Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Cancer Res Ther ; 19(3): 556-561, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37470574

ABSTRACT

Background: We investigated the impact of the lymphocyte-to-C-reactive protein ratio (LCR) on esophageal cancer survival and recurrence after curative treatment. Patients and Methods: This study included 89 patients who underwent curative surgery followed by adjuvant treatment for esophageal cancer between 2008 and 2018. The risk factors for overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were identified. Results: LCR of 12,177 was regarded to be the optimal critical point of classification considering the 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year survival rates. The OS rates at 3 and 5 years after surgery were 33.2% and 29.9% in the LCR low group, respectively, and 74.0% and 60.9% in the LCR high group, which amounted to a statistically significant difference (P = 0.001). The RFS rates at 3 and 5 years after surgery were 25.3% and 21.7% in the LCR low group, respectively, and 52.1% and 47.4% in the LCR high group, which amounted to a statistically significant difference (P = 0.001). A multivariate analysis demonstrated that the LCR was a significant independent risk factor for both the OS and RFS. Conclusion: LCR was a risk factor for survival in patients who underwent curative treatment for esophageal cancer. It is necessary to develop the effective plan of the perioperative care and the surgical strategy according to the LCR.


Subject(s)
C-Reactive Protein , Esophageal Neoplasms , Humans , C-Reactive Protein/metabolism , Esophageal Neoplasms/surgery , Risk Factors , Perioperative Care , Lymphocytes/metabolism , Retrospective Studies , Prognosis
2.
Anticancer Res ; 41(4): 1727-1732, 2021 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33813376

ABSTRACT

The standard treatment for gastrointestinal cancer is surgical resection and perioperative adjuvant treatment. Multidisciplinary treatment for gastrointestinal cancer leads to body composition changes. Body composition changes, such as skeletal muscle loss and body weight loss, during multidisciplinary treatment result in poor physical activity, severe toxicity of chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy, and poor oncological outcomes. Therefore, the hypothesis is that minimization of body composition changes during multidisciplinary treatment in gastrointestinal cancer patients, the continuation of postoperative adjuvant treatment in these patients might improve, thereby improving the oncological outcomes. Given this hypothesis, recent studies have focused on introducing perioperative oral nutritional treatment for gastrointestinal cancer patients. Thus far, oral nutritional treatment has proven promising and showed some clinical benefits for gastrointestinal cancer patients during the perioperative period. However, whether or not oral nutritional treatment has clinical benefits on the long-term oncological outcomes in gastrointestinal cancer remains unclear. To optimize oral nutritional treatment for gastrointestinal cancer patients, it is necessary to clarify the benefits of oral nutritional treatment on the long-term oncological outcomes in gastric cancer patients and establish the optimal approach to oral nutritional treatment.


Subject(s)
Body Composition , Digestive System Surgical Procedures , Enteral Nutrition , Gastrointestinal Neoplasms/therapy , Nutritional Status , Perioperative Care , Digestive System Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Digestive System Surgical Procedures/mortality , Gastrointestinal Neoplasms/mortality , Gastrointestinal Neoplasms/physiopathology , Humans , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome , Weight Loss
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...