The Importance of the Circle of Willis in Carotid Interventions Outcomes: A Real-Life Study.

BACKGROUND: The main objective of this study is to evaluate and compare the outcomes regarding operative mortality rate, ipsilateral stroke, and overall survival rate among patients with internal carotid artery stenosis submitted to carotid endarterectomy (CEA) or stenting regarding the completeness of circle of Willis (CoW). METHODS: Prospective, consecutive cohort study of patients submitted to carotid interventions (CEA and carotid stenting: CAS) for internal carotid artery stenosis diagnosis evaluated according complete or incomplete CoW. The patients were divided into 2 groups: group I, the patients with complete CoW and group II, the patients with incomplete CoW, with the disruption of anterior and/or ipsilateral posterior circulation, regarding the ipsilateral significant carotid stenosis. RESULTS: Overall, 98 patients submitted to carotid intervention were evaluated. Two groups of patients were identified: group CoW complete with 54 patients and group CoW incomplete with 44 patients. Regarding the type of intervention, the prevalence of CAS in CoW complete group and CoW incomplete group were statistically similar (54.1% vs. 55.1%, P = 0.22). Notwithstanding, CEA was also statistically similar in CoW incomplete group and CoW complete group (44.2% vs. 45.9%, P = 0.22). The perioperative mortality rate was 2% in total cohort (2 patients), with no differences among CoW complete and incomplete groups (3.7% vs. 0%, P = 0.50, respectively). Furthermore, the incidence of postoperative stroke was 3.1% (asymptomatic 2%, symptomatic 1.1%), with no differences among CoW complete and incomplete groups (3.7% vs. 2.3%, P = 0.68, respectively). A univariate and multivariate linear regression showed that among the factors evaluated, only chronic kidney failure was related with hazard ratio = 1.89, P = 0.003, confidence interval 1.058-2.850. CONCLUSIONS: The completeness of the CoW, independently of the type of carotid intervention (CEA and CAS), did not interfere in the results regarding postoperative outcomes for stroke and death. Chronic kidney disease was associated to increased risk of perioperative stroke.

Late Outcomes of Elective Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair in a Tertiary Low-Volume Hospital in Brazil.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to report early and long-term results of elective endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) in a tertiary low-volume hospital in Brazil. METHODS: Between October 2006 and May 2017, 120 patients underwent elective EVAR for infrarenal aortic aneurysm. The interventions were reviewed retrospectively, focusing on 30-day mortality, long-term survival, and freedom from reintervention. Late outcomes were assessed by the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression. RESULTS: The follow-up's median and interquartile range was 3 (1-5) years. Overall, most patients were males (75%) and the median age was 74 years. Mostly patients were at a high risk for intervention (79.1%) and the majority was classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists III (53.3%). Preoperative aneurysm diameter median was 60 mm, interquartile range was 52.7-69. As per the postoperative aneurysm sac evolution, the number of patients with a reduction, stabilization, or an increase was 93 (77.5%), 18 (15%), and 9 (7.5%), respectively. The 30-day mortality was 6.6% and no late aneurysm-related deaths were identified. The overall incidence of late endoleaks was 24.1%, with the predominance of type II (23.3%), followed by type IA (0.8 %). Secondary interventions were necessary for 9 patients (7.5%). The 6-year analyses revealed freedom from reintervention and overall survival of 87.9% and 57.7%, respectively. The Cox regression analyses identified age > 75 years as an adverse factor for overall survival (hazard ratio = 2.5; P = 0.021). CONCLUSIONS: In the present study, EVAR in a low-volume center was associated with high 30-day mortality, but satisfactory long-term results were identified.

Bilateral external iliac artery aneurysm in a young man.

Most iliac artery aneurysms occur in association with aortic aneurysms. Isolated aneurysms of the iliac arteries are uncommon, and those of the external iliac arteries are even more rare. In the present report, we have presented the case of a bilateral external iliac artery aneurysm in a young man.

The importance of the superficial and profunda femoris arteries in limb salvage following endovascular treatment of chronic aortoiliac occlusive disease.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to report the long-term limb salvage, survival and patency rates of endovascular treatment for aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD) when outflow was achieved through the profunda femoris artery (PFA) only vs both the PFA and superficial femoral artery (SFA). METHODS: From January 2008 to July 2016, patients with AIOD who underwent aortoiliac angioplasty at the Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Hospital do Servidor Público Estadual, São Paulo, Brazil, were classified into two groups according to whether they had femoral outflow via the PFA only (group 1) or both the PFA and SFA (group 2) in the affected leg. The primary outcome was amputation-free survival. The secondary outcomes were the patency and overall survival rates. RESULTS: In total, 69 aortoiliac angioplasties were performed in 69 patients: 22 patients (31.8%) in group 1 and 47 (67.2%) in group 2. A total of 12 reinterventions (17.4%) were performed, seven (31.8%) in group 1 and five (10.2%) in group 2, without statistical significance between the groups (P = .063). The mean clinical follow-up period was 2500 ± 880.5 days. Both the primary and secondary patency rates analyzed at 1800 days were similar between groups 1 and 2 (80.2% vs 82.3%; P = .80 and 84.7% vs 97.6%; P = .10, respectively). Furthermore, the limb salvage rates at 1800 days were similar between groups 1 and 2 (91.3% vs 86.1%; P = .60), as were the survival rates (74.7% vs 78%; P = .80). The Bollinger score was worse in group 1 (P = .001), as expected, because of occlusion of the SFA. However, the PFA and popliteal artery scores were similar between the two groups. Occlusion of the SFA did not influence the limb salvage rate according to univariate analysis (P = .509) and multivariate Cox regression analysis (P = .671). CONCLUSIONS: The patency of the SFA does not interfere with the outcomes of endovascular treatment for chronic AIOD. The PFA in conjunction with the popliteal artery as the sole outflow route for iliac endovascular treatment is associated with similar patency, survival, and limb salvage rates as those for outflow through both the PFA and SFA.

Concept of Angiosome Does Not Affect Limb Salvage in Infrapopliteal Angioplasty.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the importance of the "angiosome" concept in patients with critical limb ischemia treated with infrapopliteal angioplasty, analyzing limb salvage, secondary function, and survival rates between those treated with and without reference to the concept of the angiosome (groups 1 and 2, respectively). METHODS: This was a retrospective, consecutive cohort study that evaluated 95 patients with critical limb ischemia who underwent infrapopliteal angioplasty at the Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, São Paulo State Public Servants' Hospital, Brazil, between January 2009 and January 2013. Of the total 92 patients (109 limbs) who underwent angioplasty, 48 (52.2%) patients were in group 1 and 44 (47.8%) patients were in group 2. RESULTS: There was no difference between groups 1 and 2 in terms of the location, lesion severity, or active infection of the infrapopliteal angioplasty. However, groups 1 and 2 differed in their postoperative ankle-brachial indices, which were 0.95 ± 0.18 and 0.85 ± 0.18, respectively (P = 0.001). The estimates of limb salvage were similar in groups 1 and 2 (87% and 92.3%, respectively, at 360 days; P = 0.241). The analysis of secondary function did not differ between the 2 groups (65.1% and 58.3%, respectively, within 360 days; P = 0.92). Operative mortality was 8.3% in group 1 and 8% in group 2 (P = 0.60), and survival at 360 days was 78.5% in group 1 and 78.3% in group 2 (P = 0.86), which were not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we found no evidence to support revascularization based on the concept of the angiosome in preference to revascularization of the artery that is most amenable to endovascular treatment for limb salvage and secondary function.