ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Few studies have compared the effectiveness of filgrastim (FIL), pegfilgrastim (PEG), and sargramostim (SAR) to reduce the risk of febrile neutropenia (FN) associated with myelosuppressive chemotherapy (M-CT). Two large commercial database analyses were separately conducted to examine the incidence of neutropenia-related and all-cause hospitalizations associated with FIL, PEG, and SAR prophylaxis for patients receiving M-CT for non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), Hodgkin lymphoma, or solid tumors. METHODS: Separate retrospective US claims database analyses utilized patient data from January 1, 2004 to April 30, 2010 using the HealthCore Integrated Research Database (HIRD(SM)) and January 1, 2001 to August 31, 2009 using OptumInsight's (formerly Ingenix) database. Patients were ≥18 years old and treated with M-CT for NHL, Hodgkin lymphoma, and solid tumors. All identified M-CT cycles with prophylactic (first 5 days of cycle) FIL, PEG, or SAR were included in the analysis. Patterns of administration and incidence rates of all-cause and neutropenia-related hospitalization were examined on a per-cycle basis. RESULTS: In total, 9330 and 8762 patients with cancer, representing 30,264 and 24,215 chemotherapy cycles (28,189 and 22,649 (PEG), 1669 and 1351 (FIL), 406 and 215 (SAR)) from the HIRD(SM) and OptumInsight databases, respectively, were included in the separate database analyses. Both the HIRD(SM) and OptumInsight analysis showed that SAR and FIL prophylaxis had a higher risk of neutropenia-related hospitalization (SAR: OR = 3.48 [95%CI = 2.11, 5.74] and 2.81 [1.62, 4.87]; FIL: 1.78 [1.28, 2.48] and 2.36 [1.82, 3.06], respectively) and all-cause hospitalization (SAR: 2.18 [1.41, 3.36] and 2.41 [1.58, 3.68]; FIL:1.57 [1.25, 1.97] and 1.95 [1.60, 2.38], respectively) vs PEG. LIMITATIONS: Medical claims do not contain information about chemotherapy dose, and hospitalizations were not validated against the patient's chart. CONCLUSION: In this comparative effectiveness study, use of PEG was associated with a lower risk of neutropenia-related and all-cause hospitalizations compared to use of FIL or SAR prophylaxis.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor/administration & dosage , Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor/economics , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Neutropenia/prevention & control , Adult , Aged , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Female , Filgrastim , Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor/administration & dosage , Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor/economics , Hospitalization/economics , Humans , Insurance Claim Review , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Neutropenia/chemically induced , Polyethylene Glycols , Recombinant Proteins/administration & dosage , Recombinant Proteins/economics , Retrospective Studies , United States/epidemiologyABSTRACT
The safety and efficacy of auto-SCT for lymphoma in older patients is not well established, particularly in those ≥70 years old. We performed a retrospective analysis comparing 17 auto-SCT recipients ≥70 years old with 39 recipients aged 65-69 years. Hematopoietic cell transplantation comorbidity index (HCT-CI) scores were similar in both groups. Nonrelapse mortality (NRM) was increased in patients aged 70 years and older (hazard ratio (HR) 6.04, P=0.0029), and OS was decreased (HR 1.98, P=0.082). 1-year NRM was 35% in patients aged ≥70 years vs 8% in those aged 65-69 years (P=0.017). The incidence of in-hospital falls was higher in those aged ≥70 years (29 vs 8%, P=0.047). In a secondary exploratory analysis, we found that the occurrence of in-hospital falls was strongly associated with inferior OS (HR 3.36, P=0.0023) and NRM (HR 4.60, P=0.009) among all patients of aged 65 years and older. We conclude that auto-SCT is feasible in older patients but that mortality rates appear increased in those over age of 70 years. In-hospital falls were correlated with higher mortality, and prevention of falls may improve outcomes. Susceptibility to falls may indicate underlying frailty and should be explored prospectively as a means of selecting older patients for auto-SCT.
