Efficacy and safety of ketoprofen patch in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

This study assessed the efficacy and safety of ketoprofen patch compared with placebo in patients who had rheumatoid arthritis and persistent wrist pain. Patients (N = 676)who had achieved systemic disease control with a disease-modifying antirheumatic drug and/or systemic corticosteroid, but still had persistent wrist pain, were randomized to a 2-week course of once-daily treatment with application of a 20-mg ketoprofen patch or a placebo patch to the wrist. The primary efficacy end point was the percent change from baseline to the end of treatment in the intensity of wrist pain scored by each patient on a 100-mm visual analog scale. The mean ± SD percent change on the pain intensity scale was significantly larger in patients treated with ketoprofen than in those receiving placebo (31.2% ± 30.3% [95% confidence interval: 28.0-34.4] vs 25.5% ± 31.2% [95% confidence interval: 22.1-28.8]; P = .020). However, the actual difference of the mean pain intensity scale between the 2 groups was small at the end of treatment. The frequency of adverse events was similar in both groups. The ketoprofen patch was more effective than placebo for relieving persistent local joint pain in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. The patch was also safe and well tolerated during the 2-week treatment period.

A multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo controlled trial of infliximab combined with low dose methotrexate in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: A placebo controlled, double-blind trial (DBT) was conducted for Japanese patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) despite treatment with low dose methotrexate (MTX) to evaluate the efficacy and safety of infliximab. Extended treatment with infliximab was conducted in an open-label trial (OLT). METHODS: In the DBT, 147 patients were randomly assigned and treated with a placebo or 3 mg/kg or 10 mg/kg infliximab at Weeks 0, 2 and 6, combined with MTX. In the OLT, 129 patients from the DBT received 3 mg/kg infliximab every 8 weeks. RESULTS: The mean dose of MTX was 7.2 +/- 2.0 mg/week. Significantly more patients receiving 3 mg/kg (61.2%) and 10 mg/kg (52.9%)infliximab achieved a 20% improvement according to the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria at Week 14, compared to placebo (23.4%) (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in incidence of adverse events among the treatment groups. In patients receiving infliximab in the DBT, 11.6% of patients with serum infliximab just before the OLT developed antibodies to infliximab (ATI) in the OLT, whereas 62.2% of patients without serum infliximab did. In patients receiving placebo in the DBT, 43.9% developed ATI. CONCLUSION: The efficacy and safety of infliximab combined with low dose MTX were similar to those of the ATTRACT study. The data from the DBT and OLT also supported the importance of an induction treatment of infliximab, followed by a maintenance treatment without a long interval, giving stable serum concentrations in order to prevent formation of ATI.