2/FiO2 ratio for comorbidities and no comorbidities groups were 170 and 195, respectively. Fourteen patients (13 with comorbidities and 1 with no comorbidities) died in total. Results showed that risk of persistent PH and subsequent mortality following PE in COVID-19 is 4.17 times and 1.32 times more in comorbidity group as compared to no comorbidity group, respectively (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Patients with comorbidities are at high risk of persistent PH and mortality due to PE secondary to COVID-19.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hypertension, Pulmonary , Pulmonary Embolism , Humans , Aged , Hypertension, Pulmonary/etiology , Hypertension, Pulmonary/complications , Risk Factors , Retrospective Studies , Hospitals, General , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/epidemiology , Pulmonary Embolism/epidemiology , Pulmonary Embolism/complications , Pulmonary Embolism/diagnosis , Chronic DiseaseABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Pakistan has vaccinated over 122 million people. The two vaccines in widespread use are inactivated (BBIBP-CorV & Sinovac) and mRNA forms (BNT162b2 & mRNA-1273). The primary aim of this study was to compare these two forms of vaccines against unvaccinated individuals collectively and then to see which one is more efficacious. METHODS: Case-control study design was used to compare the efficacy of inactivated and mRNA vaccines against symptomatic infection, hospitalisations and mortality due to Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 between vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals. We derived recovery time from illness for both vaccines. Furthermore, we also compared the vaccines against similar parameters (symptomatic disease, hospitalisations and mortality). We calculated crude odds ratios for each dependent variable. p value of 0.05 or below was considered significant. RESULTS: Vaccinated individuals were significantly protected from hospitalisations and mortality compared to unvaccinated individuals (p < 0.001). There was no difference in protection from symptomatic disease (p = 0.28), hospitalisations (p = 0.59) and mortality (p = 0.53) between two forms of vaccines. mRNA vaccine had better recovery time than all other vaccines (p < 0.001). DISCUSSION: Our study showed that vaccinated individuals are at low risk of hospitalisations and mortality even without a booster and both vaccine forms are equally effective at preventing hospitalisations and mortality.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Humans , Case-Control Studies , RNA, Messenger , BNT162 Vaccine , Pakistan/epidemiology , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , mRNA VaccinesABSTRACT
Background: The main aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of advanced respiratory support (ARS) for acute respiratory failure in do-not-attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation order (DNACPR) COVID-19 patients. Methods: In this single-center study, the impact of different types of ARS modality, PaO2/FiO2 (PF) ratio, clinical frailty score (CFS) and 4C score on mortality was evaluated. Results: There was no significant difference in age, type of ARS modality, PF ratio and 4C scores between those who died and those who survived. Overall survival rates/hospital discharge of patients still requiring ARS at 5 and 7 days post admission were 20 and 17%, respectively. Conclusion: Our study showed that ARS can be a useful tool in frail, elderly and high-risk COVID-19 patients irrespective of high 4C mortality score.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Frailty , Respiratory Insufficiency , COVID-19/mortality , COVID-19/therapy , Humans , Respiratory Insufficiency/therapy , Resuscitation OrdersABSTRACT
Aim: COVID-19 is a known risk factor for pulmonary embolism (PE). In this retrospective, multicenter study, we aimed to determine an optimal D-dimer cutoff to predict PE in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Materials & methods: A total of 193 patients underwent computerized tomographic pulmonary angiography imaging and were classified into PE positive and negative groups. Physiological, radiological and biochemical parameters were compared and receiver operator curve analysis was conducted to determine a predictive D-dimer threshold. Results: An optimal D-dimer cutoff of 2494 ng/ml was selected (Youden index: 0.906), giving a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI: 100-100) and specificity of 90.62% (95% CI: 90.5-90.8) for predicting PE. Conclusion: We propose that in the absence of other clinical signs, a D-dimer threshold of 2495 ng/ml could be used with high sensitivity and specificity to predict PE in hospitalized patients with COVID-19.
Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products/analysis , Lung , Pulmonary Embolism , Aged , England/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Lung/diagnostic imaging , Lung/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Pulmonary Embolism/diagnosis , Pulmonary Embolism/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Sensitivity and SpecificityABSTRACT
We present the case of an asthmatic patient who continued to present with breathlessness and received multiple courses of steroids for her presumed asthma exacerbations. After multiple investigations, we made the diagnosis of TBM secondary to relapsing polychondritis. https://bit.ly/3b8Uw1O.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: DECAF is a scoring tool that can predict severity in patients with an acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD). Previous research has shown AECOPD patients with DECAF scores of 0-1 are candidates for early discharge. METHODS: Plan, do, study, act (PDSA) methodology was used. Patients with AECOPD and a DECAF score of 0-1 were included. Notes were retrospectively reviewed for patients for DECAF score, length of stay, 30-day re-admission and 30-day mortality (PDSA cycle 1). A framework to facilitate early discharge for patients was subsequently established. Awareness was increased through teaching sessions, posters and targeted emails. To evaluate our improvements, the same parameters were collected prospectively (PDSA cycle 2). RESULTS: DECAF score was assessed for no patients in PDSA cycle 1 (n=20) but was assessed for all patients in PDSA cycle 2 (n=14). Hospital stay was significantly decreased in PDSA cycle 2 (mean 0.29±0.45 days) compared with PDSA cycle 1 (mean 3.71±2.69 days; difference p<0.00001). Thirty-day re-admission and 30-day mortality was not significantly different between two groups. CONCLUSION: DECAF protocol is safe and feasible in the district general hospital setting and can facilitate early discharge for patients with low severity AECOPD without any worrisome effects.