Subject(s)
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Lymphoma/surgery , Accidental Falls , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Retrospective Studies , Survival Analysis , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Older individuals are at risk for adverse events in all settings where cancer is treated. Common geriatric syndromes can complicate cancer therapy, and thus, increase patient morbidity and the costs of care. Furthermore, cancer treatment can worsen geriatric syndromes. It is often difficult to determine whether declining health is a result of cancer treatment or the patient's underlying disease. Baseline assessment of multiple factors may facilitate detection of a decline in the patient's health status, which may be remediable. Geriatric syndromes may substantially affect quality of life and are also important in the prognosis and outcome of cancer therapy. This article reviews the assessment of cognitive syndromes (dementia and delirium), vision and hearing impairment, gait and balance difficulties, malnutrition, incontinence, depression, osteoporosis, sleep disorders, environmental and social issues, and functional decline. Although there are many geriatric domains and many focused assessment tools, assessment does not need to be time-consuming. Streamlined assessment tools have been developed; they are brief, inexpensive, and easily administered, and they may be valuable to the oncologist. Staff such as nurses, social workers, or office personnel could perform these assessments and minimize the impact on the physician's time.
Subject(s)
Aging , Geriatric Assessment , Neoplasms/complications , Activities of Daily Living , Aged , Cognition Disorders/diagnosis , Depression/diagnosis , Health Services for the Aged , Hearing Disorders/diagnosis , Humans , Karnofsky Performance Status , Nutrition Disorders/diagnosis , Osteoporosis/diagnosis , Quality of Life , Risk Factors , Sleep Wake Disorders/diagnosis , Urinary Incontinence/etiology , Vision Disorders/diagnosisABSTRACT
In an effort to localize a gene for ataxia-telangiectasia (A-T), we have genotyped 27 affected Costa Rican families, with 13 markers, in the chromosome 11q22-23 region. Significant linkage disequilibrium was detected for 9/13 markers between D11S1816 and D11S1391. Recombination events observed in these pedigrees places A-T between D11S1819 and D11S1960. One ancestral haplotype is common to 24/54 affected chromosomes and roughly two-thirds of the families. Inferred (ancestral) recombination events involving this common haplotype in earlier generations suggest that A-T is distal to D11S384 and proximal to D11S1960. Several other common haplotypes were identified, consistent with multiple mutations in a single gene. When considered together with all other evidence, this study further sublocalizes the major A-T locus to approximately 200 kb, between markers S384 and S535.
Subject(s)
Ataxia Telangiectasia/genetics , Child , Chromosome Mapping , Chromosomes, Human, Pair 11/genetics , Costa Rica , Female , Genetic Markers , Haplotypes , Humans , Linkage Disequilibrium/genetics , MaleABSTRACT
It has been estimated that 1 to 3% of the general population may be ataxia-telangiectasia (A-T) heterozygotes and hypersensitive to conventional doses of radiation. We attempted to identify heterozygotes by evaluating the proportion of cells in various phases of the cell cycle in response to irradiation. This was accomplished by using flow cytometry to study lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCLs) from 14 A-T homozygotes, 17 genotypic A-T heterozygotes, and 18 normal individuals, including 10 genotypic normals. The LCLs were exposed to 2-gRay radiation and were analyzed after 24 hr along with nonirradiated controls. The difference between the percentage of cells in G2/M with and without irradiation after 24 hr ranged, respectively, from: 12.0 to 31.5% (mean = 18.7 +/- 5.5) for A-T homozygotes; 6.7 to 19.3% (mean = 12.5 +/- 3.8) for A-T heterozygotes; and -1.5 to 12.4% (mean = 6.4 +/- 3.2) for normals. A cut-off region of 9.6 to 13.2% defined by one standard deviation above the mean for normals and one standard deviation below the mean for A-T homozygotes served as the grey zone between normals and A-T heterozygotes or homozygotes. Two of the 18 normals overlapped with the grey zone. Four of 17 heterozygotes were within the normal range; seven fell within the grey zone. This may reflect nongenetic variables, such as the status of the LCLs at the time of testing. Flow cytometry cell-cycle analysis on irradiated LCLs is a useful adjunctive test for establishing a diagnosis of A-T in questionable cases.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)