ABSTRACT
We present the case of a patient with severe obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) and hypoventilation syndrome who had hydrocephalus and acquired aqueduct stenosis. A link between these conditions in our patient is postulated. We discuss the mechanisms through which this might have occurred and the potential problems which might arise in applying non-invasive ventilation to a patient with hydrocephalus. LEARNING POINTS: Patients with severe obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) and hypoventilation require AVAPS-AE ventilation to deal with obstructive and central events which may occur.Arterial blood gas analysis and MRI of the brain are indicated in the assessment of patients with severe OSA.Hydrocephalus may develop in patients with severe OSA if there is a structural brain abnormality but may resolve with OSA treatment.
ABSTRACT
Extrapulmonary sarcoidosis accounts for only two percent of the total sarcoid cases. Sarcoidosis affecting the musculoskeletal system alone is even rarer. Diagnosis is based on suggestive history, clinical features, imaging followed by confirmation of non-caseating granulomas on a biopsy. Steroids form the first line of treatment for patients where musculoskeletal system is involved. We report the case of a 26-year-old gentleman who presented with right foot pain and unintentional weight loss. A magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan of feet confirmed bilateral stress fractures of both feet. After a battery of investigations and resultant myriad constellation of investigation findings, the diagnosis of sarcoidosis was confirmed on a tissue biopsy obtained via bronchoscopy. This case report discusses the complex journey from presentation to diagnosis and subsequent treatment while also exploring important differentials that need to be ruled out in such scenarios.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Pneumothorax and pneumomediastinum have both been noted to complicate cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) requiring hospital admission. We report the largest case series yet described of patients with both these pathologies (including nonventilated patients). METHODS: Cases were collected retrospectively from UK hospitals with inclusion criteria limited to a diagnosis of COVID-19 and the presence of either pneumothorax or pneumomediastinum. Patients included in the study presented between March and June 2020. Details obtained from the medical record included demographics, radiology, laboratory investigations, clinical management and survival. RESULTS: 71 patients from 16 centres were included in the study, of whom 60 had pneumothoraces (six with pneumomediastinum in addition) and 11 had pneumomediastinum alone. Two of these patients had two distinct episodes of pneumothorax, occurring bilaterally in sequential fashion, bringing the total number of pneumothoraces included to 62. Clinical scenarios included patients who had presented to hospital with pneumothorax, patients who had developed pneumothorax or pneumomediastinum during their inpatient admission with COVID-19 and patients who developed their complication while intubated and ventilated, either with or without concurrent extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Survival at 28â days was not significantly different following pneumothorax (63.1±6.5%) or isolated pneumomediastinum (53.0±18.7%; p=0.854). The incidence of pneumothorax was higher in males. 28-day survival was not different between the sexes (males 62.5±7.7% versus females 68.4±10.7%; p=0.619). Patients aged ≥70 years had a significantly lower 28-day survival than younger individuals (≥70â years 41.7±13.5% survival versus <70â years 70.9±6.8% survival; p=0.018 log-rank). CONCLUSION: These cases suggest that pneumothorax is a complication of COVID-19. Pneumothorax does not seem to be an independent marker of poor prognosis and we encourage continuation of active treatment where clinically possible.
Subject(s)
COVID-19/complications , Mediastinal Emphysema/epidemiology , Mediastinal Emphysema/virology , Pneumothorax/epidemiology , Pneumothorax/virology , SARS-CoV-2 , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , COVID-19/mortality , COVID-19/therapy , Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation , Female , Hospitalization , Humans , Incidence , Male , Mediastinal Emphysema/therapy , Middle Aged , Pneumothorax/therapy , Prognosis , Respiration, Artificial , Retrospective Studies , Sex Factors , Survival Rate , United Kingdom , Young AdultABSTRACT
We present a rare and unusual case of 22-year-old man who was on infliximab therapy for his uncontrolled ulcerative colitis. Infliximab was stopped as he didn't get any benefit from it and he ended up having subtotal colectomy and ileostomy. He presented with shortness of breath and eosinophilia and underwent a number of investigations and finally a diagnosis of chronic eosinophilia secondary to infliximab was made.